Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Thank you Aaron Sorkin!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
BTR1701  
View profile  
 More options Aug 11 2012, 11:58 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:58:09 -0700
Local: Sat, Aug 11 2012 11:58 am
Subject: Re: Thank you Aaron Sorkin!
In article <30862393-b990-4b1d-bf34-9e2b8a286068@googlegroups.com>,

 benjamin <beng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 10 August 2012 21:39:49 UTC-4, BTR1701  wrote:
> > In article <c18037d0-3a11-46eb-a3a0-e818bbfd65ad@googlegroups.com>,
> > When she tells you that you can't hold your iPad on your lap and quotes
> > you a 'rule' that no large objects can be on your lap during take-off
> > because they might shoot away and hit someone. You point at the guy next
> > to you who's reading a hardcover book that's twice the size and weight
> > of the iPad and she frowns for a second and says that the rule only
> > covers electronics. I damn well know she's making shit up at that point
> > just to cover for the fact that she's either misapplying the rule or
> > choosing not applying it to everyone.

>  You have no idea whether or not she made it up or is misapplying it.

Yeah, I do.

>  You think she is because you think its a stupid rule [electronics
>  forbidden but not a book]

The rule she quoted was "no large objects on the lap". If that's the
rule, then the book is covered, too, and she's just not enforcing it
because people have been allowed to read during take-off since the
Wright Bros. It's just these fancy new gizmos that have them all het up.

>  My understanding is that the problem with electronics is the concern
>  they might interfere with the plane's electronics

The iPad wasn't on. I was just holding it so I wouldn't have to crawl
all over everyone after takeoff to get it out of my bag in the overhead
bin.

Oh, and back home we have an American Airlines pilot who lives next door
to my parents in Texas. Pretty good friend of the family. He was over
for a neighborhood BBQ last time I was home and we got to talking about
the whole forbidden electronics deal. He said it's absolute nonsense.
There's no way a cell phone or an iPad can have any effect on a plane's
ability to fly. Those aircraft are designed to absorb lightning strikes
and keep flying with hardly a bump. If cell phones had even the remotest
chance to endanger a plane, they'd be as prohibited on board as guns.

Aircraft safety wasn't even the reason they were originally prohibited.
It was an FCC rule, not an FAA rule. The FCC was worried that people
trying to use cell phones that high, traveling that fast, would
overwhelm the cell towers on the ground as they bounced from one to the
other at 500+ mph. That problem has long since been solved also. Our
pilot friend told me that at this point, the real reason for it is just
a matter of keeping people under control during the flight. They don't
want people talking on them or playing Angry Birds instead of listening
to the flight attendants talk over the intercom, which means all those
people reading books and magazines should also have to put them away but
they flight crew chooses not to enforce the rule on anything but
electronics.

The book thing is a choice made by the crew/individual flight attendant.
It's not the law. Basically they're making shit up. And they're also
making shit up when they tell you that you have to turn everything off
so the plane doesn't crash.

> > And what the hell is up with your newsreader? Why does it insert blank
> > lines between every line of text?

> It's Google. Some posted get hashed other dont.But this particular
> one looks fine from my viewing.

Well, yes. I went back in and manually deleted all the extra lines
before responding.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.