Message from discussion Disrespect for a veteran
Received: by 10.180.74.74 with SMTP id r10mr879656wiv.3.1353058340525;
Fri, 16 Nov 2012 01:32:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Martin Edwards <big_mart...@yahoo.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
Subject: Re: Disrespect for a veteran
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <Mn2ns.237435$9W6.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <dfmanno-DF59E0.firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <dfmanno-2902C0.firstname.lastname@example.org> <alpine.LNX.email@example.com>
X-Trace: 1352533938 126.96.36.199 (Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:52:18 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:52:18 UTC
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:52:38 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 10/11/2012 03:35, Michael Black wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, D.F. Manno wrote:
>> In article <k7jj28$l5...@news.mixmin.net>,
>> dreyfus <d.woo...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> D.F. Manno wrote:
>>>> dreyfus <d.woo...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> Does anyone know why there wasn't *some* sort of a proper series
>>>>> with SVU?
>>>> Because SVU has _not_ been cancelled. A new episode airs Wednesday.
>>> Really? Then why did it disappear _right_in_the_middle_of_fall_sweeps_??
>> Because NBC aired a two-hour episode of "The Voice" during which the
>> audience's choices for the 12 finalists were announced.
> So it wasn't because there was some storylone about a storm hitting New
> York City and a body found in the wreckage that turned out not to be
> That does happen every so often, a fictional episode lining up with some
> real event that week so the network decides to keep the episode off the
> air for a bit.
There was a two parter transparently about the right wing hounding of
the Clintons. I'm not sure how they got away with that.
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally. History is what we must
painfully learn and struggle to remember. -Albert Goldman