Received: by 10.180.74.74 with SMTP id r10mr879656wiv.3.1353058340525;
        Fri, 16 Nov 2012 01:32:20 -0800 (PST)
Path: q13ni312994wii.0!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newspeer1.nac.net!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!novia!news-hub.siol.net!news1.t-com.hr!newsfeed.CARNet.hr!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.11.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!cyclone03.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!npeersf03.am4!fx22.am4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Martin Edwards <big_mart...@yahoo.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,alt.tv.law-and-order
Subject: Re: Disrespect for a veteran
References: <1417n7mlajmnm.1vvpqvpl307xo.dlg@40tude.net> <k7ggql$bv4$1@speranza.aioe.org> <Mn2ns.237435$9W6.39083@fx08.am4> <k7jdbb$dbn$1@news.mixmin.net> <dfmanno-DF59E0.13302209112012@news.albasani.net> <k7jj28$l52$1@news.mixmin.net> <dfmanno-2902C0.21362309112012@news.albasani.net> <alpine.LNX.2.02.1211092233491.873@darkstar.example.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1211092233491.873@darkstar.example.org>
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <SInns.351901$it2.288932@fx22.am4>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.36.165.57
X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com
X-Trace: 1352533938 82.36.165.57 (Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:52:18 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:52:18 UTC
Organization: virginmedia.com
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:52:38 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 2486
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 10/11/2012 03:35, Michael Black wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, D.F. Manno wrote:
>
>> In article <k7jj28$l5...@news.mixmin.net>,
>> dreyfus <d.woo...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> D.F. Manno wrote:
>>>> dreyfus <d.woo...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Does anyone know why there wasn't *some* sort of a proper series
>>>>> finale
>>>>> with SVU?
>>>>
>>>> Because SVU has _not_ been cancelled. A new episode airs Wednesday.
>>>
>>> Really? Then why did it disappear _right_in_the_middle_of_fall_sweeps_??
>>
>> Because NBC aired a two-hour episode of "The Voice" during which the
>> audience's choices for the 12 finalists were announced.
>>
> So it wasn't because there was some storylone about a storm hitting New
> York City and a body found in the wreckage that turned out not to be
> storm-related?
>
> That does happen every so often, a fictional episode lining up with some
> real event that week so the network decides to keep the episode off the
> air for a bit.
>
>     Michael
>
There was a two parter transparently about the right wing hounding of 
the Clintons.  I'm not sure how they got away with that.

-- 
Myth, after all, is what we believe naturally.  History is what we must 
painfully learn and struggle to remember.  -Albert Goldman