> > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto are implicit.
> > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 degree > > turn > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was drawn in by > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
> York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
> mouth...
And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
"anim8rFSK" <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote:
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
>> York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
>> mouth...
> And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS
> tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
Is she using one as an umbrella for her and a friend?
> >> Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
> >> York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
> >> mouth...
> > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS
> > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
> Is she using one as an umbrella for her and a friend?
Jessica has bigger boobs than KK; the difference is, hers aren't attached to a rancid sack of blubber.
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
On Oct 30, 8:38 am, "Obveeus" <Obve...@aol.com> wrote:
> "Professor Bubba" <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid> wrote:
> > I expect that Nielsen will adjust the sweeps period
> > to account for Sandy.
> I doubt that very much. Networks can spin all they want to the advertisers
> about why the numbers don't mean what they say. Nielsen's job is simply to
> report the numbers.
But reporting numbers with a bad foundation is not a good way to go.
Historically, local stations would rerun pre-empted prime-time network
shows at off times, such as weekend mornings or afternoon.
With the majority of the country (70%?) still able to watch, it makes
sense for the networks to still air prime-time shows. But for the 30%
of viewers who couldn't watch, alternative air times, as was done in
the past, would be nice.
> > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto are implicit.
> > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 degree > > > turn > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was drawn in by > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
> > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
> > mouth...
> And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that KK
has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
> >> > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> >> >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> >> > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto are > >> > implicit.
> >> You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 degree > >> turn
> >> and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was drawn in > >> by
> >> the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
> > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
> > mouth...
> anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
> > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
> > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto are > > > > > implicit.
> > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 degree > > > > turn > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was drawn in > > > > by > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
> > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
> > > mouth...
> > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
> The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that KK
> has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way 'round.
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
hanco...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> On Oct 30, 1:17 am, Professor Bubba <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid> wrote:
>> The New York market alone is about 18% of the national audience.
> Considering that in many areas of the NY market 90% of the people were
> without power, that is significant.
> But NY wasn't the only market without power, much of the Phila market
> and other sections along the NE US were (or still are) without power
> as well.
It wasn't just the areas that lost power. Where I was, in southern New Jersey, didn't lose power, but the local stations (mostly from Philly) broadcast continuous storm coverage rather than showing the network's shows. I suspect that was true throughout the affected states. So there was probably very little, if any, broadcasting of network programming on Monday night in Delaware, New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.
> >> And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS
> >> tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that KK
> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
> > -- > > Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
> > "I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
> That Kim Kardashian even has a following on TV "is just beyond stupid on so > many levels."
That, too. :)
When I hear about the number of people following the likes of KK and
Paris Hilton and the like (and sports jocks, for that matter) on Twitter
and then compare it to the number of people following good authors and
interesting scientists and the like, it's just another source of
depression for me. It's as if I have absolutely nothing in common with
millions and millions of my fellow Americans.
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto are > > > > > > implicit.
> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 degree > > > > > turn > > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was drawn in > > > > > by > > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
> > > > mouth...
> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS > > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that KK
> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way 'round.
And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair of
$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, or
whatnot.
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
On Nov 1, 2:07 pm, Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that KK
> has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
Not really. If it's all about having the biggest boobs around, what
better way to prove it than by wearing something only the biggest
boobs around wear?
>anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
>> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
>> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
>> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
>> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
>> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
>> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
>> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto are >> > > > > > implicit.
>> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 degree >> > > > > turn >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was drawn in >> > > > > by >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
>> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
>> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
>> > > > mouth...
>> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
>> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that KK
>> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
>> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way 'round.
>And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
>different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair of
>$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, or
>whatnot.
Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about bras.
> On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
> >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
> >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto are > >> > > > > > implicit.
> >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 degree > >> > > > > turn > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was drawn in > >> > > > > by > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in New
> >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking about her
> >> > > > mouth...
> >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF GIRLS > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves them.
> >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that KK
> >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
> >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way 'round.
> >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
> >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair of
> >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, or
> >whatnot.
> Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about bras.
With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
> Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
> > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
> > >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> > >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
> > >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> > >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto > > >> > > > > > are > > >> > > > > > implicit.
> > >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 > > >> > > > > degree > > >> > > > > turn > > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was > > >> > > > > drawn in > > >> > > > > by > > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in > > >> > > > New
> > >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking > > >> > > > about her
> > >> > > > mouth...
> > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF > > >> > > GIRLS > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves > > >> > > them.
> > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that > > >> > KK
> > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
> > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way 'round.
> > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
> > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair of
> > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, or
> > >whatnot.
> > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about bras.
> With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in place.
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
> In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
> > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
> > > >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> > > >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
> > > >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's fault?
> > > >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and Kyoto > > > >> > > > > > are > > > >> > > > > > implicit.
> > > >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took a 90 > > > >> > > > > degree > > > >> > > > > turn > > > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy was > > > >> > > > > drawn in > > > >> > > > > by > > > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > > >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been in > > > >> > > > New
> > > >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking > > > >> > > > about her
> > > >> > > > mouth...
> > > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF > > > >> > > GIRLS > > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and loves > > > >> > > them.
> > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so that > > > >> > KK
> > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
> > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way 'round.
> > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
> > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair of
> > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, or
> > > >whatnot.
> > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about bras.
> > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
> Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in > place.
Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her in
any way, shape or form.
And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
> anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
> > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
> > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. > > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
> > > > >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> > > > >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
> > > > >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's > > > > >> > > > > >> fault?
> > > > >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and > > > > >> > > > > > Kyoto > > > > >> > > > > > are > > > > >> > > > > > implicit.
> > > > >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took > > > > >> > > > > a 90 > > > > >> > > > > degree > > > > >> > > > > turn > > > > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy > > > > >> > > > > was > > > > >> > > > > drawn in > > > > >> > > > > by > > > > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > > > >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been > > > > >> > > > in > > > > >> > > > New
> > > > >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking > > > > >> > > > about her
> > > > >> > > > mouth...
> > > > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF > > > > >> > > GIRLS > > > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and > > > > >> > > loves > > > > >> > > them.
> > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so > > > > >> > that > > > > >> > KK
> > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
> > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way > > > > >> 'round.
> > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
> > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair > > > > >of
> > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, > > > > >or
> > > > >whatnot.
> > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about bras.
> > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
> > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in > > place.
> Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
> definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her in
> any way, shape or form.
> And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
I've seen her braless. It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
> In article <dbtn98dr5cqdps9j36rnh1cdvb3sn87...@4ax.com>,
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
> > > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
> > > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. > > > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> > > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
> > > > > >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
> > > > > >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's > > > > > >> > > > > >> fault?
> > > > > >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and > > > > > >> > > > > > Kyoto > > > > > >> > > > > > are > > > > > >> > > > > > implicit.
> > > > > >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took > > > > > >> > > > > a 90 > > > > > >> > > > > degree > > > > > >> > > > > turn > > > > > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy > > > > > >> > > > > was > > > > > >> > > > > drawn in > > > > > >> > > > > by > > > > > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > > > > >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been > > > > > >> > > > in > > > > > >> > > > New
> > > > > >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking > > > > > >> > > > about her
> > > > > >> > > > mouth...
> > > > > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF > > > > > >> > > GIRLS > > > > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and > > > > > >> > > loves > > > > > >> > > them.
> > > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so > > > > > >> > that > > > > > >> > KK
> > > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
> > > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way > > > > > >> 'round.
> > > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
> > > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair > > > > > >of
> > > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, > > > > > >or
> > > > > >whatnot.
> > > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about bras.
> > > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
> > > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in > > > place.
> > Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
> > definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her in
> > any way, shape or form.
> > And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
> I've seen her braless.
By choice?
> It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
In addition to the whole brain-dead, self-absorbed skank bit, she's just
not that attractive to me physically, either. So I had no interest in
seeing her sex tape when it was making the rounds.
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
> anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:41:38 -0700:
> > In article <dbtn98dr5cqdps9j36rnh1cdvb3sn87...@4ax.com>,
> > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
> > > > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> > > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
> > > > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. > > > > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> > > > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 > > > > > > >> > -0700:
> > > > > > >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 > > > > > > >> > > > -0400:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's > > > > > > >> > > > > >> fault?
> > > > > > >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and > > > > > > >> > > > > > Kyoto > > > > > > >> > > > > > are > > > > > > >> > > > > > implicit.
> > > > > > >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy > > > > > > >> > > > > took > > > > > > >> > > > > a 90 > > > > > > >> > > > > degree > > > > > > >> > > > > turn > > > > > > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, > > > > > > >> > > > > Sandy > > > > > > >> > > > > was > > > > > > >> > > > > drawn in > > > > > > >> > > > > by > > > > > > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> > > > > > >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian > > > > > > >> > > > been > > > > > > >> > > > in > > > > > > >> > > > New
> > > > > > >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be > > > > > > >> > > > talking > > > > > > >> > > > about her
> > > > > > >> > > > mouth...
> > > > > > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN > > > > > > >> > > SURF > > > > > > >> > > GIRLS > > > > > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and > > > > > > >> > > loves > > > > > > >> > > them.
> > > > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra > > > > > > >> > so > > > > > > >> > that > > > > > > >> > KK
> > > > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many > > > > > > >> > levels.
> > > > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way > > > > > > >> 'round.
> > > > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's > > > > > > >no
> > > > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a > > > > > > >pair > > > > > > >of
> > > > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his > > > > > > >Ferrari, > > > > > > >or
> > > > > > >whatnot.
> > > > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about > > > > > > bras.
> > > > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
> > > > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in > > > > place.
> > > Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
> > > definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her in
> > > any way, shape or form.
> > > And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
> > I've seen her braless.
> By choice?
> > It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
> In addition to the whole brain-dead, self-absorbed skank bit, she's just
> not that attractive to me physically, either. So I had no interest in
> seeing her sex tape when it was making the rounds.
That's where I saw her braless (although IIRC mostly she left it on, while filming a sex tape), so I guess it was intentional, although at the time of the viewing I'd never heard of her before.
Aside from being physically unattractive, she's the most boring woman in bed I've ever seen - I'd have asked for my money back.
I watched a couple minutes and fast forwarded through a couple more to see it it got any better (it didn't) and quit watching and tossed the files.
Something that amazes me is that I'm constantly seeing ads for Playboy online, trying to get you to sign up, promising pictures of KK. Really?
That's the best Playboy has to offer these days??
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
> In article <n5g2a8hvnrf4q43tq9pcvfouiuqmvls...@4ax.com>,
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:41:38 -0700:
> > > In article <dbtn98dr5cqdps9j36rnh1cdvb3sn87...@4ax.com>,
> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
> > > > > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
> > > > > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. > > > > > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> > > > > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 > > > > > > > >> > -0700:
> > > > > > > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN > > > > > > > >> > > SURF > > > > > > > >> > > GIRLS > > > > > > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and > > > > > > > >> > > loves > > > > > > > >> > > them.
> > > > > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra > > > > > > > >> > so > > > > > > > >> > that > > > > > > > >> > KK
> > > > > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many > > > > > > > >> > levels.
> > > > > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way > > > > > > > >> 'round.
> > > > > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's > > > > > > > >no
> > > > > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a > > > > > > > >pair > > > > > > > >of
> > > > > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his > > > > > > > >Ferrari, > > > > > > > >or
> > > > > > > >whatnot.
> > > > > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about > > > > > > > bras.
> > > > > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
> > > > > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in > > > > > place.
> > > > Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
> > > > definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her in
> > > > any way, shape or form.
> > > > And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
> > > I've seen her braless.
> > By choice?
> > > It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
> > In addition to the whole brain-dead, self-absorbed skank bit, she's just
> > not that attractive to me physically, either. So I had no interest in
> > seeing her sex tape when it was making the rounds.
> That's where I saw her braless (although IIRC mostly she left it on, > while filming a sex tape), so I guess it was intentional, although at > the time of the viewing I'd never heard of her before.
> Aside from being physically unattractive, she's the most boring woman in > bed I've ever seen - I'd have asked for my money back.
> I watched a couple minutes and fast forwarded through a couple more to > see it it got any better (it didn't) and quit watching and tossed the > files.
Heh. Yeah, I've heard that her performance was ... uninspired.
> Something that amazes me is that I'm constantly seeing ads for Playboy > online, trying to get you to sign up, promising pictures of KK. Really?
> That's the best Playboy has to offer these days??
Snarky reply: You see ads online?
Serious reply: Frankly, I'm surprised that *any* of the traditional pr0n
sites are surviving, given the ready availability of everything under
the sun for free. Maybe their appeal is to guys our age who want to
revisit the playmates of their youth, or something.
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:41:38 -0700, anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote:
>In article <dbtn98dr5cqdps9j36rnh1cdvb3sn87...@4ax.com>,
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
>> > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
>> > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
>> > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. >> > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
>> > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
>> > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 -0700:
>> > > > >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
>> > > > >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> > > > >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 -0400:
>> > > > >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
>> > > > >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's >> > > > >> > > > > >> fault?
>> > > > >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and >> > > > >> > > > > > Kyoto >> > > > >> > > > > > are >> > > > >> > > > > > implicit.
>> > > > >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy took >> > > > >> > > > > a 90 >> > > > >> > > > > degree >> > > > >> > > > > turn >> > > > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, Sandy >> > > > >> > > > > was >> > > > >> > > > > drawn in >> > > > >> > > > > by >> > > > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
>> > > > >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian been >> > > > >> > > > in >> > > > >> > > > New
>> > > > >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be talking >> > > > >> > > > about her
>> > > > >> > > > mouth...
>> > > > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN SURF >> > > > >> > > GIRLS >> > > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and >> > > > >> > > loves >> > > > >> > > them.
>> > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so >> > > > >> > that >> > > > >> > KK
>> > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many levels.
>> > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way >> > > > >> 'round.
>> > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's no
>> > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a pair >> > > > >of
>> > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his Ferrari, >> > > > >or
>> > > > >whatnot.
>> > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about bras.
>> > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
>> > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in >> > place.
>> Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
>> definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her in
>> any way, shape or form.
>> And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
>I've seen her braless. It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
I goggled "Kim Kardashian nude" to see the pix, and she looks very
fetching, IMO.
Of course, I am not vexed by seeing her in almost any other context. The
occasional magazine cover in the supermarket checkout line.
> anim8rFSK sent the following on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:55:56 -0700:
> > In article <n5g2a8hvnrf4q43tq9pcvfouiuqmvls...@4ax.com>,
> > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:41:38 -0700:
> > > > In article <dbtn98dr5cqdps9j36rnh1cdvb3sn87...@4ax.com>,
> > > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
> > > > > > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 > > > > > > > -0500:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. > > > > > > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 > > > > > > > > >-0700:
> > > > > > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 > > > > > > > > >> > -0700:
> > > > > > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a > > > > > > > > >> > bra > > > > > > > > >> > so > > > > > > > > >> > that > > > > > > > > >> > KK
> > > > > > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many > > > > > > > > >> > levels.
> > > > > > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other > > > > > > > > >> way > > > > > > > > >> 'round.
> > > > > > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But > > > > > > > > >it's > > > > > > > > >no
> > > > > > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on > > > > > > > > >a > > > > > > > > >pair > > > > > > > > >of
> > > > > > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his > > > > > > > > >Ferrari, > > > > > > > > >or
> > > > > > > > >whatnot.
> > > > > > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > bras.
> > > > > > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. > > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered > > > > > > in > > > > > > place.
> > > > > Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
> > > > > definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her > > > > > in
> > > > > any way, shape or form.
> > > > > And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
> > > > I've seen her braless.
> > > By choice?
> > > > It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
> > > In addition to the whole brain-dead, self-absorbed skank bit, she's just
> > > not that attractive to me physically, either. So I had no interest in
> > > seeing her sex tape when it was making the rounds.
> > That's where I saw her braless (although IIRC mostly she left it on, > > while filming a sex tape), so I guess it was intentional, although at > > the time of the viewing I'd never heard of her before.
> > Aside from being physically unattractive, she's the most boring woman in > > bed I've ever seen - I'd have asked for my money back.
> > I watched a couple minutes and fast forwarded through a couple more to > > see it it got any better (it didn't) and quit watching and tossed the > > files.
> Heh. Yeah, I've heard that her performance was ... uninspired.
> > Something that amazes me is that I'm constantly seeing ads for Playboy > > online, trying to get you to sign up, promising pictures of KK. Really?
> > That's the best Playboy has to offer these days??
> Snarky reply: You see ads online?
> Serious reply: Frankly, I'm surprised that *any* of the traditional pr0n
> sites are surviving, given the ready availability of everything under
> the sun for free. Maybe their appeal is to guys our age who want to
> revisit the playmates of their youth, or something.
Yeah, but then you'd think that's what they'd be pushing ... SEE CLAUDIA JENNINGS or something.
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
> On Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:41:38 -0700, anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote:
> >In article <dbtn98dr5cqdps9j36rnh1cdvb3sn87...@4ax.com>,
> > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
> >> > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> >> > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 -0500:
> >> > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. > >> > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 -0700:
> >> > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> >> > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 > >> > > > >> > -0700:
> >> > > > >> > > In article <fgk0989diag0nefjo46hlt94daf0ovp...@4ax.com>,
> >> > > > >> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> > > > >> > > > Obveeus sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:51:05 > >> > > > >> > > > -0400:
> >> > > > >> > > > > > BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >> > > > > >> How long will it be before Sandy is declared Bush's > >> > > > >> > > > > >> fault?
> >> > > > >> > > > > > It's already being blamed on Global Warming; Bush and > >> > > > >> > > > > > Kyoto > >> > > > >> > > > > > are > >> > > > >> > > > > > implicit.
> >> > > > >> > > > > You are both being foolish. Didn't you watch as Sandy > >> > > > >> > > > > took > >> > > > >> > > > > a 90 > >> > > > >> > > > > degree > >> > > > >> > > > > turn > >> > > > >> > > > > and headed straight towards Atlantic City? Clearly, > >> > > > >> > > > > Sandy > >> > > > >> > > > > was > >> > > > >> > > > > drawn in > >> > > > >> > > > > by > >> > > > >> > > > > the giant sucking vortex of Donald Trump's mouth.
> >> > > > >> > > > Speaking of giant sucking vortices, hasn't Kim Kardashian > >> > > > >> > > > been > >> > > > >> > > > in > >> > > > >> > > > New
> >> > > > >> > > > York all week? Of course, in her case, we wouldn't be > >> > > > >> > > > talking > >> > > > >> > > > about her
> >> > > > >> > > > mouth...
> >> > > > >> > > And in a bizarre cross over, today, Jessica Green of ALIEN > >> > > > >> > > SURF > >> > > > >> > > GIRLS > >> > > > >> > > tweeted that she got a job modeling Kim Kardashian bras and > >> > > > >> > > loves > >> > > > >> > > them.
> >> > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a bra so > >> > > > >> > that > >> > > > >> > KK
> >> > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many > >> > > > >> > levels.
> >> > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other way > >> > > > >> 'round.
> >> > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But it's > >> > > > >no
> >> > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on a > >> > > > >pair > >> > > > >of
> >> > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his > >> > > > >Ferrari, > >> > > > >or
> >> > > > >whatnot.
> >> > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff about > >> > > > bras.
> >> > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. :)
> >> > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered in > >> > place.
> >> Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
> >> definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her in
> >> any way, shape or form.
> >> And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
> >I've seen her braless. It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
> I goggled "Kim Kardashian nude" to see the pix, and she looks very
> fetching, IMO.
Airbrushed into unrecognizability. At one point she was squeezing photos of herself vertically to try to look less bovine but sticking her arms out the wrong way so they looked like midget limbs.
In video she's covered with rancid blubber, like flesh colored cottage cheese.
> Of course, I am not vexed by seeing her in almost any other context. The
> occasional magazine cover in the supermarket checkout line.
-- "Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
> In article <4n45a8tjipkdchacd55tok91v3q1rf5...@4ax.com>,
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:55:56 -0700:
> > > In article <n5g2a8hvnrf4q43tq9pcvfouiuqmvls...@4ax.com>,
> > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:41:38 -0700:
> > > > > In article <dbtn98dr5cqdps9j36rnh1cdvb3sn87...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > anim8rFSK sent the following on Wed, 07 Nov 2012 15:13:41 -0700:
> > > > > > > In article <ml9l985b7t6n6jn96osr8nhu99cvesm...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > > Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Mason Barge sent the following on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 19:14:56 > > > > > > > > -0500:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:56:02 -0600, Jim G. > > > > > > > > > <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >anim8rFSK sent the following on Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:56:28 > > > > > > > > > >-0700:
> > > > > > > > > >> In article <0se598phegu7247m80gpch1fsqj39kc...@4ax.com>,
> > > > > > > > > >> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >> > anim8rFSK sent the following on Tue, 30 Oct 2012 19:31:56 > > > > > > > > > >> > -0700:
> > > > > > > > > >> > The fact that anyone would pay more than necessary for a > > > > > > > > > >> > bra > > > > > > > > > >> > so > > > > > > > > > >> > that > > > > > > > > > >> > KK
> > > > > > > > > >> > has extra partying cash is just beyond stupid on so many > > > > > > > > > >> > levels.
> > > > > > > > > >> LOL, yeah, but at least KK is paying Jessica, not the other > > > > > > > > > >> way > > > > > > > > > >> 'round.
> > > > > > > > > >And bra buyers are willing to pay them both, apparently. But > > > > > > > > > >it's > > > > > > > > > >no
> > > > > > > > > >different than the young idiot who's willing to spend $150 on > > > > > > > > > >a > > > > > > > > > >pair > > > > > > > > > >of
> > > > > > > > > >$10 sneakers so that D-Rose can make another payment on his > > > > > > > > > >Ferrari, > > > > > > > > > >or
> > > > > > > > > >whatnot.
> > > > > > > > > Well, at least I can conceive that Kim K. knows some stuff > > > > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > bras.
> > > > > > > > With "ease of removal" undoubtedly being at the top of the list. > > > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > Oh, God, no. I want KK's undies to be self cleaning and soldered > > > > > > > in > > > > > > > place.
> > > > > > Where KK is concerned, don't assume a garment not in evidence. And
> > > > > > definitely don't get me thinking about said garment *sticking* to her > > > > > > in
> > > > > > any way, shape or form.
> > > > > > And besides, we were talking about bras, not drawers. :)
> > > > > I've seen her braless.
> > > > By choice?
> > > > > It's not an experience I wish to repeat.
> > > > In addition to the whole brain-dead, self-absorbed skank bit, she's just
> > > > not that attractive to me physically, either. So I had no interest in
> > > > seeing her sex tape when it was making the rounds.
> > > That's where I saw her braless (although IIRC mostly she left it on, > > > while filming a sex tape), so I guess it was intentional, although at > > > the time of the viewing I'd never heard of her before.
> > > Aside from being physically unattractive, she's the most boring woman in > > > bed I've ever seen - I'd have asked for my money back.
> > > I watched a couple minutes and fast forwarded through a couple more to > > > see it it got any better (it didn't) and quit watching and tossed the > > > files.
> > Heh. Yeah, I've heard that her performance was ... uninspired.
> > > Something that amazes me is that I'm constantly seeing ads for Playboy > > > online, trying to get you to sign up, promising pictures of KK. Really?
> > > That's the best Playboy has to offer these days??
> > Snarky reply: You see ads online?
> > Serious reply: Frankly, I'm surprised that *any* of the traditional pr0n
> > sites are surviving, given the ready availability of everything under
> > the sun for free. Maybe their appeal is to guys our age who want to
> > revisit the playmates of their youth, or something.
> Yeah, but then you'd think that's what they'd be pushing ... SEE CLAUDIA > JENNINGS or something.
Fair point. Overall, I think that the Playboy audience has shifted in
both directions. The more normal types are reading the likes of Maxim
while the lonely pr0n addicts continue to buy lotion while they get
their fix online.
Back in the day, I remember wishing that Playboy would come out with a
PG-rated version of the magazine, with the stories and the interviews
and the articles about fashion and movies and cool toys and whatnot, but
without the skin. Basically, a Maxim type of thing, but maybe a bit less
immature. I would have subscribed in a heartbeat, as I really did enjoy
the mix of stuff that they covered, but I was also in no hurry to be
caught reading the magazine, given the rest of the picture, so to speak.
Which is why I was never a subscriber.
And all of which makes me wish (for about the 18,243rd time) that Omni
Magazine would see a rebirth...
-- Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN
