Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Man of Steel trailer #2

28 views
Skip to first unread message

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 12:58:53 PM12/11/12
to

moviePig

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 1:27:20 PM12/11/12
to
On Dec 11, 12:58 pm, "Obveeus" <Obve...@aol.com> wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4

Currently behind kryptonite...

--

- - - - - - - -
YOUR taste at work...
http://www.moviepig.com

cloud dreamer

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 1:50:28 PM12/11/12
to
On 11/12/2012 2:28 PM, Obveeus wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>
>


Oh....my.

..

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 2:14:20 PM12/11/12
to
In article <ka7s91$a2j$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
wrote:

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4

Even if I saw anything there that interested me, and I don't, the
costume would keep me from watching.

The most interesting thing is The Postman from Waterworld telling Clark
that he should let people die rather than reveal his secret. Why is his
secret that valuable?

--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 3:15:09 PM12/11/12
to

"anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:anim8rfsk-9DC68...@news.easynews.com...
> In article <ka7s91$a2j$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>
> Even if I saw anything there that interested me, and I don't, the
> costume would keep me from watching.

For me, the beard was more off-putting.

> The most interesting thing is The Postman from Waterworld telling Clark
> that he should let people die rather than reveal his secret. Why is his
> secret that valuable?

Maybe Superman is just supposed to let people have free will? Isn't that
always God's excuse?


David Johnston

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 3:21:37 PM12/11/12
to
On 12/11/2012 12:14 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <ka7s91$a2j$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>
> Even if I saw anything there that interested me, and I don't, the
> costume would keep me from watching.
>
> The most interesting thing is The Postman from Waterworld telling Clark
> that he should let people die rather than reveal his secret. Why is his
> secret that valuable?
>

The trailer tells you the answer to that. Pa Kent thinks the world will
freak out. It would be counterproductive if Clark saves a few kids, and
in the process the world turns on him, turning him into a supervillain
as he fights backs.

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 6:20:27 PM12/11/12
to
In article <ka848g$1vd$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
wrote:
Then why should he ever do anything?

Those little blue rat bastards the Guardians tried to undermine him by
telling him that every time he helped humans he undermined them and made
them less self reliant.

But when he's young Clark in Smallville, pre Supes, what's he got to
protect, much less that's worth letting a busload of his friends drown?

And Diane Lane as Ma Kent is even more upsetting than Annette O'Toole ...

Mason Barge

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 6:30:44 PM12/11/12
to
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 12:58:53 -0500, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com> wrote:

Just looking at the cast, this has to be costing them a fortune. It has
"fired studio executives" written all over it.

The Dark Knight treatment just isn't going to work for Superman.

Plus, I thought Clark Kent was Jeremy Sisto for a second. Hey,
Christopher Meloni's in it. This should be a Dick Wolf production.

Dimensional Traveler

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 10:30:18 PM12/11/12
to
On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>
>
I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?

--
The 'Enterprise' crew in the 2009 Star Trek are adrenaline addicted,
hyper-active teenagers with ADD whose Ritalin got replaced with
methamphetamine, displaying a level of discipline that a Somali pirate
wouldn't tolerate.

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 11, 2012, 11:58:05 PM12/11/12
to
In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:

> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
> >
> >
> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?


The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.

Of course, the above is based on the out-of-context six seconds you and
I both saw ... but it's in the trailer, so I expect the movie people
think a lot of that scene.

calvin

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 12:11:24 AM12/12/12
to
Nothing in the Superman movies that I've seen beats
the young Clark running through the corn field in
'Superman Returns'.

Arthur Lipscomb

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 12:14:28 AM12/12/12
to
It's really underwhelming. Still, I'm looking forward to it. It *has*
to be better than Superman Returns, right?!?

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 7:03:06 AM12/12/12
to

"anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
> In article <ka848g$1vd$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote in message
>> > In article <ka7s91$a2j$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>> >
>> > Even if I saw anything there that interested me, and I don't, the
>> > costume would keep me from watching.
>>
>> For me, the beard was more off-putting.
>>
>> > The most interesting thing is The Postman from Waterworld telling Clark
>> > that he should let people die rather than reveal his secret. Why is
>> > his
>> > secret that valuable?
>>
>> Maybe Superman is just supposed to let people have free will? Isn't that
>> always God's excuse?
>
> Then why should he ever do anything?

Since this is 'Superman', I'm guessing that the answer to your question is:
'for love'.

> Those little blue rat bastards the Guardians tried to undermine him by
> telling him that every time he helped humans he undermined them and made
> them less self reliant.
>
> But when he's young Clark in Smallville, pre Supes, what's he got to
> protect, much less that's worth letting a busload of his friends drown?

In the earlier Superman movie, the kids in that town were all mean to him
and picked on him. I say that they deserve to drown.

> And Diane Lane as Ma Kent is even more upsetting than Annette O'Toole ...

Maybe there will be nude scenes?


trotsky

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 7:37:23 AM12/12/12
to
Couldn't he just have used his super breath to blow a lot of bubbles so
he couldn't be identified?

cloud dreamer

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 8:01:10 AM12/12/12
to
It's definitely grittier than Superman Returns. I'd give it a go.

..

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 8:25:27 AM12/12/12
to
In article <ka93rk$d7i$1...@dont-email.me>,
It can be *way* better than SR and still not remotely worth seeing.

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 8:25:58 AM12/12/12
to
In article
<770a9524-0324-4188...@f8g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
With his glasses on, that he wouldn't wear until 20 years later.

Remysun

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 8:57:43 AM12/12/12
to
On Dec 11, 10:30 pm, Dimensional Traveler <dtra...@sonic.net> wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>
> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
> bus full of kids drown?!?  WTF?

The Sweet Hereafter

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 9:10:06 AM12/12/12
to
In article <5aqdnVj9p_kb51XN...@mchsi.com>, trotsky
I guess so, if he'd thought of it ... but I think the import of the
scene is that Clark wants to help people, no matter what the
consequences to him might be, and Pa's scared.

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 9:15:06 AM12/12/12
to
In article <OOadnV_Q7paBHVXN...@supernews.com>, cloud
I really disagree that the trailer is "really underwhelming." Already
I can see that they've got a Superman who looks like Superman, and
there's lots of stuff blowing up and breaking apart. I'm not sure
they've got a Lois who looks like a Lois, though; I was kinda hoping
they'd darken Amy Adams' hair, as they did for Julie & Julia ... but
that really doesn't matter, of course. After all, Noel Neill played
Lois as a redhead.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 9:23:42 AM12/12/12
to
Professor Bubba wrote:

>I really disagree that the trailer is "really underwhelming." Already
>I can see that they've got a Superman who looks like Superman, and
>there's lots of stuff blowing up and breaking apart. I'm not sure
>they've got a Lois who looks like a Lois, though; I was kinda hoping
>they'd darken Amy Adams' hair, as they did for Julie & Julia ... but
>that really doesn't matter, of course. After all, Noel Neill played
>Lois as a redhead.

wtf is Amy Adams doing in this movie?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 9:56:07 AM12/12/12
to
In article <kaa41e$fa3$1...@news.albasani.net>, Adam H. Kerman
She sure as hell is a better choice than The Human Skeleton.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 11:43:09 AM12/12/12
to
Lewis <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>Why would anyone have a problem with Amy Adams in any movie?

She can get better parts.

calvin

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 12:36:48 PM12/12/12
to
On Dec 12, 9:42 am, Lewis <g.kr...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
> MY MOM IS NOT DATING JERRY SEINFELD Bart chalkboard Ep. AABF06

But Seinfeld's TV mom dated James Dean.

trotsky

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 1:23:33 PM12/12/12
to
On 12/12/12 8:46 AM, Lewis wrote:
> In message <kaa41e$fa3$1...@news.albasani.net>
> Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
> Why would anyone have a problem with Amy Adams in any movie?


Well, to answer Kerman's question: looking pretty and acting extremely well.

trotsky

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 1:26:38 PM12/12/12
to
No plastic surgeon is *that* talented.

Bill Steele

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 2:27:25 PM12/12/12
to
In article <OOadnV_Q7paBHVXN...@supernews.com>,
cloud dreamer <reduce...@recycle.com> wrote:

That's what makes it look interesting. Like they're moving as far away
as possible from a comic-book sensibility and trying to see what it
would really be like to be Superman. The music suggests they're going to
go with a "Jor-El gave his only begotten son" theme.

Although in a real world I'd prefer my superpowered people to have more
of a Chris Reeve personality.

cloud dreamer

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 2:50:21 PM12/12/12
to
Yeah...hard to look at anyone that plays Superman now and not think
about Reeve.

..

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 6:06:18 PM12/12/12
to
In article <jJWdnTxkKOdhQlXN...@supernews.com>, cloud
In a movie, maybe, but my Superman died in 1959. Each generation has
its own.

trotsky

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 6:51:22 PM12/12/12
to
Have you seen "Hollywoodland"? Ever since I've seen that movie, George
Reeves is always the first guy I think about wrt Superman.

Dimensional Traveler

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 10:04:03 PM12/12/12
to
On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
> In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
> Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>>>
>>>
>> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
>> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?
>
>
> The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
> clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
> going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
> Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
>
"Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."

I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P


--
The 'Enterprise' crew in the 2009 Star Trek are adrenaline addicted,
hyper-active teenagers with ADD whose Ritalin got replaced with
methamphetamine, displaying a level of discipline that a Somali pirate
wouldn't tolerate.

Dimensional Traveler

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 10:05:35 PM12/12/12
to
I think I need to repeat my "WTF?"

Remysun

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 10:12:46 PM12/12/12
to
On Dec 12, 10:05 pm, Dimensional Traveler <dtra...@sonic.net> wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 5:57 AM, Remysun wrote:> On Dec 11, 10:30 pm, Dimensional Traveler <dtra...@sonic.net> wrote:
> >> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>
> >> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
> >> bus full of kids drown?!?  WTF?
>
> > The Sweet Hereafter
>
> I think I need to repeat my "WTF?"

Sure, but brush up first.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sweet_Hereafter_(film)

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 10:58:11 PM12/12/12
to
In article <9_6dnfVx-tjnhVTN...@mchsi.com>, trotsky
I saw Hollywoodland. I liked it quite a bit.

Not that this is important, but someone pointed out that, in the scene
where all the kids in the neighborhood run home to watch Adventures of
Superman, none of the houses has a TV antenna.

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 11:00:54 PM12/12/12
to
In article <50c945a5$0$29840$742e...@news.sonic.net>,
Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:

> On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
> > In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
> > Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
> >> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?
> >
> >
> > The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
> > clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
> > going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
> > Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
> >
> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>
> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P

Seriously, unless it's "if you start saving people then reporters will
annoy your mom and me" I don't know what Pa Kent's problem is.

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 11:01:48 PM12/12/12
to
In article <50c945a5$0$29840$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:

> On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
> > In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
> > Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
> >> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?
> >
> >
> > The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
> > clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
> > going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
> > Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
> >
> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>
> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P


In pretty much every single version of Superman we've ever seen, some
mope almost succeeds in killing him well before the end of the movie or
TV episode or whatever, no matter what Superman's power levels are.
Pa's right to worry.

Ted Nolan <tednolan>

unread,
Dec 12, 2012, 11:18:56 PM12/12/12
to
In article <121220122258111127%bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid>,
Was it set in a small town? By the title, I guessing not. If you had
local stations, rabbit-ears were all you needed.
--
------
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

Arthur Lipscomb

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 12:38:15 AM12/13/12
to
On 12/12/2012 7:04 PM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
>> In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
>> Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
>>> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?
>>
>>
>> The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
>> clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
>> going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
>> Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
>>
> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>
> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P
>
>

It didn't stop the angry mob in Superman II.

"They Killed Superman!"
"Get 'em!"

Martin Phipps

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 2:27:35 AM12/13/12
to
On Dec 13, 11:04 am, Dimensional Traveler <dtra...@sonic.net> wrote:
> On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742ec...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
> > Traveler <dtra...@sonic.net> wrote:
>
> >> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>
> >> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
> >> bus full of kids drown?!?  WTF?
>
> > The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa.  To me, it's
> > clear that he doesn't like saying it.  He's so worried that Clark is
> > going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
> > Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
>
> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>
> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru.  :P

If I had superpowers I wouldn't let anybody know. Clark has
superspeed so most of the time he can save people without having them
know they are being saved. It's a bit hard to hide the fact that
you've just picked up a bus though. I guess we'll have to see the
movie to see how that situation is dealt with. ;)

Martin

trotsky

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 6:34:11 AM12/13/12
to
Ooh, that's a good point. I would imagine it was some years after TV
was being broadcast before rooftop antennas were implemented.

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 7:11:16 AM12/13/12
to

"anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote:

> Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
>> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
>> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>>
>> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P
>
> Seriously, unless it's "if you start saving people then reporters will
> annoy your mom and me" I don't know what Pa Kent's problem is.

If they know you have superpowers, you will never be able to have any
friendship/relationship again. It would be worse that just being rich or
being famous and having everyone jealous and hateful of you for it...or
clinging to your side in the hopes of getting part of the pie simply for
being part of the posse. many celebrities are destroyed by this treatment
from the public and Superman would get it times 1,.000. On top of all that,
there would be litterally millions of people making personal requests for
his time on a daily basis. My dog got lost in the woods, could you please
go find it...my mom has inoperable cancer, could you please use your laser
vision to cut it out safely...my girlfriend died in a car accident
yesterday, could you please make the planet spin backwards, reverse time,
and save her...etc...etc... How would he ever find time to do anything
other than work miracles...and no matter how many he did there would always
be millions more that he failed to do and was blamed for as a result.


Obveeus

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 7:15:49 AM12/13/12
to
Why not site the FINAL DESTINATION film series as an even scarier resulting
scenario?


nick

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 8:18:52 AM12/13/12
to
On Dec 13, 7:15 am, "Obveeus" <Obve...@aol.com> wrote:
The Superman I grew up reading, even if those kids did drown he'd fly
around the world at ultra-fast speed and take it back in time to
before the kids drowned.

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 8:28:55 AM12/13/12
to

"nick" <leftbehindb...@gmail.com> wrote:

>The Superman I grew up reading, even if those kids did drown he'd fly
>around the world at ultra-fast speed and take it back in time to
>before the kids drowned.

Yep...but once he makes that move for one adoring fan, won't he have to do
it for all of them? Then he will have no freetime at all...and soon the
lines at Starbucks will be frighteningly long because nothing is thinning
the herd.


Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 10:15:09 AM12/13/12
to
In article <kacgl6$q3s$1...@dont-email.me>, Obveeus <Obv...@aol.com>
wrote:
We get a real-life glimpse into this sort of thing by looking at how
lottery winners are treated. They're hounded endlessly by strangers
and professional fundraisers.

Professor Bubba

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 10:19:01 AM12/13/12
to
In article <kacl6p$k41$1...@dont-email.me>, Obveeus <Obv...@aol.com>
wrote:
The Superman I grew up reading was powerless to change history. It
wasn't a matter of choice for him. He'd sometimes try, but he'd always
fail.

If Superman ran time backwards to try to undo everything that had gone
wrong, the world would never move forward from that point again.
There's just too much going wrong at the same time, all the time.

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 10:50:12 AM12/13/12
to
Yep...and especially when the media acts as an evil entity out to ruin their
lives. Witness the recent big dollar winner from Arizona that wanted to
remain anonymous. The media decided his lack of cooperation was
unforgiveable so they published his name, address, occupation, purchase
price of his home, interviews with his neighbors, etc...


anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 11:19:34 AM12/13/12
to
In article <kacgl6$q3s$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
wrote:

> "anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
> >> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
> >> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
> >> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
> >>
> >> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P
> >
> > Seriously, unless it's "if you start saving people then reporters will
> > annoy your mom and me" I don't know what Pa Kent's problem is.
>
> If they know you have superpowers, you will never be able to have any
> friendship/relationship again.

yeah, but Clark never has friends or relationships *anyway*

It would be worse that just being rich or
> being famous and having everyone jealous and hateful of you for it...or
> clinging to your side in the hopes of getting part of the pie simply for
> being part of the posse. many celebrities are destroyed by this treatment
> from the public and Superman would get it times 1,.000. On top of all that,
> there would be litterally millions of people making personal requests for
> his time on a daily basis. My dog got lost in the woods, could you please
> go find it...my mom has inoperable cancer, could you please use your laser
> vision to cut it out safely...my girlfriend died in a car accident
> yesterday, could you please make the planet spin backwards, reverse time,
> and save her...etc...etc... How would he ever find time to do anything
> other than work miracles...and no matter how many he did there would always
> be millions more that he failed to do and was blamed for as a result.

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 11:24:58 AM12/13/12
to

"anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:anim8rfsk-8EBAA...@news.easynews.com...
> In article <kacgl6$q3s$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>> >> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
>> >> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at
>> >> you
>> >> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>> >>
>> >> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P
>> >
>> > Seriously, unless it's "if you start saving people then reporters will
>> > annoy your mom and me" I don't know what Pa Kent's problem is.
>>
>> If they know you have superpowers, you will never be able to have any
>> friendship/relationship again.
>
> yeah, but Clark never has friends or relationships *anyway*

True...which is why it shouldn't be a big deal to let that busload full of
classmates die. What would make them any different from the busload full of
schoolkids going over some cliff in China or Bolivia?


anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 11:47:54 AM12/13/12
to
In article <kactfm$91c$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
wrote:
Our media is infamous for stuff like that. I didn't even watch the
newscasts and I still saw they guy's house, in lingering, close up,
almost pornographic detail, at commercial breaks advertising them
revealing his identity. Stay tuned!

Remember years (decades, sigh) ago when that AZ bound airliner crashed
right after take-off? The NBC affiliate was in the middle of an ad
campaign about how they were the caring news and you wouldn't see them
pestering people, and, boy howdy, did that change in an instant when
they had blood in the water. One reporter had the camera start close on
a mailbox, so the numbers 123 filled the screen, and then pulled back to
show her and the whole house while she said "we're here on west main
street outside the home of the brother in law of the pilot who refuses
to open the door to speak to us. Back to you, Phil!"

Guess she taught HIM a lesson.

Obveeus

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 1:51:51 PM12/13/12
to

"anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote:

> In article <kactfm$91c$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "Professor Bubba" <bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid> wrote:
>> > We get a real-life glimpse into this sort of thing by looking at how
>> > lottery winners are treated. They're hounded endlessly by strangers
>> > and professional fundraisers.
>>
>> Yep...and especially when the media acts as an evil entity out to ruin
>> their
>> lives. Witness the recent big dollar winner from Arizona that wanted to
>> remain anonymous. The media decided his lack of cooperation was
>> unforgiveable so they published his name, address, occupation, purchase
>> price of his home, interviews with his neighbors, etc...
>
> Our media is infamous for stuff like that. I didn't even watch the
> newscasts and I still saw they guy's house, in lingering, close up,
> almost pornographic detail, at commercial breaks advertising them
> revealing his identity. Stay tuned!

...and there really is no news story at all beyond 'someone in Arizona won
the lottery'. Everything else is just harrassment of a private citizen.

> Remember years (decades, sigh) ago when that AZ bound airliner crashed
> right after take-off? The NBC affiliate was in the middle of an ad
> campaign about how they were the caring news and you wouldn't see them
> pestering people, and, boy howdy, did that change in an instant when
> they had blood in the water. One reporter had the camera start close on
> a mailbox, so the numbers 123 filled the screen, and then pulled back to
> show her and the whole house while she said "we're here on west main
> street outside the home of the brother in law of the pilot who refuses
> to open the door to speak to us. Back to you, Phil!"

This sounds like something from BREAKING BAD.

> Guess she taught HIM a lesson.

Maybe she wanted to make him feel bad about missing his '15 minutes of fame'
just in case he didn't feel bad about the plane crash already?


Bill Steele

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 3:19:25 PM12/13/12
to
In article <sL6dndfkRIivIFTN...@mchsi.com>,
trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:

> >> Not that this is important, but someone pointed out that, in the scene
> >> where all the kids in the neighborhood run home to watch Adventures of
> >> Superman, none of the houses has a TV antenna.
> >
> > Was it set in a small town? By the title, I guessing not. If you had
> > local stations, rabbit-ears were all you needed.
>
>
> Ooh, that's a good point. I would imagine it was some years after TV
> was being broadcast before rooftop antennas were implemented.

Depends on where you lived, how much you understood about the technology
and how willing you were to climb up on the roof or pay somebody a lot
of money to climb up there for you. (It was a little like computer stuff
is now. The TV "expert" could charge big bucks to run a piece of
twinlead down the side of your house and screw it to the terminals on
the back of the TV set.)

Where I lived on the edge of Buffalo you could get local stations with
rabbit ears, but some people -- mostly hams and other kinds of techies,
would have rooftop antennas with rotators to get Batavia and Toronto.
They also got a better picture from the local stations.

Michael Black

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 3:39:54 PM12/13/12
to
I think it wsa a set of waves, rather than a binary.

If you were really early with a tv set, you may hve had a rooftop antenna
because there was no tv station in town. Then later when the local
stations were fairlyc oommon, rabbit ears were fine, unless you wanted
those distant stations. Then cable grew and both went away.

Michael

Ken Arromdee

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 4:16:17 PM12/13/12
to
In article <slrnkch5mh....@mbp55.local>,
Lewis <g.k...@gmail.com.dontsendmecopies> wrote:
>Superman has always been a bit of an idiot. Yes, of course he could
>always act as an invisible force, making sure that no one, ever, could
>see him. We see this in Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns, but
>that's about the only time we see it.

The first few years of the radio show were like this. Most people didn't
even believe there was a Superman, and Clark claimed not to believe it.
Of course I guess you don't really "see" it on radio.
--
Ken Arromdee / arromdee_AT_rahul.net / http://www.rahul.net/arromdee

Obi-wan Kenobi: "Only a Sith deals in absolutes."
Yoda: "Do or do not. There is no 'try'."

Ken Arromdee

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 4:20:57 PM12/13/12
to
In article <2733e56f-34fa-45ea...@gu9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
nick <leftbehindb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The Superman I grew up reading, even if those kids did drown he'd fly
>around the world at ultra-fast speed and take it back in time to
>before the kids drowned.

If you *read* Superman as opposed to watching films, while he could go
back in time he was unable to change the past (although the excuse for his
inability tended to vary).

Mason Barge

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 4:27:29 PM12/13/12
to
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:04:03 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
<dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:

>On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
>> In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
>> Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
>>> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?
>>
>>
>> The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
>> clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
>> going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
>> Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
>>
>"Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
>fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
>to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>
>I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P

It's more like he's afraid of paparazzi taking photos of him and topless
Lois by the pool.
Message has been deleted

Barry Margolin

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 6:44:56 PM12/13/12
to
In article <dennism3-B7EBC2...@bonxibon.datemas.de>,
Dennis M <denn...@dennism3.invalid> wrote:

> Does anyone remember where The Lucy Show was set, a metropolitan area or
> smaller town? I remember the episode with Lucy and Viv up on the roof
> putting up or possibly adjusting their antenna for some reason. Zaniness
> ensues.

Shows like that could easily go back and forth between rabbit ears and
rooftop antennas -- if they have a storyline that requires one or the
other, that's what they have that day. Most viewers don't nitpick
details like these, and this was the days before the Internet, so the
was no way to publicize continuity errors.

--
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA

trotsky

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 7:51:20 PM12/13/12
to
On 12/13/12 5:16 PM, Dennis M wrote:
> In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1...@darkstar.example.org>,
> Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca> wrote:
>
>> If you were really early with a tv set, you may hve had a rooftop antenna
>> because there was no tv station in town. Then later when the local
>> stations were fairlyc oommon, rabbit ears were fine, unless you wanted
>> those distant stations. Then cable grew and both went away.
>
> Does anyone remember where The Lucy Show was set, a metropolitan area or
> smaller town? I remember the episode with Lucy and Viv up on the roof
> putting up or possibly adjusting their antenna for some reason. Zaniness
> ensues.


This may or may not be of interest:

http://dennysantennaservice.com/1340294.html


suzeeq

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 8:24:14 PM12/13/12
to
Dennis M wrote:
> In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1...@darkstar.example.org>,
> Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca> wrote:
>
> Does anyone remember where The Lucy Show was set, a metropolitan area or
> smaller town? I remember the episode with Lucy and Viv up on the roof
> putting up or possibly adjusting their antenna for some reason. Zaniness
> ensues.

I thought they moved to CT..? Or maybe just the 'burbs north of NYC.
Probably not that far from the big city though.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 8:49:00 PM12/13/12
to
suzeeq <su...@imbris.com> wrote:
>Dennis M wrote:

>>Does anyone remember where The Lucy Show was set, a metropolitan area or
>>smaller town? I remember the episode with Lucy and Viv up on the roof
>>putting up or possibly adjusting their antenna for some reason. Zaniness
>>ensues.

>I thought they moved to CT..? Or maybe just the 'burbs north of NYC.
>Probably not that far from the big city though.

That was a story arc over eight weeks, I think. They moved back to the
old set pretty quickly. Fred and Ethel moved with them, somehow.

suzeeq

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 8:57:40 PM12/13/12
to
Really? They had that big country house for quite a while I thought.
Fred and Ethel lived in the coachhouse or whatever it was. Or was the
one with them putting up an antenna when they were still in the apartment?

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 9:22:53 PM12/13/12
to
I don't remember the antenna, but it could have been at the aparment
building. It was just a two flat.

suzeeq

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 9:44:58 PM12/13/12
to
Two flats per floor you mean, right? I had the impression it was a
medium size building.

Dimensional Traveler

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 9:56:49 PM12/13/12
to
On 12/12/2012 8:00 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <50c945a5$0$29840$742e...@news.sonic.net>,
> Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>
>> On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
>>> In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
>>> Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
>>>> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?
>>>
>>>
>>> The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
>>> clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
>>> going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
>>> Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
>>>
>> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
>> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
>> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>>
>> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P
>
> Seriously, unless it's "if you start saving people then reporters will
> annoy your mom and me" I don't know what Pa Kent's problem is.
>
Which just makes his cover career ironic.

--
The 'Enterprise' crew in the 2009 Star Trek are adrenaline addicted,
hyper-active teenagers with ADD whose Ritalin got replaced with
methamphetamine, displaying a level of discipline that a Somali pirate
wouldn't tolerate.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 10:25:23 PM12/13/12
to
I thought it was just the two families. Now I can't remember if Lucy
and Ricky lived above or below the Mirtzes.
Message has been deleted

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 10:30:24 PM12/13/12
to
>I'm talking about The Lucy Show, not I Love Lucy. There was really a
>"rooftop antenna" Lucy Show episode. Probably the first or maybe second
>season, because I can remember it being in B&W.

>The Lucy Show has been out on all kind of cheapo budget releases, but
>there's an "official" release from CBS Video with all kinds of cool
>extras. I ran across the first season at the local Big Lots for $10
>several months ago and almost bought it for old times sake.

Oops.

suzeeq confused me with the followup about Connecticut, which was
definitely I Love Lucy. I haven't seen The Lucy Show in decades, although
I do remember it in second run syndication as a kid. I guess I'm old
enough to have seen it in first run, but I don't recall that.

It's not been as popular to run in second run as I Love Lucy.

suzeeq

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 10:54:28 PM12/13/12
to
Across the hall I thought, or the entrance foyer to that floor. I
figured it was an apartment building because 1) it was in Manhattan, and
2) I think you could see a skyline out the window so it was not at
ground level. Who knows, maybe it was a duplex in Queens or the Bronx
(shrug). But I'm pretty sure their front door was an interior door, not
leading directly outside. Will have to catch a couple on METV sometime
to see the details.

suzeeq

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 10:55:44 PM12/13/12
to
Yeah, mea culpa. I never saw much of the Lucy Show anyway, just ILL.

Michael Black

unread,
Dec 13, 2012, 11:10:05 PM12/13/12
to
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, Dennis M wrote:

> Does anyone remember where The Lucy Show was set, a metropolitan area or
> smaller town? I remember the episode with Lucy and Viv up on the roof
> putting up or possibly adjusting their antenna for some reason. Zaniness
> ensues.
>
I don't know where it was set, but maybe that was one of those sitcom
continuums, where things are flexible.

They couldn't do the antenna bit, which probably was a familiar thing to
viewers at the time, unless they had a need. So wherever they lived, they
suddenly had the need, in order to do the bit.

Michael

Ted Nolan <tednolan>

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 12:05:39 AM12/14/12
to
In article <alpine.LNX.2.02.1...@darkstar.example.org>,
Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca> wrote:
Then came digital, and now they're back.
--
------
columbiaclosings.com
What's not in Columbia anymore..

Ed Stasiak

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 4:31:32 AM12/14/12
to
> Ted Nolan
>
> Then came digital, and now they're back.

I still have a roof-top TV antenna but it's mounted
up-side-down to a roof joist in the attic, to preserve
it from the effects of weather.

I keep telling myself to get rid of cable and hook
the TV up to the antenna, as I barely watch any
TV nowadays as it is and can't really justify the
cost of paying for 52 channels of shit but the few
shows that I do watch, (Walking Dead, Justified)
are all on cable networks.

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 7:21:13 AM12/14/12
to
In article <50ca9571$0$29850$742e...@news.sonic.net>,
Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:

> On 12/12/2012 8:00 PM, anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article <50c945a5$0$29840$742e...@news.sonic.net>,
> > Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/11/2012 8:58 PM, Professor Bubba wrote:
> >>> In article <50c7fa4d$0$29858$742e...@news.sonic.net>, Dimensional
> >>> Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 12/11/2012 9:58 AM, Obveeus wrote:
> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVu3gS7iJu4
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> I'm sorry, Pa Kent suggesting to young Clark that maybe he should let a
> >>>> bus full of kids drown?!? WTF?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The way I took the scene, it was something torn out of Pa. To me, it's
> >>> clear that he doesn't like saying it. He's so worried that Clark is
> >>> going to be done in by the mob that he despairingly says that, maybe,
> >>> Clark should have stayed aloof and just let everyone die.
> >>>
> >> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability to
> >> fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can throw at you
> >> to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
> >>
> >> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P
> >
> > Seriously, unless it's "if you start saving people then reporters will
> > annoy your mom and me" I don't know what Pa Kent's problem is.
> >
> Which just makes his cover career ironic.

Yep :)

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 7:22:39 AM12/14/12
to
In article <kadv3f$p6t$1...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
wrote:
The Lucy Show? First a fictional town, Danfield, New York, then
California. The move to Connecticut was during the I Love Lucy years.

anim8rFSK

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 7:32:26 AM12/14/12
to
In article <kae7t6$19d$1...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
Remember her out on the ledge, afraid she'd fall to her death, and
George Reeves as Superman had to save her? They were playing it like
they were pretty high up. And that same episode involved an empty
apartment on the same floor. The address was 623 East 68th Street btw.

Ted Nolan <tednolan>

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 8:19:42 AM12/14/12
to
In article <8dcab563-70ad-4765...@dg10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Yeah, there is that, but with digital subchannels where your local
stations will have 3 feeds per main channel, it hardly makes sense
to have cable otherwise.

suzeeq

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 9:54:19 AM12/14/12
to
Yeah, sorry, I confused the shows. I never saw much of the Lucy show.

suzeeq

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 9:55:16 AM12/14/12
to
Thanks. Even though that was not the show being asked about I was sure
ILL was set in NYC.

Bill Steele

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 1:34:15 PM12/14/12
to
In article <guhkc851gc9rvhj18...@4ax.com>,
The standard explanation in the comics is that if people know about you
it puts your friends and family in danger.

David Johnston

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 1:49:43 PM12/14/12
to
There's also "The government will try to capture and dissect you."

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 2:44:05 PM12/14/12
to
I remember a subsequent series Here's Lucy which had major cast
changes. Gale Gordon was in both series but Vivian Vance wasn't a regular
in Here's Lucy. Was that the California relocation you're talking about?

All I remember about The Lucy Show is that the scripts weren't
all that funny but Gale Gordon gave it his all and was absolutely
hysterical. However, Lucy often had celebrity guest appearances, and
those episodes could be quite funny. Don't recall Here's Lucy at all.

For those who don't know, Gale Gordon was a comic character actor who had
perfected the slow burn in the Edgar Kennedy tradition. He was long
associated with Fibber McGee & Molly and spinoff The Great Gildersleeve
on radio. On McGee, he was the "victim" of McGee's awful tongue twisters,
truly funny stuff.

Ah. Refreshing my memory by looking at Wikipedia, Lucy wanted to hire
Gale Gordon to play Fred Mertz on I Love Lucy, but he was committed to Our
Miss Brooks, on which he played Osgood Conklin the pricipal on both radio
and television. The much older William Frawley got the part, of course,
best part he ever had, for his career was otherwise unimportant. Gale Gordon
still wasn't available for the first season of The Lucy Show, so Charles
Lane played her boss.

The move to California had to do with Lucy and Desi selling Desilu to
Paramount, the ex-RKO Studio they owned. This now meant Paramount owned
The Lucy Show, so she created Here's Lucy so she could produce it.

Ah. Lucy played a different character, too. I'm right: Vivian Vance wasn't
a regular, but she did play a recurring character. Lucie Arnaz and Desi Jr.
(her real life daughter and son) were on the show, too.

Here's Lucy really isn't a spinoff, then, and The Lucy Show simply ended
due to the sale of the studio.

WrongWayWade

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 3:50:21 PM12/14/12
to
Bill Steele wrote:
> In article <sL6dndfkRIivIFTN...@mchsi.com>,
> trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Not that this is important, but someone pointed out that, in the
>>>> scene where all the kids in the neighborhood run home to watch
>>>> Adventures of Superman, none of the houses has a TV antenna.
>>>
>>> Was it set in a small town? By the title, I guessing not. If you
>>> had local stations, rabbit-ears were all you needed.
>>
>>
>> Ooh, that's a good point. I would imagine it was some years after TV
>> was being broadcast before rooftop antennas were implemented.
>
> Depends on where you lived, how much you understood about the
> technology and how willing you were to climb up on the roof or pay
> somebody a lot of money to climb up there for you. (It was a little
> like computer stuff is now. The TV "expert" could charge big bucks to
> run a piece of twinlead down the side of your house and screw it to
> the terminals on the back of the TV set.)
>
> Where I lived on the edge of Buffalo you could get local stations with
> rabbit ears, but some people -- mostly hams and other kinds of
> techies, would have rooftop antennas with rotators to get Batavia and
> Toronto. They also got a better picture from the local stations.

You could also install 'rooftop' antennas inside your attic.


Dimensional Traveler

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 10:06:53 PM12/14/12
to
But then we always knew Superman was a putz! :P

Dimensional Traveler

unread,
Dec 14, 2012, 10:07:54 PM12/14/12
to
As though just being in the same state as Superman wasn't dangerous enough.

WrongWayWade

unread,
Jan 11, 2013, 2:16:43 PM1/11/13
to
anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <kacgl6$q3s$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>> "anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Dimensional Traveler <dtr...@sonic.net> wrote:
>>>> "Yes son, I'm afraid that if you show your super-strength, ability
>>>> to fly supersonic and invulnerability to anything humanity can
>>>> throw at you to the public, a mob will descend and beat you up."
>>>>
>>>> I'm thinking someone failed to think that idea thru. :P
>>>
>>> Seriously, unless it's "if you start saving people then reporters
>>> will annoy your mom and me" I don't know what Pa Kent's problem is.
>>
>> If they know you have superpowers, you will never be able to have any
>> friendship/relationship again.
>
> yeah, but Clark never has friends or relationships *anyway*
>
> It would be worse that just being rich or
>> being famous and having everyone jealous and hateful of you for
>> it...or clinging to your side in the hopes of getting part of the
>> pie simply for being part of the posse. many celebrities are
>> destroyed by this treatment from the public and Superman would get
>> it times 1,.000. On top of all that, there would be litterally
>> millions of people making personal requests for his time on a daily
>> basis. My dog got lost in the woods, could you please go find
>> it...my mom has inoperable cancer, could you please use your laser
>> vision to cut it out safely...my girlfriend died in a car accident
>> yesterday, could you please make the planet spin backwards, reverse
>> time, and save her...etc...etc... How would he ever find time to do
>> anything other than work miracles...and no matter how many he did
>> there would always be millions more that he failed to do and was
>> blamed for as a result.

Luckily he was able to solve this corundum by focusing entirely on whatever
misadventures Jimmy Olsen and Lois Lane might get into.


0 new messages