Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
"Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  12 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
David  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 4:23 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: David <dimla...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:23:49 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 4:23 pm
Subject: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
http://insidetv.ew.com/2012/11/13/firefly-reunion-special-delivers-bi...

'Firefly' reunion special delivers big for Science Channel
by Sandra Gonzalez

The Browncoats came out strong on Sunday night for the Firefly Reunion
special.

Firefly: Browncoats Unite garnered a total of 1.2 million viewers and
was also the Science Channel s most-watched Sunday night ever among
the 25-54 demo with a 0.5 rating, the network said today.

The special, which was moderated by EW s Jeff Jensen, brought together
stars Nathan Fillion, Adam Baldwin, Summer Glau, and more for a chat
about everything from the show s truncated run on Fox to its
incredible cult following.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
hanco...@bbs.cpcn.com  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 4:26 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: hanco...@bbs.cpcn.com
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:26:17 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 4:26 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
On Nov 13, 4:23 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> 'Firefly' reunion special delivers big for Science Channel

Many people don't get Science Channel.  It should've been aired on a
channel that's more widely available.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Michael Black  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 7:03 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Michael Black <et...@ncf.ca>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:05:56 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 7:05 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, hanco...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> On Nov 13, 4:23 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> 'Firefly' reunion special delivers big for Science Channel

> Many people don't get Science Channel.  It should've been aired on a
> channel that's more widely available.

And you'd kind of think a channel called "Science Channel" would be
about science, not fiction, but then I seem to recall some dicussion of
that when the show was announced.

   Michael


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dano  
View profile  
 More options Nov 13 2012, 7:31 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:31:04 -0500
Local: Tues, Nov 13 2012 7:31 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
"Michael Black"  wrote in message

news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1211131905220.7788@darkstar.example.org...

On Tue, 13 Nov 2012, hanco...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> On Nov 13, 4:23 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> 'Firefly' reunion special delivers big for Science Channel

> Many people don't get Science Channel.  It should've been aired on a
> channel that's more widely available.

And you'd kind of think a channel called "Science Channel" would be
about science, not fiction, but then I seem to recall some dicussion of
that when the show was announced.

================================

I'm going out on a limb in thinking that folks interested in science MIGHT
just be interested in science fiction too.  And vice versa.

More appropriate than wrestling on the SyFy network I think.  Or the reality
crap on A&E and Bravo.  Gotta pay the bills...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Barry Margolin  
View profile  
 More options Nov 14 2012, 10:09 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:09:11 -0500
Local: Wed, Nov 14 2012 10:09 am
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
In article
<c8af3f24-f2e4-47d6-a351-931e19c4c...@s14g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,

 hanco...@bbs.cpcn.com wrote:
> On Nov 13, 4:23 pm, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > 'Firefly' reunion special delivers big for Science Channel

> Many people don't get Science Channel.  It should've been aired on a
> channel that's more widely available.

Looks like they aired it because they've also started running reruns of
Firefly.

--
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim G.  
View profile  
 More options Nov 14 2012, 3:34 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:34:46 -0600
Local: Wed, Nov 14 2012 3:34 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
David sent the following on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:23:49 -0500:

> Firefly: Browncoats Unite garnered a total of 1.2 million viewers

Which speaks to two realities. Hardcore Whedonites are
disproportionately vocal, and (for the rest of us) everything worth
saying about this short-lived show has already been said.

--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Johnston  
View profile  
 More options Nov 17 2012, 11:38 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: David Johnston <Da...@block.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:38:11 -0700
Local: Sat, Nov 17 2012 11:38 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
On 11/14/2012 1:34 PM, Jim G. wrote:

> David sent the following on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:23:49 -0500:
>> Firefly: Browncoats Unite garnered a total of 1.2 million viewers

> Which speaks to two realities. Hardcore Whedonites are
> disproportionately vocal, and (for the rest of us) everything worth
> saying about this short-lived show has already been said.

Wouldn't that depend on how many people actually subscribe to the
channel it was on?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William December Starr  
View profile  
 More options Nov 18 2012, 3:24 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: wdst...@panix.com (William December Starr)
Date: 18 Nov 2012 15:24:27 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 18 2012 3:24 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
In article <o9l7a8h4pk2325u0qdh549b1oct6oql...@4ax.com>,
Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> said:

> Which speaks to two realities. Hardcore Whedonites are
> disproportionately vocal, and (for the rest of us) everything
> worth saying about this short-lived show has already been said.

I don't know where all these "hardcore Whedonites" are, but I gotta
say that since I came back into r.a.t in April I think I've seen a
lot more of you complaining about them than I've actually seen any
_of_ them.

-- wds


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim G.  
View profile  
 More options Nov 19 2012, 4:06 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:06:10 -0600
Local: Mon, Nov 19 2012 4:06 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
David Johnston sent the following on Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:38:11 -0700:

> On 11/14/2012 1:34 PM, Jim G. wrote:
> > David sent the following on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:23:49 -0500:
> >> Firefly: Browncoats Unite garnered a total of 1.2 million viewers

> > Which speaks to two realities. Hardcore Whedonites are
> > disproportionately vocal, and (for the rest of us) everything worth
> > saying about this short-lived show has already been said.

> Wouldn't that depend on how many people actually subscribe to the
> channel it was on?

Well, for starters, DirecTV carries it, which is a pretty good-sized
chunk of the potential audience right there. Can anyone else here speak
to whether other outlets carry it? Cox? Time Warner? Others?

--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Johnston  
View profile  
 More options Nov 19 2012, 5:05 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: David Johnston <Da...@block.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:05:31 -0700
Local: Mon, Nov 19 2012 5:05 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
On 11/19/2012 2:06 PM, Jim G. wrote:

> David Johnston sent the following on Sat, 17 Nov 2012 21:38:11 -0700:
>> On 11/14/2012 1:34 PM, Jim G. wrote:
>>> David sent the following on Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:23:49 -0500:
>>>> Firefly: Browncoats Unite garnered a total of 1.2 million viewers

>>> Which speaks to two realities. Hardcore Whedonites are
>>> disproportionately vocal, and (for the rest of us) everything worth
>>> saying about this short-lived show has already been said.

>> Wouldn't that depend on how many people actually subscribe to the
>> channel it was on?

> Well, for starters, DirecTV carries it, which is a pretty good-sized
> chunk of the potential audience right there.

Is it part of their basic package?

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim G.  
View profile  
 More options Nov 26 2012, 4:06 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:05:53 -0600
Local: Mon, Nov 26 2012 4:05 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
David Johnston sent the following on Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:05:31 -0700:

Everyone I know who has DirecTV seems to have it, but maybe they all get
the same basic upgrade.

--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jim G.  
View profile  
 More options Nov 26 2012, 4:06 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:05:53 -0600
Local: Mon, Nov 26 2012 4:05 pm
Subject: Re: "Firefly" reunion special watched by 1.2 million
William December Starr sent the following on 18 Nov 2012 15:24:27 -0500:

> In article <o9l7a8h4pk2325u0qdh549b1oct6oql...@4ax.com>,
> Jim G. <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> said:

> > Which speaks to two realities. Hardcore Whedonites are
> > disproportionately vocal, and (for the rest of us) everything
> > worth saying about this short-lived show has already been said.

> I don't know where all these "hardcore Whedonites" are, but I gotta
> say that since I came back into r.a.t in April I think I've seen a
> lot more of you complaining about them than I've actually seen any
> _of_ them.

(1) I'm no more "complaining" about the reality of "hardcore Whedonites"
than I am "complaining" that water is wet or that the sun rises in the
east.

(2) They don't congregate on r.a.t. or anywhere else on USENET. They
tend to gravitate to web forums, where avatars and pictures and other
shiny things can add to their entertainment.

--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I'm really ready for this day to be over." -- Duke Crocker, HAVEN


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »