Mason Barge <
mason...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2013 14:09:23 -0500, "Jim G."
> <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> >Mason Barge sent the following on 5/21/2013 8:54 AM:
> >> Problem is, they both write excellent software when
> >> they stick to their specialties.
> >
> >Isn't this almost always the problem, though, and not just in software?
>
> We're headed different directions here. I'm more concerned with the
> problem that, say, Microsoft does *not* write excellent software.
>
> If they didn't have a virtual monopoly, they'd be dead. Who knows,
> maybe the Japanese (or even Chinese) will build an OS so good that
> they will do to MS what they did to GM.
>
> >People do something well. Their business thrives. They get investors.
> >Those investors want a return. The market saturates as the original
> >product reaches everyone who wants it. The investors want more. The
> >investors call for mission creep. The business looks for new features or
> >other things that will increase growth and revenue streams. And the
> >cycle repeats. Then more mission creep. Then more. Then still more...
>
> I understand. I will say, though, that Google has managed to keep
> it's "mission creep" products at a very high standard. In fact, they
> are wiping the floor with Microsoft in the smartphone OS market.
>
> And what's more, Google actually understands customer service.
Umm... not really. Google is notorious for its near complete lack of
customer service. It's virtually impossible to get anyone on the phone
Same goes with YouTube, which Google owns. If your video is removed for