charlie sheen arrested
steve march
in domestic violence but their is something so apropriate about this cinema
verite. Why could I think of his mug shot in terms of the episode where he
is brought beofre the judge he was dating? And somehow I imagine the wife as
Chelsea who Charlie finally has enough of.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/actor-charlie-sheen-arrested/article1412153/
Aspen, Colo. - The Associated Press Published on Friday, Dec. 25, 2009
6:57PM EST Last updated on Friday, Dec. 25, 2009 10:33PM EST
A police spokeswoman in Aspen, Colo., says Charlie Sheen has posted bond and
been released from jail hours after he was arrested in an alleged domestic
violence case.
Stephanie Dasaro says Sheen posted $8,500 (U.S.) bond Friday after speaking
with a county judge and was advised on the conditions of his release.
The star of CBS's Two and a Half Men was taken into custody on suspicion of
second-degree assault and menacing, both felonies, along with criminal
mischief, a misdemeanour, Dasaro said.
Police arrested the 44-year-old actor after responding to a 911 call
regarding a report of domestic violence at 8:34 a.m. at a historic house up
for sale for $7.5-million. The alleged victim in the case, whose name was
withheld, did not have to be taken to the hospital, police said.
Dasaro declined to name the accuser, citing a department policy prohibiting
the identification of potential victims in domestic violence cases.
Sheen's publicist Stan Rosenfield released a statement saying, "It would
benefit everyone not to jump to any conclusion."
Police said Sheen will be held without bond until his first court appearance
in this ski resort town about 320 kilometres west of Denver. The court was
closed for Christmas, and no date for his appearance has been set.
Jail officials said Sheen wasn't available to comment. After-hours messages
left for his managers weren't immediately returned.
Sheen is the son of actor Martin Sheen. He is married to Brooke Mueller
Sheen, who gave birth to the couple's first children, twin boys, in March.
They married in May, 2008, following Sheen's bitter divorce from Denise
Richards.
Charlie Sheen's screen credits include Platoon , Wall Street and the Hot
Shots! movies. He nearly died of a drug overdose in 1998 but received
court-ordered rehabilitation.
Steve Newport
who Charlie finally has enough of.
SN: I've certainly had enough of Chelsea.
John McWilliams
> I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
>
--
lsmft
steve march
"John McWilliams" <jp...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:hh5djo$8sk$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> steve march wrote:
>> I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
> Cool. 'Cause there's already a thread on this.
And it never occurred to you that not all threads show up on all servers at
the same time?
Adam H. Kerman
>>>I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
>>Cool. 'Cause there's already a thread on this.
>And it never occurred to you that not all threads show up on all servers at
>the same time?
You looked? At least one article from that thread should have been on your
server already, even if there were gaps.
steve march
"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote in message
news:hh5gb6$903$3...@news.albasani.net...
> steve march <sma...@home.ca> wrote:
>>"John McWilliams" <jp...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>steve march wrote:
>
>>>>I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
>
>>>Cool. 'Cause there's already a thread on this.
>
>>And it never occurred to you that not all threads show up on all servers
>>at
>>the same time?
>
> You looked?
Yes.
> At least one article from that thread should have been on your
> server already, even if there were gaps.
How do you know?
Steve Newport
John McWilliams
--
lsmft
Patty Winter
In article <hh5krp$dqp$2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net> wrote:
[extraneous quotage removed]
>It was quite a few hours. Even relays should have covered it.
Given all the people in this group who are just plain too lazy
to check for previous threads before posting, why on earth are
you guys trashing someone who *did*??
We have gotten so accustomed to most Usenet traffic being carried
via the Internet that we assume that postings will show up on all
servers quickly. Yes, it's unusual for several hours to pass, but
it's hardly unheard of.
Patty
John McWilliams
Well, it was over five hours.
I don't know Mr. march, whether he looked or not, or was likely to. It
was a truculent reply or two that hooked me.
--
john mcwilliams
Adam H. Kerman
>"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>steve march <sma...@home.ca> wrote:
>>>"John McWilliams" <jp...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>steve march wrote:
>>>>>I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
>>>>Cool. 'Cause there's already a thread on this.
>>>And it never occurred to you that not all threads show up on all servers
>>>at the same time?
>>You looked?
>Yes.
>>At least one article from that thread should have been on your
>>server already, even if there were gaps.
>How do you know?
Your situation seemed illogical. Do you see that thread now?
Patty Winter
In article <hh5m1r$lun$1...@news.eternal-september.org>,
John McWilliams <jp...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Patty Winter wrote:
[extraneous quotage removed again]
>> We have gotten so accustomed to most Usenet traffic being carried
>> via the Internet that we assume that postings will show up on all
>> servers quickly. Yes, it's unusual for several hours to pass, but
>> it's hardly unheard of.
>
>Well, it was over five hours.
Like I said, unusual, but not unheard of.
>I don't know Mr. march, whether he looked or not
He said he did. Since he is not one of our known trolls, I see
no reason to disbelieve him.
Patty
steve march
"Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com> wrote in message
news:hh5odb$ab6$1...@news.albasani.net...
Yes, I do. I don't know why it seems 'illogical' to you. Asynchonicity is
nothing new especially considering my feed is a free service on another
continent.
steve march
By whom? I posted something on topic I did not see posted elsewhere, as
hard as that seems for some to believe. When a 'John Williams' saw fit to
point out it had already generated a thread, I responded witha n equal level
of.... truculence.
Now to end all this: I did not see a thread before starting a new one.
Accept that as true or not. Your choice.
Steve Newport
not. Your choice.
You tell 'em, steve!
Steve Newport
known trolls, I see no reason to disbelieve him.
Wow! Congratulations steve march!
Ubiquitous
>I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find humour
>in domestic violence but their is something so apropriate about this cinema
>verite. Why could I think of his mug shot in terms of the episode where he
>is brought beofre the judge he was dating? And somehow I imagine the wife as
>Chelsea who Charlie finally has enough of.
I hear Charlie tried to blame this on some grande conspiracy to silence him
because he's a "truther"
--
It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats
did to America.
trotsky
> In article <hh4m3r$n4o$1...@news.datemas.de>, sma...@home.ca wrote:
>
>> I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find humour
>> in domestic violence but their is something so apropriate about this cinema
>> verite. Why could I think of his mug shot in terms of the episode where he
>> is brought beofre the judge he was dating? And somehow I imagine the wife as
>> Chelsea who Charlie finally has enough of.
>
> I hear Charlie tried to blame this on some grande conspiracy to silence him
> because he's a "truther"
How much teabaggin' did you have to do to come up with that?
> --
> It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats
> did to America.
Ibid.
Ubiquitous
>Ubiquitous wrote:
>> In article <hh4m3r$n4o$1...@news.datemas.de>, sma...@home.ca wrote:
>>> I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
>>> humour in domestic violence but their is something so apropriate about
>>> this cinema verite. Why could I think of his mug shot in terms of the
>>> episode where he is brought beofre the judge he was dating? And somehow
>>> I imagine the wife as Chelsea who Charlie finally has enough of.
>>
>> I hear Charlie tried to blame this on some grande conspiracy to silence him
>> because he's a "truther"
>
>How much teabaggin' did you have to do to come up with that?
Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
>> --
>> It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats
>> did to America.
>
>Ibid.
You might want to learn the proper use of those terms so you don't make
an arse of yourself in the future, "trotsky".
--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.
Ubiquitous
>Ubiquitous wrote:
>> gms...@mchsi.com, pretending to be gms...@email.com, wrote:
>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>> In article <hh4m3r$n4o$1...@news.datemas.de>, sma...@home.ca wrote:
>>>>> I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
>>>>> humour in domestic violence but their is something so apropriate about
>>>>> this cinema verite. Why could I think of his mug shot in terms of the
>>>>> episode where he is brought beofre the judge he was dating? And somehow
>>>>> I imagine the wife as Chelsea who Charlie finally has enough of.
>>>> I hear Charlie tried to blame this on some grande conspiracy to silence
>>>> him because he's a "truther"
>>> How much teabaggin' did you have to do to come up with that?
>>
>> Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
>>
>>>> --
>>>> It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats
>>>> did to America.
>>> Ibid.
>>
>> You might want to learn the proper use of those terms so you don't make
>> an arse of yourself in the future, "trotsky".
>
>It occurs to me that you have the brains of a pubic hair--would it be
>alright if I called you Mike Pubie?
Non-responsive followup noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
Steve Newport
trotsky
> gms...@mchsi.com, pretending to be gms...@email.com, wrote:
>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>> gms...@mchsi.com, pretending to be gms...@email.com, wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>> In article <hh4m3r$n4o$1...@news.datemas.de>, sma...@home.ca wrote:
>
>>>>>> I don't usually go for the gossip side of celebrities and not to find
>>>>>> humour in domestic violence but their is something so apropriate about
>>>>>> this cinema verite. Why could I think of his mug shot in terms of the
>>>>>> episode where he is brought beofre the judge he was dating? And somehow
>>>>>> I imagine the wife as Chelsea who Charlie finally has enough of.
>>>>> I hear Charlie tried to blame this on some grande conspiracy to silence
>>>>> him because he's a "truther"
>>>> How much teabaggin' did you have to do to come up with that?
>>> Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats
>>>>> did to America.
>>>> Ibid.
>>> You might want to learn the proper use of those terms so you don't make
>>> an arse of yourself in the future, "trotsky".
>> It occurs to me that you have the brains of a pubic hair--would it be
>> alright if I called you Mike Pubie?
>
> Non-responsive followup noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
Yes, you are right. How's this: I made no errors, and you're an idiot.
Any questions?
Steve Newport
------------------------------------
What's your going away rate?