Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 26 - 50 of 85 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals) < Older  Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
chia eull  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 5:12 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: chia eull <chiaeullt...@ymail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:12:09 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 5:12 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

In article <k50pbv$4p...@dont-email.me>, web...@polaris.net wrote:
>TWO BROKE GIRLS:
>"And the Stickup". An incoherant plot involving Caroline pissing hsrself
>when someone attempts to rob the diner and them later sneaking into a movie
>theatre without paying, where they see Hong. What was the point of this ep?

This show's getting worse. Another episode that had a kind of "random-ness"
to it, almost like it was cobbled together from scripts they had lying
around. I get what the writers were trying to say - despite their fondness
for each other, Max and Caroline are narcissists who don't mind giving each
other up if the cause is right, a hollow sentiment that came out of nowhere.
The whole "sneaking into a movie theater" sub-plot was a piss-poor (pun
intended) way to make the point. The cold open slap fight was not funny,
other than to play into male fantasies. Adults wetting themselves under
stress- this is funny how, exactly? And who were those folks Han appeared to
be with?

The only redeeming thing for me is that, out of the mustard and orange
uniform, Kat Dennings is one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen. But
even that's not gonna keep me tuning in for this crap too much longer. I
really wanted 2BG to turn into "must see" TV for me, but it doesn't look
like that's gonna happen.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Gretchen Lorita  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 5:14 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: "Gretchen Lorita" <carollpa...@panalpina.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 21:14:44 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 5:14 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

Last week we learned that pretty much everyone there is stealing from Han, and
this week we learn that it s okay to sneak into a movie theater without
paying, and then sit around talking loudly, while occasionally yelling things
at the screen.

I felt sorry for the other people in the theater, who paid good money to watch
a movie, and then get treated to the rants and opinions of an asshole in the
audience who thinks they are more entertaianing than the movie.

Also, the Amazon woman from Poland is too much of a characature, and I cringe
everytime she shows up with her questionable fashions and fake accent.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Dano  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 5:15 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 17:15:08 -0400
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 5:15 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
"chia eull"  wrote in message

news:1349340763.54296.YahooMailNeo@web121101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com...

Kat Dennings is one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen.

================================================

Seriously?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
JRStern  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 5:28 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: JRStern <JRSt...@foobar.invalid>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:28:58 -0700
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 5:28 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:29:55 -0400, Mason Barge <masonba...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>DWTS

>Grade: A

>ALPHAS
>    I really liked this episode. Lots of good stories and personality
>development.  The business about Gary and his mother could have been a
>total schlockfest, but they did a great job with it.  Excellent writing,
>directing, acting -- it just shows how much more importance competence is
>than money.

>Grade: A

>I blew off Revolution to read my current book, "Lucifer's Hammer".

You finished Ringworld?

J.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anim8rFSK  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 6:23 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 15:23:41 -0700
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 6:23 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <ho5978dems9ecaqcnkoi99hcsdt5a14...@4ax.com>,

His version has the Earth spinning the wrong way, so it finishes at the
start.

--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "The Mob Doctor" by William December Starr
William December Starr  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 9:29 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: wdst...@panix.com (William December Starr)
Date: 9 Oct 2012 21:29:20 -0400
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 9:29 pm
Subject: Re: The Mob Doctor
In article <d3cfc11b-18b1-4ab1-a467-4de7178033ee@googlegroups.com>,
David Johnston <davidjohnston29yahoo...@gmail.com> said:

> On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 6:18:02 AM UTC-6, Obveeus wrote:
> > THE MOB DOCTOR:  These mob guys are really not very nice.  Grace juggles

> > sick friends, real hospital work, and a pregnant mom selling her Alderman

> > tryst baby to the mob.  I didn't much like the pregnant mom stuff or the

> > twist for her female coworker's first heart surgery assist.  I do love

> > Michael Rappaport as one of the evil mob bosses...and the other evil mob

etc.

Can you please figure out how to not double-space when you quote stuff?

-- wds


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Johnston  
View profile  
 More options Oct 9 2012, 9:53 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: David Johnston <davidjohnston29yahoo...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Oct 9 2012 9:53 pm
Subject: Re: The Mob Doctor

On Tuesday, October 9, 2012 7:29:20 PM UTC-6, William December Starr wrote:
> etc.

> Can you please figure out how to not double-space when you quote stuff?

The way how is to use my own computer.  Which is a thousand miles away.  

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)" by Ian J. Ball
Ian J. Ball  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 12:09 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: "Ian J. Ball" <ijball-NO_S...@mac.invalid>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:09:48 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 12:09 am
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <atropos-1D3B9F.11163009102...@news-europe.giganews.com>,

This show is really, really dumb!

If it weren't me waiting for the Tracy Spriridakos bubble bath scene,
I'm not sure I could make it through...  >:/

--
"Surf-crazed aliens... Of course." - Amber, "Alien Surf Girls",
  Episode #1.1, "Wipeout".
Wait a minute... "Of course"?! "*Of course*"?!! Did I miss a step here??!!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ian J. Ball  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 12:10 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: "Ian J. Ball" <ijball-NO_S...@mac.invalid>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:10:37 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 12:10 am
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <buj878tli4jp7h31f663p29hdlab4bp...@4ax.com>,
 Mason Barge <masonba...@gmail.com> wrote:

> ALPHAS
>    I really liked this episode. Lots of good stories and personality
> development.  The business about Gary and his mother could have been a
> total schlockfest, but they did a great job with it.  Excellent writing,
> directing, acting -- it just shows how much more importance competence is
> than money.

Yes - "Alphas" and "Haven" are several steps above the rest of Siffy's
stuff.

--
"Surf-crazed aliens... Of course." - Amber, "Alien Surf Girls",
  Episode #1.1, "Wipeout".
Wait a minute... "Of course"?! "*Of course*"?!! Did I miss a step here??!!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Hunter  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 8:09 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: Hunter <buffhun...@my-deja.com> (Hunter)
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:09:02 GMT
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 9:09 am
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

-----
In recent post you took me to task for saying that "Homeland" is one
of the most realistic spy shows on TV because I am not an intelligence
officer. Well, are you a damn shipwright?

Do you really think it is so damn simple to build a proper ocean going
sailing ship? I am not talking about a boat that could sail on
Horseshoe Lake in Florida. Do you think it is a matter of slapping a
few planks of wood together from the remains of Home Depot and putting
up a pole for a mast with bed sheets and it will survive the damn
North Atlantic? Get a crew to properly man it and a Captain that can
read sextants and star maps because the GPS don't work, to know the
ocean currents? That it is likelyt that many of competent sea captains
who know how to handle a sailing vessels died during the chaos?

Besides as some people can't figure out things like when Maggie was
taking to that fisherman it was just a few years-call it five-after
everything went to Shit and maybe it could be different now, but not
then?

The action is soon going to shift to Philadelphia which is a port city
that is under the control of the Monrovians. Now that the Monrovians
have taken over and consolidated power-enough apparent to get at least
to refurbish at least a few miles of railroad track and have at least
one steam engine maybe they could be getting around to building ocean
going vessels. Its going to take time to recover and in many cases
relearn old technology because we lost a lot of those skills because
they became obsolete. They aren't going to magically reappear.

How is that for wanking? Better than just mindless snarking.

>If my TV is going to survive the season, I may have to jettison shows
>that are this abjectly stupid.

-----
Says the expert on ship building.

------>Hunter

"No man in the wrong can stand up against
 a fellow that's in the right and keeps on acomin'."

               -----William J. McDonald
           Captain, Texas Rangers from 1891 to 1907


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anim8rFSK  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 10:34 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:34:38 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 10:34 am
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article
<ijball-NO_SPAM-FDE5D5.21094809102...@news.eternal-september.org>,
 "Ian J. Ball" <ijball-NO_S...@mac.invalid> wrote:

I wonder how stuff like this works.  With a non mythology show, I can
see how someone as deeply stupid as Anne Coffel Saunders can write a
howler line.  But with a show like this and it's background ... do they
really let someone as deeply stupid as Anne Coffel Saunders just add a
bit about there being no boats, and let the next guy worry about it, or
is there actually a writer's guide they hand to someone as deeply stupid
as Anne Coffel Saunders that says 'there are no boats' and she sticks it
in?

--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
BTR1701  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 11:19 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:19:49 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 11:19 am
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <50756be2.9802...@news.optonline.net>,
 Hunter <buffhun...@my-deja.com> (Hunter) wrote:

Nope, but I know that people as far back as days of Christ could build
ocean-going vessels. The idea that no one in modern America (or anyone
on the other side of the ocean) could figure it out after 15 years is
deeply moronic.

> Do you really think it is so damn simple to build a proper ocean going
> sailing ship? I am not talking about a boat that could sail on
> Horseshoe Lake in Florida. Do you think it is a matter of slapping a
> few planks of wood together from the remains of Home Depot and putting
> up a pole for a mast with bed sheets and it will survive the damn
> North Atlantic?

The Hawaiians did exactly that and crossed thousands of miles in the
Pacific in bamboo rafts.

 Get a crew to properly man it and a Captain that can

> read sextants and star maps because the GPS don't work, to know the
> ocean currents?

Books, Hunter. I could find all that in any library.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Steve Bartman  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 11:40 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: Steve Bartman <sbart...@visi.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:39:56 -0500
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 11:39 am
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:19:49 -0700, BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com> wrote:
>Nope, but I know that people as far back as days of Christ could build
>ocean-going vessels.

The Atlantic is not the Med. And in the times you're talking about
they didn't leave sight of shore. They had no way to calculate
longitude.

I've been in the North Atlantic in winter. Have you?

The idea that no one in modern America (or anyone

>on the other side of the ocean) could figure it out after 15 years is
>deeply moronic.

You need to do some research about the tools, timber, and techniques
required to build ocean-going sailing ships. It's not something you
get right on a first try. And you need a crew.

>> Do you really think it is so damn simple to build a proper ocean going
>> sailing ship? I am not talking about a boat that could sail on
>> Horseshoe Lake in Florida. Do you think it is a matter of slapping a
>> few planks of wood together from the remains of Home Depot and putting
>> up a pole for a mast with bed sheets and it will survive the damn
>> North Atlantic?

Exactly. Knowing someone else did it is nice. To actually build the
infrastructure to begin to lay a keep is the work of many years by
skilled engineers and hundreds of workers who are fed and safe.

Old growth timber helps a lot too. It's rather scarce on the East
Coast.

But there is a more fundamental question. If they could, by supreme
effort, come up with a way to travel to England, why do they need to?

Steve


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Obveeus  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 12:07 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: "Obveeus" <Obve...@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 12:05:16 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 12:05 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

"Steve Bartman" <sbart...@visi.com> wrote:
> But there is a more fundamental question. If they could, by supreme
> effort, come up with a way to travel to England, why do they need to?

Exactly.  There is no incentive, other than by a doctor or two separated
from their kids, to cross the ocean.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mason Barge  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 1:40 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: Mason Barge <masonba...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:40:59 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 1:40 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

Yeah, except for the small fact that a rookie receiver dropped a long TD
pass Tebow threw.

>> And, may I point out, the Denver Broncos:

>> Record starting Kyle Orton 1-5
>> Record starting Tebow 8-5 (including playoffs)
>> Record starting Peyton Manning 2-3

>Yes, the Broncoes wwre on a role in spite of Tebow's inability at QB.

Odd coincidence!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mason Barge  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 1:42 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: Mason Barge <masonba...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:43:16 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 1:43 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:51:20 -0400, "Obveeus" <Obve...@aol.com> wrote:

>"anim8rFSK" <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote:

>> JRStern <JRSt...@foobar.invalid> wrote:

>>> I completely ignored Revolution.

>> A wise choice.  I'm *almost* there.  I'd be LONG past it if we weren't
>> snarking here.  I suspect NBC is going to regret renewing it.

>They didn't renew it, they just extended the order to a full season.
>Meanwhile, the show could still lose 1/3rd of its viewers and be among the
>top shows on NBC, so a season #2 is very likely.

You said it, this thing looks like a lock for another season.

SNARKFEST IS ON!!!!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mason Barge  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 1:43 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: Mason Barge <masonba...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:44:05 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 1:44 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

Yeah but I read it backwards.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mason Barge  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 1:52 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: Mason Barge <masonba...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:52:32 -0400
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 1:52 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:28:58 -0700, JRStern <JRSt...@foobar.invalid>
wrote:

It's pretty short.  Very enjoyable. A+

I read a lot.  There was actually a fairly dense book in between, "The
Swerve: How the World Became Modern" by  Stephen Greenblatt.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Barnett  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 1:58 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: David Barnett <dbar3...@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:58:41 +1100
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 1:58 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <k50pbv$4p...@dont-email.me>,
web...@polaris.net says...

> What did you watch?

Yesterday, I later watched:

GCB: Revelation
The final episode & I was unimpressed.

ONCE UPON A TIME: We Are Both
I was not bored unlike some other poster.
I think the writers are pretty clever, but I am not sure
whether they are doing the right thing softening the
character of the Evil Queen.

DEXTER: Sunshine and Frosty Swirl
I wish Dexter's sister had not found out about him.
What's going on now between the two of them just does not
seem quite right to me. She should have arrested him on
the spot.
Thank goodness Yvonne Strahov-very hot-ski is in the next
episode. I hope the writers have done her proud. Fingers
crossed I'm not disappointed.

Today, Wed Oct 10, I have so far watched:

NCIS: Recovery
I like Steve Valentine, but did the writers of NCIS &
HAVEN get together re having a psychologist in each show?
And for anim's benefit, no *you know who*.

NCIS:LA: Recruit
I thought there was some silly dialogue in this one,
otherwise the usual sort of thing.

--
David Barnett


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
David Barnett  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 1:58 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: David Barnett <dbar3...@bigpond.net.au>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 04:58:42 +1100
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 1:58 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <anim8rfsk-66CB5D.10033409102012
@news.easynews.com>, anim8r...@cox.net says...

> In article
> <ijball-NO_SPAM-6EFC89.08322909102...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>  "Ian J. Ball" <ijball-NO_S...@mac.invalid> wrote:

> > I also had H-5-ZERO on in the background, but was not paying attention
> > to it, aside from seeing that Cynthia Watros and Julie McNiven
> > guest-starred.

> And Kono never once appeared in a bikini, not even in the opening
> credits.

She now looks anorexic to me.

--
David Barnett


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anim8rFSK  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 2:55 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:55:25 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 2:55 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <9vcb785qls3318rdgquo0rev7274erl...@4ax.com>,
 Mason Barge <masonba...@gmail.com> wrote:

Yeah, it's a quick read, and a pretty good re-read.

Next:  THE RINGWORLD ENGINEERS

--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anim8rFSK  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 3:36 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: anim8rFSK <anim8r...@c0x.n3t>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:36:16 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 3:36 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 20:39:45 -0400, "Hydr@Blanky", an obvious murphy

sock, wrote:

NaN> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv

NaN> YHBS...seriously seamused *----------------D

Who is "seamus", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.

NaN> From: "Gretchen Lorita" <carollpa...@panalpina.com>
NaN> Message-ID: <56g20c97l37-52033200-689x5i45@didxdrq>
NaN> NNTP-Posting-Host: G3c8P7eveiq4IE+N0KvO+g.user.speranza.aioe.org
NaN>
NaN> Message-ID: <1349340763.54296.YahooMail...@web121101.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
NaN> Reply-To: chia eull <chiaeullt...@ymail.com>
NaN> NNTP-Posting-Host: G3c8P7eveiq4IE+N0KvO+g.user.speranza.aioe.org

What does your paranoia have to do with television, murphy?

In fact, I don't see anything in your post with any apparent relationship
to television at all, murphy.

   "violating one basic rule in continually posting to or creating "off
    topic" messages is a violation of group's charters."
      --murphy

How ironic.

   "I had 'volunteered (years back) to support those who do endeavor
    to provide free Free Usenet access, support those who offered
    subscription based Free Usenet access, nothing more than
    cooperation expected in return for what has been many
    thousands of hours of work. I note most of those I joined with
    are either deceased, severely disabled, or plain ole' MIA..
    now it is my Time. ...

    You just read my last. ...

    For those who think they see me in future times I can only wish
    you severe Tinnitus in your dreams. For those who know me
    well (eMail, whatever) and see me, know I will be smiling also.
    It is to you I say "adieu mein frenz and adios .. grazie' [hugs]
    for all the Good Times! May you and yours always bear well
    with all Life brings you".

    /0ut"
      --murphy

http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/goodbye.htm

And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
BTR1701  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 8:41 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: BTR1701 <atro...@mac.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:41:46 -0500
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 8:41 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)

"Obveeus" <Obve...@aol.com> wrote:
> "Steve Bartman" <sbart...@visi.com> wrote:

>> But there is a more fundamental question. If they could, by supreme
>> effort, come up with a way to travel to England, why do they need to?

> Exactly.  There is no incentive, other than by a doctor or two separated
> from their kids, to cross the ocean.

Maybe to get out from under a sadistic dictator? Maybe there's one there,
too, but maybe not. Worth it to at least check it out. Or maybe just find
some little island somewhere and live there without having to worry about
the machinations of the broader world.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ian J. Ball  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 9:42 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: "Ian J. Ball" <ijball-NO_S...@mac.invalid>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:42:01 -0700
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 9:42 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
In article <MPG.2adfb852a42f1a4c989...@news.bigpond.com>,
 David Barnett <dbar3...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:

> In article <anim8rfsk-66CB5D.10033409102012
> @news.easynews.com>, anim8r...@cox.net says...
> > In article
> > <ijball-NO_SPAM-6EFC89.08322909102...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> >  "Ian J. Ball" <ijball-NO_S...@mac.invalid> wrote:

> > > I also had H-5-ZERO on in the background, but was not paying attention
> > > to it, aside from seeing that Cynthia Watros and Julie McNiven
> > > guest-starred.

> > And Kono never once appeared in a bikini, not even in the opening
> > credits.

> She now looks anorexic to me.

+1

--
"Surf-crazed aliens... Of course." - Amber, "Alien Surf Girls",
  Episode #1.1, "Wipeout".
Wait a minute... "Of course"?! "*Of course*"?!! Did I miss a step here??!!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Paul Derbyshire  
View profile  
 More options Oct 10 2012, 9:43 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
From: Paul Derbyshire <nad318b...@gmail.invalid>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 20:43:06 -0500
Local: Wed, Oct 10 2012 9:43 pm
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2012-10-08 (Monday)
Ian J. Ball formulated on Wednesday :

Codswallop, idiot.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 26 - 50 of 85 < Older  Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »