I can't see how in the heck they will make this episode work now.
Bye-bye episode, I guess.
It can't,.. the whole punchline was the twin towers,...
It will probably be out of the rotation for the near future, but I'm sure it
will be back within a couple of months (or maybe a year...)
Yes, but edited or not? That's my question. If they are going
to edit it because of this, I simply can't see any way for them
to do so and keep the episode intact. They'd have to cut out at
LEAST a good five minutes.
Oops... sorry.
--
Katie Prodoehl -- #1 Benoit Mark
www.geocities.com/kpro23
"I'm only gonna say this once, but since I'm
in Alabama, I'll say it really slow." -- Mankind
Alex Cain <alex...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3BA2ED...@yahoo.com...
*I suppose this means that the episode where The Simpsons
*go to New York City and Homer's car is parked between
*the two towers will no longer be aired, forever until
*the end of time now? Because I've seen that episode
*several times and I just can't see how they could edit
*it to make it work.
Why would it be edited? I've seen reports saying that current and
future TV and movie releases will be edited to eliminate footage of the
WTC, but I haven't heard anything about people going back to erase all
mentions of the WTC from existing shows. The specific examples I've
heard about have been the "Spider-Man" trailer and the opening credits
for a New York-based cop show; have you heard something about older
shows being affected?
----j7y
--
*********************************** <*> ***********************************
jere7my tho?rpe / 734-769-0913 "Oh, yeah. Old guys becoming pandas --
c/o kesh...@umich.edu _that's_ the future." Mike Nelson, MST3K
>have you heard something about older
>shows being affected?
nothing at all has come out about old shows being reedited. i imagine that that
episode of "the simpsons" will show back up in the rotation at some point. it's
not as if every book, poster, card, movie, tv show, etc. with an image or
mention of the WTC is going to be recalled and reedited.
amy
"that's what the internet is for...slandering others anonymously."--banky
I agree -- remember everyone thought the JFK Jr. episode of Seinfield
would be permanently shelved? It was back in about six months after his
death...
> THOSE BASTARDS MUST DIE!!!
>
> Oops... sorry.
Think you're thinking 'bout South Park, Katie!!
> Alex Cain <alex...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:3BA2ED...@yahoo.com...
> >
> > I can't see how in the heck they will make this episode work now.
> > Bye-bye episode, I guess.
--
Posted from p23t4.xpr.dialup.ncf.carleton.ca [134.117.137.154]
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
That's ridiculous... The show is the way it is.... Do they go back and cut
out all fictional references to the Soviet Union from all the old James Bond
movies because the Soviet Union fell? No, of course not... The episode will
now have the added interest of being from a time when the towers still
stood...
It may not air for a while... on that I agree... but it's downright silly
and if not somewhat dangerous to even plan on going back and editing all
cultural references to the towers...
More or less,
Kyle
I don't get it, why would they want to edit this stuff out? Do we want to
forget that the world trade center ever stood? Sure right now the image of the
WTC may bring on too many emotions...honestly I don't think I'll be able to go
into Manhattan for a while without being depressed...heck, I crossed the
Verazzano bridge into Brooklyn before and just got totally depressed when I
looked across and saw nothing...
Editing the WTC out of everything and making believe it was never there would
be just plain stupid...I can see why you wouldn't show movies like Independence
Day and Air Force One for some time, and I can even see the pilot for the Lone
Gunmen (which I never watched but I understand had a plot with a plane going
into the WTC) ending up on the cutting room floor for good...but let's not be
silly, let's not edit out every little scene of the WTC in all it's greatness
from every show/movie...
I don't know how I'll feel a few months from now but right now when I
see the towers I'm sure the expression on my face matches my dog's the
first week after he was neutered. Which means, I'd rather not see
these shows in the immediate future.
Alex Cain wrote:
>
> I suppose this means that the episode where The Simpsons
> go to New York City and Homer's car is parked between
> the two towers will no longer be aired, forever until
> the end of time now?
Where's the hemlock? I can't go on.
--David Johnson
Dude, it's _only_ Mad Magazine.
Phil is RAT's Pro Wrestling Ambassador
WWF line of the week: "I don't want you to be afraid and there are far more
good people in the world than bad"
-WCW Superstar Ivory talking directly to children on the recent terrorist
activity
It's funny how MAD MAGAZINE had a joke "In case of nuclear attack, the
amendment banning school prayer shall be suspended." Well, we have had a
similar kind of attack, and there are a lot of people who endorse church/state
separation to anal-retentive death leaping to the Lord as if they went to
church every Sunday.
> I suppose this means that the episode where The Simpsons
> go to New York City and Homer's car is parked between
> the two towers will no longer be aired, forever until
> the end of time now?
Probably for a couple of months. But, after that, it should
be no problem. It's not as if the episode dealt with terrorists
or death or anything. It just used the towers as a humorous
bathroom gag. Nothing offensive or painful there.
-- Bing Monopoly Expansion Set
Visit us at http://www.paxentertainment.com
No, it's Madmoiselle, we're buying our sign on the installment plan.
David Z
Houston TX
I agree. It will be shelved for a while and then will appear again.
Heck Seinfeld still shows JFK Jr. deflowering a virgin. I thought for
sure that would have been cut.
Scott
>I suppose this means that the episode where The Simpsons
>go to New York City and Homer's car is parked between
>the two towers will no longer be aired, forever until
>the end of time now?
>I can't see how in the heck they will make this episode work now.
>Bye-bye episode, I guess.
It will be back when we rebuild the towers.
Brian
I don't see why; the episode was about subliminal recruiting for the armed
services. YVAN EHT NIOJ!
I think the "Man has always loved his buildings...but what happens when
the buildings say 'NO MORE!'?" scene is the most "offensive" scene in
light of recent events...
Neil
During the opening credits of the 1986 movie "The Money Pit", there was a shot
of the NYC skyline including the WTC twin towers. That movie was recently
shown on FX after they resumed their regular programming this past week. I
assume at least that movie will remain as is.
T.S.
> That's ridiculous... The show is the way it is.... Do they go back and cut
> out all fictional references to the Soviet Union from all the old James Bond
> movies because the Soviet Union fell? No, of course not... The episode will
> now have the added interest of being from a time when the towers still
> stood...
>
> It may not air for a while... on that I agree... but it's downright silly
> and if not somewhat dangerous to even plan on going back and editing all
> cultural references to the towers...
Very good point, but they will probably edit the "When Buildings
Collapse" moment in the episode where Lisa finds out about the Simpson
gene.
How many radio stations still play Blind Melon's bee girl song, despite the
singer's drug death? All of them that play alternative, at least.
--David Johnson
>
> During the opening credits of the 1986 movie "The Money Pit", there was a
> shot
> of the NYC skyline including the WTC twin towers. That movie was
> recently
> shown on FX after they resumed their regular programming this past week.
> I
> assume at least that movie will remain as is.
Then again, maybe "The Money Pit" should be edited so the only scene
left is the opening with WTC in the skyline. That would make it a better
movie.
--
3finger
Chicago Cubs: World Series Champions 1907, 1908