Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

James Gandolfini dies of heart attack at 51

15 views
Skip to first unread message

David

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 7:39:56 PM6/19/13
to
http://www.deadline.com/2013/06/r-i-p-james-gandolfini/

R.I.P. James Gandolfini
By NELLIE ANDREEVA

I�ve learned that actor James Gandolfini died suddenly in Italy after
a suspected heart attack. He was 51. Gandolfini will be forever known
for his portrayal of mob boss Tony Soprano on the seminal HBO series
The Sopranos, which won him three Emmy Awards. He remained in business
with the pay cable network and was in pre-production on a new limited
series, Criminal Justice, one of several projects he had in the works.

Michael Black

unread,
Jun 19, 2013, 10:41:18 PM6/19/13
to
On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, David wrote:

> http://www.deadline.com/2013/06/r-i-p-james-gandolfini/
>
> R.I.P. James Gandolfini
> By NELLIE ANDREEVA
>
> I?ve learned that actor James Gandolfini died suddenly in Italy after
> a suspected heart attack. He was 51. Gandolfini will be forever known
> for his portrayal of mob boss Tony Soprano on the seminal HBO series
> The Sopranos, which won him three Emmy Awards. He remained in business
> with the pay cable network and was in pre-production on a new limited
> series, Criminal Justice, one of several projects he had in the works.
>
He was only 51? Younger than me by 2 years. I always thought of him as
older, I guess playing a mob boss on tv does that.

But I suppose that will be happening more and more, being older than
"older" characters on tv.

Michael

chicagofan

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 8:26:12 PM6/26/13
to
LOL... I'm not going to touch that... no sirreeee! ;) I'm always
going to be "29".
bj

suzeeq

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 8:43:27 PM6/26/13
to
Jack Benny had it right - 39 is the perfect age.

chicagofan

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 9:23:22 PM6/26/13
to
I agree... 39 is actually better than 29! :)
bj

Professor Bubba

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 10:14:51 PM6/26/13
to
In article <kqg1ha$4do$1...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
wrote:
I still remember Walter Cronkite reading the report of Benny's death,
ending it along the lines of: "Jack Benny, born in Chicago in 1894,
dead today at the age of ... 39."

suzeeq

unread,
Jun 26, 2013, 10:31:59 PM6/26/13
to
LOL! Nice tribute.

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 9:34:28 AM6/27/13
to
Professor Bubba wrote:
>suzeeq <su...@imbris.com> wrote:

>>Jack Benny had it right - 39 is the perfect age.

>I still remember Walter Cronkite reading the report of Benny's death,
>ending it along the lines of: "Jack Benny, born in Chicago in 1894,
>dead today at the age of ... 39."

Waukegan!

1972, as I recall. I'd been listening to his radio programs for several years.
He died wrong, though, pancreatic cancer, which has got to be the single,
nastiest way to go.

Professor Bubba

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 2:15:10 PM6/27/13
to
In article <kqhf13$gos$1...@news.albasani.net>, Adam H. Kerman
<a...@chinet.com> wrote:

> Professor Bubba wrote:
> >suzeeq <su...@imbris.com> wrote:
>
> >>Jack Benny had it right - 39 is the perfect age.
>
> >I still remember Walter Cronkite reading the report of Benny's death,
> >ending it along the lines of: "Jack Benny, born in Chicago in 1894,
> >dead today at the age of ... 39."
>
> Waukegan!

Jack was born in Mercy Hospital in Chicago. His parents were from
Waukegan (about 40 mi away) and Jack grew up there, which is why he
claimed Waukegan as his hometown.

> 1972, as I recall. I'd been listening to his radio programs for several years.
> He died wrong, though, pancreatic cancer, which has got to be the single,
> nastiest way to go.

He died the day after Christmas in 1974, only two or three weeks after
his diagnosis. He'd begun exhibiting symptoms in October, though.

BTW, as I was looking all this up, I found a reference to Jack Benny
Middle School in Waukegan. It's known as the "Home of the 39ers."

<http://schools.wps60.org/benny/>

I've also found that the other famous person from Waukegan was Ray
Bradbury.

Jim G.

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 2:26:55 PM6/27/13
to
suzeeq sent the following on 6/26/2013 7:43 PM:
I'd go with 33 or 36. They appeal more to the numbers fan in me.

--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"I was wondering if you could give me some advice on how to handle
stress." -- Norma Bates, BATES MOTEL

Adam H. Kerman

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 2:48:02 PM6/27/13
to
Professor Bubba wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote:
>>Professor Bubba wrote:
>>>suzeeq <su...@imbris.com> wrote:

>>>>Jack Benny had it right - 39 is the perfect age.

>>>I still remember Walter Cronkite reading the report of Benny's death,
>>>ending it along the lines of: "Jack Benny, born in Chicago in 1894,
>>>dead today at the age of ... 39."

>>Waukegan!

>Jack was born in Mercy Hospital in Chicago.

I never read that, but I'll take your word for it.

>>1972, as I recall. I'd been listening to his radio programs for several
>>years. He died wrong, though, pancreatic cancer, which has got to be
>>the single, nastiest way to go.

>He died the day after Christmas in 1974, only two or three weeks after
>his diagnosis. He'd begun exhibiting symptoms in October, though.

Yeah. I read it in the Hilliard Marks biography (the brother-in-law).

>BTW, as I was looking all this up, I found a reference to Jack Benny
>Middle School in Waukegan. It's known as the "Home of the 39ers."

Hehe

>I've also found that the other famous person from Waukegan was Ray
>Bradbury.

I've heard Waukegan claim him, too.

Professor Bubba

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 3:41:08 PM6/27/13
to
In article <kqi08u$q7h$1...@dont-email.me>, Jim G.
<jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:

> suzeeq sent the following on 6/26/2013 7:43 PM:
> > chicagofan wrote:
> >> Michael Black wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, David wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> http://www.deadline.com/2013/06/r-i-p-james-gandolfini/
> >>>>
> >>>> R.I.P. James Gandolfini
> >>>> By NELLIE ANDREEVA
> >>>>
> >>>> I?ve learned that actor James Gandolfini died suddenly in Italy after
> >>>> a suspected heart attack. He was 51. Gandolfini will be forever known
> >>>> for his portrayal of mob boss Tony Soprano on the seminal HBO series
> >>>> The Sopranos, which won him three Emmy Awards. He remained in business
> >>>> with the pay cable network and was in pre-production on a new limited
> >>>> series, Criminal Justice, one of several projects he had in the works.
> >>>>
> >>> He was only 51? Younger than me by 2 years. I always thought of him
> >>> as older, I guess playing a mob boss on tv does that.
> >>>
> >>> But I suppose that will be happening more and more, being older than
> >>> "older" characters on tv.
> >>>
> >>> Michael
> >>
> >> LOL... I'm not going to touch that... no sirreeee! ;) I'm always
> >> going to be "29".
> >> bj
> >
> > Jack Benny had it right - 39 is the perfect age.
>
> I'd go with 33 or 36. They appeal more to the numbers fan in me.


I ran across a bit about that while I was looking up the other stuff.
Jack had celebrated earlier birthdays on his show, and they'd done 36
and 37 and so on. When they got to 40, though, they realized that 40
wasn't a funny number. They came up with some business about a dispute
concerning Jack's actual age, and that he might have been born a year
earlier than he thought, so Jack calls Rochester at home to look for
his birth certificate. Rochester says he found it, but he can't read
the date of birth. Jack says why not? Because it's been erased so
often there's a hole in it, says Rochester.

And, after that, they left Jack's age at 39.

suzeeq

unread,
Jun 27, 2013, 7:59:22 PM6/27/13
to
Jim G. wrote:
> suzeeq sent the following on 6/26/2013 7:43 PM:
>> chicagofan wrote:
>>> Michael Black wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, David wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.deadline.com/2013/06/r-i-p-james-gandolfini/
>>>>>
>>>>> R.I.P. James Gandolfini
>>>>> By NELLIE ANDREEVA
>>>>>
>>>>> I?ve learned that actor James Gandolfini died suddenly in Italy after
>>>>> a suspected heart attack. He was 51. Gandolfini will be forever known
>>>>> for his portrayal of mob boss Tony Soprano on the seminal HBO series
>>>>> The Sopranos, which won him three Emmy Awards. He remained in business
>>>>> with the pay cable network and was in pre-production on a new limited
>>>>> series, Criminal Justice, one of several projects he had in the works.
>>>>>
>>>> He was only 51? Younger than me by 2 years. I always thought of him
>>>> as older, I guess playing a mob boss on tv does that.
>>>>
>>>> But I suppose that will be happening more and more, being older than
>>>> "older" characters on tv.
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>> LOL... I'm not going to touch that... no sirreeee! ;) I'm always
>>> going to be "29".
>>> bj
>> Jack Benny had it right - 39 is the perfect age.
>
> I'd go with 33 or 36. They appeal more to the numbers fan in me.

39 is divisible by 3 too!

Besides 39 says you've got some maturity, being in your late 30s, but
not getting into middle age into your 40s.

Jim G.

unread,
Jun 28, 2013, 4:57:31 PM6/28/13
to
Adam H. Kerman sent the following on 6/27/2013 1:48 PM:
And he, in turn, claimed Waukegan, apparently. I just read this a few
days ago:

http://www.sj-r.com/breaking/x871007375/Waukegan-library-to-get-Bradburys-book-collection#axzz2WjffV3Cf
or http://preview.tinyurl.com/npvwv2w

Jim G.

unread,
Jun 28, 2013, 5:00:02 PM6/28/13
to
suzeeq sent the following on 6/27/2013 6:59 PM:
That's not how I'm looking at it, though. 33 is a power double, and 36
is a square.

> Besides 39 says you've got some maturity, being in your late 30s, but
> not getting into middle age into your 40s.

36 only looks immature to us auld pharts.

But back to the subject of numbers, the numbers geek in me just *has* to
point out that today is the only perfect day of the year. Because June
28 contains the only two numbers (6 and 28) that are both perfect *and*
capable of landing on a Gregorian calendar. So enjoy the perfection! :)

chicagofan

unread,
Jun 28, 2013, 6:02:17 PM6/28/13
to
Thanks Professor! I loved all these anecdotes/messages about Benny...
especially this one about the "Home of the 39ers"! LOL....
bj

Mason Barge

unread,
Jun 29, 2013, 1:22:59 PM6/29/13
to
I only hope you live until 2203 so you can have a "perfect day". :)

Jim G.

unread,
Jun 30, 2013, 5:13:01 PM6/30/13
to
Mason Barge sent the following on 6/29/2013 12:22 PM:
Dagnabit. Now I've been WHOOSH!ed twice on the same weekend. :(

Mason Barge

unread,
Jul 1, 2013, 12:16:10 PM7/1/13
to
On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 16:13:01 -0500, "Jim G."
<jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:

>Mason Barge sent the following on 6/29/2013 12:22 PM:
>> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:00:02 -0500, "Jim G."
>> <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> suzeeq sent the following on 6/27/2013 6:59 PM:
>>>> Jim G. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd go with 33 or 36. They appeal more to the numbers fan in me.
>>>>
>>>> 39 is divisible by 3 too!
>>>
>>> That's not how I'm looking at it, though. 33 is a power double, and 36
>>> is a square.
>>>
>>>> Besides 39 says you've got some maturity, being in your late 30s, but
>>>> not getting into middle age into your 40s.
>>>
>>> 36 only looks immature to us auld pharts.
>>>
>>> But back to the subject of numbers, the numbers geek in me just *has* to
>>> point out that today is the only perfect day of the year. Because June
>>> 28 contains the only two numbers (6 and 28) that are both perfect *and*
>>> capable of landing on a Gregorian calendar. So enjoy the perfection! :)
>>
>> I only hope you live until 2203 so you can have a "perfect day". :)
>
>Dagnabit. Now I've been WHOOSH!ed twice on the same weekend. :(

I think that 2203 is the next perfect-number year.

suzeeq

unread,
Jul 1, 2013, 1:49:57 PM7/1/13
to
I saw this too late to enjoy that. But... why are they perfect numbers?

thinbluemime

unread,
Jul 1, 2013, 10:02:56 AM7/1/13
to

Jim G.

unread,
Jul 1, 2013, 7:37:03 PM7/1/13
to
Mason Barge sent the following on 7/1/2013 11:16 AM:
The next perfect number will only work in the year slot, but that still
won't be until the year 8128. But we can have June and the 28th every
single year. :)

Jim G.

unread,
Jul 1, 2013, 7:37:56 PM7/1/13
to
suzeeq sent the following on 7/1/2013 12:49 PM:
Because they are the sum of their divisors, excluding themselves.

Look at the number six. 6=6*1 and 6=3*2. So you've got 1,2,3 and 6
there. Toss out the 6 (the number itself), and you're left with 1,2,and
3. And 1+2+3=6. A perfect number.

Similarly, 28=1*28 and 2*14 and 4*7, giving us 1,2,4,7,14 and 28. Remove
the 28 and you make your way to 1+2+4+7+14, which equals 28. A perfect
number.

There aren't many of them. The next two are 496 and 8128, and I had to
cheat to "remember" them. And no, I won't show you my math. :)

suzeeq

unread,
Jul 1, 2013, 9:32:34 PM7/1/13
to
Thanks. This is one of those number puzzler things isn't it...? :>

> There aren't many of them. The next two are 496 and 8128, and I had to
> cheat to "remember" them. And no, I won't show you my math. :)

Wouldn't dream of asking you to.

Jim G.

unread,
Jul 2, 2013, 1:08:28 PM7/2/13
to
suzeeq sent the following on 7/1/2013 8:32 PM:
You say that like it's a bad thing. :)

>> There aren't many of them. The next two are 496 and 8128, and I had to
>> cheat to "remember" them. And no, I won't show you my math. :)
>
> Wouldn't dream of asking you to.

Good. Because then I'd have to cheat a second time.

suzeeq

unread,
Jul 2, 2013, 1:48:16 PM7/2/13
to
Yesterday I was too tired to make sense of it...
0 new messages