Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

5th Season Supernatural - Changing Channels - 5 star poll - SPOILERS AHOY !

0 views
Skip to first unread message

George Avalos

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 1:05:07 PM11/7/09
to
"Changing Channels"
11-5-09 Supernatural

5 stars (televisions)

0-1 stars (telescreens)

-George


Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Mac Breck

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 8:11:08 PM11/12/09
to
Wickeddoll wrote:
> DJensen wrote:
>> Wickeddoll wrote:
>>>>> The parodies were funny and all, but I've had more than enough of
>>>>> this meta humour on Supernatural. How about some mid-season
>>>>> episodes where the plot actually advances, instead of this
>>>>> holding pattern nonsense?
>>>>
>>>> I just saw the preview for next week.
>>>>
>>>> More meta. A Supernatural (the book series!) fan convention, with
>>>> the return of "Becky" (who is completely unrecognizable from her
>>>> Ginger Snaps days, holy rhinoplasty) the superfan, jokes about
>>>> homoeroticism, and awkward confrontations with fans dressed like
>>>> Sam and Dean.
>>>>
>>>> Ugh.
>>>
>>> As someone who has gone to a SN convention, I'd love to see that -
>>> bet they skewer the psychos well. Might even take a dig at
>>> smartasses, like me.
>>
>> So you're the one all this series-derailing fan service is for.
>>
>>
>
> I don't remember anyone asking for this turn they're taking. I'm just
> saying I enjoy (some) of these off-kilter eps.
>
> Having said that, though, I think *each* ep should forward the
> season's arc, as last week's did.
>
> I mean, at least half the reason most of us love Buffy was the humor
> blended with the darker themes. I see SN as doing that, but much more
> broadly.
>
> Kripke strikes me as a guy who does what *he* wants, and doesn't
> pander to the fandom. That would be a huge mistake, because oy, some
> of the stuff the freaks want for this show...
>
> Natalie

The question is whether or not Kripke knows where he's going with the
show or if he's gone the way of Chris Carter/X-Files and is just
meandering aimlessly around.

--
Mac Breck (KoshN)
-------------------------------
"Babylon 5: Crusade" (1999) - "War Zone"
Galen (to Gideon): "I've been penalized before for helping other
people. I've been trying to decide whether or not I should risk it
again."


Message has been deleted

Wickeddoll

unread,
Nov 12, 2009, 8:56:24 PM11/12/09
to
DJensen wrote:
> Mac Breck wrote:

>
>>>> Wickeddoll wrote:
>>>>> As someone who has gone to a SN convention, I'd love to see that -
>>>>> bet they skewer the psychos well. Might even take a dig at
>>>>> smartasses, like me.
>>>> So you're the one all this series-derailing fan service is for.
>>>>
>>> I don't remember anyone asking for this turn they're taking. I'm just
>>> saying I enjoy (some) of these off-kilter eps.
>>>
>>> Having said that, though, I think *each* ep should forward the
>>> season's arc, as last week's did.
>>>
>>> I mean, at least half the reason most of us love Buffy was the humor
>>> blended with the darker themes. I see SN as doing that, but much more
>>> broadly.
>>>
>>> Kripke strikes me as a guy who does what *he* wants, and doesn't
>>> pander to the fandom. That would be a huge mistake, because oy, some
>>> of the stuff the freaks want for this show...
>>>
>>> Natalie
>>
>> The question is whether or not Kripke knows where he's going with the
>> show or if he's gone the way of Chris Carter/X-Files and is just
>> meandering aimlessly around.
>
> He knows where he's going, but that only explains the first and last two
> or three episodes a season. The stuff in the middle tends to be filler
> that doesn't move the plot, just keeps rephrasing it.
>

I have to agree with ya there; we're treading water on the arc.

Natalie
--
"Wicked little doll, you have no soul"
(David Byrne, 1997)
http://www.supernaturalusa.net

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
0 new messages