Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Smallville Movie - Who Should Star in it?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

IAPW

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 1:06:26 AM6/21/04
to
Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
movie.

Clark Kent - Tom Welling. Tom Welling has shown extreme maturity as the
young lad from Kryptonite. Welling is able to express both sides of Clark
Kent - his earnest desire to help others in need, and his desire to live a
normal life bereft of his extraordinary abilities. The constant struggle
between his two desires is what captures the viewers' attention, and it
this constant struggle which Tom Welling is able to express superbly
without peer. Bravo Tom!

Lois Lane - Lindsay Lohan. This Mean Girl has all of the prerequisites to
be the Lois Lane ever - including the double L's which make up the
initials of her name. As the current Queen of the Teen Queens, she has
shown the unique ability to connect to her audience, both male and female,
the traumas of adolescent youth. Girls are able to see her as an ordinary
yet smart and clever girl who one want to a best friend, and boys are able
to see her as a sexy red hair starlet who one would want to date not only
for her looks but for her mind. She is both beautiful and yet exudes
strength of will - both qualities which a modern day Lois Lane must have.
Lindsay, you go girl!

Pete Ross - Chad Micheal Murray. Chad Micheal Murray is the current king
of male teen flick heartthrobs. Having wooed and wowed Alexis Bledel,
Lindsay Lohan, and Hilary Duff, Chad Micheal Murray would stop the hearts
of all teen girls and tween girls who watch Smallville. Yet, as he has
show in One Tree Hill, he is also able to portray a devoted best friend.
If anyone deserves to have 3 first names Chad Micheal Murray does. Yea
Chad Micheal Murray!

Lana Lang - Amanda Bynes. Sexy, Funny - when those 2 words are spoken, the
immediate thought is of the young lady who personifies those words -
Amanda Bynes. With her acerbic wit and flawlessly executed pratfalls,
Amanda would make people of all ages laugh with her. Never at a loss for
words and endlessly funny yet also charming and beautiful, young viewers
would understand why Clark could not take her eyes off Amanda Byne's Lana
Lang. We luv ya Amanda!

Jimmy Olsen - Adam Brody. As Seth in The O.C., he has ably portrayed a
lanky socially awkward youth who's ultimate pursuit is Summer. As Jimmy
Olsen, he has the chance to play another socially awkward youth who's
maturing in to adulthood. Adam Brody is the every man of the current
youth generation and what is Jimmy Olsen but the every man of youths? Go
get 'em Adam!

Chloe Sullivan - Mischa Barton. Whether she be Jessie's lesbian
girlfriend in Once and Again or the object of obsession in the OC, Mischa
Barton has never been anything but lovely. Strong-headed yet loyal, this
cousin of Lois Lane will be Clark's constant thorn who is constantly
trying to discover his secrets. Love and kisses, Mischa!

Lex Luthor - Ashton Kutcher. Yes, Lex Luthor is evil. And what could be
more evil than to be punk'd? This lovable bad boy would be perfect as the
teenage Lex Luthor. Lex Luthor would try to punk unsuspecting passerbys
and Clark Kent would save the innocent victims from Lex's despicable
pranks. We hate ya and luv ya Ashton!

Supergirl (Kara) - Hilary Duff. Already a mega star around the world with
countless legions following her every move, Hilary Duff would cap off her
career as the young girl from Krypton Kara. Contrasted with the dark and
moody Clark Kent, Kara is bubbly and enthusiastic. And who could be more
bubbly and enthusiastic than Hilary Duff? Best wishes, Hilary!

Super Ice Me

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 6:57:28 AM6/21/04
to

"IAPW" <lk...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:34054600.0406...@posting.google.com...


> Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
> only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
> other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
> movie.

<SNIP>

I guess my first thought is to ask why any of the cast of Smallville would
need to be replaced in a feature film? I mean, is Kristen Kreuk, at 20 years
of age, too old to play Lana Lang anymore? Are the late teen/early
twenty-something cast members over the hill already? Your cast list read
like a whose who of Tiger Beat magazine. Ashton Kutcher as Lex Luthor? Why
not just stick Harvey Feirstein in the role and kill off the series for
good?

-----------------------------------------------------------------
ICEBREAKER
"Well, was she ill?"
"Yeah, but nothing serious. Well, serious in one way obviously."
"Well how can you say it wasn't serious if she died from it?"
"She made an unsuccessful recovery."


Farrell22

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 8:19:48 AM6/21/04
to
>From: lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW)

>Chad Micheal Murray.

>Chad Micheal Murray

>Chad Micheal Murray

>Chad Micheal Murray

>Chad Micheal Murray!

That's Michael, you dimwit.

Avatar

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 9:13:34 AM6/21/04
to
On 20 Jun 2004 22:06:26 -0700, lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW) wrote:

>Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
>only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
>other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
>movie.
>
>Clark Kent - Tom Welling. Tom Welling has shown extreme maturity as the
>young lad from Kryptonite. Welling is able to express both sides of Clark
>Kent - his earnest desire to help others in need, and his desire to live a
>normal life bereft of his extraordinary abilities. The constant struggle
>between his two desires is what captures the viewers' attention, and it
>this constant struggle which Tom Welling is able to express superbly
>without peer. Bravo Tom!
>
>Lois Lane - Lindsay Lohan. This Mean Girl has all of the prerequisites to
>be the Lois Lane ever - including the double L's which make up the
>initials of her name. As the current Queen of the Teen Queens, she has
>shown the unique ability to connect to her audience, both male and female,
>the traumas of adolescent youth. Girls are able to see her as an ordinary
>yet smart and clever girl who one want to a best friend, and boys are able
>to see her as a sexy red hair starlet who one would want to date not only
>for her looks but for her mind. She is both beautiful and yet exudes
>strength of will - both qualities which a modern day Lois Lane must have.
>Lindsay, you go girl!

Plus she has some killer boobs.

Sorry, the ability to act is a prerequisite.

>
>Supergirl (Kara) - Hilary Duff. Already a mega star around the world with
>countless legions following her every move, Hilary Duff would cap off her
>career as the young girl from Krypton Kara. Contrasted with the dark and
>moody Clark Kent, Kara is bubbly and enthusiastic. And who could be more
>bubbly and enthusiastic than Hilary Duff? Best wishes, Hilary!

Again with the rackage.
---

Remove whiz to email

----

arnold kim

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 10:25:05 AM6/21/04
to

"IAPW" <lk...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:34054600.0406...@posting.google.com...

> Pete Ross - Chad Micheal Murray. Chad Micheal Murray is the current king


> of male teen flick heartthrobs. Having wooed and wowed Alexis Bledel,
> Lindsay Lohan, and Hilary Duff, Chad Micheal Murray would stop the hearts
> of all teen girls and tween girls who watch Smallville. Yet, as he has
> show in One Tree Hill, he is also able to portray a devoted best friend.
> If anyone deserves to have 3 first names Chad Micheal Murray does. Yea
> Chad Micheal Murray!

You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes skin color.

> Chloe Sullivan - Mischa Barton. Whether she be Jessie's lesbian
> girlfriend in Once and Again or the object of obsession in the OC, Mischa
> Barton has never been anything but lovely. Strong-headed yet loyal, this
> cousin of Lois Lane will be Clark's constant thorn who is constantly
> trying to discover his secrets. Love and kisses, Mischa!

No. Lois Lane? Yes. Chloe? No.

> Lex Luthor - Ashton Kutcher. Yes, Lex Luthor is evil. And what could be
> more evil than to be punk'd? This lovable bad boy would be perfect as the
> teenage Lex Luthor. Lex Luthor would try to punk unsuspecting passerbys
> and Clark Kent would save the innocent victims from Lex's despicable
> pranks. We hate ya and luv ya Ashton!

You have _got_ to be joking. First of all, the guy from "Dude, Where's My
Car?" as misunderstood rich kid with the potential for evil? Secondly, you
don't replace the best actor in the series with someone with about .01% of
the talent.

> Supergirl (Kara) - Hilary Duff. Already a mega star around the world with
> countless legions following her every move, Hilary Duff would cap off her
> career as the young girl from Krypton Kara. Contrasted with the dark and
> moody Clark Kent, Kara is bubbly and enthusiastic. And who could be more
> bubbly and enthusiastic than Hilary Duff? Best wishes, Hilary!

This is actually doable. However, I think Kara is best left to her own
movie and out of Smallville continuity, at least for now.

Arnold Kim


Solarbeat

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 11:02:28 AM6/21/04
to
On 20 Jun 2004 22:06:26 -0700, lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW) wrote:

>Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
>only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
>other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
>movie.
>
>Clark Kent - Tom Welling. Tom Welling has shown extreme maturity as the
>young lad from Kryptonite. Welling is able to express both sides of Clark
>Kent - his earnest desire to help others in need, and his desire to live a
>normal life bereft of his extraordinary abilities. The constant struggle
>between his two desires is what captures the viewers' attention, and it
>this constant struggle which Tom Welling is able to express superbly
>without peer. Bravo Tom!
>
>Lois Lane - Lindsay Lohan. This Mean Girl has all of the prerequisites to
>be the Lois Lane ever - including the double L's which make up the
>initials of her name. As the current Queen of the Teen Queens, she has
>shown the unique ability to connect to her audience, both male and female,
>the traumas of adolescent youth. Girls are able to see her as an ordinary
>yet smart and clever girl who one want to a best friend, and boys are able
>to see her as a sexy red hair starlet who one would want to date not only
>for her looks but for her mind. She is both beautiful and yet exudes
>strength of will - both qualities which a modern day Lois Lane must have.
>Lindsay, you go girl!
>

Yeesh, what a long winded way to say 'great rack'

IO

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 12:28:02 PM6/21/04
to
With the exception of Ashton Kutcher, I don't know a single name in
your list of actors, but no doubt that reflects my age.

However, as far as replacing any of the existing cast, Kristin Kruek
is doing a great job as Lana, but even more so, Michael Rosenbaum as
Lex is probably the single strongest actor of a generally excellent
cast. Can't imagine any reason to replace these people.

By the way, wouldn't Superman make occasional visits back to the farm?
Annette O'Toole and John Schneider should be in any movie as well.

SO (using e-mail from a family member)


On 20 Jun 2004 22:06:26 -0700, lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW) wrote:

Clell Harmon

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 12:34:10 PM6/21/04
to

IAPW wrote:

> Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
> only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
> other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
> movie.
>
> Clark Kent - Tom Welling. Tom Welling has shown extreme maturity as the
> young lad from Kryptonite. Welling is able to express both sides of Clark

Lad from Kryptonite?

Farrell22

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 12:56:12 PM6/21/04
to
>From: "arnold kim" arno...@optonline.net

>> Chad Micheal Murray!
>
>You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes skin color.

He's supposed to be white.

Robert Goodman

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 1:47:04 PM6/21/04
to
lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW) wrote in message news:<34054600.0406...@posting.google.com>...

> Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
> only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
> other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
> movie.

> Clark Kent - Tom Welling.

Aw, c'm'on, that's the best you could do? He's grown into the role on
TV, yes, but we could do better. I'll take John Chodes, although I
don't know if he's acting these days. Come to think of it, I don't
think I've ever known him to do anything besides write, direct, and
produce, but I THINK he'd be good at acting.

> Lois Lane

You sure there'd be such a part? Well then, Annie Potts.

> Pete Ross

Jerry O'Connell.

> Lana Lang

Christina Applegate.

> Jimmy Olsen

Allen J. Rickman.

> Chloe Sullivan

If you're allowed to take Mr. Welling, then I'm allowed Ms. Mack.

> Lex Luthor

Paul Gross. This Luthor's going to sing.

> Supergirl (Kara)

The kid in "Poison Pill", who must be grown up by now.

Shucks, I didn't give a part to Alan Arkin.

Robert

Robert Goodman

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 1:53:42 PM6/21/04
to
"arnold kim" <arno...@optonline.net> wrote in message news:<5dCBc.87576$V57.12...@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...

> > Pete Ross - Chad Micheal Murray. Chad Micheal Murray is the current king
> > of male teen flick heartthrobs.

> You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes skin color.

What, like they're going to splice in footage from the TV show? Why
would anyone perceive a sudden change otherwise?

Andrew Ryan Chang

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 5:10:03 PM6/21/04
to
Robert Goodman <robg...@bestweb.net> wrote:
>"arnold kim" <arno...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> > Pete Ross - Chad Micheal Murray. Chad Micheal Murray is the current king
>> > of male teen flick heartthrobs.
>
>> You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes skin color.
>
>What, like they're going to splice in footage from the TV show? Why
>would anyone perceive a sudden change otherwise?

Cause this hypothetical movie is billed "Smallville" and viewers
might remember Clark's former best friend who moved away. Even if he did
get only three lines per episode.

--
Wow, a baseball made out of Secretariat!
-- Bart gazes upon the Spend Zone, "You Only Move Twice"

Lynley James

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 5:59:44 PM6/21/04
to
On 21 Jun 2004 10:47:04 -0700, robg...@bestweb.net (Robert Goodman)
wrote:


>> Lex Luthor
>
>Paul Gross. This Luthor's going to sing.

Always believed he wold make an excellent Superman. His MOuntie
character from Due South was basically Superman without powers.

Lynley

sh...@disney.mouse

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 7:22:43 PM6/21/04
to
> From: lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW)

>Supergirl (Kara) - Hilary Duff.

duff's too fat. it's supposed to be supergirl not supersized girl.

Ian J. Ball

unread,
Jun 21, 2004, 9:35:54 PM6/21/04
to
In article <cb7qk3$7vu$2...@News.Dal.Ca>, sh...@disney.mouse wrote:

> > From: lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW)
>
> >Supergirl (Kara) - Hilary Duff.
>
> duff's too fat.

More to the point, she's too short.

Oh, and her likeability ratings are plunging as we speak.

--
Ian J. Ball | "I think things are even worse now after
TV lover, and | the awful... fish sex."
Usenet slacker | - Seth Cohen, "The O.C."
ijball@macDOTcom | http://homepage.mac.com/ijball/TV.html

arnold kim

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 12:08:40 AM6/22/04
to

"Robert Goodman" <robg...@bestweb.net> wrote in message
news:efcc2f4e.04062...@posting.google.com...

Because this is apparently a movie based on Smallville the TV show. (If
not, why mention Chloe at all?)

Arnold Kim


arnold kim

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 12:08:41 AM6/22/04
to

<sh...@disney.mouse> wrote in message news:cb7qk3$7vu$2...@News.Dal.Ca...

> > From: lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW)
>
> >Supergirl (Kara) - Hilary Duff.
>
> duff's too fat. it's supposed to be supergirl not supersized girl.

It seems we have different standards for "fat" when it comes to regular
people vs. people in Hollywood.

Arnold Kim


arnold kim

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 12:09:33 AM6/22/04
to

"Ian J. Ball" <ijball***SPAM-No***@mac.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:ijball***SPAM-No***-ADECF3.183...@orngca-news04.socal.rr.com...

> In article <cb7qk3$7vu$2...@News.Dal.Ca>, sh...@disney.mouse wrote:
>
> > > From: lk...@my-deja.com (IAPW)
> >
> > >Supergirl (Kara) - Hilary Duff.
> >
> > duff's too fat.
>
> More to the point, she's too short.

Ever read the silver age comics? Kara Zor-El was not exactly towering over
anyone.

Arnold Kim


Robert Goodman

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 1:25:40 PM6/22/04
to
"arnold kim" <arno...@optonline.net> wrote in message news:<chOBc.96776$V57.15...@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...

> > > > Pete Ross - Chad Micheal Murray. Chad Micheal Murray is the current
> king
> > > > of male teen flick heartthrobs.

> > > You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes skin
> color.

> > What, like they're going to splice in footage from the TV show? Why
> > would anyone perceive a sudden change otherwise?

> Because this is apparently a movie based on Smallville the TV show.

So? Are they going to have a hell of a time explaining why there are
no commercials too? Or why there's a projector running?

Why should Pete's "change" in skin color need any more explaining than
the "changes" in appearance of the other characters who were re-cast?

If two people tell the same story, is it a problem that they don't
have the same voice?

> (If not, why mention Chloe at all?)

There's a difference between roles and actors. The actors are only
playing the roles; that's all they're there for. Changing the actor
doesn't change the role any more than changing the newscaster changes
the news. You get a different delivery, that's all.

Robert

Robert Goodman

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 1:31:47 PM6/22/04
to
Lynley James <mag...@netactive.co.za> wrote in message news:<v1ced09c9mo3j7ki1...@4ax.com>...

> >Paul Gross. This Luthor's going to sing.

> Always believed he wold make an excellent Superman. His MOuntie
> character from Due South was basically Superman without powers.

What do you mean, "without powers"? How about total B.S.
marksmanship, the ability to tie a rope in an eyeblink, practically
psychic knowledge...and in the finale, the trick with the wire in the
ear? Just as with Superman, they kept ramping up his powers along
with the humor as the series progressed.

Robert

Bill Bickel

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 3:36:54 PM6/22/04
to

>
> > > > You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes
skin
> > color.

They never explained Harvey Dent's change in skin color from teh first
Batman movie to the second (or was it the third?).

Bill Bickel


arnold kim

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 8:22:05 PM6/22/04
to

"Bill Bickel" <bill...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:qT%Bc.104863$V57.18...@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...

And you're right; every comic book movie should aspire to be like Batman
Forever.

Arnold Kim


arnold kim

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 8:32:24 PM6/22/04
to

"Robert Goodman" <robg...@bestweb.net> wrote in message
news:efcc2f4e.04062...@posting.google.com...
> "arnold kim" <arno...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:<chOBc.96776$V57.15...@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...
>
> > > > > Pete Ross - Chad Micheal Murray. Chad Micheal Murray is the
current
> > king
> > > > > of male teen flick heartthrobs.
>
> > > > You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes
skin
> > color.
>
> > > What, like they're going to splice in footage from the TV show? Why
> > > would anyone perceive a sudden change otherwise?
>
> > Because this is apparently a movie based on Smallville the TV show.
>
> So? Are they going to have a hell of a time explaining why there are
> no commercials too? Or why there's a projector running?

I have no idea what either of those have to do with anything.

> Why should Pete's "change" in skin color need any more explaining than
> the "changes" in appearance of the other characters who were re-cast?

Because you expect a certain level of consistency when trying to tell a
continuous story. There's a reason why white roles are rarely recast black,
and vice versa. The difference in appearance is _too_ abrupt.

> If two people tell the same story, is it a problem that they don't
> have the same voice?
>
> > (If not, why mention Chloe at all?)
>
> There's a difference between roles and actors. The actors are only
> playing the roles; that's all they're there for. Changing the actor
> doesn't change the role any more than changing the newscaster changes
> the news. You get a different delivery, that's all.

Then I guess you wouldn't have a problem if a 68 year old Asian woman played
Clark Kent, would you?

Arnold Kim


Bill Bickel

unread,
Jun 22, 2004, 11:25:15 PM6/22/04
to

"arnold kim" <arno...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:sc4Cc.107027$V57.19...@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net...

What a secret identity THAT would be though, huh?

Bill Bickel


Message has been deleted

Robert Goodman

unread,
Jun 23, 2004, 1:32:40 PM6/23/04
to
"arnold kim" <arno...@optonline.net> wrote in message news:<sc4Cc.107027$V57.19...@news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>...

> > > > > > Pete Ross - Chad Micheal Murray. Chad Micheal Murray is the
> current
> king
> > > > > > of male teen flick heartthrobs.

> > > > > You'd have a hell of a time explaining how Pete suddenly changes
> skin
> > > color.

> > > > What, like they're going to splice in footage from the TV show? Why
> > > > would anyone perceive a sudden change otherwise?

> > > Because this is apparently a movie based on Smallville the TV show.

> > So? Are they going to have a hell of a time explaining why there are
> > no commercials too? Or why there's a projector running?

> I have no idea what either of those have to do with anything.

You seem to think differences between the TV show and a movie would
need to be explained.



> > Why should Pete's "change" in skin color need any more explaining than
> > the "changes" in appearance of the other characters who were re-cast?

> Because you expect a certain level of consistency when trying to tell a
> continuous story. There's a reason why white roles are rarely recast black,
> and vice versa. The difference in appearance is _too_ abrupt.

So the first time he's shown on screen, hang a little title on him
saying "Pete Ross", and a picture of Sam Jones in parentheses. Or
just colorize him dark, and slowly lighten him as the scene goes on.



> > There's a difference between roles and actors. The actors are only
> > playing the roles; that's all they're there for. Changing the actor
> > doesn't change the role any more than changing the newscaster changes
> > the news. You get a different delivery, that's all.

> Then I guess you wouldn't have a problem if a 68 year old Asian woman played
> Clark Kent, would you?

Not if she played him well. Got someone in mind?

Robert

Lynley James

unread,
Jun 23, 2004, 2:45:22 PM6/23/04
to
On 22 Jun 2004 10:31:47 -0700, robg...@bestweb.net (Robert Goodman)
wrote:

>Lynley James <mag...@netactive.co.za> wrote in message news:<v1ced09c9mo3j7ki1...@4ax.com>...

Well he couldn't fly could he, nor shoot heat beams out of his eyes?
;OP

What wire trick by the way?

Lynley

CM

unread,
Jun 24, 2004, 1:53:19 AM6/24/04
to
"IAPW" <lk...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:34054600.0406...@posting.google.com...
> Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
> only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
> other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
> movie.
>

You forget that in the odd time that a television show spawns a theatrical
movie, as many of the television actors as possible are used in the movie.
This is because the target audience are the fans of the television show. So
changing the actors is something the producers will be very hesitant to do.
Fans are invested not just in the story but in the actors, as well.

If you are talking about a Smallville movie after the series ends, that is
another story. It is unlikely that such a thing would take place, as series
are most often cancelled for low ratings (i.e. not enough people care to
watch). However, if a movie is made next year or the following, most of the
actors you listed will have returned to obscurity.


ANIM8Rfsk

unread,
Jun 24, 2004, 2:30:03 AM6/24/04
to
<< From: Lynley James mag...@netactive.co.za >>


<< >What do you mean, "without powers"? How about total B.S.
>marksmanship, the ability to tie a rope in an eyeblink, practically
>psychic knowledge...and in the finale, the trick with the wire in the
>ear? Just as with Superman, they kept ramping up his powers along
>with the humor as the series progressed.
>
>Robert
Well he couldn't fly could he, nor shoot heat beams out of his eyes?
;OP

What wire trick by the way? >>

google search for 'due south wire ear' returns:

http://home.hiwaay.net/~warydbom/duesouth/interviews/pg0798_01.htm

"Paul suddenly remembers another fantasy section in the new season, and is
about to tell me the scene, but feels it may spoil the story when people watch
it. By this point, I have no shame; 'It's alright', I reassure him, 'We can put
some sticky tape over this bit'. It seems that a squad of Mounties is stuck on
a plane in bad weather, and they urgently need to get a help message out. With
the radio damaged, Fraser has to improvise in a manner more reminiscent of
Commander Data from ST: TNG [Star Trek: The Next Generation]. With the aid of a
strand of wire, a piece of chewing gum and his ear, he manages to get the
message through! Now you must wipe that memory from your minds... "

Andrew Ryan Chang

unread,
Jun 24, 2004, 4:40:02 AM6/24/04
to
In article <79ednQiUOKf...@look.ca>, CM <te...@rogers.com> wrote:
>"IAPW" <lk...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:34054600.0406...@posting.google.com...
>> Recently there was an interesting post about a Smallville movie starring
>> only Tom Welling from the original cast and starring other people in the
>> other roles. Here are my thoughts on who should star in the Smallville
>> movie.
>>
>
>You forget that in the odd time that a television show spawns a theatrical
>movie, as many of the television actors as possible are used in the movie.
>This is because the target audience are the fans of the television show. So
>changing the actors is something the producers will be very hesitant to do.
>Fans are invested not just in the story but in the actors, as well.

Frankly, given IAPW's posting history, I figured it was just a
long-winded way for him to post another L*nds*y L*h*n love note.


--
"When I feed the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask, 'Why are they
poor?' they call me a communist!"

- Archbishop Dom Helder Camara of Recife, Brazil, 1964.

Ian J. Ball

unread,
Jun 24, 2004, 11:56:43 AM6/24/04
to
In article <cbe412$btr$1...@morgoth.sfu.ca>,

arc...@sfu.ca (Andrew Ryan Chang) wrote:

> Frankly, given IAPW's posting history, I figured it was just a
> long-winded way for him to post another L*nds*y L*h*n love note.

Not for long - IAPW's pedophillic tendencies will take over now that
Lohan is 18. He'll dump her shortly, and be trolling for new bait:
probably Mika Boorem or someone like that...

Robert Goodman

unread,
Jun 24, 2004, 4:06:37 PM6/24/04
to
Lynley James <mag...@netactive.co.za> wrote in message news:<g5ehd01d9h1bb9ctp...@4ax.com>...

> >> >Paul Gross. This Luthor's going to sing.

> >> Always believed he wold make an excellent Superman. His MOuntie
> >> character from Due South was basically Superman without powers.

> >What do you mean, "without powers"? How about total B.S.
> >marksmanship, the ability to tie a rope in an eyeblink, practically
> >psychic knowledge...and in the finale, the trick with the wire in the
> >ear? Just as with Superman, they kept ramping up his powers along
> >with the humor as the series progressed.

> Well he couldn't fly could he, nor shoot heat beams out of his eyes?

But he could sing, box, understand obscure languages (including wolf),
charm ladies, and withstand all types of deprivation. Superman
resists bullets, but I doubt he could beat Frazier in a staring
contest or any of various other types of endurance.

Frazier's powers were like those of the G-man in "Twin Peaks" --
relatively subtle but total bull shit.

> What wire trick by the way?

In the concluding episode, he "read" electronic data xmission by
sticking the wire in his ear with some chewing gum and making a funny
face.

Robert

Lynley James

unread,
Jun 25, 2004, 2:36:41 AM6/25/04
to
On 24 Jun 2004 13:06:37 -0700, robg...@bestweb.net (Robert Goodman)
wrote:

>Lynley James <mag...@netactive.co.za> wrote in message news:<g5ehd01d9h1bb9ctp...@4ax.com>...


>
>> >> >Paul Gross. This Luthor's going to sing.
>
>> >> Always believed he wold make an excellent Superman. His MOuntie
>> >> character from Due South was basically Superman without powers.
>
>> >What do you mean, "without powers"? How about total B.S.
>> >marksmanship, the ability to tie a rope in an eyeblink, practically
>> >psychic knowledge...and in the finale, the trick with the wire in the
>> >ear? Just as with Superman, they kept ramping up his powers along
>> >with the humor as the series progressed.
>
>> Well he couldn't fly could he, nor shoot heat beams out of his eyes?
>
>But he could sing, box, understand obscure languages (including wolf),
>charm ladies, and withstand all types of deprivation. Superman
>resists bullets, but I doubt he could beat Frazier in a staring
>contest or any of various other types of endurance.
>

Besides the wolf language understanding you just described Bats, but
give him enough time... ;O)

I understand what you are saying, but it kinda kept up that whole,
"there's more to mounties from the frozen tundra, than you would
think" theme that ran throughout the entire show.

It kinda lost something when they moved production to Canada and lost
the Ray character, but it was still enjoyable. I think that in those
last coupla seasons they knew that it would end soon so they just
tried to outdo themselves with silly ideas.

Lynley

Brent McKee

unread,
Jun 25, 2004, 4:51:06 AM6/25/04
to

"Lynley James" <mag...@netactive.co.za> wrote in message
news:ebhmd05fqensu006j...@4ax.com...

The production was always in Canada. The first two season (the CBS
seasons) were shot in Toronto and area just like the non-Ray
season(s -- in Canada the last 20 some episodes were split into two
season). The big difference was where the money was coming from.
Seasons 1 and 2 were a partnership between CBS and CTV with
Alliance-Atlantis as the production house. Season 3/4 was CTV with
BBC and one of the German networks and Alliance-Atlantis producing.

--
Brent McKee

To reply by email, please remove the capital letters (S and N) from
the email address

"If we cease to judge this world, we may find ourselves, very quickly,
in one which is infinitely worse."
- Margaret Atwood

"Nothing is more dangerous than a dogmatic worldview - nothing more
constraining, more blinding to innovation, more destructive of
openness to novelty. "
- Stephen Jay Gould (1941-2002)

Lynley James

unread,
Jun 29, 2004, 12:56:40 PM6/29/04
to
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:51:06 GMT, "Brent McKee" <bSm...@shaw.caN>
wrote:


>
>The production was always in Canada. The first two season (the CBS
>seasons) were shot in Toronto and area just like the non-Ray
>season(s -- in Canada the last 20 some episodes were split into two
>season). The big difference was where the money was coming from.
>Seasons 1 and 2 were a partnership between CBS and CTV with
>Alliance-Atlantis as the production house. Season 3/4 was CTV with
>BBC and one of the German networks and Alliance-Atlantis producing.

You sure? I read somewher when the show aired here that it was filmed
in Chicago for the first 2 seasons and when CBS cancelled it they
moved up north.

Lynley

Brent McKee

unread,
Jun 29, 2004, 2:56:25 PM6/29/04
to

"Lynley James" <mag...@netactive.co.za> wrote in message
news:pm53e0le0v8iv2l5a...@4ax.com...

I'm sure. The pilot was partially shot in Chicago but after that most
of the "obvious" Chicago scenes were stock shots that had been made
during the shoot for the pilot, and in truth there weren't that many
scenes that were "obviously" Chicago. In fact, this website

http://home.hiwaay.net/~warydbom/duesouth/location.htm

lists most if not all of the locations used for each episode of the
series.

Lynley James

unread,
Jun 30, 2004, 4:58:09 AM6/30/04
to
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:56:25 GMT, "Brent McKee" <bSm...@shaw.caN>
wrote:

>
>"Lynley James" <mag...@netactive.co.za> wrote in message
>news:pm53e0le0v8iv2l5a...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 08:51:06 GMT, "Brent McKee" <bSm...@shaw.caN>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> >The production was always in Canada. The first two season (the CBS
>> >seasons) were shot in Toronto and area just like the non-Ray
>> >season(s -- in Canada the last 20 some episodes were split into two
>> >season). The big difference was where the money was coming from.
>> >Seasons 1 and 2 were a partnership between CBS and CTV with
>> >Alliance-Atlantis as the production house. Season 3/4 was CTV with
>> >BBC and one of the German networks and Alliance-Atlantis producing.
>>
>> You sure? I read somewher when the show aired here that it was
>filmed
>> in Chicago for the first 2 seasons and when CBS cancelled it they
>> moved up north.
>
>I'm sure. The pilot was partially shot in Chicago but after that most
>of the "obvious" Chicago scenes were stock shots that had been made
>during the shoot for the pilot, and in truth there weren't that many
>scenes that were "obviously" Chicago. In fact, this website
>
>http://home.hiwaay.net/~warydbom/duesouth/location.htm
>
>lists most if not all of the locations used for each episode of the
>series.

Thanks for the info. Never realised that Toronto doubled for Chicago.

Lynley

0 new messages