And how do you propose to accomplish that, Rush Limbaugh? Honest to
Christ, Rich, I don't understand what mental illness you suffer from
that constantly causes you to fish for comments that equate to telling
you you are the most useless piece of crap on Earth. Any theories?
"Rich" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6_Odnci84-MePavW...@giganews.com...
He doesn't want to offend any Muslims. He (and other liberals) think that
there is a acceptable amount of dead Americans in order to remain
politically correct.
>
>"Lets not jump to conclusions" (on the terrorist??!). Is he insane? The
>terrorist should be executed a week from now once they've tortured all the
>info out of him they can get.
You're jumping to the conclusion that he has any information.
Hmmm...let's see. I think YOU are a terrorist. Perhaps we should execute
YOU next week since you think we don't need laws or courts or a judicial
system for matters such as these. After a reasonable period of torture of
course. We'll have to squeeze what we can out of you first to be safe. You
fucking lunatic!
You're jumping to the conclusion that this shitbird has a lick of common
sense.
Of course no one will EVER accuse YOU of being politically correct...or
carrect about any frigging thing at all.
That is un-American and a violation of the defining document of the
United States, the Consitution. You may think you are a patriot, but
you do not hold American values.
> More and more, Obama reminds me of Jimmy
> Carter. He should be building houses for the poor, not running the United
> States.
Why? Because he said let's see al the information before we make a
decision? That's called being an adult. After eight years of GWB, it's
easy to forget that the president is supposed to have some maturity.
That's a lie. The attempted plane bomber will be arrested, tried,
probably convicted, and then sent to jail. That's not "political
correctness;" that's the American way.
>On Dec 26, 3:47�pm, Rich <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> "Lets not jump to conclusions" (on the terrorist??!). �Is he insane? �The
>> terrorist should be executed a week from now once they've tortured all the
>> info out of him they can get. �
>
>That is un-American and a violation of the defining document of the
>United States, the Consitution. You may think you are a patriot, but
>you do not hold American values.
>
<snicker> He doesn't have to hold American values. He's not an
American. Just a wannabe.
No. He's a decent and honorable human being. A concept a cretin like you
has no frame of reference for.
A decent and honorable human being whose first impulse is to torture?
I guess the standards have been lowered.
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hh6n0r$lc4$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Right, cause political correctness KILLS!
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:bac928fe-a56b-4975...@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
Then be over with it and call him a TERRORIST! Obama won't do it.
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hh6mub$ksf$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
I say the FBI should torture you!
>
>
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:cad21a31-b29a-466c...@u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 26, 3:47 pm, Rich <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> "Lets not jump to conclusions" (on the terrorist??!). Is he insane? The
>> terrorist should be executed a week from now once they've tortured all
>> the
>> info out of him they can get.
>
> That is un-American and a violation of the defining document of the
> United States, the Consitution. You may think you are a patriot, but
> you do not hold American values.
Yes, we should not ever question or imprison him. We should just let him
go.
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hh70m4$i62$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
of course a piece of shit like you would call a terrorist a "decent and
honorable human being'! You are no better than him.
>
>
He's a wannabe Canadian too....just because he lives here doesn't make
him one of us. He belongs in the Sudan...or the back country of Pakistan.
I have NO DOUBT whatsoever that Rich never expresses his views in public
up here...because he would be shunned and laughed at...or given a good
smack.
..
--
We must change the way we live
Or the climate will do it for us.
I think you are confused about who I'm referring to. It happens. Try
reading more carefully.
Yeah. Obama's all about waiting for the info, unless he's blasting a
white cop who is quite correctly arresting his criminal asshole black
buddy.
--
Tiger Woods has just been named "Athlete of the Decade"
His chosen event? The Broad Jump.
Yes, that's what decent and honorable human beings are noted for,
their fantasies about torturing and lynching people.
>
>
>
>"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:cad21a31-b29a-466c...@u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 26, 3:47 pm, Rich <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>> "Lets not jump to conclusions" (on the terrorist??!). Is he insane? The
>>> terrorist should be executed a week from now once they've tortured all
>>> the
>>> info out of him they can get.
>>
>> That is un-American and a violation of the defining document of the
>> United States, the Consitution. You may think you are a patriot, but
>> you do not hold American values.
>
>Yes, we should not ever question or imprison him.
So for you "torture" means "question" and "execute without trial"
means "imprison"?
More "aid and comfort" to America's enemies talk. No surprise.
> On Dec 26, 3:47�pm, Rich <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> "Lets not jump to conclusions" (on the terrorist??!). �Is he insane?
> �The
>> terrorist should be executed a week from now once they've tortured
>> all th
> e
>> info out of him they can get. �
>
> That is un-American and a violation of the defining document of the
> United States, the Consitution. You may think you are a patriot, but
> you do not hold American values.
Please stop being such a clueless, myopic sissy. This is the World you
live in, not Disneyland.
Ha! I do ALL THE TIME! I love to see the reaction from bleeding-heart,
anti-American liberals and Toronto is awash in them, ungrateful traitors
that they all are.
No, we should question him, try and (probably, depending on the FACTS)
convict him, and imprison him. We shouldn't torture him, or execute
him without a trial. Try reading what was written.
And they're all laughing at you behind your back...and a few might
actually pity you. Canadians want nothing to do with your infantile
level of bigotry and hate. We know it says more about you than it can
ever say about "liberals." You lead a sad, lonely life and can only find
comfort by tearing down others. Is your penis really that short?
Some day, you'll be sitting back and realize what a waste your life has
been...wasted on hate when it could have been productive.
Certainly nothing I say will change your the vomit you spew. Back in the
killfile you go.
..
I've seen Rich called a lot of things in this group, but "decent"
and "honorable" are new ones...
"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
news:kadfj59fjqpr351to...@4ax.com...
Sure, let's torture the SOB and find out everything he knows and then put a
bullet in his brain!
GOOD SUGGESTION!
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:47cbe022-1f91-4760...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
We make him a lesson, you try to kill Americans, you die!
Can you say that in a way that doesn't make you sound like a gurgling
baby? tia.
Not TV related.
They seem to get along well enough with you :)
We know it says more about you than it can
> ever say about "liberals." You lead a sad, lonely life and can only find
> comfort by tearing down others. Is your penis really that short?
When was the last time you saw one, fatso?
>
> Some day, you'll be sitting back and realize what a waste your life has
> been...wasted on hate when it could have been productive.
Perfect projection yet again, socialist weasel. Please continue
humiliating yourself :)
Don't like the U.S. Constitution much, do you?
And then THEY make US a lesson: you try to kill Nigerians (or Muslims,
or whatever), YOU die.
And then WE make a lesson....
You want to know how well this works? Look at Israel and the
Palestinians. Look at Norhern Ireland.
As someone once said: "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth - until
everyone is blind and can't chew their food."
Of course, the man should be arrested, tried, and appropriately
punished. But in accord with our laws and our values, not the savagery
and bloodthirstiness you seem to share with him
Someone who apparently cares more about American lives than MANY of
the leftist sympathizers in the U.S.
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:52a1210f-6b57-4028...@m25g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
I can ask the same question. But first, I love the constitution! But I
don't want Americans to die by terrorism. So the question is "How many
dead Americans are acceptable?"
And you seem to hate the constitution also. Heard of the Commerce Clause?
Basically it states you do not have to buy any good or service to remain a
citizen in good standing in the USA. HCR means you have to buy health
insurance in order not to go to jail. That violates the constitution!
So I guess you like the constitution to protect terrorists, but hate it when
it interferes with your god's, Obama's plans!
No, he just likes the idea of people getting tortured and killed.
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1a9e9d06-c142-4aef...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
Listen, dumbfucker! They declared war on US! So either we fight, or we
die. What's your choice. I choose to live! And if living means our
enemies must die? SO BE IT!
>> Of course, the man should be arrested, tried, and appropriately
>> punished. But in accord with our laws and our values, not the savagery
>> and bloodthirstiness you seem to share with him
>
>
>Listen, dumbfucker! They declared war on US! So either we fight, or we
>die.
Gosh, you're desperate. What makes you so afraid?
When did I say ANYTHING about health reform? When did I say Obama was
my god? You're just making things up. You have a fixed, obsessive idea
of what a "liberal" is, and you project it onto anybody who disagrees
with you on anything.
Unlike a war against a nation (Germany, Iran, whatever), where there
can be a surrender and a peace treaty, the War Against Terrorism (like
the War Against Drugs) is, by definition, endless. I will not let
these terrorist bastards - or you, "dumbfucker" - take away the things
that make America great. That's what they want - to destroy our way of
life. And you're just going to hand it over to them.
I don't know if you ever noticed, but even in war there are -
according to the U.S. - rules. Hence the Nuremberg Trials. Hence the
Geneva Conventions. Hence, if we consider the attempted bomber a
"solider," we - by our own laws - make him a prisoner of war. If we
consider him a criminal (another choice, since he wasn't representing
any country and may not have been part of an army), we arrest and try
him. In either case: no torture. Sorry to diappoint you.
Don't like rules, laws, and fair treatment? Move to North Korea. They
agree with your philosophy wholeheartedly.
Why is it all the neocons seem to be in need of neo-natal care?
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8223b823-4618-4a64...@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
You libs worship Obama like he is your god.
"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
news:i8hgj5l4jjtudluch...@4ax.com...
Dying? Being Killed by radical Jhadis?
Got news for you, you can't tell a terrorist that "Hey, I'm down with you
guys!" and hope he doesn't kill you. They hate all Americans, they want
to kill all Americans, there is no appeasing them! Either we get killed
or we kill them!
"trotsky" <gms...@email.com> wrote in message
news:i_ydnXepn6cBPqXW...@mchsi.com...
Why do all libs think they know everything?
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:8c13bb8b-5b24-4503...@21g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
Democrats are taking our freedoms everyday and you are silent about it.
>
> I don't know if you ever noticed, but even in war there are -
> according to the U.S. - rules. Hence the Nuremberg Trials. Hence the
> Geneva Conventions. Hence, if we consider the attempted bomber a
> "solider," we - by our own laws - make him a prisoner of war. If we
> consider him a criminal (another choice, since he wasn't representing
> any country and may not have been part of an army), we arrest and try
> him. In either case: no torture. Sorry to diappoint you.
The Geneva Conventions only apply to those soldiers who wear their nation's
uniform. Not terrorist (who by your own definition) do not wear any
country's uniform.
>
> Don't like rules, laws, and fair treatment? Move to North Korea. They
> agree with your philosophy wholeheartedly.
Funny, you don't like the constitution, so you go to COMMIE LAND! And
leave us freedom loving Americans alone!
>
>
>"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
>news:i8hgj5l4jjtudluch...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:59:22 -0500, "Syvyn11" <robhor...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Of course, the man should be arrested, tried, and appropriately
>>>> punished. But in accord with our laws and our values, not the savagery
>>>> and bloodthirstiness you seem to share with him
>>>
>>>
>>>Listen, dumbfucker! They declared war on US! So either we fight, or we
>>>die.
>>
>> Gosh, you're desperate. What makes you so afraid?
>
>Dying?
And the odds of that are?
> Being Killed by radical Jhadis?
How many radical Jihadis are there in your vicinity?
Because compared to you we look so good. Thank you.
It's all relative.
I think YOU'RE a terrorist!
GET HIM!
You mean other than HIS cell?
He is. And he WILL smite you!
Repent heathen filth. Before it's to late!
BWAHAHAHA!
You talking about the constitution is like Osama Bin Laden talking about
world peace.
Yes, because it was Democrats who tossed out habeas corpus and pursued
secret warrantless wiretaps. Right.
>
>
> > I don't know if you ever noticed, but even in war there are -
> > according to the U.S. - rules. Hence the Nuremberg Trials. Hence the
> > Geneva Conventions. Hence, if we consider the attempted bomber a
> > "solider," we - by our own laws - make him a prisoner of war. If we
> > consider him a criminal (another choice, since he wasn't representing
> > any country and may not have been part of an army), we arrest and try
> > him. In either case: no torture. Sorry to diappoint you.
>
> The Geneva Conventions only apply to those soldiers who wear their nation's
> uniform. Not terrorist (who by your own definition) do not wear any
> country's uniform.
>
So far: he's a criminal, like Timothy McVeigh. Let's treat him as a
criminal.
>
>
> > Don't like rules, laws, and fair treatment? Move to North Korea. They
> > agree with your philosophy wholeheartedly.
>
> Funny, you don't like the constitution, so you go to COMMIE LAND! And
> leave us freedom loving Americans alone!-
I'm quite fond of the Constitution.
I don't. Don't speak for me.
[lots of extraneous quotage removed]
>> You libs worship Obama like he is your god.-
>
>I don't. Don't speak for me.
If "libs" means liberals (so I guess conservatives are "cons"?),
then "syvyn" apparently doesn't watch any of them speaking on TV
or listen to any of them on the radio, or he/she would know that
liberals are hardly building altars to President Obama these days.
But then, wingnuts (of any stripe) aren't interested in facts.
Patty
And Patty has now joined the ranks of those posting about politics.
"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
news:t1nhj5djbtj81dlo3...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:13:04 -0500, "Syvyn11" <robhor...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
>>news:i8hgj5l4jjtudluch...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:59:22 -0500, "Syvyn11" <robhor...@yahoo.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Of course, the man should be arrested, tried, and appropriately
>>>>> punished. But in accord with our laws and our values, not the savagery
>>>>> and bloodthirstiness you seem to share with him
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Listen, dumbfucker! They declared war on US! So either we fight, or
>>>>we
>>>>die.
>>>
>>> Gosh, you're desperate. What makes you so afraid?
>>
>>Dying?
>
> And the odds of that are?
So your solution is don't fight?
Just lay down and let them have their way with us?
Or maybe we should convert to Islam?
Which is it?
>
>
>> Being Killed by radical Jhadis?
>
> How many radical Jihadis are there in your vicinity?
I don't know? 1, 100, 1000? Who knows?
I do know one tried to get in to Detroit.
Do you really think he was working alone?
>
>
>
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hhaq88$a8c$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
Yeah, I terrorize liberals, so it's okay!
>
>
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hhaqk1$e2j$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
It's you guys that treat the constitution like toilet paper.
>
>
No. Extremists set free by Bush and his Saudi pals set two of them free and
they're running loose in Yemen...courtesy of you Cons! They actually took
credit for it. What do you have to say to that? Thank Bush for that one.
I'm not a bit terrorized by cheap punks likkke you. You're a classic
chicken hawk. I know the type well.
Yeah. Like you give a rat's ass about human rights. You're a liar and a
coward.
>
>
>"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
>news:t1nhj5djbtj81dlo3...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 08:13:04 -0500, "Syvyn11" <robhor...@yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
>>>news:i8hgj5l4jjtudluch...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:59:22 -0500, "Syvyn11" <robhor...@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Of course, the man should be arrested, tried, and appropriately
>>>>>> punished. But in accord with our laws and our values, not the savagery
>>>>>> and bloodthirstiness you seem to share with him
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Listen, dumbfucker! They declared war on US! So either we fight, or
>>>>>we
>>>>>die.
>>>>
>>>> Gosh, you're desperate. What makes you so afraid?
>>>
>>>Dying?
>>
>> And the odds of that are?
>
>So your solution is don't fight?
Solution to what?
Yeah, it's "us guys" who tossed out habeas corpus, used secret
warrantless wiretapping, and stretched "no cruel and unusual
punishment" until it could cover torture.
I like to give people the beneift of the doubt, Syvyn11, but you're
either a liar or delusional. Or both.
None of the above. Fight them, but in a way that is in accord with
American values and enlists allies rather than alientates the world.
Nobody suggested any of the things you wrote above. Try (a) reading
and (b) being honest.
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hhc4r7$7qu$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
And you have nothing to say about the Obama administration setting more
loose in Yemen?
>
>
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:2520b89e-5814-49e0...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
Kill them before they kill us!
>
> Nobody suggested any of the things you wrote above. Try (a) reading
> and (b) being honest.
Honesty from a lib.
"Dano" <janea...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hhc4vp$84f$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
The greatest human right is to live. Not fighting the war on terrorism is
death.
>
>
Sadly, she's now had to killfile herself.
> "Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1a9e9d06-c142-4aef...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 27, 1:33 pm, "Syvyn11" <robhorine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> "Anlatt the Builder" <tirh...@aol.com> wrote in
> >> messagenews:47cbe022-1f91-4760-...
> >>
> >> > On Dec 27, 4:21 am, "Syvyn11" <robhorine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> "Anlatt the Builder" <tirh...@aol.com> wrote in
> >> >> messagenews:cad21a31-b29a-...
> >>
> >> >> > On Dec 26, 3:47 pm, Rich <n...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> "Lets not jump to conclusions" (on the terrorist??!). Is he
> >> >> >> insane?
> >> >> >> The
> >> >> >> terrorist should be executed a week from now once they've tortured
> >> >> >> all
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> info out of him they can get.
> >>
> >> >> > That is un-American and a violation of the defining document of the
> >> >> > United States, the Consitution. You may think you are a patriot, but
> >> >> > you do not hold American values.
> >>
> >> >> Yes, we should not ever question or imprison him. We should just
> >> >> let
> >> >> him
> >> >> go.
> >>
> >> > No, we should question him, try and (probably, depending on the FACTS)
> >> > convict him, and imprison him. We shouldn't torture him, or execute
> >> > him without a trial. Try reading what was written.
> >>
> >> We make him a lesson, you try to kill Americans, you die!-
> >
> > And then THEY make US a lesson: you try to kill Nigerians (or Muslims,
> > or whatever), YOU die.
> >
> > And then WE make a lesson....
> >
> > You want to know how well this works? Look at Israel and the
> > Palestinians. Look at Norhern Ireland.
> >
> > As someone once said: "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth - until
> > everyone is blind and can't chew their food."
> >
> > Of course, the man should be arrested, tried, and appropriately
> > punished. But in accord with our laws and our values, not the savagery
> > and bloodthirstiness you seem to share with him
>
> Listen, dumbfucker! They declared war on US! So either we fight, or we
> die. What's your choice. I choose to live! And if living means our
> enemies must die? SO BE IT!
>
Does anybody know how old this Syvyn11 is? Many participants in
this newsgroup are willing to take any thread into name-calling at a
moment's notice but he is harder to take than the average. He doesn't
seem to be able to reason clearly--or even read, for that matter--but
his posts don't demonstrate only that inability to reason. They're
simply immature.
So my question is: Is he immature just because he hasn't been
around very long or is he immature because he never grew up?
Charlie
--
All the world's a stage, and most
of us are desperately unrehearsed. Sean O'Casey
How long have you been raping your sister? :)
> Does anybody know how old this Syvyn11 is? Many participants in
>this newsgroup are willing to take any thread into name-calling at a
>moment's notice but he is harder to take than the average. He doesn't
>seem to be able to reason clearly--or even read, for that matter--but
>his posts don't demonstrate only that inability to reason. They're
>simply immature.
>
> So my question is: Is he immature just because he hasn't been
>around very long or is he immature because he never grew up?
Ad hominem noted. Get back to us when you have a real argument to make.
--
It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats did
to America.
Ubiquitous will no doubt tell you that that's an ad hominum attack,
and you should come back when you have a real argument.
Yes, honesty from a "lib."
But nobody is saying don't fight it. We're only discussing how to
fight it.
You set up some very impressive strawman arguments, but that's all
they are.
Be fair and note that the real arguments have already been made.
Syvyn11 engages entirely in strawman arguments; he makes up what other
people say, and then attacks them for it.
> --
> It's now time for healing, and for fixing the damage the Democrats did
> to America.
Gosh, can we fix the damage the Republicans did first? We can get on
on to the Democrats after that.
I have killfiled sooooo many people on this group, more than any other news
group.
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3533ee0a-ad4c-4d0e...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
Great, treat it like a WAR, not hand it off to the FBI and treat it like a
criminal matter.
To them, it's war, we should treat it the same.
>
> You set up some very impressive strawman arguments, but that's all
> they are.
Typical of a lib. Anyone who disagrees, their arguments are 'strawmen'.
Kill who before they kill who?
And you're still talking to Newport!?!?!
--
Tiger Woods has just been named "Athlete of the Decade"
His chosen event? The Broad Jump.
Yes, because we should always let our enemies decide for us how we
want to treat things. Let their defiitions, their values, and their
agenda dictate how we approach the matter.
>
>
> > You set up some very impressive strawman arguments, but that's all
> > they are.
>
> Typical of a lib. Anyone who disagrees, their arguments are 'strawmen'.-
Sorry, but: Bullshit, dumbfucker! (to use your euphonious term) You
can check my posts. I don't call the arguments of anyone who disagrees
with me "strawman." I call YOURS that, for the simple and obvious
reason that you constantly create strawman arguments. You make up
things that people didn't say, and then you attack them for saying it.
Worth noting:
Crazed right-wing Obama-haters like Syvyn11 here explode with outrage
when Obama does things that, when Bush did them - or worse - they
never even raised an eyebrow over. (Also worth noting: Democrats, at
the time, did not attack Bush for not mentioning the shoe bomber for a
week or for having him tried in non-military court. Because, really,
there were more important things to get upset over.)
So how about it, Syvyn11? When Bush did that with a terrorist, did you
get all upset? Did you scream that he wasn't treating this like a WAR,
but as a criminal matter? Did you post that this proved his and his
adminstration's incompetence?
Or are you just a complete hypocrite who will attack Obama for
ANYTHING he does, even things that wouldn't bother you a bit if a
Republican president did them?
"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
news:m7jlj5dhecevosajg...@4ax.com...
are you really that fucking stupid?
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5221e80d-75a9-4bfe...@e37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
They are going to treat it like a war no matter what we do. They aren't
going to change their mind by seeing that "Hey, they're letting the FBI
handle it, we'll tone it down a little!"
No, they see that as weakness! They saw what Clinton did as weakness.
They see everything we do as weakness. So we take the fight to them and
destroy them. Them or us. Which one is it?
"Anlatt the Builder" <tir...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:03b23bf8-f55d-4d6d...@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 29, 7:07 pm, "Syvyn11" <robhorine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> "Anlatt the Builder" <tirh...@aol.com> wrote in
>>
>> >> The greatest human right is to live. Not fighting the war on
>> >> terrorism
>> >> is
>> >> death.
>>
>> > But nobody is saying don't fight it. We're only discussing how to
>> > fight it.
>>
>> Great, treat it like a WAR, not hand it off to the FBI and treat it like
>> a
>> criminal matter.
>>
>> To them, it's war, we should treat it the same.
>>
>>
>
> Worth noting:
>
>
> http://salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/index.html?story=/opinion/walsh/politics/2009/12/29/obama_double_standard
>
> Crazed right-wing Obama-haters like Syvyn11 here explode with outrage
> when Obama does things that, when Bush did them - or worse - they
> never even raised an eyebrow over. (Also worth noting: Democrats, at
> the time, did not attack Bush for not mentioning the shoe bomber for a
> week or for having him tried in non-military court. Because, really,
> there were more important things to get upset over.)
>
> So how about it, Syvyn11? When Bush did that with a terrorist, did you
> get all upset? Did you scream that he wasn't treating this like a WAR,
> but as a criminal matter? Did you post that this proved his and his
> adminstration's incompetence?
Unlike you assholes, we don't fall to our knees every time we hear Bush or
Cheney's name. Bush was wrong, that doesn't make Obama right.
>
> Or are you just a complete hypocrite who will attack Obama for
> ANYTHING he does, even things that wouldn't bother you a bit if a
> Republican president did them?
When Obama does something right, I'll say so. He followed the Bush plan
for victory in Iraq, that's good. He's giving the Afghanistan theater 75%
of what they want, that's kind of good.
But I'm not a Obama ass kisser like you are.
>
"Mature" anonymice. LOL!
> Crazed right-wing Obama-haters like Syvyn11 here explode with outrage
> when Obama does things that, when Bush did them - or worse - they
> never even raised an eyebrow over.
On our local hate-io station today, the RWA was going on about Obama's
being *ON VACATION*!!!
It's the week between Christmas and New Years. Of course he's on
vacation. The RWA today was only the radio today because the regular
RWAs were *ON VACATION*!!!. And the real issue: was Bush ever *not* on
vacation?