Re: GAY "ankle-biters" nipping at the heels of the "Great Man".....DOC !!

["The Great One"]

"Hulahoop" <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:94181a0e-a83c-4146...@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Nov 25, 12:14 am, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> John Fleming wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:47:29 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> > desk in the scriptorium Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> $On Nov 24, 1:09 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >> $> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:53:04 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> $> > $John Fleming wrote:
> >> $> > $> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >> $> > $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >> $> > $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $John Fleming wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >> $> > $>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >> $> > $>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $john smith wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the Doc as they are all
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most telling of all is that
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay as an insult.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a cantankerous old man with
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a troll, and it's the one insult that
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. So it's effective.-
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his arsenal is "Hey, look at
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what you have is effective.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure in your own
> >> $> > $>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means fuck all...
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $
> >> $> > $>> $>> $ I agree completely.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $
> >> $> > $>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure enough to easily dismiss
> >> $> > $>> $>> $that particular allegation.
> >> $> > $>> $>
> >> $> > $>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay as an
> >> $> > $>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in
> >> $> > $>> $> one's onw sexuality.
> >> $> > $>> $
> >> $> > $>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
> >> $> > $>> $
> >> $> > $>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, whose only
> >> $> > $>> $intention is to rile people up.
> >> $> > $>
> >> $> > $> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
> >> $> > $> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
> >> $> > $>
> >> $> > $
> >> $> > $ Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and almost 100%
> >> $> > $effective.
> >> $>
> >> $> So they use it on use thinking it will be just as effective.
> >> $>
> >> $> Should have figured it out sooner.
> >> $>
> >> $> Thanks Peachy!
> >> $>
> >> $I wonder if HJ is so repressed that he is denying a homosexual
> >> $orientation within himself, and thus finds it loathsome and disgusting
> >> $
> >> $He might therefore assume that everyone else will be equally
> >> $disgusted. The flaw in that plan is that most people are probably
> >> $quite relaxed with their sexuality, me included.
>
> > I say you've hit the nail on the head there Ged.
>
> > Calling someone a homosexual as a derogatory label might
> > have worked 25 to 50 years ago. But the western world has
> > changed quite a bit since then, and while most people
> > wouldn't chose to live a homosexual lifestyle, they won't
> > denounce it either.
>
> I wish that this were true, but I think you both overlook the facts.
> You may well be answering for yourselves, but the vast majority of men
> are not that comfortable with themselves and their sexuality.
>
> Ian Baynham was killed in London last month, for being gay.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6874257.ece
>
> Reports are that incidences of gay bashing are up in London.
>
> Chris Skinner was killed in Canada last month too. While I can't find
> any report of them finding who did it, friends firmly believe that it
> was because he was openly gay. He was beaten then run over, in an area
> that friends say they too have experienced gay bashing.
>
> And googling "killed for being gay in the usa" brings up 3,030,000
> hits. In June a US Navy sailor was killed, apparently because he was
> gay. A Syracuse New York man was killed in 2008, clearly for being gay.
> 15 year old Lawrence King was killed in California because he liked a
> boy, who felt so threatened by it that he killed him.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I am missing something that allows me to think in a rational manner.

Regards,

Gelded Ged
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sorry.....
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote in message news:amVOm.54900$PH1.43555@edtnps82...
> The Doctor wrote:
> > In article <EM2dnfKPVft_m5HW...@bt.com>,
> > Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> >> PV wrote:
> >>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>> In article <rqdmg59miq8sgpki8...@4ax.com>,
> >>>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:09:22 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> >>>>> desk in the scriptorium Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> $On Nov 23, 11:11 am, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >>>>> [snip]

> >>>>>
> >>>>>> $> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
> >>>>>> $> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
> >>>>>> $

> >>>>>> $Not if you are Honest John
> >>>>>> $
> >>>>>> $For some reason he thinks that using homosexual epithets is an
> >>>>>> insult $
> >>>>>> $I presume he is in denial over his own sexual orientation. Poor
> >>>>>> sod, $doesn't know if he is coming or going
> >>>>> You are probably right Ged.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One day, he might come to terms with it, and beome a
> >>>>> healthier, happier person as a result.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Homosexuality is an anti-Christian Act.
> >>>
> >>> No, your constant attempts to marginalize people and slot them into
> >>> pigeon holes created by your own fears and prejudices is an
> >>> "anti-Christian Act".
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well said!
> >
> > 2 lying trolls for you.
>
> Is that the best response you can come up with Doc? There are not many
> things that remain constant in life, you however can be counted on to turn
> tail and run whenever challenged. What a feeble faith you must have,
> especially when you employ it to denigrate others.
> --
> Miss "PV"

OOH, Miss "PV" having a "Hissy-Fit"...............

Hee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message news:hei36q$fbo$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <1g3pg5tmqnfashcal...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:45:14 +0000, while chained to a desk
> >in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> >> $john smith wrote:
> >> $> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote in message
> >> $> news:amVOm.54900$PH1.43555@edtnps82...
> >> $>> The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> $>>> 2 lying trolls for you.
> >> $>> Is that the best response you can come up with Doc? There are not many
> >> $>> things that remain constant in life, you however can be counted on to turn
> >> $>> tail and run whenever challenged. What a feeble faith you must have,
> >> $>> especially when you employ it to denigrate others.
> >> $>
> >> $> Too true! Not that Yads will even comprehend that fact...
> >> $
> >> $Maybe because he won't even read a post that runs to more than one line.
> >
> >Even though he insists on quoting 250 lines so he can a one
> >line unrelated comment to the end.
> >
> >--
> >
> >John Fleming
> >Edmonton, Canada
> >
> > Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
> > And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
> > With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
> > Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
> > Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
>
> It is called: "keeping the context".
> --
> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

Those "Gay-Tards" will never understand that concept !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message news:hei2ps$etd$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <hehtm...@news1.newsguy.com>,

> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >The Doctor wrote:

> >> In article <heffe...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> >> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>>> In article <hefbd...@news6.newsguy.com>,
> >>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a desk

> >>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:

> >>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>> $>> $> news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...

> >>>>>>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>

> >>>>>>> $>> $>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the Doc as they are all
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most telling of all is that
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!

> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> --

> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay as an insult.
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a cantankerous old man with

> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.

> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a troll, and it's the one insult that
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. So it's effective.-
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>

> >>>>>>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his arsenal is "Hey, look at
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
> >>>>>>> $>> $>>>

> >>>>>>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what you have is effective.
> >>>>>>> $>> $>
> >>>>>>> $>> $>

> >>>>>>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure in your own
> >>>>>>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means fuck all...
> >>>>>>> $>> $>
> >>>>>>> $>> $

> >>>>>>> $>> $ I agree completely.
> >>>>>>> $>> $

> >>>>>>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure enough to easily dismiss

> >>>>>>> $>> $that particular allegation.
> >>>>>>> $>

> >>>>>>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay as an

> >>>>>>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in

> >>>>>>> $> one's onw sexuality.
> >>>>>>> $

> >>>>>>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
> >>>>>>> $

> >>>>>>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, whose only

> >>>>>>> $intention is to rile people up.

> >>>>>> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone

> >>>>>> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
> >>>>>>

> >>>>> Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and almost 100%

> >>>>> effective.
> >>>> Repressed??
> >>>
> >>> Repressed. People like you try to give the impression that natural
> >>> and normal things people do with their own bodies are somehow bad.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This is what you get when secular humanism perverts society.
> >
> >
> > The perverts are the ones that try to tell us natural things are bad.
>
> are you certain?

> --
> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

It's very obvious that she knows nothing of the Bible !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message news:hegusa$11r$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <r5qmg51l19dt9djpp...@4ax.com>,
> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:47:29 -0800 (PST), while chained to a

> >desk in the scriptorium Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com>
> >wrote:

> >> $On Nov 24, 1:09 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:

> >> $> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:53:04 -0500, while chained to a desk

> >> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> $> > $John Fleming wrote:
> >> $> > $> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >> $> > $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >> $> > $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $John Fleming wrote:

> >> $> > $>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >> $> > $>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >> $> > $>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $john smith wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the Doc as they are all
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most telling of all is that
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay as an insult.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a cantankerous old man with
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a troll, and it's the one insult that
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. So it's effective.-

> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his arsenal is "Hey, look at

> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> the gay!"

> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what you have is effective.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>

> >> $> > $>> $>> $>

> >> $> > $>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure in your own

> >> $> > $>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means fuck all...
> >> $> > $>> $>> $>
> >> $> > $>> $>> $

> >> $> > $>> $>> $ I agree completely.
> >> $> > $>> $>> $
> >> $> > $>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure enough to easily dismiss

> >> $> > $>> $>> $that particular allegation.
> >> $> > $>> $>
> >> $> > $>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay as an
> >> $> > $>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in
> >> $> > $>> $> one's onw sexuality.
> >> $> > $>> $
> >> $> > $>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
> >> $> > $>> $
> >> $> > $>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, whose only
> >> $> > $>> $intention is to rile people up.
> >> $> > $>
> >> $> > $> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
> >> $> > $> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
> >> $> > $>
> >> $> > $

> >> $> > $ Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and almost 100%
> >> $> > $effective.
> >> $>
> >> $> So they use it on use thinking it will be just as effective.
> >> $>
> >> $> Should have figured it out sooner.
> >> $>
> >> $> Thanks Peachy!
> >> $>
> >> $I wonder if HJ is so repressed that he is denying a homosexual
> >> $orientation within himself, and thus finds it loathsome and disgusting
> >> $
> >> $He might therefore assume that everyone else will be equally
> >> $disgusted. The flaw in that plan is that most people are probably
> >> $quite relaxed with their sexuality, me included.
> >
> >I say you've hit the nail on the head there Ged.
> >
> >Calling someone a homosexual as a derogatory label might
> >have worked 25 to 50 years ago. But the western world has
> >changed quite a bit since then, and while most people
> >wouldn't chose to live a homosexual lifestyle, they won't
> >denounce it either.
> >

> >--
> >
> >John Fleming
> >Edmonton, Canada
>

> You think?

> --
> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

Fleming NEVER thinks !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hei7r...@news2.newsguy.com...

> The Doctor wrote:
> > In article <hehtm...@news1.newsguy.com>,
> > peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> The Doctor wrote:
> >>> In article <heffe...@news2.newsguy.com>,
> >>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>> In article <hefbd...@news6.newsguy.com>,
> >>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> John Fleming wrote:

> >>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk

> >>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:

> >>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a desk

> >>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:

> >>>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>> $>> $> news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the Doc as they are all
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most telling of all is that
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> --

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay as an insult.
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a cantankerous old man with

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a troll, and it's the one insult that
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. So it's effective.-
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his arsenal is "Hey, look at
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>>>

> >>>>>>>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what you have is effective.
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>

> >>>>>>>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure in your own
> >>>>>>>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means fuck all...
> >>>>>>>> $>> $>
> >>>>>>>> $>> $

> >>>>>>>> $>> $ I agree completely.
> >>>>>>>> $>> $

> >>>>>>>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure enough to easily dismiss

> >>>>>>>> $>> $that particular allegation.
> >>>>>>>> $>

> >>>>>>>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay as an

> >>>>>>>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in

> >>>>>>>> $> one's onw sexuality.
> >>>>>>>> $

> >>>>>>>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
> >>>>>>>> $

> >>>>>>>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, whose only

> >>>>>>>> $intention is to rile people up.

> >>>>>>> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone

> >>>>>>> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>> Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and almost 100%

> >>>>>> effective.
> >>>>> Repressed??
> >>>> Repressed. People like you try to give the impression that natural
> >>>> and normal things people do with their own bodies are somehow bad.
> >>>>
> >>> This is what you get when secular humanism perverts society.
> >>
> >> The perverts are the ones that try to tell us natural things are bad.
> >
> > are you certain?
>
>

> Yes. Some things are natural, like a pile of dog shit.
> --
> peachy

Try some with a cherry on top !!
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:heia4...@news2.newsguy.com...
> John Fleming wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:23:24 -0500, while chained to a desk

> > in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> > <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >> $The Doctor wrote:
> >> $> In article <8d3pg59jp0ehir0md...@4ax.com>,
> >> $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >> $>> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:14:34 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> >> $>> the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> >> $>>> $The Doctor wrote:
> >> $>>> $> In article <rqdmg59miq8sgpki8...@4ax.com>,
> >> $>>> $> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >> $>>> $>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:09:22 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
> >> $>>> $>> desk in the scriptorium Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com>
> >> $>>> $>> wrote:
> >> $>>> $>>> $On Nov 23, 11:11 am, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
> >> $>>> $>>
> >> $>>> $>> [snip]
> >> $>>> $>>
> >> $>>> $>>> $> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
> >> $>>> $>>> $> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
> >> $>>> $>>> $
> >> $>>> $>>> $Not if you are Honest John
> >> $>>> $>>> $
> >> $>>> $>>> $For some reason he thinks that using homosexual epithets is an
> >> $>>> $>>> insult $
> >> $>>> $>>> $I presume he is in denial over his own sexual orientation. Poor
> >> $>>> $>>> sod, $doesn't know if he is coming or going
> >> $>>> $>>
> >> $>>> $>> You are probably right Ged.
> >> $>>> $>>
> >> $>>> $>> One day, he might come to terms with it, and beome a
> >> $>>> $>> healthier, happier person as a result.
> >> $>>> $>>
> >> $>>> $>
> >> $>>> $> Homosexuality is an anti-Christian Act.
> >> $>>> $
> >> $>>> $No, your constant attempts to marginalize people and slot them into pigeon
> >> $>>> $holes created by your own fears and prejudices is an "anti-Christian Act".
> >> $>> Besides, he has yet to provide scriptural support for his
> >> $>> claims.
> >> $
> >> $> You missed my post on that I see.
> >> $
> >> $ We all missed that.
> >
> > He never actually supplied it.
> >
>
> Yup. That's why we all missed it.

Why don't you try reading the Bible for yourselves ??
--
John C.

["The Great One"]

"peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hei8l...@news2.newsguy.com...
> The Doctor wrote:
> > In article <hei7r...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> > peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> The Doctor wrote:
> >>> In article <hehtm...@news1.newsguy.com>,
> >>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>> In article <heffe...@news2.newsguy.com>,
> >>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <hefbd...@news6.newsguy.com>,

> >>>>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk

> >>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >>>>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
> >>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>

> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the Doc as they are all
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most telling of all is that
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay as an insult.
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a cantankerous old man with
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a troll, and it's the one insult that
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. So it's effective.-
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his arsenal is "Hey, look at
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> the gay!"

> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>

> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what you have is effective.

> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>

> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure in your own
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means fuck all...

> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $

> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I agree completely.
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure enough to easily dismiss
> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $that particular allegation.
> >>>>>>>>>> $>
> >>>>>>>>>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay as an
> >>>>>>>>>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in
> >>>>>>>>>> $> one's onw sexuality.
> >>>>>>>>>> $
> >>>>>>>>>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
> >>>>>>>>>> $
> >>>>>>>>>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, whose only
> >>>>>>>>>> $intention is to rile people up.

> >>>>>>>>> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone

> >>>>>>>>> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>> Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and almost 100%
> >>>>>>>> effective.
> >>>>>>> Repressed??
> >>>>>> Repressed. People like you try to give the impression that natural
> >>>>>> and normal things people do with their own bodies are somehow bad.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> This is what you get when secular humanism perverts society.
> >>>> The perverts are the ones that try to tell us natural things are bad.
> >>> are you certain?
> >>

> >> Yes. Some things are natural.
> >
> > Homosexuality is NOT!
>
> Actually, yes it is.

Actually, you are dumber than a box of rocks !!
--
John C.

[Hulahoop]

On Nov 25, 7:22 pm, "\"The Great One\"" <honestj...@centurytel.net>
wrote:
> "Hulahoop" <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote in messagenews:94181a0e-a83c-4146...@b36g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

> John C.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

You are such a shining wit

[The Doctor]

In article <Kfqdnbz2nYXfd5HW...@centurytel.net>,
\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>"PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote in message =

>news:amVOm.54900$PH1.43555@edtnps82...
>> The Doctor wrote:
>> > In article <EM2dnfKPVft_m5HW...@bt.com>,
>> > Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> >> PV wrote:
>> >>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>> In article <rqdmg59miq8sgpki8...@4ax.com>,
>> >>>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:09:22 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
>> >>>>> desk in the scriptorium Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> $On Nov 23, 11:11 am, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> [snip]
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> $> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
>> >>>>>> $> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.
>> >>>>>> $
>> >>>>>> $Not if you are Honest John
>> >>>>>> $
>> >>>>>> $For some reason he thinks that using homosexual epithets is an
>> >>>>>> insult $

>> >>>>>> $I presume he is in denial over his own sexual orientation. =

>Poor
>> >>>>>> sod, $doesn't know if he is coming or going
>> >>>>> You are probably right Ged.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> One day, he might come to terms with it, and beome a
>> >>>>> healthier, happier person as a result.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> Homosexuality is an anti-Christian Act.
>> >>>

>> >>> No, your constant attempts to marginalize people and slot them =

>into
>> >>> pigeon holes created by your own fears and prejudices is an
>> >>> "anti-Christian Act".
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Well said!
>> >
>> > 2 lying trolls for you.

>>=20
>> Is that the best response you can come up with Doc? There are not =
>many=20
>> things that remain constant in life, you however can be counted on to =
>turn=20
>> tail and run whenever challenged. What a feeble faith you must have,=20

>> especially when you employ it to denigrate others.

>> --=20

>> Miss "PV"
>
>OOH, Miss "PV" having a "Hissy-Fit"...............
>
>Hee....Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
>--
>John C.

Hiss. Hiss.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

God, Queen and country! Never Satan President Republic! Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://twitter.com/rootnl2k http://www.myspace.com/502748630
Merry Christmas 2009 and Happy New Year 2010

[The Doctor]

In article <WNudndJ4GvlPd5HW...@centurytel.net>,

\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>

>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message =

>news:hei36q$fbo$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <1g3pg5tmqnfashcal...@4ax.com>,
>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> >On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:45:14 +0000, while chained to a desk
>> >in the scriptorium Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> >> $john smith wrote:

>> >> $> "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote in message=20

>> >> $> news:amVOm.54900$PH1.43555@edtnps82...
>> >> $>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >
>> >> $>>> 2 lying trolls for you.

>> >> $>> Is that the best response you can come up with Doc? There are =
>not many=20
>> >> $>> things that remain constant in life, you however can be counted =
>on to turn=20
>> >> $>> tail and run whenever challenged. What a feeble faith you must =
>have,=20

>> >> $>> especially when you employ it to denigrate others.

>> >> $>=20

>> >> $> Too true! Not that Yads will even comprehend that fact...
>> >> $

>> >> $Maybe because he won't even read a post that runs to more than one =

>line.
>> >
>> >Even though he insists on quoting 250 lines so he can a one
>> >line unrelated comment to the end.

>> >=20
>> >--
>> >=20
>> >John Fleming
>> >Edmonton, Canada
>> >=20

>> > Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
>> > And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
>> > With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
>> > Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
>> > Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O

>>=20

>> It is called: "keeping the context".

>> --=20
>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici =

>doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>
>Those "Gay-Tards" will never understand that concept !!
>--
>John C.

Becuase they like to twist the context.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

[The Doctor]

In article <c--dnVe53OONcZHW...@centurytel.net>,

\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>

>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message =

>news:hegusa$11r$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <r5qmg51l19dt9djpp...@4ax.com>,
>> John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> >On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:47:29 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
>> >desk in the scriptorium Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >> $On Nov 24, 1:09 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>> >> $> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:53:04 -0500, while chained to a desk
>> >> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> $> > $John Fleming wrote:
>> >> $> > $> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
>> >> $> > $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >> $> > $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> $> > $>> $John Fleming wrote:

>> >> $> > $>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a =

>desk
>> >> $> > $>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >> $> > $>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $john smith wrote:

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> =

>wrote in message
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion =

><exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> wrote:
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the =

>Doc as they are all

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most =

>telling of all is that
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay as an =
>insult.
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a =

>cantankerous old man with
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a troll, and it's =
>the one insult that
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. So it's =

>effective.-
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his =

>arsenal is "Hey, look at
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>>>

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what you have =

>is effective.
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure in =
>your own
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means =

>fuck all...
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $>
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $ I agree completely.
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $

>> >> $> > $>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure enough =

>to easily dismiss
>> >> $> > $>> $>> $that particular allegation.
>> >> $> > $>> $>

>> >> $> > $>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay =

>as an
>> >> $> > $>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in
>> >> $> > $>> $> one's onw sexuality.
>> >> $> > $>> $
>> >> $> > $>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
>> >> $> > $>> $

>> >> $> > $>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, =

>whose only
>> >> $> > $>> $intention is to rile people up.
>> >> $> > $>
>> >> $> > $> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
>> >> $> > $> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.

>> >> $> > $>=20
>> >> $> > $
>> >> $> > $ Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and almost =

>100%
>> >> $> > $effective.
>> >> $>
>> >> $> So they use it on use thinking it will be just as effective.
>> >> $>
>> >> $> Should have figured it out sooner.
>> >> $>
>> >> $> Thanks Peachy!
>> >> $>
>> >> $I wonder if HJ is so repressed that he is denying a homosexual

>> >> $orientation within himself, and thus finds it loathsome and =

>disgusting
>> >> $
>> >> $He might therefore assume that everyone else will be equally
>> >> $disgusted. The flaw in that plan is that most people are probably
>> >> $quite relaxed with their sexuality, me included.
>> >
>> >I say you've hit the nail on the head there Ged.
>> >
>> >Calling someone a homosexual as a derogatory label might
>> >have worked 25 to 50 years ago. But the western world has
>> >changed quite a bit since then, and while most people
>> >wouldn't chose to live a homosexual lifestyle, they won't
>> >denounce it either.

>> >=20
>> >--
>> >=20
>> >John Fleming
>> >Edmonton, Canada
>>=20

>> You think?
>> --=20
>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici =

>doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>
>Fleming NEVER thinks !!
>--
>John C.

I will let John Fl. reply to that.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

[The Doctor]

In article <2YKdna7hLsjjbpHW...@centurytel.net>,

\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>

>"peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message =

>news:hei8l...@news2.newsguy.com...
>> The Doctor wrote:
>> > In article <hei7r...@news2.newsguy.com>,
>> > peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>> In article <hehtm...@news1.newsguy.com>,
>> >>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>> In article <heffe...@news2.newsguy.com>,
>> >>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>> In article <hefbd...@news6.newsguy.com>,
>> >>>>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
>> >>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a =

>desk
>> >>>>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisi...@hotmail.com> =
>wrote in message=20

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion =

><exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the =

>Doc as they are all

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most =

>telling of all is that
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay as an =
>insult.
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a =

>cantankerous old man with
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a troll, and it's =
>the one insult that
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. So it's =
>effective.-
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his =

>arsenal is "Hey, look at
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what you =
>have is effective.
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=20
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=20
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure in =
>your own=20

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means =
>fuck all...

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=20

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $ I agree completely.
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $

>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure enough =
>to easily dismiss=20
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $that particular allegation.
>> >>>>>>>>>> $>=20
>> >>>>>>>>>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay =

>as an
>> >>>>>>>>>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in
>> >>>>>>>>>> $> one's onw sexuality.
>> >>>>>>>>>> $
>> >>>>>>>>>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
>> >>>>>>>>>> $

>> >>>>>>>>>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, =
>whose only=20

>> >>>>>>>>>> $intention is to rile people up.
>> >>>>>>>>> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
>> >>>>>>>>> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.

>> >>>>>>>>> =20
>> >>>>>>>> Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and =
>almost 100%=20
>> >>>>>>>> effective.
>> >>>>>>> Repressed??
>> >>>>>> Repressed. People like you try to give the impression that =
>natural=20
>> >>>>>> and normal things people do with their own bodies are somehow =

>bad.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> This is what you get when secular humanism perverts society.

>> >>>> The perverts are the ones that try to tell us natural things =

>are bad.
>> >>> are you certain?
>> >>
>> >> Yes. Some things are natural.

>> >=20
>> > Homosexuality is NOT!
>>=20

>> Actually, yes it is.
>
>Actually, you are dumber than a box of rocks !!
>--
>John C.

Homosexuality natural?? 0/10 !! Dumb humanists for you.

[Bernard Hedges]

Thank you Dennis Dunstable.

[PV]

"The Great One" wrote:

That's nice

--
PV

Stupidity is a condition
Ignorance is a choice

[PV]

Ironic coming from a homophobic, racist, misogynistic idiot like you

http://dictionary.reference.com/

To help you with the big words

[PV]

Is that english shorthand for "freaking idiot"?

[peachy ashie passion]

Yeah, keep telling yourself that.

And also that all the animal homosexuality that we see is just
"dominance".

You'll sleep better at night.

[George Avalos]

you're back! But I hope for more than just to zap a poster!
-George

[Alan Sailsbury]

It's sarcasm for "whining shit". ;-)

[Mac Breck]

[All crossposting except RAT and RAST removed.]

George Avalos wrote:
> you're back! But I hope for more than just to zap a poster!
> -George

But is it the real PV or an imposter? The email addy's different and so
is the sig.

--
Mac Breck (KoshN)
-------------------------------
"Babylon 5: Crusade" (1999) - "War Zone"
Galen (to Gideon): "I've been penalized before for helping other
people. I've been trying to decide whether or not I should risk it
again."

[The Doctor]

In article <DeGdnUauHIvx2pDW...@supernews.com>,

George Avalos <george...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>you're back! But I hope for more than just to zap a poster!
>-George
>
>

Whom are you addressing?

--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

[The Doctor]

In article <7sqdnY2kltXWzJDW...@bt.com>,

>It's sarcasm for "whining !@#$". ;-)
>
>

Trolls PV and Sailsbury just lit the flames.

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:hej9j0$1nc$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

Actually, there was an article I read a while back that said they had found
actual differences in the brains of homosexuals. Which means it is either
natural, or caused by brain damage. In either case, there isn't a damn
thing they can do about it, and condemning them for it is stupid.

[Hulahoop]

On Nov 27, 1:52 pm, "Dragon Lady" <dragonlad...@q.com> wrote:
> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>
> news:hej9j0$1nc$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>
>
>
>
>

> > In article <2YKdna7hLsjjbpHWnZ2dnUVZ_sCdn...@centurytel.net>,

> > \"The Great One\" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>

> >>"peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message =

> >>news:hei8l...@news2.newsguy.com...
> >>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>> > In article <hei7rj3...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> >>> > peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> The Doctor wrote:

> >>> >>> In article <hehtm001...@news1.newsguy.com>,

> >>> >>> peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>> >>>>> In article <heffei31...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> >>> >>>>> peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>> >>>>>>> In article <hefbd261...@news6.newsguy.com>,

> >>> >>>>>>> peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >>> >>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>> >>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a =
> >>desk
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:

> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> =

> thing they can do about it, and condemning them for it is stupid.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Welcome to the World of the Doctor

Regards

Ged

[Dragon Lady]

"PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote in message

news:y5bPm.55012$PH1.45196@edtnps82...

Nah, he just forgot to put the t in twit.

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:hek7n6$1ud$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

Oh, that's funny. The first post I saw came from "The Great One", who is
obviously a twit who cross posted to a bunce of unrelated groups in hopes of
starting those flames you're claiming Alan and PV started. Somehow I
seriously doubt either of those two dragged rast into it.

[The Doctor]

In article <henet7$cgf$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

Condeming is not the way to go. Argument by love works better.

[The Doctor]

In article <f0892995-300a-465a...@s20g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Nov 27, 1:52=A0pm, "Dragon Lady" <dragonlad...@q.com> wrote:
>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> news:hej9j0$1nc$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > In article <2YKdna7hLsjjbpHWnZ2dnUVZ_sCdn...@centurytel.net>,
>> > \"The Great One\" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>
>> >>"peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message =

>=3D

>> >>news:hei8l...@news2.newsguy.com...
>> >>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>> > In article <hei7rj3...@news2.newsguy.com>,

>> >>> > peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>> >>> In article <hehtm001...@news1.newsguy.com>,

>> >>> >>> peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> In article <heffei31...@news2.newsguy.com>,

>> >>> >>>>> peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>> In article <hefbd261...@news6.newsguy.com>,

>> >>> >>>>>>> peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
>> >>> >>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>> >>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a =

>=3D

>> >>desk
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>=

> =3D
>> >>wrote in message=3D20

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion =3D

>> >><exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of the=

> =3D

>> >>Doc as they are all
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and most =

>=3D

>> >>telling of all is that
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> =A0 How sad for you that you are using gay as =
>an =3D

>> >>insult.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a =

>=3D

>> >>cantankerous old man with
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> =A0 =A0 Actually, it's because he's a troll, and=
> it's =3D
>> >>the one insult that
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. =A0So it's =3D
>> >>effective.-
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his =3D

>> >>arsenal is "Hey, look at
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> =A0 =A0You don't need much of an arsenal if what y=
>ou =3D
>> >>have is effective.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=3D20
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=3D20
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. =A0If you're secure in =
>=3D
>> >>your own=3D20

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means =

>=3D
>> >>fuck all...
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=3D20
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $ =A0 =A0I agree completely.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $ =A0But it would appear that few men are secure enoug=
>h =3D
>> >>to easily dismiss=3D20
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>> $that particular allegation.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $>=3D20

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people gay =

>=3D

>> >>as an
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security in
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $> one's onw sexuality.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $ =A0 As a general rule, I agree.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $
>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $ =A0I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls, =
>=3D
>> >>whose only=3D20

>> >>> >>>>>>>>>> $intention is to rile people up.
>> >>> >>>>>>>>> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someone
>> >>> >>>>>>>>> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.

>> >>> >>>>>>>>> =3D20
>> >>> >>>>>>>> =A0 Oh sure. =A0But in this repressed culture, it's fast and=
> =3D
>> >>almost 100%=3D20
>> >>> >>>>>>>> effective.
>> >>> >>>>>>> Repressed??
>> >>> >>>>>> =A0 Repressed. =A0People like you try to give the impression t=
>hat =3D
>> >>natural=3D20

>> >>> >>>>>> and normal things people do with their own bodies are somehow =

>=3D

>> >>bad.
>>
>> >>> >>>>> This is what you get when secular humanism perverts society.

>> >>> >>>> =A0 =A0The perverts are the ones that try to tell us natural thi=
>ngs =3D

>> >>are bad.
>> >>> >>> are you certain?
>>

>> >>> >> =A0 Yes. =A0Some things are natural.
>> >>> >=3D20
>> >>> > Homosexuality is NOT!
>> >>>=3D20
>> >>> =A0 =A0 Actually, yes it is.

>>
>> >>Actually, you are dumber than a box of rocks !!
>> >>--
>> >>John C.
>>

>> > Homosexuality natural?? =A00/10 !! =A0Dumb humanists for you.
>>
>> Actually, there was an article I read a while back that said they had fou=
>nd
>> actual differences in the brains of homosexuals. =A0Which means it is eit=
>her
>> natural, or caused by brain damage. =A0In either case, there isn't a damn
>> thing they can do about it, and condemning them for it is stupid.- Hide q=

>uoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Welcome to the World of the Doctor
>
>Regards
>
>Ged

IT is called Doctor Who now on BBC as those who wish to purchase.

[The Doctor]

In article <henf0j$chd$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

Could be a spoonerism.

[The Doctor]

In article <henf7i$cld$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

Well they have an artful way of doing it.

BTW if HJ gives you trouble, I will make him apologise.

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:henfcm$ovm$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

It's a physical condition. Neither argument nor love is going to make them
heterosexual.

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:henfga$p36$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

Is that the guy posting as "The Great One"? He hasn't given me any trouble.
I'm just pointing out his is the first post that appeared on my newsreader.

["The Great One"]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message news:henfga$p36$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

And he will too !!
--
John C.

[PV]

LOL...good one!

[TBerk]

On Nov 26, 6:57 pm, "Dragon Lady" <dragonlad...@q.com> wrote:
<snip>

> Oh, that's funny.  The first post I saw came from "The Great One", who is
> obviously a twit who cross posted to a bunce of unrelated groups in hopes of
> starting those flames you're claiming Alan and PV started.  Somehow I
> seriously doubt either of those two dragged rast into it.

Crossposted to:
rec.arts.drwho,
edm.general,
uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,
rec.arts.tv,
rec.arts.sf.tv

btw- 'Doc!' = 'Doc Savage', <ahem>.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doc_Savage

berk

[Alan Sailsbury]

It might be worth pointing out that "the Doctor's" idea of "argument by
love" involves a wish to forcibly castrate homosexuals. He's mentioned
it numerous times on radw over the years.

[Hulahoop]

On Nov 27, 9:28 pm, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> Dragon Lady wrote:
> > "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >news:henfcm$ovm$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

> >> In article <henet7$cg...@news.telesweet.net>,

> >> Dragon Lady <dragonlad...@q.com> wrote:
> >>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >>>news:hej9j0$1nc$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

> >>>> In article <2YKdna7hLsjjbpHWnZ2dnUVZ_sCdn...@centurytel.net>,

> >>>> \"The Great One\" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:

> >>>>> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message =

> >>>>>news:hei8l...@news2.newsguy.com...
> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>>>>>> In article <hei7rj3...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> >>>>>>> peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>>>>>>>> In article <hehtm001...@news1.newsguy.com>,

> >>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <heffei31...@news2.newsguy.com>,

> >>>>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <hefbd261...@news6.newsguy.com>,

> >>>>>>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion  <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a desk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to a =
> >>>>> desk
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>

> it numerous times on radw over the years.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

As in he would love to castrate them I presume

Regards

Ged

[The Doctor]

In article <henjgv$f0k$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

I disagree. LEt's agree to disagree.

[The Doctor]

In article <henjle$f1s$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

That's him. He has a theological problem about women being
pastors.

[The Doctor]

In article <mfSdnTIHt_Om95LW...@centurytel.net>,
\"The Great One\" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message =

>news:henfga$p36$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <henf7i$cld$1...@news.telesweet.net>,
>> Dragon Lady <dragon...@q.com> wrote:
>> >

>> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message=20

>> >news:hek7n6$1ud$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> In article <7sqdnY2kltXWzJDW...@bt.com>,
>> >> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> >>>PV wrote:
>> >>>> Hulahoop wrote:

>> >>>>> On Nov 25, 7:22 pm, "\"The Great One\"" =

><honestj...@centurytel.net>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>> "Hulahoop" <sweeney...@hotmail.com> wrote in

>> >>>>>> =
>messagenews:94181a0e-a83c-4146...@b36g2000prf.googlegroups=

>.com...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Nov 25, 12:14 am, peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:47:29 -0800 (PST), while chained to a
>> >>>>>>>> desk in the scriptorium Hulahoop <sweeney...@hotmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>> $On Nov 24, 1:09 pm, John Fleming <nos...@sprynet.com> =
>wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:53:04 -0500, while chained to a =

>desk
>> >>>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $John Fleming wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to =

>a
>> >>>>>>>>> desk $> > $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $John Fleming wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while =

>chained to
>> >>>>>>>>> a desk $> > $>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $john smith wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion"
>> >>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote in message $> > $>> $>>
>> >>>>>>>>> $>news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com... $> > $>> $>> $>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Mr.Smartypants wrote: $> > $>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am,

>> >>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> $> > $>> =

>$>>
>> >>>>>>>>> $>>> wrote: $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" =
>of
>> >>>>>>>>> the Doc as they are all $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous =
>and
>> >>>>>>>>> Envious of the Doc and most telling of all is that $> > $>> =

>$>>
>> >>>>>>>>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !! $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>>>>>> How sad for you that you are using gay =
>as an
>> >>>>>>>>> insult. $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 =
>years
>> >>>>>>>>> old or a cantankerous old man with $> > $>> $>> $>>>>> =
>outdated
>> >>>>>>>>> ideas. $> > $>> $>> $>>>> Actually, it's because he's a =
>troll,
>> >>>>>>>>> and it's the one insult that $> > $>> $>> $>>>> most guys =

>can't
>> >>>>>>>>> just shake off. So it's effective.- $> > $>> $>> $>>>

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in =

>his
>> >>>>>>>>> arsenal is "Hey, look at $> > $>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>>>

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>> You don't need much of an arsenal if what =

>you
>> >>>>>>>>> have is effective. $> > $>> $>> $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $>

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. If you're secure =
>in
>> >>>>>>>>> your own $> > $>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being =

>called
>> >>>>>>>>> "gay" means fuck all... $> > $>> $>> $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $ I agree completely.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>> $ But it would appear that few men are secure =

>enough
>> >>>>>>>>> to easily dismiss $> > $>> $>> $that particular allegation.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $>

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling =
>people
>> >>>>>>>>> gay as an $> > $>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a =

>lack of
>> >>>>>>>>> security in $> > $>> $> one's onw sexuality.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $ As a general rule, I agree.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>> $ I think I may change my mind in the case of =

>trolls,
>> >>>>>>>>> whose only $> > $>> $intention is to rile people up.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>

>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult =
>someone
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $> and rile them up without resorting to sexual =

>orientation.
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $
>> >>>>>>>>> $> > $ Oh sure. But in this repressed culture, it's fast and
>> >>>>>>>>> almost 100% $> > $effective.
>> >>>>>>>>> $>

>> >>>>>>>>> $> So they use it on use thinking it will be just as =

>effective.
>> >>>>>>>>> $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> Should have figured it out sooner.
>> >>>>>>>>> $>
>> >>>>>>>>> $> Thanks Peachy!
>> >>>>>>>>> $>

>> >>>>>>>>> $I wonder if HJ is so repressed that he is denying a =

>homosexual
>> >>>>>>>>> $orientation within himself, and thus finds it loathsome and
>> >>>>>>>>> disgusting $

>> >>>>>>>>> $He might therefore assume that everyone else will be =
>equally
>> >>>>>>>>> $disgusted. The flaw in that plan is that most people are =

>probably
>> >>>>>>>>> $quite relaxed with their sexuality, me included.
>> >>>>>>>> I say you've hit the nail on the head there Ged.
>> >>>>>>>> Calling someone a homosexual as a derogatory label might
>> >>>>>>>> have worked 25 to 50 years ago. But the western world has
>> >>>>>>>> changed quite a bit since then, and while most people
>> >>>>>>>> wouldn't chose to live a homosexual lifestyle, they won't
>> >>>>>>>> denounce it either.

>> >>>>>>> I wish that this were true, but I think you both overlook the =
>facts.
>> >>>>>>> You may well be answering for yourselves, but the vast =

>majority of
>> >>>>>>> men
>> >>>>>>> are not that comfortable with themselves and their sexuality.
>> >>>>>>> Ian Baynham was killed in London last month, for being

>> >>>>>>> =

>gay.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6874257.ece
>> >>>>>>> Reports are that incidences of gay bashing are up in London.

>> >>>>>>> Chris Skinner was killed in Canada last month too. While I =
>can't
>> >>>>>>> find
>> >>>>>>> any report of them finding who did it, friends firmly believe =
>that
>> >>>>>>> it
>> >>>>>>> was because he was openly gay. He was beaten then run over, in =

>an
>> >>>>>>> area
>> >>>>>>> that friends say they too have experienced gay bashing.

>> >>>>>>> And googling "killed for being gay in the usa" brings up =
>3,030,000
>> >>>>>>> hits. In June a US Navy sailor was killed, apparently because =
>he was
>> >>>>>>> gay. A Syracuse New York man was killed in 2008, clearly for =
>being
>> >>>>>>> gay. 15 year old Lawrence King was killed in California =
>because he
>> >>>>>>> liked a
>> >>>>>>> boy, who felt so threatened by it that he killed him.- Hide =

>quoted
>> >>>>>>> text -
>> >>>>>>> - Show quoted text -

>> >>>>>> I am missing something that allows me to think in a rational =

>manner.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Gelded Ged
>> >>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Sorry.....
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> John C.- Hide quoted text -
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>> >>>>> You are such a shining wit
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Is that english shorthand for "freaking idiot"?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>It's sarcasm for "whining !@#$". ;-)
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Trolls PV and Sailsbury just lit the flames.
>> >

>> >Oh, that's funny. The first post I saw came from "The Great One", =
>who is=20
>> >obviously a twit who cross posted to a bunce of unrelated groups in =
>hopes of=20
>> >starting those flames you're claiming Alan and PV started. Somehow I =

>
>> >seriously doubt either of those two dragged rast into it.
>> >
>> >

>>=20

>> Well they have an artful way of doing it.

>>=20

>> BTW if HJ gives you trouble, I will make him apologise.

>> --=20
>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici =

>doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>
>And he will too !!
>--
>John C.

Look HJ DL is a callsy poster. Trouble here and the Dragon Fire will
crisp you.

--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca

[The Doctor]

In article <97087ab5-1b08-4ab5...@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
TBerk <bayar...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Nov 26, 6:57=A0pm, "Dragon Lady" <dragonlad...@q.com> wrote:
><snip>

>> Oh, that's funny. =A0The first post I saw came from "The Great One", who =
>is
>> obviously a twit who cross posted to a bunce of unrelated groups in hopes=
> of
>> starting those flames you're claiming Alan and PV started. =A0Somehow I

>> seriously doubt either of those two dragged rast into it.
>
>Crossposted to:
>rec.arts.drwho,
>edm.general,
>uk.media.tv.sf.drwho,
>rec.arts.tv,
>rec.arts.sf.tv
>

>btw- 'Doc!' =3D 'Doc Savage', <ahem>.
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doc_Savage
>
>
>berk

Your point TBerk?

[The Doctor]

In article <A9adnSxGie49NJLW...@bt.com>,

IF homosexal rape was to occur. Get the context correct or you self-defile
yourself.

[The Doctor]

In article <97ff9687-b225-4dd5...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com>,
Hulahoop <sween...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>On Nov 27, 9:28=A0pm, Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
>> Dragon Lady wrote:
>> > "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> >news:henfcm$ovm$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> In article <henet7$cg...@news.telesweet.net>,
>> >> Dragon Lady <dragonlad...@q.com> wrote:
>> >>> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> >>>news:hej9j0$1nc$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >>>> In article <2YKdna7hLsjjbpHWnZ2dnUVZ_sCdn...@centurytel.net>,
>> >>>> \"The Great One\" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote:

>> >>>>> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote in messag=
>e =3D

>> >>>>>news:hei8l...@news2.newsguy.com...
>> >>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>> In article <hei7rj3...@news2.newsguy.com>,

>> >>>>>>> peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> In article <hehtm001...@news1.newsguy.com>,

>> >>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <heffei31...@news2.newsguy.com>,

>> >>>>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <hefbd261...@news6.newsguy.com>,

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> peachy ashie passion =A0<exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> John Fleming wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:50:53 -0500, while chained to a de=

>sk
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $John Fleming wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:25:40 -0500, while chained to =
>a =3D

>> >>>>> desk
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> in the scriptorium peachy ashie passion
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $john smith wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $> "peachy ashie passion" <exquisitepe...@hotmail.co=
>m>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D
>> >>>>> wrote in message=3D20

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>news:he71t...@news3.newsguy.com...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> Mr.Smartypants wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> On Nov 20, 11:47 am, peachy ashie passion =3D

>> >>>>> <exquisitepe...@hotmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> Alan Sailsbury wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> peachy ashie passion wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> "The Great One" wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> Please excuse all these "ankle-biters" of t=
>he
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D

>> >>>>> Doc as they are all

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> very Jealous and Envious of the Doc and mos=
>t =3D

>> >>>>> telling of all is that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> they are *GAY* !!
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>>> John C.

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>>> =A0 How sad for you that you are using gay a=
>s an
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D

>> >>>>> insult.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> That's because he's either 13 years old or a =

>=3D

>> >>>>> cantankerous old man with
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>>> outdated ideas.

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> =A0 =A0 Actually, it's because he's a troll, a=
>nd it's
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D
>> >>>>> the one insult that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>> most guys can't just shake off. =A0So it's =3D

>> >>>>> effective.-
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> He's not much of a troll if all he has in his =

>=3D

>> >>>>> arsenal is "Hey, look at
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>> the gay!"
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>> =A0 =A0You don't need much of an arsenal if what=
> you =3D
>> >>>>> have is effective.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $> Hmmm... I dunno about that. =A0If you're secure i=
>n =3D
>> >>>>> your own=3D20

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $> self/sexuality/identity, being called "gay" means=

> =3D
>> >>>>> fuck all...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $>=3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $ =A0 =A0I agree completely.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $ =A0But it would appear that few men are secure eno=
>ugh =3D
>> >>>>> to easily dismiss=3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>> $that particular allegation.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $>=3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> I would also suggest that, perhaps, calling people ga=
>y =3D
>> >>>>> as an
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> attempt to insult them also shows a lack of security =

>in
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $> one's onw sexuality.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ =A0 As a general rule, I agree.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ =A0I think I may change my mind in the case of trolls,=
> =3D
>> >>>>> whose only=3D20

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $intention is to rile people up.

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> At the same time, there are lots of ways to insult someon=

>e
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and rile them up without resorting to sexual orientation.

>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> =3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> =A0 Oh sure. =A0But in this repressed culture, it's fast a=
>nd =3D
>> >>>>> almost 100%=3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> effective.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Repressed??
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> =A0 Repressed. =A0People like you try to give the impression=
> that =3D
>> >>>>> natural=3D20
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and normal things people do with their own bodies are someho=
>w =3D

>> >>>>> bad.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> This is what you get when secular humanism perverts society.

>> >>>>>>>>>> =A0 =A0The perverts are the ones that try to tell us natural t=
>hings =3D

>> >>>>> are bad.
>> >>>>>>>>> are you certain?

>> >>>>>>>> =A0 Yes. =A0Some things are natural.
>> >>>>>>> =3D20
>> >>>>>>> Homosexuality is NOT!
>> >>>>>> =3D20

>> >>>>>> =A0 =A0 Actually, yes it is.

>> >>>>> Actually, you are dumber than a box of rocks !!
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> John C.

>> >>>> Homosexuality natural?? =A00/10 !! =A0Dumb humanists for you.

>> >>> Actually, there was an article I read a while back that said they had
>> >>> found

>> >>> actual differences in the brains of homosexuals. =A0Which means it is=
> either
>> >>> natural, or caused by brain damage. =A0In either case, there isn't a =

>damn
>> >>> thing they can do about it, and condemning them for it is stupid.
>>

>> >> Condeming is not the way to go. =A0Argument by love works better.
>>
>> > It's a physical condition. =A0Neither argument nor love is going to mak=

>e them
>> > heterosexual.
>>
>> It might be worth pointing out that "the Doctor's" idea of "argument by
>> love" involves a wish to forcibly castrate homosexuals. He's mentioned
>> it numerous times on radw over the years.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>As in he would love to castrate them I presume
>
>Regards
>
>Ged

If they rape.

[peachy ashie passion]

Actually, the last time you said it, you said you were going to the
gay pride parade and if any gay man came too close, you'd castrate them.

[The Doctor]

In article <heou8...@news2.newsguy.com>,

Newsfalsh PEachy, I **NEVER** Attend Gay Pride parades.

[Alan Sailsbury]

No, you didn't mention rape at all. What you said was:
"I castrate homosexuals if they get that close to me."

Proof:

http://groups.google.ca/group/edm.general/msg/50861abe58865821?hl=en&dmode=source

[PV]

Thanks for posting that, I am getting tired of digging it up every time he
attempts to spin it in another direction.

[Dragon Lady]

"Alan Sailsbury" <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote in message
news:A9adnSxGie49NJLW...@bt.com...

Which will also not accomplish anything, other than misery for the innocent.

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:heoshm$iip$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

Okay be me. It's obvious neither of us is going to change the other's mind.

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:heospg$iov$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

It's my understanding castration doesn't always work in rape cases,
regardless of sexual orientation. Ever heard of penal implants?

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:heosj3$ik4$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

Him and a lot of other people. It's just one more irrational prejudice.

[The Doctor]

In article <hepjce$27bj$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

10/10 .

[The Doctor]

In article <hepje9$27cp$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

Debate nor force.

[The Doctor]

In article <hepjg4$27cu$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

Not yet. I would love to see that implemented.

[The Doctor]

In article <hepjj8$27dm$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

In both old and new testament, women are held in right esteem
if in hte Eyes of God.

[Alan Sailsbury]

Oh I'm not condoning it! :-)

[The Doctor]

In article <556dnZaGmKvn-43W...@bt.com>,

:-(

[Dragon Lady]

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:hepnfg$fem$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

No. You wouldn't.

Doc, penal implants allow an erection without the hormones normally
necessary to get one. Which means castration won't necessarily stop a
rapist.

[The Doctor]

In article <hepqe2$2cis$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

Yikes!!

[Dragon Lady]

"Alan Sailsbury" <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote in message

news:556dnZaGmKvn-43W...@bt.com...

I didn't think you were.

[PV]

Dragon Lady wrote:
> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

<snip>

Thank for taking the time to explain to the EVI what penile implant actually
means. It was one of his finer examples of reading without comprehension
coupled with his insane desire to post as much as he can in the shortest
amount of time.

(EVI=Edmonton's Village Idiot=The Doctor. For our friends that Honest John
cross-posted this too)

[John Fleming]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:10:18 GMT, while chained to a desk in
the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> $Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> $> The Doctor wrote:
> $>> In article <A9adnSxGie49NJLW...@bt.com>,

> $>> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>>>
> $>>>>
> $>>>>

> $>>> It might be worth pointing out that "the Doctor's" idea of
> $>>> "argument by love" involves a wish to forcibly castrate
> $>>> homosexuals. He's mentioned it numerous times on radw over the
> $>>> years.
> $>>
> $>> IF homosexal rape was to occur. Get the context correct or you
> $>> self-defile yourself.
> $>
> $>
> $> No, you didn't mention rape at all. What you said was:
> $> "I castrate homosexuals if they get that close to me."
> $>
> $> Proof:
> $>
> $>
> $> http://groups.google.ca/group/edm.general/msg/50861abe58865821?hl=en&dmode=source
> $
> $Thanks for posting that, I am getting tired of digging it up every time he
> $attempts to spin it in another direction.

I sure hope the doctor doesn't have any plans to run for the
Liberals in an upcoming federal election. The Conservative,
the NDP. the Greens and possibly the BQ would have a field
day with this.

--

John Fleming
Edmonton, Canada

Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O
And on that farm he had a genome E-I-E-I-O
With a SNP SNP here and a SNP SNP there,
Here a SNP, there a SNP, everywhere a SNP SNP
Old MacDonald had a farm E-I-E-I-O

[PV]

I, for one, would be glad to hand the links to them to ensure that he would
not be in a position of power in this country!

[RL]

On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:22:00 -0700, "Dragon Lady"

<dragon...@q.com> wrote:
> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

> news:heoshm$iip$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...

> > I disagree. LEt's agree to disagree.
>
>
> Okay be me. It's obvious neither of us is going to change the other's mind.

You don't need to worry about changing the doctor's mind. He
hasn't got one to change.

[John Fleming]

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:33:13 GMT, while chained to a desk in

the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:

> $John Fleming wrote:
> $> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:10:18 GMT, while chained to a desk in
> $> the scriptorium "PV" <edrnouser@ spam telus.net> wrote:
> $>> $Alan Sailsbury wrote:
> $>> $> The Doctor wrote:
> $>> $>> In article <A9adnSxGie49NJLW...@bt.com>,

> $>> $>> Alan Sailsbury <al...@yahoo.comm> wrote:
> $>> $>>>
> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>>>>
> $>> $>>> It might be worth pointing out that "the Doctor's" idea of

> $>> $>>> "argument by love" involves a wish to forcibly castrate
> $>> $>>> homosexuals. He's mentioned it numerous times on radw over the
> $>> $>>> years.
> $>> $>>

> $>> $>> IF homosexal rape was to occur. Get the context correct or you

> $>> $>> self-defile yourself.
> $>> $>
> $>> $>

> $>> $> No, you didn't mention rape at all. What you said was:

> $>> $> "I castrate homosexuals if they get that close to me."

> $>> $>
> $>> $> Proof:
> $>> $>

> $>> $>

> $>> $>
> $>> http://groups.google.ca/group/edm.general/msg/50861abe58865821?hl=en&dmode=source

> $>> $ $Thanks for posting that, I am getting tired of digging it up
> $>> every time he $attempts to spin it in another direction.
> $>
> $> I sure hope the doctor doesn't have any plans to run for the
> $> Liberals in an upcoming federal election. The Conservative,
> $> the NDP. the Greens and possibly the BQ would have a field
> $> day with this.
> $
> $I, for one, would be glad to hand the links to them to ensure that he would
> $not be in a position of power in this country!

A former NDP candidate, Malcolm Azania (sp?) found out the
hard way, a couple of federal elections back, that stuff
posted to Usenet can come back to haunt you. His campaign
was torpedoed by something he'd posted to Usenet as a
student back in the early 1990s.

And while not Usenet, another NDP candidate got his campaign
derailed when a bunch of pictures of him in a less than
ideal state of dress with a bunch of kids surfaced.

I'm sure a post to Usenet talking about castrating
homosexuals would do just as much damage to the campaign of
a budding politician.

[The Doctor]

In article <vjf2h5p1k2lud2ku7...@4ax.com>,
RL <nos...@rl.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:29:30 +0000 (UTC),
>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
>> 10/10 .
>
>Your bra size.

Hey troll RL where do come from.

[The Doctor]

In article <cnf2h5d456thvp22g...@4ax.com>,

Hey troll RL do you know alt.usenet.koks ?

[The Doctor]

In article <tqf2h5t17hbsr7tfe...@4ax.com>,
RL <nos...@rl.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:30:07 +0000 (UTC),
>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
>> Debate nor force.
>
>You can't debate.

TRoll RL is tenacious.

[Dragon Lady]

"RL" <nos...@rl.com> wrote in message
news:vjf2h5p1k2lud2ku7...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:29:30 +0000 (UTC),
> doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>
>> 10/10 .
>
> Your bra size.

I don't think they make bras that small.

[The Doctor]

In article <het5gf$2jre$1...@news.telesweet.net>,

You have to remember trolls of the ilk
of RL have a brainsize and an IQ of 1 and belong to
both alt.troll and alt.usenet.kooks .