Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
New York Times interviews the four surviving soaps
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Lynn Kelly  
View profile  
 More options Feb 25 2012, 10:43 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs, rec.arts.tv.soaps.abc, rec.arts.tv.soaps.misc
Followup-To: rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs, rec.arts.tv.soaps.abc, rec.arts.tv.soaps.misc
From: Lynn Kelly <lynn...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Feb 25 2012 10:43 pm
Subject: New York Times interviews the four surviving soaps
The NYT reporter contacted the soaps to ask about "the measures they
were taking to remain vital and relevant in television’s changing
landscape."  Only GH declined to comment for the article.  Here are
what the Executive Producers had to share.

DOOL's Greg Meng:  "The goal is to respect the tradition of the show
but tell the stories as they can be told today, using modern dialogue
in two-week or even three-day story arcs."

Y&R's Maria Arena Bell:  "Once upon a time soaps wrote to Fridays,
where things would slowly build throughout the week, and Friday you’d
have a stunning cliffhanger to keep your attention. I still build to
Fridays, but my motto is that every day has to be a Friday."

B&B's Bradley Bell:  "The old theory says: Keep things moving slowly,
because if people are only watching two or three times a week, they
need to know what’s happening."  "Our new theory is: Something has to
happen every day, and it’s more important to feel as though you’ve
missed something by not watching."

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/19/arts/television/after-some-soaps-ca...


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Diva  
View profile  
 More options Feb 26 2012, 1:11 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs, rec.arts.tv.soaps.abc, rec.arts.tv.soaps.misc
From: Diva <c.fril...@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:11:36 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 26 2012 1:11 am
Subject: Re: New York Times interviews the four surviving soaps
On Feb 25, 10:43 pm, Lynn Kelly <lynn...@gmail.com> wrote:

There is  a real problem with making every day Friday. Too many
ridiculous turns. Things are either happening too fast or dragging out
for months.Little exists that is happy or fun anymore. Really
indiscriminate sex with no depth or meaning abounds.. Nikki was
married to Deacon as a subterfuge to save Victor but she slept with
Deacon. Now she is going to be back with Jack to whom she was once
married. Jack is probably Summer's bio dad.Look at the Phyllis-Ronan
back to Nick scenario, the Nick and Avery period, the Sharon back to
Nick and now back to Adam thread. Genny with Colin, Jill with Colin.
How long before Kevin has sex with Angie? I'll bet Angelo goes for
Anita. It defies being a story and has just become a string of
hookups. If it is for sweeps, the sweepings are ashes and the
characters are asses.

Diva


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
bigb...@yahoo.com  
View profile  
 More options Feb 26 2012, 2:43 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs, rec.arts.tv.soaps.abc, rec.arts.tv.soaps.misc
From: bigb...@yahoo.com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:43:48 -0600
Local: Sun, Feb 26 2012 2:43 pm
Subject: Re: New York Times interviews the four surviving soaps
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:11:36 -0800 (PST), Diva

Why have so many soaps went off the air? Could it be that the Social
Networks on the Internet are causing people not to watch them as much?

Save 15% to 85% on Prescription drugs with our FREE Rx Drug card.

http://bit.ly/wUAgbW

Save hundreds of dollars a year on Diabetic Supplies
http://bit.ly/zTjbVL


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mr. Hole the Magnificent  
View profile  
 More options Feb 26 2012, 6:33 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv.soaps.cbs, rec.arts.tv.soaps.abc, rec.arts.tv.soaps.misc
From: "Mr. Hole the Magnificent" <classic.mr.h...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 15:33:44 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sun, Feb 26 2012 6:33 pm
Subject: Re: New York Times interviews the four surviving soaps
On Feb 25, 10:43 pm, Lynn Kelly <lynn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> B&B's Bradley Bell:  "The old theory says: Keep things moving slowly,
> because if people are only watching two or three times a week, they
> need to know what’s happening."  "Our new theory is: Something has to
> happen every day, and it’s more important to feel as though you’ve
> missed something by not watching."

In B&B's case the same thing has to happen every day it seems.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »