USA TODAY REVIEW: "Not a great musical. But it's about as impossible to
dislike as an adorable puppy."
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS REVIEW:
"Last night, In the Heights, a musical about a Latino New York
neighborhood, opened on Broadway. Unfortunately, this show doesn't quite
hit those earlier, headier heights."
THE NEW YORK POST REVIEW:
"There is no real plot, no true drama. Everyone is as cute as a
litter of kittens. Without any lows, just how high can these sanitized
In the Heights climb?"
AMNY REVIEW:
"Not even Mr. Rogers Neighborhood is so cheery as the colorful,
multilingual quarters found in In the Heights, the Latin hip-hop musical
valentine to the Washington Heights crowd outside the 191st Street
subway stop and George Washington Bridge."
NEW YORK SUN REVIEW:
"It doesn't always seem to know where it's going or why..."Deeply
flawed..."
The question is: Why?
a. To mislead readers of this newsgroup into believing the show didn't
get raves?
b. To discourage us from buying a ticket to this widely-lauded show?
c. Because he hopes old favorites of his (No No Nanette, Let It Ride,
Pipe Dream) will be revived more often if they don't have 21st Century
musicals to compete with?
d. Out of jealousy that newcomers succeed while he continues to
languish in stock?
e. General contempt for us, our taste, our intelligence?
I'm hoping everybody will ignore the malicious pull-quoting, see the
show, and give an original reaction, based upon entertainment actually
experienced
Several newcomers who scored with the critics in LITTLE MERMAID and
CRY-BABY and got other noms this season, were passed over in the Tony
noms.