Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

IN THE HEIGHTS moves uptown

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Steve Newport

unread,
May 11, 2008, 2:23:30 PM5/11/08
to
NEW YORK TIMES REVIEW:
"Its fundamental deficiencies are also along for the ride,
unfortunately."

USA TODAY REVIEW: "Not a great musical. But it's about as impossible to
dislike as an adorable puppy."
 
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS REVIEW:
"Last night, In the Heights, a musical about a Latino New York
neighborhood, opened on Broadway. Unfortunately, this show doesn't quite
hit those earlier, headier heights."
 
THE NEW YORK POST REVIEW:
 "There is no real plot, no true drama. Everyone is as cute as a
litter of kittens. Without any lows, just how high can these sanitized
In the Heights climb?"
 
AMNY REVIEW:
"Not even Mr. Rogers Neighborhood is so cheery as the colorful,
multilingual quarters found in In the Heights, the Latin hip-hop musical
valentine to the Washington Heights crowd outside the 191st Street
subway stop and George Washington Bridge."
 
NEW YORK SUN REVIEW:
"It doesn't always seem to know where it's going or why..."Deeply
flawed..."
 

Robert Bouton

unread,
May 12, 2008, 12:15:09 PM5/12/08
to
Once again, Mr. Newport has cherry-picked negative quotes about a new
musical he hasn't seen that got overwhelmingly positive reviews.

The question is: Why?

a. To mislead readers of this newsgroup into believing the show didn't
get raves?

b. To discourage us from buying a ticket to this widely-lauded show?

c. Because he hopes old favorites of his (No No Nanette, Let It Ride,
Pipe Dream) will be revived more often if they don't have 21st Century
musicals to compete with?

d. Out of jealousy that newcomers succeed while he continues to
languish in stock?

e. General contempt for us, our taste, our intelligence?

I'm hoping everybody will ignore the malicious pull-quoting, see the
show, and give an original reaction, based upon entertainment actually
experienced

Steve Newport

unread,
May 13, 2008, 11:56:51 AM5/13/08
to

From: mpro...@aol.com (Noel Katz still writing as Robert Bouton): old
favorites (No No Nanette, Let It Ride, Pipe Dream) will be revived more
often....
---------------------------------------
Hmmm. They just did NANETTE again. You basically enjoyed it. I've done
it twice, and enjoyed the original revival as well as the Kaye Ballard
Paper Mill version. LET IT RIDE! is not a favorite-- and as you know I'd
want to see that (unfunny) animal cruelty song (you like so much) cut.
With the success of their straightforward revival of SOUTH PACIFIC,
perhaps the R & H organization (and Sher and his dream team) will get
around to PIPE DREAM. Like SOUTH PACIFIC (and LET IT RIDE!) it would be
its first Tony-eigible revival.
------------------------------------------

jealousy that newcomers succeed while he continues to languish
------------------------------------------
Noel Katz, we've been through this crap so many times before.
Ironically, you're the one who sounds so bitter, humourless, and
unfulfilled that hardly anyone ever responds to you anymore-- even after
you've changed your screen name to protect the guilty. (Did you get
turned down once as a pianist for a stock season or something?)

Several newcomers who scored with the critics in LITTLE MERMAID and
CRY-BABY and got other noms this season, were passed over in the Tony
noms.

0 new messages