info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Star Trek: Nemesis
12 views
Skip to first unread message
Unknown
Jul 9, 2012, 9:21:01 PM7/9/12
to
paul (seamus) <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wanked extraordinarily vigorously in:
<joaks3$9ub$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>On 07/05/2012 5:38 PM, Oliver Klozov wrote:
>> On 07/05/2012 4:59 AM, Duggy wrote:
>>> On May 7, 5:07 pm, Oliver Klozov<o.klozov_...@sneakemail.org> wrote:
>>>> Oh, wait, that'd require fourth-grade math skills that you probably
>>>> don't have yet.
>>>
>>> [insult deleted]
>>
>> No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are
>> at all true.
>
>Well, *that* sounds eerily familiar.
>
>But what does any of this have to do with Angband, Duggy and Klozov?
>
oH Dear paul.kook
at it again with the self harm?
you naughty naughty wee poppett!
.. a present for you, something you left, hurriedly.
my two bits follows.
~enjoy!
<snicker>
--
>On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:38:08 +0000, _________ wrote:
>> kook <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> [wipes the jism off the ceiling light bulb]
>>
>> ah..!..there you are.
>> WTF was that!!?
>>
>>>TTFN. But you'll be back. I know it. I seem to have you hopping almost
>>>as madly as thoolen often does. Dance, kook!
>>>
>> ..had to happen, you came too soon though, more is the pity. I was
>> having some great giggles!
>> But you had to go and fuck it all up with the Kook's Godwin!
>> "he who invokes the dance
>> is seen to concede"
>>
>> I will take it as an easy win...but I aint happy, no sireeee.
>>
>> [grumbles]
>>
>> ..fucking Hydra Blanket went in early!
>>
>ROTFLMGDFFAO@ewe
>
>Your failure to respond to the substance of my post is noted, kook.
translation: waaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaHHH
[pops dummy in gob of "nad31...@gmail.invalid"]
>Particularly noteworthy is your snipping and ignoring the whole bit where
>you got the name of my news client wrong. And pretty much everything
>else.
translation: mommy waaaaaah...!!..my diaper is full.
[hands the dweeb a bunch of green thistle]
wipe your own ass.
Message-ID: <mqhmv7lmedbeh7r36...@4ax.com>
>And then invoking a rule you just made up to claim "VICTOLLY!!1!!!
>
"VICTOLLY!!1!!!"[sic] nonetheless the thread sure reads as being you,
in your kook[i]ness, being well reamed a new asshole!
PML
.. actually the man paraphrased, the full rule being;
"As the kook moves toward meltdown, the probability of a directive of
"dance kook dance" being put to the kookologist engaged in burning
the kook's ass approaches 1."
>I am starting to wonder /slap
.. always brings you undone, those hallucinations. take some shroom
tea, lad...there's a good mommy's boy.
>
>Of course, the normal act after inventing a rule and then using it to
>claim victory is to then disappear for a while, or nymshift competently
>enough not to instantly get outed.
>
oH ReaLLY...oh My fuCking g0d my fucking caps loCK is Broken AgaiN!
"mmmmmmuuurphy" anyone?
>I am guessing that you will do neither, thus cementing your claim to
>the coveted July 2012 CNoTM Award.
.. there you go again with that "I guess" = "it i s fact" routine you
are so well known for, paul. kook
two problems I read with your "guess" statement.
1. --> Message-ID: <js8eif$bvq$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> says
your nomination of "Murphy/phlatArse/Flash/etc."
has been denied, being a "revenge nomination".
you do understand what that deny message is?
no, never would you think that far ahead.
effectively the FNVW is decreeing your kook status, for only known kooks
are denied nominating rights. you, paul, being an award winning kook have
been "outed" by that decree.
now, the FNVW is historically held in respect by _ALL_ usenetizens of any
worth in any forum. no self-respecting poster wants a kook award.
you lap them up, thrive on the kookiness, no less.
2.--> under all socks you use it is that "speak English" troll you get the most
mileage from, in your head. yet here **you** are using incorrect nomenclature
for a title. in your hurried effort to correct fla...@gmail.invalid in the use
of "COTN"[sic] you spew out "CNoTM". oH Dear!
.. the kook award status page says;
CNotM -- Clueless Newbie of the Month
http://www.coloneljake.com/AUK/AAD/
.. can you say "DoH!" paul.kook
should the Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
be not up for a Barbara Woodhouse Memorial and Hammer of Thor
"meritorious mention" - at the very least - for the butt hurt you are
experiencing right now, then it is so Usenet lives up to tradition, in not
being "fair" as in "fair go". one lesson you have never grasped.
folks are permitted to argue, permitted to disagree, permitted to call
a cunt a cunt. you are not going to get free reign in subverting those
discussions, nor instigating such egregiousness simply because the
results give you your jollies.cunt
in the words of Joe Attardi;
http://preview.tinyurl.com/cd7xtcl
Why go through such trouble to identify this troll? Because Paul
Derbyshlre has a history of going around usenet causing trouble. Here's
the hilarious but true Paul Derbyshlre FAQ: http://preview.tinyurl.com/7apwwnt
.. more links for your savaged ravaged CNotM ass.kook
http://www.searchlores.org/way_kook.htm
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If they
respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
http://www.searchlores.org/way_kook.htm
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not require proof.
------------------------------------------------------------------
CastAlone [Doktor Nauk] - Usenet Agent Provocateur
[Logistics Support Analyzer [Dept. of] of that Murphy Cabal]
Visit the Page we Occupy - http://66.39.71.195/Derbyshlre/index.html [http://preview.tinyurl.com/celtbta]
And be sure to sign up and become a member of that Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
Need to book est...@aioe.org
Call the office use...@aioe.org
Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
<joaks3$9ub$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
>On 07/05/2012 5:38 PM, Oliver Klozov wrote:
>> On 07/05/2012 4:59 AM, Duggy wrote:
>>> On May 7, 5:07 pm, Oliver Klozov<o.klozov_...@sneakemail.org> wrote:
>>>> Oh, wait, that'd require fourth-grade math skills that you probably
>>>> don't have yet.
>>>
>>> [insult deleted]
>>
>> No. None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are
>> at all true.
>
>Well, *that* sounds eerily familiar.
>
>But what does any of this have to do with Angband, Duggy and Klozov?
>
oH Dear paul.kook
at it again with the self harm?
you naughty naughty wee poppett!
.. a present for you, something you left, hurriedly.
my two bits follows.
~enjoy!
<snicker>
--
>On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 15:38:08 +0000, _________ wrote:
>> kook <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> [wipes the jism off the ceiling light bulb]
>>
>> ah..!..there you are.
>> WTF was that!!?
>>
>>>TTFN. But you'll be back. I know it. I seem to have you hopping almost
>>>as madly as thoolen often does. Dance, kook!
>>>
>> ..had to happen, you came too soon though, more is the pity. I was
>> having some great giggles!
>> But you had to go and fuck it all up with the Kook's Godwin!
>> "he who invokes the dance
>> is seen to concede"
>>
>> I will take it as an easy win...but I aint happy, no sireeee.
>>
>> [grumbles]
>>
>> ..fucking Hydra Blanket went in early!
>>
>ROTFLMGDFFAO@ewe
>
>Your failure to respond to the substance of my post is noted, kook.
translation: waaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaHHH
[pops dummy in gob of "nad31...@gmail.invalid"]
>Particularly noteworthy is your snipping and ignoring the whole bit where
>you got the name of my news client wrong. And pretty much everything
>else.
translation: mommy waaaaaah...!!..my diaper is full.
[hands the dweeb a bunch of green thistle]
wipe your own ass.
Message-ID: <mqhmv7lmedbeh7r36...@4ax.com>
>And then invoking a rule you just made up to claim "VICTOLLY!!1!!!
>
"VICTOLLY!!1!!!"[sic] nonetheless the thread sure reads as being you,
in your kook[i]ness, being well reamed a new asshole!
PML
.. actually the man paraphrased, the full rule being;
"As the kook moves toward meltdown, the probability of a directive of
"dance kook dance" being put to the kookologist engaged in burning
the kook's ass approaches 1."
>I am starting to wonder /slap
.. always brings you undone, those hallucinations. take some shroom
tea, lad...there's a good mommy's boy.
>
>Of course, the normal act after inventing a rule and then using it to
>claim victory is to then disappear for a while, or nymshift competently
>enough not to instantly get outed.
>
oH ReaLLY...oh My fuCking g0d my fucking caps loCK is Broken AgaiN!
"mmmmmmuuurphy" anyone?
>I am guessing that you will do neither, thus cementing your claim to
>the coveted July 2012 CNoTM Award.
.. there you go again with that "I guess" = "it i s fact" routine you
are so well known for, paul. kook
two problems I read with your "guess" statement.
1. --> Message-ID: <js8eif$bvq$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> says
your nomination of "Murphy/phlatArse/Flash/etc."
has been denied, being a "revenge nomination".
you do understand what that deny message is?
no, never would you think that far ahead.
effectively the FNVW is decreeing your kook status, for only known kooks
are denied nominating rights. you, paul, being an award winning kook have
been "outed" by that decree.
now, the FNVW is historically held in respect by _ALL_ usenetizens of any
worth in any forum. no self-respecting poster wants a kook award.
you lap them up, thrive on the kookiness, no less.
2.--> under all socks you use it is that "speak English" troll you get the most
mileage from, in your head. yet here **you** are using incorrect nomenclature
for a title. in your hurried effort to correct fla...@gmail.invalid in the use
of "COTN"[sic] you spew out "CNoTM". oH Dear!
.. the kook award status page says;
CNotM -- Clueless Newbie of the Month
http://www.coloneljake.com/AUK/AAD/
.. can you say "DoH!" paul.kook
should the Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
be not up for a Barbara Woodhouse Memorial and Hammer of Thor
"meritorious mention" - at the very least - for the butt hurt you are
experiencing right now, then it is so Usenet lives up to tradition, in not
being "fair" as in "fair go". one lesson you have never grasped.
folks are permitted to argue, permitted to disagree, permitted to call
a cunt a cunt. you are not going to get free reign in subverting those
discussions, nor instigating such egregiousness simply because the
results give you your jollies.cunt
in the words of Joe Attardi;
http://preview.tinyurl.com/cd7xtcl
Why go through such trouble to identify this troll? Because Paul
Derbyshlre has a history of going around usenet causing trouble. Here's
the hilarious but true Paul Derbyshlre FAQ: http://preview.tinyurl.com/7apwwnt
.. more links for your savaged ravaged CNotM ass.kook
http://www.searchlores.org/way_kook.htm
If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed. If they
respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
http://www.searchlores.org/way_kook.htm
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not require proof.
------------------------------------------------------------------
CastAlone [Doktor Nauk] - Usenet Agent Provocateur
[Logistics Support Analyzer [Dept. of] of that Murphy Cabal]
Visit the Page we Occupy - http://66.39.71.195/Derbyshlre/index.html [http://preview.tinyurl.com/celtbta]
And be sure to sign up and become a member of that Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
Need to book est...@aioe.org
Call the office use...@aioe.org
Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks
t0rminosus
Jul 10, 2012, 3:22:46 AM7/10/12
to
On 09/07/2012 9:21 PM, "Hydra-Blanky", an obvious murphy sock, wrote:
NaN> Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,ott.jobs,rec.games.roguelike.angband
NaN> paul (seamus) <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wanked extraordinarily
vigorously in:
NaN> <joaks3$9ub$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Suffering from reading
comprehension problems as well, murphy? Wally wrote that post, murphy,
not some "paul (seamus)", and Wally's email address is
hpar...@usa.net.nospam.invalid, not nad31...@gmail.invalid. And who
is "paul (seamus)", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> oH Dear paul.kook
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> at it again with the self harm?
What does your unsubstantiated claim regarding Wally have to do with
Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN you naughty naughty wee poppett!
Who is "you naughty naughty wee poppett", murphy? There is nobody in
this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> .. a present for you, something you left, hurriedly.
What does your alleged present for Wally have to do with Star Trek,
jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> my two bits follows.
What do your two bits have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> ~enjoy!
What does your directive to Wally have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> <snicker>
What does your amusement have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband,
murphy?
NaN> > Your failure to respond to the substance of my post is noted, kook.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> translation: waaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaHHH
What does your bad translation have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> [pops dummy in gob of "nad31...@gmail.invalid"]
What does your gibberish have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband,
murphy?
NaN> > Particularly noteworthy is your snipping and ignoring the whole
bit where
NaN> > you got the name of my news client wrong. And pretty much everything
NaN> > else.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> translation: mommy waaaaaah...!!..my diaper is full.
What does your bad translation have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> [hands the dweeb a bunch of green thistle]
Who is "the dweeb", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> wipe your own ass.
What does your unsubstantiated insinuation that Wally doesn't have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Message-ID: <mqhmv7lmedbeh7r36...@4ax.com>
What does that have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> > And then invoking a rule you just made up to claim "VICTOLLY!!1!!!
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> "VICTOLLY!!1!!!"[sic] nonetheless the thread sure reads as being you,
NaN> in your kook[i]ness, being well reamed a new asshole!
What does your ironic and unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to
do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> PML
What is "PML", murphy, and what does it have to do with Star Trek, jobs,
or Angband?
NaN> .. actually the man paraphrased, the full rule being;
NaN>
NaN> "As the kook moves toward meltdown, the probability of a directive of
NaN> "dance kook dance" being put to the kookologist engaged in burning
NaN> the kook's ass approaches 1."
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? There is no such documented
rule, murphy.
NaN> > I am starting to wonder /slap
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> .. always brings you undone, those hallucinations.
What does your ironic and unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to
do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> take some shroom tea, lad...there's a good mommy's boy.
Who is "lad", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> > Of course, the normal act after inventing a rule and then using
it to
NaN> > claim victory is to then disappear for a while, or nymshift
competently
NaN> > enough not to instantly get outed.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> oH ReaLLY...oh My fuCking g0d my fucking caps loCK is Broken AgaiN!
What do your foul language and your "caps loCK" have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> "mmmmmmuuurphy" anyone?
What does your non sequitur question have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> > I am guessing that you will do neither, thus cementing your claim to
NaN> > the coveted July 2012 CNoTM Award.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> .. there you go again with that "I guess" = "it i s fact" routine you
NaN> are so well known for, paul. kook
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> two problems I read with your "guess" statement.
What does your hallucination have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> 1. --> Message-ID: <js8eif$bvq$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> says
NaN> your nomination of "Murphy/phlatArse/Flash/etc."
NaN> has been denied, being a "revenge nomination".
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Even were any decree emerging from the
cesspit that is databasix.com to ever be taken seriously, Wally didn't
nominate you for anything, murphy. All he did was post a question in
rec.games.roguelike.angband to which you inexplicably responded, a whole
month later, with a large wad of screed.
NaN> you do understand what that deny message is?
What does your irrelevant question have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> no, never would you think that far ahead.
What does your unsubstantiated claim about Wally have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> effectively the FNVW is decreeing your kook status, for only known
kooks
NaN> are denied nominating rights.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Nowhere in the post you
referenced does the (fake) FNVW even mention Wally, murphy.
NaN> you, paul, being an award winning kook have
NaN> been "outed" by that decree.
Who is "you, paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> now, the FNVW is historically held in respect by _ALL_ usenetizens
of any
NaN> worth in any forum.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> no self-respecting poster wants a kook award.
You seem to be trying really hard. I guess you must not be
self-respecting, then, murphy. I now hear you're up for no fewer than
eight of them, six in June and KotM itself and CNoTM in July. That's
quite possibly some sort of a record, murphy.
NaN> you lap them up, thrive on the kookiness, no less.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? There is no record of Wally
ever having received a kook award, murphy.
NaN> 2.--> under all socks you use it is that "speak English" troll you
get the most
NaN> mileage from, in your head.
What does your unsubstantiated allegation that Wally trolls and uses
socks have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> yet here **you** are using incorrect nomenclature
NaN> for a title.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> in your hurried effort to correct fla...@gmail.invalid in the use
NaN> of "COTN"[sic] you spew out "CNoTM". oH Dear!
What does your hallucination have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? Wally hasn't done anything that even remotely fits any
fragment of your rather-incoherent narrative.
NaN> .. the kook award status page says;
NaN>
NaN> CNotM -- Clueless Newbie of the Month
What does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> .. can you say "DoH!" paul.kook
Who is "paul.kook", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> should the Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
NaN> be not up for a Barbara Woodhouse Memorial and Hammer of Thor
NaN> "meritorious mention" - at the very least - for the butt hurt you
are
NaN> experiencing right now, then it is so Usenet lives up to tradition,
in not
NaN> being "fair" as in "fair go".
What does your bogus email address have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? There is not currently a top-level domain ".helpdesk",
murphy. Still suffering from Internet how-to cluelessness, murphy?
NaN> one lesson you have never grasped.
What does your unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to do with
Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> folks are permitted to argue, permitted to disagree, permitted to call
NaN> a cunt a cunt.
Folks are also permitted to call you a kook, murphy.
NaN> you are not going to get free reign in subverting those
NaN> discussions, nor instigating such egregiousness simply because the
NaN> results give you your jollies.cunt
Who is "cunt", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias. Rather ironic, too, that you'd threaten someone with lack of free
reign in subverting discussions while you derail random threads with
off-topic trolling, which some might equate to you subverting discussions.
NaN> in the words of Joe Attardi;
What does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Why go through such trouble to identify this troll?
Who is "this troll", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias, though it's interesting that you said "this troll" rather
than "that troll" and suggests that you refer to yourself.
NaN> Because Paul Derbyshlre has a history of going around usenet
NaN> causing trouble.
Who is "Paul Derbyshlre", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias. Rather ironic, too, coming from someone who has a
Who is "Paul Derbyshlre", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias. And what does your URL have to do with Star Trek,
jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> .. more links for your savaged ravaged CNotM ass.kook
Who is "kook", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias. Rather ironic, too, coming from a fresh CNotM nominee. And what
does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed.
If they
NaN> respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
How ironic.
What does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do
not require proof.
How ironic.
NaN> ------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> CastAlone [Doktor Nauk] - Usenet Agent Provocateur
NaN> [Logistics Support Analyzer [Dept. of] of that Murphy Cabal]
What do your increasingly-elaborate delusions have to do with Star Trek,
jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Visit the Page we Occupy -
What do your URLs have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> And be sure to sign up and become a member of that
NaN> Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
What does your bogus email address have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? There is not currently a top-level domain ".helpdesk",
murphy. Still suffering from Internet how-to cluelessness, murphy?
NaN> Need to book est...@aioe.org
NaN> Call the office use...@aioe.org
What does your attempt to cause your own NSP's administrator to get
spammed with off-topic kooky foamage have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? You're rapidly running out of NSPs that will tolerate
you, murphy, so your continual badmouthing of AIOE's administrator, and
now this attempt to flood his inbox, are exceptionally unwise.
I don't see anything in your post with any apparent relationship to Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy.
"violating one basic rule in continually posting to or creating "off
topic" messages is a violation of group's charters."
--murphy
How ironic.
"I had 'volunteered (years back) to support those who do endeavor
to provide free Free Usenet access, support those who offered
subscription based Free Usenet access, nothing more than
cooperation expected in return for what has been many
thousands of hours of work. I note most of those I joined with
are either deceased, severely disabled, or plain ole' MIA..
now it is my Time. ...
You just read my last. ...
For those who think they see me in future times I can only wish
you severe Tinnitus in your dreams. For those who know me
well (eMail, whatever) and see me, know I will be smiling also.
It is to you I say "adieu mein frenz and adios .. grazie' [hugs]
for all the Good Times! May you and yours always bear well
with all Life brings you".
/0ut"
--murphy
http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/goodbye.htm
And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.
P.S. Your latest post also had a ludicrously long signature, murphy. The
generally accepted maximum is four lines, while yours is currently
closer to 150 lines. Still suffering from netiquette cluelessness, murphy?
NaN> Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.misc,ott.jobs,rec.games.roguelike.angband
NaN> paul (seamus) <nad31...@gmail.invalid> wanked extraordinarily
vigorously in:
NaN> <joaks3$9ub$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Suffering from reading
comprehension problems as well, murphy? Wally wrote that post, murphy,
not some "paul (seamus)", and Wally's email address is
hpar...@usa.net.nospam.invalid, not nad31...@gmail.invalid. And who
is "paul (seamus)", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> oH Dear paul.kook
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> at it again with the self harm?
What does your unsubstantiated claim regarding Wally have to do with
Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN you naughty naughty wee poppett!
Who is "you naughty naughty wee poppett", murphy? There is nobody in
this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> .. a present for you, something you left, hurriedly.
What does your alleged present for Wally have to do with Star Trek,
jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> my two bits follows.
What do your two bits have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> ~enjoy!
What does your directive to Wally have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> <snicker>
What does your amusement have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband,
murphy?
NaN> > Your failure to respond to the substance of my post is noted, kook.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> translation: waaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaah waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaHHH
What does your bad translation have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> [pops dummy in gob of "nad31...@gmail.invalid"]
What does your gibberish have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband,
murphy?
NaN> > Particularly noteworthy is your snipping and ignoring the whole
bit where
NaN> > you got the name of my news client wrong. And pretty much everything
NaN> > else.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> translation: mommy waaaaaah...!!..my diaper is full.
What does your bad translation have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> [hands the dweeb a bunch of green thistle]
Who is "the dweeb", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> wipe your own ass.
What does your unsubstantiated insinuation that Wally doesn't have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Message-ID: <mqhmv7lmedbeh7r36...@4ax.com>
What does that have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> > And then invoking a rule you just made up to claim "VICTOLLY!!1!!!
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> "VICTOLLY!!1!!!"[sic] nonetheless the thread sure reads as being you,
NaN> in your kook[i]ness, being well reamed a new asshole!
What does your ironic and unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to
do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> PML
What is "PML", murphy, and what does it have to do with Star Trek, jobs,
or Angband?
NaN> .. actually the man paraphrased, the full rule being;
NaN>
NaN> "As the kook moves toward meltdown, the probability of a directive of
NaN> "dance kook dance" being put to the kookologist engaged in burning
NaN> the kook's ass approaches 1."
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? There is no such documented
rule, murphy.
NaN> > I am starting to wonder /slap
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> .. always brings you undone, those hallucinations.
What does your ironic and unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to
do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> take some shroom tea, lad...there's a good mommy's boy.
Who is "lad", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> > Of course, the normal act after inventing a rule and then using
it to
NaN> > claim victory is to then disappear for a while, or nymshift
competently
NaN> > enough not to instantly get outed.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> oH ReaLLY...oh My fuCking g0d my fucking caps loCK is Broken AgaiN!
What do your foul language and your "caps loCK" have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> "mmmmmmuuurphy" anyone?
What does your non sequitur question have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> > I am guessing that you will do neither, thus cementing your claim to
NaN> > the coveted July 2012 CNoTM Award.
Wally didn't write that, murphy, yet you quoted it anyway in your
response to his post. Classic dishonesty on your part, murphy.
NaN> .. there you go again with that "I guess" = "it i s fact" routine you
NaN> are so well known for, paul. kook
Who is "paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.
NaN> two problems I read with your "guess" statement.
What does your hallucination have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> 1. --> Message-ID: <js8eif$bvq$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> says
NaN> your nomination of "Murphy/phlatArse/Flash/etc."
NaN> has been denied, being a "revenge nomination".
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Even were any decree emerging from the
cesspit that is databasix.com to ever be taken seriously, Wally didn't
nominate you for anything, murphy. All he did was post a question in
rec.games.roguelike.angband to which you inexplicably responded, a whole
month later, with a large wad of screed.
NaN> you do understand what that deny message is?
What does your irrelevant question have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy?
NaN> no, never would you think that far ahead.
What does your unsubstantiated claim about Wally have to do with Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> effectively the FNVW is decreeing your kook status, for only known
kooks
NaN> are denied nominating rights.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? Nowhere in the post you
referenced does the (fake) FNVW even mention Wally, murphy.
NaN> you, paul, being an award winning kook have
NaN> been "outed" by that decree.
Who is "you, paul", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> now, the FNVW is historically held in respect by _ALL_ usenetizens
of any
NaN> worth in any forum.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> no self-respecting poster wants a kook award.
You seem to be trying really hard. I guess you must not be
self-respecting, then, murphy. I now hear you're up for no fewer than
eight of them, six in June and KotM itself and CNoTM in July. That's
quite possibly some sort of a record, murphy.
NaN> you lap them up, thrive on the kookiness, no less.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy? There is no record of Wally
ever having received a kook award, murphy.
NaN> 2.--> under all socks you use it is that "speak English" troll you
get the most
NaN> mileage from, in your head.
What does your unsubstantiated allegation that Wally trolls and uses
socks have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> yet here **you** are using incorrect nomenclature
NaN> for a title.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> in your hurried effort to correct fla...@gmail.invalid in the use
NaN> of "COTN"[sic] you spew out "CNoTM". oH Dear!
What does your hallucination have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? Wally hasn't done anything that even remotely fits any
fragment of your rather-incoherent narrative.
NaN> .. the kook award status page says;
NaN>
NaN> CNotM -- Clueless Newbie of the Month
What does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> .. can you say "DoH!" paul.kook
Who is "paul.kook", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias.
NaN> should the Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
NaN> be not up for a Barbara Woodhouse Memorial and Hammer of Thor
NaN> "meritorious mention" - at the very least - for the butt hurt you
are
NaN> experiencing right now, then it is so Usenet lives up to tradition,
in not
NaN> being "fair" as in "fair go".
What does your bogus email address have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? There is not currently a top-level domain ".helpdesk",
murphy. Still suffering from Internet how-to cluelessness, murphy?
NaN> one lesson you have never grasped.
What does your unsubstantiated allegation about Wally have to do with
Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> folks are permitted to argue, permitted to disagree, permitted to call
NaN> a cunt a cunt.
Folks are also permitted to call you a kook, murphy.
NaN> you are not going to get free reign in subverting those
NaN> discussions, nor instigating such egregiousness simply because the
NaN> results give you your jollies.cunt
Who is "cunt", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias. Rather ironic, too, that you'd threaten someone with lack of free
reign in subverting discussions while you derail random threads with
off-topic trolling, which some might equate to you subverting discussions.
NaN> in the words of Joe Attardi;
What does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Why go through such trouble to identify this troll?
Who is "this troll", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias, though it's interesting that you said "this troll" rather
than "that troll" and suggests that you refer to yourself.
NaN> Because Paul Derbyshlre has a history of going around usenet
NaN> causing trouble.
Who is "Paul Derbyshlre", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias. Rather ironic, too, coming from someone who has a
history of going around usenet causing trouble.
NaN> Here's the hilarious but true Paul Derbyshlre FAQ:
Who is "Paul Derbyshlre", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias. And what does your URL have to do with Star Trek,
jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> .. more links for your savaged ravaged CNotM ass.kook
Who is "kook", murphy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that
alias. Rather ironic, too, coming from a fresh CNotM nominee. And what
does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> If you respond to every post someone else makes, they're obsessed.
If they
NaN> respond to less than 1% of your posts, they're even more obsessed.
How ironic.
What does your URL have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do
not require proof.
How ironic.
NaN> ------------------------------------------------------------------
What does that have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> CastAlone [Doktor Nauk] - Usenet Agent Provocateur
NaN> [Logistics Support Analyzer [Dept. of] of that Murphy Cabal]
What do your increasingly-elaborate delusions have to do with Star Trek,
jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> Visit the Page we Occupy -
What do your URLs have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy?
NaN> And be sure to sign up and become a member of that
NaN> Murph...@aioe.news.helpdesk
What does your bogus email address have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? There is not currently a top-level domain ".helpdesk",
murphy. Still suffering from Internet how-to cluelessness, murphy?
NaN> Need to book est...@aioe.org
NaN> Call the office use...@aioe.org
What does your attempt to cause your own NSP's administrator to get
spammed with off-topic kooky foamage have to do with Star Trek, jobs, or
Angband, murphy? You're rapidly running out of NSPs that will tolerate
you, murphy, so your continual badmouthing of AIOE's administrator, and
now this attempt to flood his inbox, are exceptionally unwise.
I don't see anything in your post with any apparent relationship to Star
Trek, jobs, or Angband, murphy.
"violating one basic rule in continually posting to or creating "off
topic" messages is a violation of group's charters."
--murphy
How ironic.
"I had 'volunteered (years back) to support those who do endeavor
to provide free Free Usenet access, support those who offered
subscription based Free Usenet access, nothing more than
cooperation expected in return for what has been many
thousands of hours of work. I note most of those I joined with
are either deceased, severely disabled, or plain ole' MIA..
now it is my Time. ...
You just read my last. ...
For those who think they see me in future times I can only wish
you severe Tinnitus in your dreams. For those who know me
well (eMail, whatever) and see me, know I will be smiling also.
It is to you I say "adieu mein frenz and adios .. grazie' [hugs]
for all the Good Times! May you and yours always bear well
with all Life brings you".
/0ut"
--murphy
http://www.uffnet.com/kookkamp/goodbye.htm
And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.
P.S. Your latest post also had a ludicrously long signature, murphy. The
generally accepted maximum is four lines, while yours is currently
closer to 150 lines. Still suffering from netiquette cluelessness, murphy?
tsbr...@gmail.com
Nov 28, 2014, 4:32:21 AM11/28/14
to
Star Trek TNG Nemisis:
Chief villian Shin-Shon, being a clone of Picard, and also a subject of accelerated aging, is dying from a genetically inherited disease Picar also has. His only hope for survival is a complete blood transfusion from Picard.
He therefore captures Picard, and his doctors prepare for the procedure. Picard is held captive for some time before Data can free him. Minutes after Picard is freed, Shin-Shon and his guards come to Picard's cell for the procedure (presumably the blood transfusion). Why hadn't Shin-Shon had Picard's blood extracted the moment he captured Picard?
Why can't Shin-Shon's doctors replicate enough blood from a sample of Picard's blood to provide the full blood transfusion he needs?
Data has a prototype emergency transporter transponder. Why doesn't he have it replicated so that Picard can have one also?
Great moments: Shin-Shon's conspirators turning the Romulan Senate into stone with their biogenic weapons.
The Riker-Deanna wedding! Worf objecting to stripping naked at the planned wedding repeat on Betazed!
The android B-4, a Data prototype.
Shin-Shon's ship, the Scimitar, cutting a wing off of a Romulan warbird that came to help the Enterprise.
The Scimitar's cloak, which allows it to fire its weapons! The Romulans should save the blueprints for that cloak!
Deanna mind linking with Shin-Shon's Reman side-kick to locate the Scimitar.
The Enterprise hitting the Scimitar head-on!
Riker crossing over while the two ships are merged.
Data jumping from the enterprise to the Scimitar!
Picard impaling Shin-Shon on a piece of railing at the end of their climatic fight.
Data sending Picard back from the Scimitar to the Enterprise with his emergency transponder, and then dying as the ship blows up after data phasers the engine core to prevent Shin-Shon's biogenic weapons from firing.
After the battle, the Romulans sending medical assistance and inviting the Federation to discussions on improved relationships.
B-4 whistling one of Data's favorite songs, indicating that Data's engrams are taking hold.
Chief villian Shin-Shon, being a clone of Picard, and also a subject of accelerated aging, is dying from a genetically inherited disease Picar also has. His only hope for survival is a complete blood transfusion from Picard.
He therefore captures Picard, and his doctors prepare for the procedure. Picard is held captive for some time before Data can free him. Minutes after Picard is freed, Shin-Shon and his guards come to Picard's cell for the procedure (presumably the blood transfusion). Why hadn't Shin-Shon had Picard's blood extracted the moment he captured Picard?
Why can't Shin-Shon's doctors replicate enough blood from a sample of Picard's blood to provide the full blood transfusion he needs?
Data has a prototype emergency transporter transponder. Why doesn't he have it replicated so that Picard can have one also?
Great moments: Shin-Shon's conspirators turning the Romulan Senate into stone with their biogenic weapons.
The Riker-Deanna wedding! Worf objecting to stripping naked at the planned wedding repeat on Betazed!
The android B-4, a Data prototype.
Shin-Shon's ship, the Scimitar, cutting a wing off of a Romulan warbird that came to help the Enterprise.
The Scimitar's cloak, which allows it to fire its weapons! The Romulans should save the blueprints for that cloak!
Deanna mind linking with Shin-Shon's Reman side-kick to locate the Scimitar.
The Enterprise hitting the Scimitar head-on!
Riker crossing over while the two ships are merged.
Data jumping from the enterprise to the Scimitar!
Picard impaling Shin-Shon on a piece of railing at the end of their climatic fight.
Data sending Picard back from the Scimitar to the Enterprise with his emergency transponder, and then dying as the ship blows up after data phasers the engine core to prevent Shin-Shon's biogenic weapons from firing.
After the battle, the Romulans sending medical assistance and inviting the Federation to discussions on improved relationships.
B-4 whistling one of Data's favorite songs, indicating that Data's engrams are taking hold.
0 new messages