The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.arts.startrek.current
From: w...@essc.psu.edu (Bill Capehart)
Date: 13 Jan 1995 02:44:39 GMT
Local: Thurs, Jan 12 1995 9:44 pm
Subject: Re: STNG Phasers: Lame! was Re: Vulcans of color...
Matt Thompson <matt_thomp...@radius.com> wrote: And the ones from the first season looked like Dustbusters, obviously >Is that why the Phasers now look like big Norleco shavers, not firearms? I >think the STNG Phasers are lame lame lame. "Kirk had a cool phaser, not >some pansy Braun Mix-Master" (from "100 reasons why Kirk is better than >Picard") a Freudian reference to those who do not wish to anger thier mothers my making a mess. I always prefered the Romulan and Klingon disrupters as well as Babylon 5's (I don't wanna hear it) PPGs, none of which seem to have stun settings (or at least lower settings that don't leave you in ICU for a month). I was never fond quickly resolving a nasty situation by stunning the offender(s) and then brushing off the use of force (remember what Q said in the premiere -- Stunning some creature DOES kill them). I'm not blaming casual TV violence on the stun setting, it's the Trek equivalent of the sonic screwdriver -- an easy out when the writers could have done something more clever. Remember, neck pinch was Nimoy's idea to get Spock out of hitting the baddie of the week with a phaser butt. As for the phasers, If you're gonna shoot someone, you should mean it. (And this from a guy who thinks that gun control is hitting the target.) You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||