[VGR] S.O.S.: Parallax (1)
Joe Reiss
- ::/ \:: -------------------------------------------- .---.--..--- -
::( ):: PARALLAX [7.7] `--.| |`--.
= `|,-^\|' ============================================ ---'`--'---' =
` '
BY AIRDATE BY RATING
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Caretaker 8.4 [Parallax 7.7]
[Parallax 7.7] Caretaker 8.4
================================== ==================================
Average 8.1 Average 8.1
Standard Deviation 0.0 Standard Deviation 0.0
---------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Hit space to view the EPISODE BREAKDOWN, or hit `n' to move along to
the next article...
Parallax (81 ratings)
---------------------------------------------------------------
......... Past ......... Current
Name Average Ratings StdDev Rating
===============================================================
Average 8.2 (1) 0.3 7.7
Standard Deviation 1.2 (0) 0.7 1.5
===============================================================
Sean Erwin 5.2 (2) 4.6 2.0
Bill Prasad 5.0 (2) 3.5 2.5
Ian Novack 4.5 (2) 0.7 4.0
Timothy Burke 6.8 (2) 2.5 5.0
Chris Henry 5.0 (1) 0.0 5.0
Jeffrey Sutherland 5.0 (1) 0.0 5.0
Stew Barnes 6.0 (1) 0.0 6.0
Gregory Paik 7.8 (2) 2.5 6.0
Jeff Rupley 7.0 (2) 1.4 6.0
Martin Duke 7.8 (2) 1.8 6.5
John Hengeveld 7.0 (2) 0.7 6.5
Todd Horowitz 7.2 (2) 1.1 6.5
Colin O'Connell 6.5 (1) 0.0 6.5
Jason Snell 6.3 (2) 0.5 6.7
Michael Campana 7.7 (2) 1.2 6.8
Russ Silberglied 6.9 (1) 0.0 6.9
Todd Drake 7.0 (1) 0.0 7.0
David Driscoll 7.0 (1) 0.0 7.0
Misael Fernandez 7.0 (1) 0.0 7.0
Mark Heringer 7.2 (2) 0.4 7.0
John Quintanilla 7.5 (2) 0.7 7.0
Anne Whipple 7.5 (2) 0.7 7.0
Paul Mackin 7.5 (2) 0.6 7.1
Paul Dussault 7.8 (2) 0.7 7.3
Marston Gould 6.9 (2) 0.6 7.3
Stuart Janney 8.6 (2) 1.8 7.3
John Lee 7.9 (2) 0.8 7.3
Chris Doelle 7.2 (2) 0.3 7.4
Timothy Cree 8.0 (2) 0.7 7.5
Michael Facello 8.2 (2) 0.9 7.5
Nick Gouskos 8.4 (2) 1.2 7.5
Mike Heffner 8.2 (2) 0.9 7.5
Jacob Huebert 8.0 (2) 0.7 7.5
Leroy Jenkins 7.5 (1) 0.0 7.5
Mary Lee 8.2 (2) 0.9 7.5
Kelly Willis 8.2 (2) 1.1 7.5
Ken Papai 8.3 (2) 1.1 7.6
Hunter Tabony 7.8 (1) 0.0 7.8
Kevin Behrens 8.5 (2) 0.7 8.0
Wayne Burnett 8.0 (1) 0.0 8.0
Garrett Deacon 8.0 (1) 0.0 8.0
Scott Elam 9.0 (2) 1.4 8.0
Robert Essig 8.0 (1) 0.0 8.0
Dirk Loedding 8.2 (2) 0.4 8.0
Elizabeth McClemens 8.5 (2) 0.7 8.0
Dale McClosekey 8.0 (1) 0.0 8.0
Jeffrey Schultz 9.0 (2) 1.4 8.0
Kevin Sidell 8.6 (2) 0.8 8.0
Troy Patience 8.2 (2) 0.2 8.1
Bobbi Manian 7.8 (2) 0.5 8.2
Paulo Pereira 8.3 (2) 0.2 8.2
Anton Sanderfoot 8.5 (2) 0.4 8.2
Dennis Sibberson 7.3 (2) 1.2 8.2
Michael Hopkins 7.9 (2) 0.6 8.3
Drew Aron 8.8 (2) 0.4 8.5
Blanche Cohen 8.5 (2) 0.0 8.5
Benjamin Combee 7.2 (2) 1.8 8.5
Thomas Cook 8.5 (1) 0.0 8.5
George Dvorsky 8.5 (2) 0.0 8.5
Marcelo Magallon 8.2 (2) 0.4 8.5
John Piscitello 7.5 (2) 1.4 8.5
Eric Scheirer 7.8 (2) 1.1 8.5
Blake Thomas 8.4 (2) 0.2 8.6
Neil Sarver 9.2 (2) 0.8 8.7
Keith Krivitzky 8.4 (2) 0.6 8.8
Gina Berardesco 9.0 (2) 0.0 9.0
John Campbell 9.0 (1) 0.0 9.0
Mark Reay 8.5 (2) 0.7 9.0
David Sutton 9.0 (1) 0.0 9.0
Mark Bledsoe 9.1 (1) 0.0 9.1
Jeff Kaplan 8.7 (2) 0.6 9.1
Nathan Fleming 9.2 (1) 0.0 9.2
Daniel Laursen 9.6 (2) 0.2 9.4
Brian Bedard 9.5 (1) 0.0 9.5
Michael Evans 9.2 (2) 0.4 9.5
Erik Flippo 9.6 (2) 0.1 9.5
William Hickman 9.7 (2) 0.3 9.5
Phillip Sral 9.5 (1) 0.0 9.5
Manu Sridharan 9.5 (1) 0.0 9.5
Ryan Mahoney 9.8 (2) 0.1 9.7
Gregg Weaver 9.0 (2) 1.4 10.0
---------------------------------------------------------------
If you're new to the S.O.S., hit space and keep reading. If you're
familiar with the system, hit `n' now
WHAT IS IT?
The S.O.S. (Spoiler-free Opinion Summary) is a twice-weekly posting
made by yours truly. Its purpose is to provide an indication of the
net's reaction to new episodes of the current Star Trek series, DS9
and Voyager. The first posting is made Thursday and is intended to
give those people who don't see the episode until later in the week
a hint as to the quality of episode to expect. The second posting
is made Monday and gives the final ratings for the entire week, to
summarize the opinions of the viewing populace (or at least those
who participate :-)
HOW DO I JOIN IN?
Becoming a part of the S.O.S. is simple. After you've seen the
episode, send me email at `jre...@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu'.
Include a simple rating on any numeric scale and an indication of
the series for which you are submitting a rating. Please do NOT
include any spoiler information. I usually don't get to see the
episodes until Saturday or Sunday, and I like to go in fresh. Also,
if your name does not appear in the "From:" line of your emails, try
to be sure to include your first and last name somewhere in the
message. Having it in your .sig is fine. You can submit changes to
your ratings later, but if you do PLEASE let me know that you
already sent a rating in for that episode. It makes my life much
easier.
WHEN CAN I SUBMIT?
You can submit any time you like. It's best if you submit before
the posting times (sometime Monday and Thursday evenings). All
ratings I get up until the minute I post will be included in the
postings. Ratings I get after the second posting will be included
in the database and used to calculate episode averages, but they
will not be seen individually in any postings.
This concludes this installment of the S.O.S. Join us next posting
for more exciting adventures... and thanks for your opinions!
Joe
--
| NeXTMail OK! | + Who's going to wait 54 years to deliver a letter? |
| ________ | + The post office. |
| | |__) | ======================================================== |
| (_|OE| \EISS | - Al Calavicci and Sam Beckett |