On 13/10/12 10:45 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
> Robert Bannister <rob...@clubtelco.com> wroteThey have very recently started considering the case of one surviving
>> JRStern wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> JRStern <JRSt...@foobar.invalid> wrote
>>>>> Robert Bannister <rob...@clubtelco.com> wrote
>>>>>>> We need nukes <sob> and we need them ten years ago.
>>>>>> There are other ways of generating electricity. Almost
>>>>> No operating nuke plants are fail safe, afaik.
>>>> That's not right. The CANDU nukes are.
>>> Reviewing the Wikipedia article, they seem safer, but are not
>>> Now before someone bothers, it's not like even the Fukashima plants
>> Fine indeed for governments because governments usually refuse to pay
> That's not correct. They have done that with the nuke weapon tests.
soldier. I'm sure they hope he will die. Not one single case was settled
without a long struggle, and the Brits are still refusing to cough up.
Only after a fight. I am forever reading about war vets or their widows
> And ours has done it for any illnesses that are the result of war
moaning about how the government won't compensate them.
I know nothing about the what the US does for its military.
> The US does too and not just war service either, military service too.
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.