> In article <
13438...@sheol.org>, Wayne Throop <
thr...@sheol.org> wrote:
>>::: I read all of Feed and mostly liked it, despite the basic
>>::: stupidities in so many directions, because of the characters. She
>>::: fixed that for the second one.
>>
>>:: Then she fixed the fix.
>>
>>: David Dyer-Bennet <
dd...@dd-b.net>
>>: Sort-of, but in a way that is nonsense from what we know of how memory
>>: works (Lydy finished it).
>>
>>Hm? Not that I'm a big admirer of the third book, but assuming you mean
>>the third book, they had her intact, active brain to scan with evoked
>>potentials and doubtless all manner of other things they didn't mention.
>>What, specifically, conflicts with what we know of how memory works.
>>I mean, yes, it's horribly implausible, but I didn't see anything that
>>actually ruled it out.
>>
>>
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure what "Lydy finished it" means, but I thought he explicitly
> said he had not finished book 2.
Yes, that too. Stupid books!