The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
From: "Robert A. Woodward" <rober...@drizzle.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 09:35:32 -0700
Local: Mon, Oct 15 2012 12:35 pm
Subject: Re: Only of interest to USA citizens...
In article <XnsA0ED5E4BAC23Ftaustingm...@69.16.186.7>,
Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <tausti...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Rod Speed" <rod.speed....@gmail.com> wrote in news:adukm2Fjir7U2
From coal that is 300+ million years old? C-14 has a half-life of > @mid.individual.net: > > Wayne Throop <thro...@sheol.org> wrote > >>> Yes, the coal plant just sends the pollution > >> I had heard that coal power plants release more radioactivity > > Yes, but its not true of CO2 particularly.
> Isn't a certain percentage of the C in CO2 still (technically) about 5730 years; that is over 52 thousand half-lives. My BoE calculation suggests a reduction to 10^-15000 of the original concentration. Since that requires vastly more particles than there is in the universe, I would say the approximate number of C-14 atoms in all of the coal on Earth is zero. -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||