Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
rec.arts.sf.written
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Google Groups becomes even less useful.
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Shawn Wilson  
View profile  
 More options Jul 22 2012, 5:51 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.fandom
From: Shawn Wilson <ikonoql...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:51:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Jul 22 2012 5:51 pm
Subject: Re: Google Groups becomes even less useful.
Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
On Jul 22, 2:41 pm, Jared <jared4...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/15/2012 4:35 PM, Shawn Wilson wrote:

> > On Jul 15, 6:39 am, David Dyer-Bennet <d...@dd-b.net> wrote:

> >> Luckily, corporations don't think, and I'm perfectly happy to consider
> >> them not to be "people" entitled to free speech.

> > How about the New York Times Corporation?  Does it not have the right
> > to free speech?  Why not Monsanto?

> "You" don't have the right to free speech if "you" are a composite
> entity that by speaking, is denying other people their right to free speech.

...?

Like what you are doing here?  Speaking so as to deny others the right
to free speech?

Do you have the right to do what you are now doing?

> It's as simple, or as complicated, as that.

> If a lot of stakeholders in Monsanto didn't sign up for political
> activism, then it's wrong.

...?

So a lot of their shareholders didn't sign up to for political
activism, so the New York Times is now wrong to exercise free speech?

About Monsantos PR flack, does he/she have the right to say what he
wants?  How about if he wants to say good things about Monsanto?

Why is the Left so openly hostile to basic human rights?  You start
shutting down anyones right to free speech and that is that.

Does freedom have any meaning or value to you?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google