In article <jh1t54$1is$
1...@dont-email.me>, Kurt Busiek <
ku...@busiek.com>
wrote:
> On 2012-02-10 00:32:38 +0000, erilar <dra...@chibardun.net.invalid> said:
> > A question for all you experts. If "real" chili is supposed to have
> > neither meat nor beans,
>
> It isn't.
>
> "Real" chili has meat and peppers and other stuff, but the base is meat
> and peppers.
>
> Dave was claiming the base is beans and peppers.
>
> No one was saying it did'nt have either meat or beans.
Well, some said no meat and others said no beans, so I was visualizing
something souplike with chili peppers in a tomato-ish base.
--
Erilar, biblioholic medievalist