Nothing to do with the nightingale tongues being discussed.
> Rod Speed wrote
>> Robert Carnegie <rja.carne...
>>> Anyway, you may be top of the food chain,
>>> but dining on nightingale tongue is still crass.
>> Whats wrong with eating any part of the animal that's dead ?
> Well for one rather obvious point for the general case, little fleas
> have lesser fleas, so you're not eating a part of the animal that's
> dead, you're eating a part of the animal that's dead PLUS potentially
> all the lesser fleas that killed it, some of which may not be truely
> most sincerely dead. Such as bactera, virussesses, prionses, etc.
> Among others.