>Quadibloc <jsa...@ecn.ab.ca> wrote:
>>On Dec 15, 8:02�am, cryptoguy <treifam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I actually picked murder because it is one of the best reported
>>> crimes, and there is very little debate over what is and is not
>>> murder.
>>
>>> The US murder rate is 2.5-3x that of Britain. It was substantially
>>> higher than Britain's even before Britain restricted firearms
>>> ownership.
>>
>>> Any idea why?
>>
>>Well, I know that the murder rate in Canada was vastly lower than it
>>is now back in 1962,
>
>Of course one would have to be a right-wing moron to ignore the fact
>that Canada's population was half of today's population.
"rate"
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27
Nonsense.
Population density, people/sq mile
US: 83
Holland: 1034
Canada: 9
Murder rate per 100,000
US 5.8
Holland 0.91
Canada 1.83
pt
You must be quite the asshole to think that you can get away with
that obvious dishonesty. Why did you think that you could try and
compare completely different countries? Why didn't you compare
rural and urban crimes rates within the same country?
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
When Quadibloc cited Canada, you didn't have a problem with it. Why
now?
I guess you find it uncomfortable to be faced with actual facts.
pt
You tried to disporve my statement with a dishonest comparison.
Now you're trying another dishonest comparison.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Citing your very own response to a similar issue is dishonest?
Wow, just wow.
BTW, Holland is *much* more urbanized than the US. With over 12x the
US population density, it could hardly be otherwise. Yet somehow they
manage to have 1/6 our murder rate.
So, even using your moved goalposts, you fail.
pt
"Don't confuse me with facts!!"
And now you're lying. There isn't a "similar issue".
>BTW, Holland is *much* more urbanized than the US.
It's a completely different culture with different laws, you stupid
moron. That means you cannot compare it with the US.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net