Received: by 10.204.156.18 with SMTP id u18mr770336bkw.3.1333756986293; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Path: h15ni94367bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!jx17g2000pbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Duggy Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv Subject: Re: Game of Thrones: Robert's bastards Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 17:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <10578552.226.1333344985739.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcp5> <22ddb3fb-13ce-4269-8f2d-3990f5979410@db5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <9u0h1sF6m1U1@mid.individual.net> <5895ce7d-06cc-4334-b4f4-7de219c32e4a@t8g2000pbe.googlegroups.com> <1c9936e9-7684-426f-ac15-6526b300769b@s27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <188788e6-f6d4-4e48-8099-7f0d93271fb8@pg6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <72f59646-2dea-41d0-8d4e-7f63b93db142@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <9727583.146.1333668850960.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynkf14> <5528d64f-8474-48b6-8b38-d637740fb8be@z5g2000pbu.googlegroups.com> <11772690.270.1333725222375.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynvv7> NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.185.25.187 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1333756986 16433 127.0.0.1 (7 Apr 2012 00:03:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 00:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: jx17g2000pbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=124.185.25.187; posting-account=k4dZdgkAAACCq3qKCncuLwoQ3w6S6ePD User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Apr 7, 1:13=A0am, "Smokie Darling (Annie)" wrote: > As I said, I do not recall it at all. =A0If they are showing some of the = less attractive people nude, then I'd have to say it isn't gratuitous True enough. I don't think that's what people are complaining about. Or maybe they are and using "gratuitous nude" to hide the fact that they mean "ugly people nude" > (although, I seem to recall that Danaerys was naked more in the book, as = well as her brother, and he wasn't naked much in the first season). =A0In f= act, I don't think she wore much, once the ...danggit, brain fart ... =A0th= e Horse Warriors made camp each night. She was probably naked more... these things are toned down usually. Her brother I don't recall. > > > They did say, in EW, that the Dire Wolves will have a bigger role thi= s season, so there is that. > > Makes sense. =A0Hopefully the FX will be better than in the first > > episode. > They wanted Dire Wolves in the first season, but it was one of the many t= hings that had to be set aside, because it got "too expensive", and HBO was= n't positive that the show would do well (along with a battle that should h= ave ended the first season). True. =3D=3D=3D =3D DUG. =3D=3D=3D