Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 78 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
The Doctor  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 10:21 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 02:21:53 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 10:21 pm
Subject: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
This one is 9/10 .

The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

We also knew Stone Angels were invovle.

River is back.

Major twists and turn.

The Angles invade 1938 Manhattan.

And the Doctor is reading a novel that turns out to
be a River Song Biography.

Modern Manhattan 1938 Manhattan.

Get ready!!

Angels are not friendly.

Also the Doctor hates endings.  Big time clue!!!

Who likes an Angel clutching River Song's wrist .

She get s her 'husband' involved.

All right.

1) Who expected Rory and Amy dropping off Winter Quay would defeat
most of the Angles?

2)  Who expected a surviving Angel to send Amy and Rory back in time?

3)  Who would expect River Song to cheer the Doctor up in the end.

Moffat I see that Rory and Amy can return

from 1888 to 1938 so one will have to wait.
--
Member - Liberal International  This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November 2012


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Agamemnon  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 10:42 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:42:20 +0100
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 10:42 pm
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message

news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...

> This one is 9/10 .

> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that they
were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

> We also knew Stone Angels were invovle.

The Stature of Liberty is made of bronze.

Everyone.

> 2)  Who expected a surviving Angel to send Amy and Rory back in time?

Everyone.

> 3)  Who would expect River Song to cheer the Doctor up in the end.

What else was she supposed to do?

It's Rory's dad I'm worried about.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Charles E. Hardwidge  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 10:54 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Charles E. Hardwidge" <nos...@nospam.invalid>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:54:08 +0100
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 10:54 pm
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

"Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message

news:3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk...

> The Stature of Liberty is made of bronze.

"Upgrades".

--
Charles E. Hardwidge


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anim8rFSK  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 11:18 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:18:41 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 11:18 pm
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,

 "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

> "The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> > This one is 9/10 .

> > The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

> Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that they
> were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

> > We also knew Stone Angels were invovle.

> The Stature of Liberty is made of bronze.

What?  No it's not.  It's copper clad iron.

--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
anim8rFSK  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 11:19 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:19:46 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 11:19 pm
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,

 "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
> > 3)  Who would expect River Song to cheer the Doctor up in the end.

> What else was she supposed to do?

> It's Rory's dad I'm worried about.

Yeah, no mention or thought of him was annoying.

Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case, twice)
when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Agamemnon  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 11:30 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 04:30:43 +0100
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 11:30 pm
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

"anim8rFSK" <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote in message

news:anim8rfsk-E14043.20184129092012@news.easynews.com...

Either way it's not made of stone.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Arthur Lipscomb  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 11:52 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: Arthur Lipscomb <art...@alum.calberkeley.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:52:42 -0700
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 11:52 pm
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
On 9/29/2012 8:30 PM, Agamemnon wrote:

And no one saw it moving?!?

I don't recall the original explanation but I thought the weeping angels
simply looked like statutes.  Now they are saying the angels are taking
over existing statutes.  Is that a retcon or was that how they
originally described them?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Charles E. Hardwidge  
View profile  
 More options Sep 29 2012, 11:59 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Charles E. Hardwidge" <nos...@nospam.invalid>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 04:59:32 +0100
Local: Sat, Sep 29 2012 11:59 pm
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
"anim8rFSK" <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote in message

news:anim8rfsk-C8CF0B.20194629092012@news.easynews.com...

> In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,
> Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case, twice)
> when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

They certainly had issues.

--
Charles E. Hardwidge


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ian B  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 12:22 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Ian B" <noem...@invalid.invalid>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 05:22:12 +0100
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 12:22 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,
> "Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

>>> 3)  Who would expect River Song to cheer the Doctor up in the end.

>> What else was she supposed to do?

>> It's Rory's dad I'm worried about.

> Yeah, no mention or thought of him was annoying.

> Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case,
> twice) when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

Ah yes, that reminds me of the other thing that suddenly appeared out of the
Doctor's ass. The speech about how if Rory tried to run away, the Angels
would follow him everywhere, presenting us with the image of Rory tanking
along with a huddle of Angels after him like the Keystone Kops. Since when
could the Angels do that? Anywhere? If he zaps off to Metebelis 3 with the
Doctor, will the Angels appear there too? And why would they anyway? What's
so special about Rory? It can't be becasue he's the one who changed the
timeline, because simply by changing the timeline- which he achieves by
running away rather than staying in the hotel bedroom in his jim-jams- "none
of it will have ever happened".

None of the plot held together at all. Fookin' awful, this one.

Ian


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Rich  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 2:26 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Followup-To: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: Rich <n...@nowhere.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 01:26:24 -0500
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 2:26 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:k48ac1$qfe$1
@gallifrey.nk.ca:

Unlikely.  The Brits, unlike American TV producers sometimes kill
off/delete major characters from highly-rated shows.  Witness MI-5
(Spooks).  

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MDS  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 4:13 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv
From: MDS <M...@RADW.USENET>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 04:13:47 -0400
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 4:13 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

American TV producers are changing.  Lost and The Walking Dead are good
examples of major characters being killed off.

--
MDS (Mister Doctor Sir)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Mike Hall  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 5:25 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: Mike Hall <tar...@spam3spam.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:25:53 +0100
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 5:25 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
On 30/09/2012 04:52, Arthur Lipscomb wrote:

> I don't recall the original explanation but I thought the weeping angels
> simply looked like statutes.  Now they are saying the angels are taking
> over existing statutes.  Is that a retcon or was that how they
> originally described them?

I'm guessing that it is pretty obvious that the angels replace existing
statues.  It is not confirmed whether they actually take over the statue
itself.  The powers of the weeping angels are vast.

Mike Hall


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Adam H. Kerman  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 5:31 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:31:14 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 5:31 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote:
>"Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
>>>3)  Who would expect River Song to cheer the Doctor up in the end.
>>What else was she supposed to do?
>>It's Rory's dad I'm worried about.
>Yeah, no mention or thought of him was annoying.
>Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case, twice)
>when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

It's like several scenes were missing.

The Doctor's "fixed point in time" concept is a floating target. If you
read about your future, that's what makes it fixed?

What would have happened to New York if there had been a second paradox?
Boston would have won all those World Series that the Yankees won?

Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

All that being said, the Angels are creepy as hell, one of the few
decent villains this revived show has created.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
solar penguin  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 5:37 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 02:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 5:37 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

Adam H. Kerman wrote:

> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

Since Blink.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
MDS  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 5:53 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: MDS <M...@RADW.USENET>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 05:53:19 -0400
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 5:53 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

This was established in the first angels story, Blink

> All that being said, the Angels are creepy as hell, one of the few
> decent villains this revived show has created.

--
MDS (Mister Doctor Sir)

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Adam H. Kerman  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 5:53 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:53:29 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 5:53 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>Since when did the Angels send you back in time?
>Since Blink.

Oh, yeah, Kathy. I'd forgotten. But were they eating? That seemed new.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jerry Brown  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 5:55 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: Jerry Brown <je...@jwbrown.co.uk.invalid>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:55:08 +0100
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 5:55 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:31:14 +0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"

This contradicts the classic series story Pyramids of Mars when the
Doctor took Sarah Jane forward to their own time and actually _showed_
her the lifeless Earth that would result if they just departed without
finishing the job of defeating Sutekh.

--
Jerry Brown

A cat may look at a king
(but probably won't bother)


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
solar penguin  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 6:09 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 6:09 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Adam H. Kerman wrote:

> >>Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

> >Since Blink.

> Oh, yeah, Kathy. I'd forgotten.

And the policeman guy.

> But were they eating? That seemed new.

IIRC the Doctor said something about them feeding on the displaced
time energy in Blink.  But it was just throwaway line, easy to miss
i..

And that was probably why they were after time energy from the crack
in the Flesh And Stone two-parter too.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Adam H. Kerman  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 7:23 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <a...@chinet.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:23:35 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 7:23 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers

solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>Since when did the Angels send you back in time?
>>>Since Blink.
>>Oh, yeah, Kathy. I'd forgotten.
>And the policeman guy.
>>But were they eating? That seemed new.
>IIRC the Doctor said something about them feeding on the displaced
>time energy in Blink.  But it was just throwaway line, easy to miss
>i..
>And that was probably why they were after time energy from the crack
>in the Flesh And Stone two-parter too.

I know it's stupid to ask, but why does every energy source on Doctor Who
expend more energy than it creates? I'm thinking about that ship powered
by wave energy on Dinosaurs on a Spaceship.

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
cloud dreamer  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 8:13 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: cloud dreamer <reduce.re...@recycle.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:43:31 -0230
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 8:13 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
On 30/09/2012 12:12 AM, Agamemnon wrote:

Oh no!  A typo!! Careful, Doctor, you'll be labelled a troll.

  ..


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Doctor  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 8:30 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:30:40 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 8:30 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,

Agamemnon <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> This one is 9/10 .

>> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

>Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that they
>were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

We got the Sorry but you died Commerical here as well.

>> We also knew Stone Angels were invovle.

>The Stature of Liberty is made of bronze.

In New York, the Angels did take over including the Statue of Liberty.

I was not.

>> 2)  Who expected a surviving Angel to send Amy and Rory back in time?

>Everyone.

In the end?

>> 3)  Who would expect River Song to cheer the Doctor up in the end.

>What else was she supposed to do?

>It's Rory's dad I'm worried about.

We may not see Brian again.

>> Moffat I see that Rory and Amy can return

>> from 1888 to 1938 so one will have to wait.
>> --
>> Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici
>> doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
>> God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist
>> rising!
>> http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
>> USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November
>> 2012

--
Member - Liberal International  This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November 2012

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Doctor  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 8:35 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 8:35 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
In article <k48c8u$re...@dont-email.me>,
Charles E. Hardwidge <nos...@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>"Agamemnon" <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote in message
>news:3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk...

>> The Stature of Liberty is made of bronze.

>"Upgrades".

>--
>Charles E. Hardwidge

Or invasion of the Angels into everything stone.
--
Member - Liberal International  This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November 2012

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Doctor  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 8:36 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:36:29 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 8:36 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
In article <anim8rfsk-C8CF0B.20194629092...@news.easynews.com>,

The first is to destory the Winter Quay.

The second is to join Rory.

After all Rory fell into the trap.

>--
>"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."

--
Member - Liberal International  This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November 2012

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Doctor  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 8:37 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:37:12 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 8:37 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
In article <k48g3j$cl...@dont-email.me>,
Charles E. Hardwidge <nos...@nospam.invalid> wrote:

>"anim8rFSK" <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote in message
>news:anim8rfsk-C8CF0B.20194629092012@news.easynews.com...
>> In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,

>> Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case, twice)
>> when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

>They certainly had issues.

They were really in love which each other.

>--
>Charles E. Hardwidge

--
Member - Liberal International  This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November 2012

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
The Doctor  
View profile  
 More options Sep 30 2012, 8:38 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
From: doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:38:04 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, Sep 30 2012 8:38 am
Subject: Re: Angels take Manhattan REview with Spoilers
In article <5067c8ef$0$7317$5b6aa...@news.zen.co.uk>,

What about a non-survive paradox?
--
Member - Liberal International  This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve it in November 2012

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 78   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »