>>>> On 30/09/2012 18:56, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:
>>>>>> solar penguin <solar.peng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Adam H. Kerman wrote:

>>>>>>>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>>>>>>> Since Blink.

>>>>>> Blink discusses the concept well.

>>>>> The concept of constantly posting followups imparting no new information
>>>>> whatsoever? Damn, the Weeping Angels are hideously evil.

>>>> In the heyday of Usenet, people used to reply RTF and get on with their
>>>> life.  Now we have Google.

>>> Why? Is there some fine manual that explains how to use Google?
>> Very good question.

>Yes.  Most beautiful troll reply that I've ever seen!  I'm going to make
>a cool Dr Who-themed pic out of it when I get the chance!

>Mike Hall

>>>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>>> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

>> The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
>> Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

> Try and linearise Blink.

>>>>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>>>> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

>>> The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
>>> Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

>> Try and linearise Blink.

>No.  Its too timey-whimey.

>>>>>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>>>>> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

>>>> The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
>>>> Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

>>> Try and linearise Blink.

>> No.  Its too timey-whimey.

> It is a task, I agree but the end is the beginning.

>>>>>>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>>>>>> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

>>>>> The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
>>>>> Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

>>>> Try and linearise Blink.

>>> No.  Its too timey-whimey.

>> It is a task, I agree but the end is the beginning.

>Okay.  I just started so I'm done.

> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> >news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> >> This one is 9/10 .

> >> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

> >Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that they
> >were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

> We got the Sorry but you died Commerical here as well.

> >> Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case, twice)
> >> when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

> >They certainly had issues.

> They were really in love which each other.

> > >>> 3) Who would expect River Song to cheer the Doctor up in the end.

> > >> What else was she supposed to do?

> > >> It's Rory's dad I'm worried about.

> > > Yeah, no mention or thought of him was annoying.

> > > Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case,
> > > twice) when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

> > Ah yes, that reminds me of the other thing that suddenly appeared out of the
> > Doctor's ass. The speech about how if Rory tried to run away, the Angels
> > would follow him everywhere, presenting us with the image of Rory tanking
> > along with a huddle of Angels after him like the Keystone Kops. Since when
> > could the Angels do that? Anywhere? If he zaps off to Metebelis 3 with the
> > Doctor, will the Angels appear there too? And why would they anyway? What's
> > so special about Rory? It can't be becasue he's the one who changed the
> > timeline, because simply by changing the timeline- which he achieves by
> > running away rather than staying in the hotel bedroom in his jim-jams- "none
> > of it will have ever happened".

> No, it's only when he kills himself that the timeline changes.

> If he just runs away, the Angels can always find him later and bring
> him back, and then there's no paradox.

> >>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

> >> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

> >The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
> >Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

> Try and linearise Blink.

> > >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> > >news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> > >> This one is 9/10 .

> > >> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

> > >Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that
> > >they
> > >were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

> > We got the Sorry but you died Commerical here as well.

> Okay, even my translation dictionary isn't helping me out here. Can
> anyone help me out, in English?

>> >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> >news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> >> This one is 9/10 .

>> >> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

>> >Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that they
>> >were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

>> We got the Sorry but you died Commerical here as well.

>Okay, even my translation dictionary isn't helping me out here. Can
>anyone help me out, in English?

>--
>Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
>"Get down off the cross. We need the wood." -- Pete Lattimer, WAREHOUSE 13

>> >> Amy and Rory were WAY too eager to commit suicide (in Amy's case, twice)
>> >> when it wasn't actually urgent that they do so.

>> >They certainly had issues.

>> They were really in love which each other.

>Someone's been reading too much Shakespeare.

>> >>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>> >> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

>> >The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
>> >Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

>> Try and linearise Blink.

>I'll try sometime last week.

>--
>Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
>"Get down off the cross. We need the wood." -- Pete Lattimer, WAREHOUSE 13

>> The Doctor sent the following on Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:30:40 +0000 (UTC):
>> > In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,
>> > Agamemnon <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

>> > >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> > >news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> > >> This one is 9/10 .

>> > >> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

>> > >Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that
>> > >they
>> > >were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

>> > We got the Sorry but you died Commerical here as well.

>> Okay, even my translation dictionary isn't helping me out here. Can
>> anyone help me out, in English?

>Try some punctuation:

>We got the ""Sorry but you died" Commerical" here, as well.

>--
>"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."

>>> I maybe mistaken, but weren't the weeping angels first from off-world? Where would all those human angel statues come from?
>> Blink is when the Weeping Angels are introduced.
>> Early in the universe.

>Ah, I had only seen them first in 2010. But still, if they inhabit other statues as opposed to being humanoid statues, why did that starship have so many of them?

> > The Doctor sent the following on Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:30:40 +0000 (UTC):
> > > In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,
> > > Agamemnon <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

> > > >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
> > > >news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> > > >> This one is 9/10 .

> > > >> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

> > > >Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that
> > > >they
> > > >were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

> > > We got the Sorry but you died Commerical here as well.

> > Okay, even my translation dictionary isn't helping me out here. Can
> > anyone help me out, in English?

> Try some punctuation:

> We got the ""Sorry but you died" Commerical" here, as well.

>> > The Doctor sent the following on Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:30:40 +0000 (UTC):
>> > > In article <3oKdnXCpKM4QLPrNnZ2dnUVZ7vidn...@eclipse.net.uk>,
>> > > Agamemnon <agamem...@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:

>> > > >"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>> > > >news:k48ac1$qfe$1@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> > > >> This one is 9/10 .

>> > > >> The audience was getting set up for the Death of either Amy or Rory.

>> > > >Don't think so. There were Weeping Angels involved. It was obvious that
>> > > >they
>> > > >were going to be split up from either each other or the Doctor or both.

>> > > We got the Sorry but you died Commerical here as well.

>> > Okay, even my translation dictionary isn't helping me out here. Can
>> > anyone help me out, in English?

>> Try some punctuation:

>> We got the ""Sorry but you died" Commerical" here, as well.

>I'd also throw in a comma after "sorry." And I had already realized that
>"Commerical" was really "commercial." He does like to make things a
>challenge for the reader, doesn't he?

>--
>Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
>"Get down off the cross. We need the wood." -- Pete Lattimer, WAREHOUSE 13

>>>>>>>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>>>>>>> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

>>>>>> The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
>>>>>> Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

>>>>> Try and linearise Blink.

>>>> No.  Its too timey-whimey.

>>> It is a task, I agree but the end is the beginning.

>> Okay.  I just started so I'm done.

> Sort it out!

>>>>>>>>> Since when did the Angels send you back in time?

>>>>>>>> I wondered if that was new to this episode or if I'd missed a memo.

>>>>>>> The very first episode that introduced them, 'Blink', had Carey
>>>>>>> Mulligan's friend sent back in time by a Weeping Angel.

>>>>>> Try and linearise Blink.

>>>>> No.  Its too timey-whimey.

>>>> It is a task, I agree but the end is the beginning.

>>> Okay.  I just started so I'm done.

>> Sort it out!

>Isn't this where you came in the first time?

>--
>The 'Enterprise' crew in the 2009 Star Trek are adrenaline addicted,
>hyper-active teenagers with ADD whose Ritalin got replaced with caffeine
>pills, displaying a level of discipline that a Somali pirate wouldn't
>tolerate.

>As usual!
>Debatable as to whether it is worth that grade, but I
>liked the episode, which was only aired in Australia last
>night.
>--
>David Barnett

>>As usual!
>>Debatable as to whether it is worth that grade, but I
>>liked the episode, which was only aired in Australia last
>>night.
>>--
>>David Barnett

>Debate it!

>>In article <MPG.2adb515b256abcaa989...@news.bigpond.com>,
>>David Barnett  <dbar3...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>>>In article <k48ac1$qf...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
>>>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca says...
>>><snip>
>>>> This one is 9/10 .

>>>As usual!
>>>Debatable as to whether it is worth that grade, but I
>>>liked the episode, which was only aired in Australia last
>>>night.
>>>--
>>>David Barnett

>>Debate it!

>Well, I watched it with my sister, who enjoyed it. I thought it was
>rubbish, because I find the concept of the weeping angels complete
>nonsense. (I know, it's Doctor Who...)
>But generally I really like the newest innovations on the show, his wife
>River, Amy and Rory are his parents-in-law,...

>One of the baffling things is how a race which existed *throughout time*
>(The Timelords) could be made to not exist!

>--
>Edward McArdle

> In article <mcardle-0710121153230...@10.1.1.3>,
> Edward McArdle <mcar...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >In article <k4q90d$g5...@gallifrey.nk.ca>, doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
> >Doctor) wrote:

> >>In article <MPG.2adb515b256abcaa989...@news.bigpond.com>,
> >>David Barnett  <dbar3...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >>>In article <k48ac1$qf...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> >>>doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca says...
> >>><snip>
> >>>> This one is 9/10 .

> >>>As usual!
> >>>Debatable as to whether it is worth that grade, but I
> >>>liked the episode, which was only aired in Australia last
> >>>night.
> >>>--
> >>>David Barnett

> >>Debate it!

> >Well, I watched it with my sister, who enjoyed it. I thought it was
> >rubbish, because I find the concept of the weeping angels complete
> >nonsense. (I know, it's Doctor Who...)

> > >>>As usual!
> > >>>Debatable as to whether it is worth that grade, but I
> > >>>liked the episode, which was only aired in Australia last
> > >>>night.

> > >>Debate it!

> > >Well, I watched it with my sister, who enjoyed it. I thought it was
> > >rubbish, because I find the concept of the weeping angels complete
> > >nonsense. (I know, it's Doctor Who...)

> I agree that it is rubbish, but other stories have equally
> rubbishy aliens.