On 08/10/2012 8:30 AM, jack wrote:
> On Sunday, October 7, 2012 1:58:02 PM UTC-4, JM Morrison wrote:
>> The Farmer spoilers...
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>
>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> See, now that is how you introduce a new character. Give him a real
>> reason to be there and a real character, and then pull the rug out from
>> under audience with a twist at the end. Speculations as to what happened?
>
>
> Agreed, the show hit its stride this week. A really creepy Trouble. We have our mystery man out there out to get Audrey; hope this develops well; this show has missed having a decent villain since the Reverend got killed. One point: aren't you not allowed to take photos of crime scenes?
>
Don't know. I would imagine that police try to conceal what they can,
but with everyone now with cell phones/cameras that would take shrouding
every crime scene in a tent.
>>
>>
>> The other one, on the other hand, is still entirely useless and
>> distracting bad. Someone please tell me she's sleeping with someone
>> important, because that would at least be an excuse for why she's there.
>
> You meant the shrink? Sort of reminds me of Sweets on _Bones_. Can only assume it was felt by the writers that they needed another major female character to balance the new cop.
>
I can understand the want for another female character, even agree. I
hate the expositional device of a psychiatrist - where the characters
tell us what they are feeling instead of showing us. How much more
powerful was Duke's completely wordless betrayal and anguish at the end
than Audrey and Claire talking about how she pushed Nathan away.
Especially when we just saw Audrey push Nathan away. Not that there's
much there to start with anyway, but the actress brings absolutely
nothing to the role.
>> I can't see any other reason.
>>
>>
>
>>
>> The only part I don't buy about what happened between Duke, Audrey and
>> Nix at the end there is when Audrey walked away - apparently leaving Nix
>> alone so that Duke kills him unobserved. Silly and awkward construction
>> merely to provide the story beats at the right time for the script.
>> Knew that it was going to come down to this - Duke killing someone to
> save others, knew that Audrey was going to force him to make that
>> choice. But I just don't see her walk away from a dying man, and a
>> prisoner.
>
> Audrey did put in a call for an ambulance; covered herself there; but I thought she walked off hoping Duke would have second thoughts. The biggest problem here I thought is how the hell did they explain what happened to the wife and even the kid? Your "troubled" husband attempted to use "Alien" tongue to scoop out some organ from your son? And how would the husband have explained his son's sudden death especially given he had been in a hurry to leave Haven?
>
I doubt the husband was thinking of explaining things yet - he was just
trying to survive. At all costs. If he's willing to suck the organs
out of his own children, I don't think killing his wife would have
stopped him. Explaining the events to the survivors is what Nathan and
Audrey do - sometimes with the truth, sometimes with a convenient lie,
depending on what they need to know or can accept.