Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
NBC orders J.J. Abrams' "Believe" to series
4 views
Skip to first unread message
David
May 9, 2013, 1:22:45 PM5/9/13
to
http://www.deadline.com/2013/05/nbc-starts-ordering-new-series-crisis-about-a-boy-picked-up/
NBC Starts Ordering New Series: �Crisis�, �About A Boy�, �Believe�
Picked Up
By NELLIE ANDREEVA
UPDATE: Also picked up is J.J. Abrams� drama Believe.
NBC Starts Ordering New Series: �Crisis�, �About A Boy�, �Believe�
Picked Up
By NELLIE ANDREEVA
UPDATE: Also picked up is J.J. Abrams� drama Believe.
David
May 9, 2013, 1:36:13 PM5/9/13
to
Believe
Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
from the evil elements that hunt her power.
Cast: Jake McLaughlin (Savages), Kyle MacLachlan, Delroy Lindo (The
Chicago Code),Sienna Guillory (Resident Evil), Jamie Chung (Once Upon
a Time), Johnny Sequoyah, Arian Moayed
Team: W/EP Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban),
Mark Friedman (The Forgotten); EP J. J. Abrams, Bryan Burk
Studio: Warner Bros. Television, Bad Robot
Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
from the evil elements that hunt her power.
Cast: Jake McLaughlin (Savages), Kyle MacLachlan, Delroy Lindo (The
Chicago Code),Sienna Guillory (Resident Evil), Jamie Chung (Once Upon
a Time), Johnny Sequoyah, Arian Moayed
Team: W/EP Alfonso Cuaron (Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban),
Mark Friedman (The Forgotten); EP J. J. Abrams, Bryan Burk
Studio: Warner Bros. Television, Bad Robot
Ian J. Ball
May 9, 2013, 1:54:51 PM5/9/13
to
On May 9, 10:36 am, David <dimla...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Believe
>
> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>
> Cast: Jake McLaughlin (Savages), Kyle MacLachlan, Delroy Lindo (The
> Chicago Code),Sienna Guillory (Resident Evil), Jamie Chung (Once Upon
> a Time), Johnny Sequoyah, Arian Moayed
So, a shaky premise, and a not great cast, from an overrated
> Believe
>
> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>
> Cast: Jake McLaughlin (Savages), Kyle MacLachlan, Delroy Lindo (The
> Chicago Code),Sienna Guillory (Resident Evil), Jamie Chung (Once Upon
> a Time), Johnny Sequoyah, Arian Moayed
producer?!
Meh...
Jim G.
May 10, 2013, 1:42:36 PM5/10/13
to
David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
> Believe
>
> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
It'll end up being all about the relationships.
>
> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
Ian J. Ball
May 10, 2013, 3:52:18 PM5/10/13
to
On May 10, 10:42 am, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>
> > Believe
>
> > Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> > Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> > McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> > from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>
> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
Johnny Sequoyah is, like, a 10 year-old girl - *how's* she gonna have
> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>
> > Believe
>
> > Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> > Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> > McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> > from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>
> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
"relationships"?!...
Obveeus
May 10, 2013, 3:59:49 PM5/10/13
to
Jim G.
May 10, 2013, 5:54:41 PM5/10/13
to
Ian J. Ball sent the following on 5/10/2013 2:52 PM:
Not every relationship is romantic or sexual, you know.
Your Name
May 10, 2013, 6:11:44 PM5/10/13
to
David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>
> NBC orders J.J. Abrams' "Believe" to series
>
Oh "goody". Now the talentless idiot is doing 5-million-and-one things at
the same time ... simply one more reason added to the massive pile of why
the new Star Wars movies will be crap. :-\
Ian J. Ball
May 10, 2013, 6:17:09 PM5/10/13
to
On May 10, 2:54 pm, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Ian J. Ball sent the following on 5/10/2013 2:52 PM:
> > On May 10, 10:42 am, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>
> >>> Believe
>
> >>> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> >>> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> >>> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> >>> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>
> >> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
>
> > Johnny Sequoyah is, like, a 10 year-old girl - *how's* she gonna have
> > "relationships"?!...
>
> Not every relationship is romantic or sexual, you know.
Not according to television.
> Ian J. Ball sent the following on 5/10/2013 2:52 PM:
> > On May 10, 10:42 am, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>
> >>> Believe
>
> >>> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> >>> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> >>> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> >>> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>
> >> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
>
> > Johnny Sequoyah is, like, a 10 year-old girl - *how's* she gonna have
> > "relationships"?!...
>
> Not every relationship is romantic or sexual, you know.
suzeeq
May 10, 2013, 8:45:35 PM5/10/13
to
Your Name
May 10, 2013, 8:53:10 PM5/10/13
to
In article <kmjqqi$7u9$6...@dont-email.me>, "Jim G."
<jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> Ian J. Ball sent the following on 5/10/2013 2:52 PM:
> > On May 10, 10:42 am, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
> >>
> >>> Believe
> >>
> >>> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> >>> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> >>> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> >>> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
> >>
> >> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
> >
> > Johnny Sequoyah is, like, a 10 year-old girl - *how's* she gonna have
> > "relationships"?!...
>
> Not every relationship is romantic or sexual, you know.
Please don't confuse the 13 year old perverts with real facts. :-)
> Ian J. Ball sent the following on 5/10/2013 2:52 PM:
> > On May 10, 10:42 am, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
> >> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
> >>
> >>> Believe
> >>
> >>> Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
> >>> Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
> >>> McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
> >>> from the evil elements that hunt her power.
> >>
> >> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
> >
> > Johnny Sequoyah is, like, a 10 year-old girl - *how's* she gonna have
> > "relationships"?!...
>
> Not every relationship is romantic or sexual, you know.
anim8rFSK
May 10, 2013, 9:26:29 PM5/10/13
to
In article <kmk44f$hmd$1...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
wrote:
They finished the latest Star Wars movie?
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
wrote:
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
suzeeq
May 10, 2013, 9:55:34 PM5/10/13
to
anim8rFSK wrote:
> In article <kmk44f$hmd$1...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Your Name wrote:
>>> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>>>> NBC orders J.J. Abrams' "Believe" to series
>>> Oh "goody". Now the talentless idiot is doing 5-million-and-one things at
>>> the same time ... simply one more reason added to the massive pile of why
>>> the new Star Wars movies will be crap. :-\
>> The latest one...? It's about to be released so he's finished with that one.
>
> They finished the latest Star Wars movie?
Oh yeah, guess I didn't read that close enough. Abrams doesn't have
> In article <kmk44f$hmd$1...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Your Name wrote:
>>> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>>>> NBC orders J.J. Abrams' "Believe" to series
>>> Oh "goody". Now the talentless idiot is doing 5-million-and-one things at
>>> the same time ... simply one more reason added to the massive pile of why
>>> the new Star Wars movies will be crap. :-\
>> The latest one...? It's about to be released so he's finished with that one.
>
> They finished the latest Star Wars movie?
anything to do with a Star wars movie.
Obveeus
May 10, 2013, 10:42:09 PM5/10/13
to
suzeeq
May 10, 2013, 10:43:38 PM5/10/13
to
Obveeus
May 10, 2013, 10:52:39 PM5/10/13
to
anim8rFSK
May 10, 2013, 11:13:19 PM5/10/13
to
In article <kmk87l$1fa$2...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
wrote:
Um, well, except that he's directing them.
wrote:
anim8rFSK
May 10, 2013, 11:16:59 PM5/10/13
to
In article <kmkb1p$db4$1...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
wrote:
We could torture you with this for hours, but I'm going to be kind. :)
Abrams is a Star Wars fan. Knew nothing (still doesn't) about Trek.
Didn't like it. Did two Trek films (that feel a lot more like Wars,
right down to Kirk saying "punch it"). Got hired to do the new Star
Wars movies (some reports say one a year). Is keeping mum about it in
the midst of Trek 2 launching, but he's off the Trek franchise, as
Paramount wants Trek 3 in 2016 for the 40th Anniversary, and Abrams is
committed to Wars. His idiot scum muffin Orci blabbed that Abrams is
off Trek.
wrote:
Abrams is a Star Wars fan. Knew nothing (still doesn't) about Trek.
Didn't like it. Did two Trek films (that feel a lot more like Wars,
right down to Kirk saying "punch it"). Got hired to do the new Star
Wars movies (some reports say one a year). Is keeping mum about it in
the midst of Trek 2 launching, but he's off the Trek franchise, as
Paramount wants Trek 3 in 2016 for the 40th Anniversary, and Abrams is
committed to Wars. His idiot scum muffin Orci blabbed that Abrams is
off Trek.
anim8rFSK
May 10, 2013, 11:48:48 PM5/10/13
to
In article <kmkbir$fg8$1...@dont-email.me>, "Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com>
wrote:
Well, he was. Not at the same time though. :)
wrote:
Your Name
May 10, 2013, 11:55:55 PM5/10/13
to
still be one more than he would have had.
Your Name
May 11, 2013, 12:06:10 AM5/11/13
to
In article <anim8rfsk-F7D73...@news.easynews.com>, anim8rFSK
starting in 2015. They plan to release an Episode of the new Trilogy every
two years and have a standalone spin-off movie on the "off years". The
rumours are that the stand-alone movies will be based around Boba Fett,
Han Solo, and Yoda. That would give a schedule something like:
2015 Star Wars: Episode VII
2016 Star Wars: Yoda
2017 Star Wars: Episode VIII
2018 Star Wars: Han Solo
2019 Star Wars: Episode IX
2020 Star Wars: Boba Fett
At the moment JJ Abrams is only in charge of Episode VII, but no doubnt
the idiot will be given the other two in the new Trilogy as well. :-( The
stand-alone movies will probably be done by someone else though.
There's also "news" that Dave Filoni is working on a new animated Star
Wars TV series, even though Disney shutdown "The Clone Wars" series
despite having many episodes of a new season completed or near-completed.
Having shutdown the recently acquired LucasArts game company, Disney have
also just announced they've signed a deal with Electronic Arts to make
Star Wars games.
<anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Abrams is a Star Wars fan. Knew nothing (still doesn't) about Trek.
> Didn't like it. Did two Trek films (that feel a lot more like Wars,
> right down to Kirk saying "punch it"). Got hired to do the new Star
> Wars movies (some reports say one a year). Is keeping mum about it in
> the midst of Trek 2 launching, but he's off the Trek franchise, as
> Paramount wants Trek 3 in 2016 for the 40th Anniversary, and Abrams is
> committed to Wars. His idiot scum muffin Orci blabbed that Abrams is
> off Trek.
Disney has said they are definitely planning one Star Wars movie per year
>
> Abrams is a Star Wars fan. Knew nothing (still doesn't) about Trek.
> Didn't like it. Did two Trek films (that feel a lot more like Wars,
> right down to Kirk saying "punch it"). Got hired to do the new Star
> Wars movies (some reports say one a year). Is keeping mum about it in
> the midst of Trek 2 launching, but he's off the Trek franchise, as
> Paramount wants Trek 3 in 2016 for the 40th Anniversary, and Abrams is
> committed to Wars. His idiot scum muffin Orci blabbed that Abrams is
> off Trek.
starting in 2015. They plan to release an Episode of the new Trilogy every
two years and have a standalone spin-off movie on the "off years". The
rumours are that the stand-alone movies will be based around Boba Fett,
Han Solo, and Yoda. That would give a schedule something like:
2015 Star Wars: Episode VII
2016 Star Wars: Yoda
2017 Star Wars: Episode VIII
2018 Star Wars: Han Solo
2019 Star Wars: Episode IX
2020 Star Wars: Boba Fett
At the moment JJ Abrams is only in charge of Episode VII, but no doubnt
the idiot will be given the other two in the new Trilogy as well. :-( The
stand-alone movies will probably be done by someone else though.
There's also "news" that Dave Filoni is working on a new animated Star
Wars TV series, even though Disney shutdown "The Clone Wars" series
despite having many episodes of a new season completed or near-completed.
Having shutdown the recently acquired LucasArts game company, Disney have
also just announced they've signed a deal with Electronic Arts to make
Star Wars games.
suzeeq
May 11, 2013, 12:05:09 AM5/11/13
to
suzeeq
May 11, 2013, 12:06:12 AM5/11/13
to
register in my brain.
anim8rFSK
May 11, 2013, 1:59:59 AM5/11/13
to
In article
<YourName-110...@203-118-187-207.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
Episode VII in 2015 is enough to keep him from doing Star Trek 3 for
2016.
<YourName-110...@203-118-187-207.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
2016.
Your Name
May 11, 2013, 2:13:02 AM5/11/13
to
In article <anim8rfsk-EB8B8...@news.easynews.com>, anim8rFSK
Nope. He's always supposedly doing 5 million things at the same time.
Your Name
May 11, 2013, 2:15:06 AM5/11/13
to
In article <anim8rfsk-C78AE...@news.easynews.com>, anim8rFSK
I don't think they've said who is doing the third so-called "Star Trek"
movie yet, so technically he is currently in charge of both, unfortunately
... he shouldn't even be in charge of scrubbing the toilets of anything.
movie yet, so technically he is currently in charge of both, unfortunately
... he shouldn't even be in charge of scrubbing the toilets of anything.
RichA
May 11, 2013, 4:24:19 AM5/11/13
to
On May 10, 11:16 pm, anim8rFSK <anim8r...@cox.net> wrote:
> In article <kmkb1p$db...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
> In article <kmkb1p$db...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Obveeus wrote:
> > > "suzeeq" <su...@imbris.com> wrote:
> > >> anim8rFSK wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Obveeus wrote:
> > > "suzeeq" <su...@imbris.com> wrote:
> > >> anim8rFSK wrote:
> > >>> In article <kmk44f$hm...@dont-email.me>, suzeeq <su...@imbris.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>> Your Name wrote:
> > >>>>> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
> > >>>>>> NBC orders J.J. Abrams' "Believe" to series
> > >>>>> Oh "goody". Now the talentless idiot is doing 5-million-and-one things
> > >>>>> at
> > >>>>> the same time ... simply one more reason added to the massive pile of
> > >>>>> why
> > >>>>> the new Star Wars movies will be crap. :-\
> > >>>> The latest one...? It's about to be released so he's finished with that
> > >>>> one.
> > >>> They finished the latest Star Wars movie?
> > >> Oh yeah, guess I didn't read that close enough. Abrams doesn't have
> > >> anything to do with a Star wars movie.
>
> > > You mean, other than being in charge of it?
>
> > No. It's the Star Trek movie.
>
> We could torture you with this for hours, but I'm going to be kind. :)
>
> Abrams is a Star Wars fan. Knew nothing (still doesn't) about Trek.
> Didn't like it. Did two Trek films (that feel a lot more like Wars,
> right down to Kirk saying "punch it").
Low-brow. Thoughtless. Why think when you can "use the force?"
>
> > >>>> Your Name wrote:
> > >>>>> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
> > >>>>>> NBC orders J.J. Abrams' "Believe" to series
> > >>>>> Oh "goody". Now the talentless idiot is doing 5-million-and-one things
> > >>>>> at
> > >>>>> the same time ... simply one more reason added to the massive pile of
> > >>>>> why
> > >>>>> the new Star Wars movies will be crap. :-\
> > >>>> The latest one...? It's about to be released so he's finished with that
> > >>>> one.
> > >>> They finished the latest Star Wars movie?
> > >> Oh yeah, guess I didn't read that close enough. Abrams doesn't have
> > >> anything to do with a Star wars movie.
>
> > > You mean, other than being in charge of it?
>
> > No. It's the Star Trek movie.
>
> We could torture you with this for hours, but I'm going to be kind. :)
>
> Abrams is a Star Wars fan. Knew nothing (still doesn't) about Trek.
> Didn't like it. Did two Trek films (that feel a lot more like Wars,
> right down to Kirk saying "punch it").
anim8rFSK
May 11, 2013, 9:38:49 AM5/11/13
to
In article
<YourName-110...@203-118-187-33.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
Yep. Read the posts. Orci shot off his fat ignorant mouth, and *said*
JJ is off Trek.
<YourName-110...@203-118-187-33.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
JJ is off Trek.
Dimensional Traveler
May 11, 2013, 10:42:15 PM5/11/13
to
both, but not enough to keep him from claiming "supervisor director"
credit or some such BS. This is the man who is trying to get his name
on the credits of every movie and TV show being produced, after all. :P
--
The 'Enterprise' crew in the 2009 Star Trek are adrenaline addicted,
hyper-active teenagers with ADD whose Ritalin got replaced with
methamphetamine, displaying a level of discipline that a Somali pirate
wouldn't tolerate.
Jim G.
May 13, 2013, 12:15:00 PM5/13/13
to
Ian J. Ball sent the following on 5/10/2013 5:17 PM:
This is what a soap opera fetish will do to you. :)
Jim G.
May 13, 2013, 12:16:28 PM5/13/13
to
Dimensional Traveler sent the following on 5/11/2013 9:42 PM:
I can't really fault him for that as long as he's honest about it. He's
hot right now, and he'd be a fool to not take advantage of that hotness,
given that there's no way for him to know when he won't be hot anymore.
hot right now, and he'd be a fool to not take advantage of that hotness,
given that there's no way for him to know when he won't be hot anymore.
William December Starr
May 13, 2013, 7:42:33 PM5/13/13
to
In article <YourName-110...@203-118-187-207.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz>,
to be "The Early Years".
-- wds
Your...@YourISP.com (Your Name) said:
> Disney has said they are definitely planning one Star Wars movie
> per year starting in 2015. They plan to release an Episode of the
> new Trilogy every two years and have a standalone spin-off movie
> on the "off years". The rumours are that the stand-alone movies
> will be based around Boba Fett, Han Solo, and Yoda. That would
> give a schedule something like:
>
> 2015 Star Wars: Episode VII
> 2016 Star Wars: Yoda
> 2017 Star Wars: Episode VIII
> 2018 Star Wars: Han Solo
> 2019 Star Wars: Episode IX
> 2020 Star Wars: Boba Fett
If that's correct, I'm gonna guess that the 2018 movie is going
> Disney has said they are definitely planning one Star Wars movie
> per year starting in 2015. They plan to release an Episode of the
> new Trilogy every two years and have a standalone spin-off movie
> on the "off years". The rumours are that the stand-alone movies
> will be based around Boba Fett, Han Solo, and Yoda. That would
> give a schedule something like:
>
> 2015 Star Wars: Episode VII
> 2016 Star Wars: Yoda
> 2017 Star Wars: Episode VIII
> 2018 Star Wars: Han Solo
> 2019 Star Wars: Episode IX
> 2020 Star Wars: Boba Fett
to be "The Early Years".
-- wds
Obveeus
May 13, 2013, 7:46:38 PM5/13/13
to
I think that VII, VIII, and IX are supposed to be released one per summer.
No idea where those other three intermixed ideas came from.
William December Starr
May 13, 2013, 7:57:42 PM5/13/13
to
In article <kmrtps$p9h$1...@dont-email.me>,
Truthfully, I forgot that entirely; I was just thinking about actors
who are getting too old for this sort of thing.
-- wds
"Obveeus" <Obv...@aol.com> said:
> "William December Starr" <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>>> 2015 Star Wars: Episode VII
>>> 2016 Star Wars: Yoda
>>> 2017 Star Wars: Episode VIII
>>> 2018 Star Wars: Han Solo
>>> 2019 Star Wars: Episode IX
>>> 2020 Star Wars: Boba Fett
>>
>> If that's correct, I'm gonna guess that the 2018 movie is going
>> to be "The Early Years".
>
> Um...what will be the explanation for the 2016 film?
"Better, I got."
> "William December Starr" <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>>> 2015 Star Wars: Episode VII
>>> 2016 Star Wars: Yoda
>>> 2017 Star Wars: Episode VIII
>>> 2018 Star Wars: Han Solo
>>> 2019 Star Wars: Episode IX
>>> 2020 Star Wars: Boba Fett
>>
>> If that's correct, I'm gonna guess that the 2018 movie is going
>> to be "The Early Years".
>
> Um...what will be the explanation for the 2016 film?
Truthfully, I forgot that entirely; I was just thinking about actors
who are getting too old for this sort of thing.
-- wds
Dimensional Traveler
May 13, 2013, 9:47:14 PM5/13/13
to
back away slowly.
Your Name
May 14, 2013, 2:55:08 AM5/14/13
to
movies every other year, with Episode VII due in 2015.
> No idea where those other three intermixed ideas came from.
release a stand-alone spin-off movie (i.e. not an "Episode" of the Saga)
in each of the off-years. What the stand-alone movies will be about is
currently only rumour and fan speculation.
The news can be found all over the Internet, including here:
<http://herocomplex.latimes.com/movies/star-wars-disney-chief-promises-movies-every-year-starting-in-2015/>
Your Name
May 14, 2013, 2:58:27 AM5/14/13
to
In article <kmrtp9$3ge$1...@panix2.panix.com>, wds...@panix.com (William
Possibly, although its more likely to be set a few years before Episode IV
with a younger Han Solo, but not a young kid. Something similar perhaps to
the "Adventures of Young Indiana Jones" TV series when he was a late-teen
/ early twenties.
Of course those three stand-alone / spin-off movies are only rumour and
speculation, so there may not be a Han Solo movie at all ... but there are
three movies planned to be released in those years that are not "Episode"
in the Saga.
with a younger Han Solo, but not a young kid. Something similar perhaps to
the "Adventures of Young Indiana Jones" TV series when he was a late-teen
/ early twenties.
Of course those three stand-alone / spin-off movies are only rumour and
speculation, so there may not be a Han Solo movie at all ... but there are
three movies planned to be released in those years that are not "Episode"
in the Saga.
Dano
May 14, 2013, 12:09:34 PM5/14/13
to
"Dimensional Traveler" wrote in message
news:5191979c$0$52770$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>> Its enough to keep him from actually being the one physically directing
>> both, but not enough to keep him from claiming "supervisor director"
>> credit or some such BS. This is the man who is trying to get his name
>> on the credits of every movie and TV show being produced, after all. :P
>
> I can't really fault him for that as long as he's honest about it. He's
> hot right now, and he'd be a fool to not take advantage of that hotness,
> given that there's no way for him to know when he won't be hot anymore.
>
J.J. Abrams? Honest? Put down the mug of whatever you are drinking and
back away slowly.
=========================================
Seriously? You DON'T think he's "hot" right now?
You better "define" hot. Or redefine it.
news:5191979c$0$52770$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>> Its enough to keep him from actually being the one physically directing
>> both, but not enough to keep him from claiming "supervisor director"
>> credit or some such BS. This is the man who is trying to get his name
>> on the credits of every movie and TV show being produced, after all. :P
>
> I can't really fault him for that as long as he's honest about it. He's
> hot right now, and he'd be a fool to not take advantage of that hotness,
> given that there's no way for him to know when he won't be hot anymore.
>
J.J. Abrams? Honest? Put down the mug of whatever you are drinking and
back away slowly.
Seriously? You DON'T think he's "hot" right now?
You better "define" hot. Or redefine it.
Your Name
May 14, 2013, 5:22:14 PM5/14/13
to
"Hot": n. slang.
Ugly, talentless, brainless, lazy, over-paid,
massively egotistical and self-important, ...
;-)
Dimensional Traveler
May 14, 2013, 9:11:10 PM5/14/13
to
Jim G.
May 15, 2013, 3:02:42 PM5/15/13
to
Dimensional Traveler sent the following on 5/13/2013 8:47 PM:
How is he being dishonest?
Mason Barge
May 17, 2013, 11:44:50 AM5/17/13
to
On Fri, 10 May 2013 12:52:18 -0700 (PDT), "Ian J. Ball"
<ijb...@mac.com> wrote:
>On May 10, 10:42 am, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>>
>> > Believe
>>
>> > Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
>> > Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
>> > McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
>> > from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>>
>> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
>
>Johnny Sequoyah is, like, a 10 year-old girl - *how's* she gonna have
>"relationships"?!...
Did you ever see The Professional? Jean Reno, Gary Oldman, Natalie
<ijb...@mac.com> wrote:
>On May 10, 10:42 am, "Jim G." <jimgy...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>> David sent the following on 5/9/2013 12:36 PM:
>>
>> > Believe
>>
>> > Logline: An unlikely relationship develops between a young girl named
>> > Bo (Johnny Sequoyah) with a gift and a man named Tate (Jake
>> > McLaughlin) sprung from prison who has been tasked with protecting her
>> > from the evil elements that hunt her power.
>>
>> It'll end up being all about the relationships.
>
>Johnny Sequoyah is, like, a 10 year-old girl - *how's* she gonna have
>"relationships"?!...
Portman. Really reasonably good and I'm sure exactly what they are
hoping for here (with the supernatural element).
I'd mention Hannah except I think the guy was her father. Or even
"Push" except that I think everybody but me hated it.
0 new messages