Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion The B5 That Never Was
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bil  
View profile  
 More options Jun 18 2002, 5:34 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated
From: Bil <bil_irv...@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 19:30:47 GMT
Local: Tues, Jun 18 2002 3:30 pm
Subject: Re: The B5 That Never Was
warl...@es.co.nz (Matthew Vincent) wrote in
news:44aa4edb.0206180232.32e6bf10@posting.google.com:

>>Any comments on this site?
>>http://www.webcs.com/b5/neverwas.html
> Yeah, quite frankly I think the site is full of shit. The author is
> obviously trying to get attention for himself by disparaging an
> existing Sci-Fi show. I think it's a very dishonest and disrespectful

Jeez, give the guy a break! It's an *opinion*. Sometimes its fun to
speculate on what might have been. It's not as though there's much else
going on right now in the B5 world is there? I don't think the author was
being disrespectful or dishonest, on several occassions in the article he
mentions how much admiration he has for jms in creating the show, and how
he *did* deliver on his promises.

B5 is a unique situation in any event. Not only was it a unique show, we
as fans also gained a (sometimes unhealthy) level of inside knowledge on
its evolution through jms. The knowledge was great, insofar as it brought
show and fan together like no other show ever has (not even Star Trek
IMO), but I think it *was* a bit unhealthy in retrospect because its
difficult to enjoy & take a show at face value whilst knowing about all
the little pieces of broken glass jms crawled across carrying the
'elephant'.

One thing about the article that I did agree with was his assessment of
season 5. I'm not going to get into the 'season 5 was crap' debate,
because as far as I'm concerned there is no debate (saying that though, I
think that season 5 was a classic example of how too much inside
knowledge can ruin one's perceptions of a show). B5 was brilliant, end of
story. :-) *But* (and I have done this) it comes across as a very
different show if you watch seasons 1-4 then SiL. Not 'better' per se,
just different. It still works.

Anyway, all I'm trying to say is, he's only expressing an opinion. As am
I. Neither are threats to your own beliefs about the show. We all love
jms' work! :-) There's no need to go jumping up and down about it.

Cheers,

Bil
--
   _
_ // Bil Irving                 | Email: *Private*                    |
\X/  Visions Perceived Software | Web:   www.visions-perceived.co.uk/ |

... "Greater than the death of flesh is the death of hope, the death of
    dreams. Against this peril we can never surrender."
                                  - Citizen G'Kar, 2261


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.