Update on Episode 3 *Spoiler Warning!*
free...@hotmail.com
want to know why? Here's a relevant link that will prove it:
http://www.watleyreview.com/2005/041205-3.html
It will be dark and intellectual! I'm definitely watching it!
Wavy G
can't be done. We got a long way to go, and a short time to get there.
I'm eastbound, just watch ol' "free...@hotmail.com" run.
>Episode 3 could end up being the darkest of all Star Wars movies. You
>want to know why? Here's a relevant link that will prove it:
>http://www.watleyreview.com/2005/041205-3.html
***FAKE!! DON'T READ THIS WEBSITE!! IT'S A FAKE!!****
free...@hotmail.com
be about a legal battle. No lightsabers and space battles here folks.
***JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS!! WAVY G DENIES FANS THE TRUTH!!***
Wavy G
can't be done. We got a long way to go, and a short time to get there.
I'm eastbound, just watch ol' "free...@hotmail.com" run.
> You're wrong Wavy G! It's not a fake! Seriously, Episode 3 is going to
>be about a legal battle. No lightsabers and space battles here folks.
>
> ***JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS!! WAVY G DENIES FANS THE TRUTH!!***
*FAKE!* *FAKE!* *FAKE!!*
free...@hotmail.com
true. Prove to me that it's fake and I'll let this drop. It's simply
stating that Episode 3 is going to be more about bureaucracy and legal
matters. It's directed at a more sophisticated audience. The article
cites legitimate references, so I don't see how it's fake. See for
yourselves my fellow Star Wars fans! It's easy for you, Wavy G, to say
that the article is fake. But can you PROVE it? I just want to share
this crucial information with the rest of the fanbase out there. This
is nothing personal of course. If I'm wrong and you prove it then you
have my fullest respect. Even if you don't prove anything, I accept
your disbelief. No hard feelings either way.
But I KNOW that the article is true.
Charles Kunz
From <http://watleyreview.com/About.html>
"The Watley Review is dedicated to the production of articles completely
without journalistic merit or factual basis, as this would entail
leaving our chairs or actually working. Names, places and events are
generally fictitious, except for public figures about which we may have
heard something down at the pub. All contents are intended as parody
and should be construed as such."
"Generally fictitious" and "intended as parody" being the keywords here.
Episode 1 had enough about legal matters (particularly when Darth
Sidious said "I will make it legal."), and frankly I don't think we need
any more of that shit.
Chuck
C'Pi
> On 17 Apr 2005 15:38:18 -0700, free...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry to tell you this Wavy G, but the article is serious and
>> true. Prove to me that it's fake and I'll let this drop. It's simply
>> stating that Episode 3 is going to be more about bureaucracy and
>> legal matters. It's directed at a more sophisticated audience. The
>> article cites legitimate references, so I don't see how it's fake.
>> See for yourselves my fellow Star Wars fans! It's easy for you, Wavy
>> G, to say that the article is fake. But can you PROVE it? I just
>> want to share this crucial information with the rest of the fanbase
>> out there. This is nothing personal of course. If I'm wrong and you
>> prove it then you have my fullest respect. Even if you don't prove
>> anything, I accept your disbelief. No hard feelings either way.
>> But I KNOW that the article is true.
>
> From <http://watleyreview.com/About.html>
> "The Watley Review is dedicated to the production of articles
> completely without journalistic merit or factual basis, as this would
> entail leaving our chairs or actually working. Names, places and
> events are generally fictitious, except for public figures about
> which we may have heard something down at the pub. All contents are
> intended as parody and should be construed as such."
>
> "Generally fictitious" and "intended as parody" being the keywords
> here.
Ah, but you see it says *generally* fictitious. That means it's not always
fictitious. And *intended* as parody. It means they may not have
accomplished what they intended. I think it's about time we learned more
about the legal system in a GFFA. ROTS is gonna rock.
--
C'Pi
"It's because of men like you that all must be destroyed."
Captain Murphy
>From <http://watleyreview.com/About.html>
>"The Watley Review is dedicated to the production of articles completely
>without journalistic merit or factual basis, as this would entail
>leaving our chairs or actually working. Names, places and events are
>generally fictitious, except for public figures about which we may have
>heard something down at the pub. All contents are intended as parody
>and should be construed as such."
>"Generally fictitious" and "intended as parody" being the keywords here.
>Episode 1 had enough about legal matters (particularly when Darth
>Sidious said "I will make it legal."), and frankly I don't think we need
>any more of that shit.
Chuck, why are you even bothing? The original poster is trolling, trying
to get you to do exactly what you just did -- your best bet is to ignore
him. Otherwise, he just sits back and laughs as you actually try to prove
your point to him as if he's really serious about his own view.
C'Pi
Or....maybe Chuck was trolling.
free...@hotmail.com
look at the whole site. O_O Nevermind then... I still can't wait for
the movie!
C'Pi
> Man do I feel stupid. I only read that article and didn't bother to
> look at the whole site. O_O Nevermind then... I still can't wait for
> the movie!
It would be better for you if you just said you were trolling.
'Err...eh, yeah, I knew it was fake.'
Wavy G
can't be done. We got a long way to go, and a short time to get there.
>free...@hotmail.com, you magnificent bastard. I read your post:
>> Man do I feel stupid. I only read that article and didn't bother to
>> look at the whole site. O_O Nevermind then... I still can't wait for
>> the movie!
>
>It would be better for you if you just said you were trolling.
>
>'Err...eh, yeah, I knew it was fake.'
At least we should respect him for his honesty. I must say, I've read
the "Oh, err, umm...yeah...I was, uhh, trolling you the *whole time*,
and you didn't even know it...ha ha, uhh, jokes on you" responses all
too many times.
C'Pi
Eh, I know that. Haha. Uhh.
David B
Maybe it's you.
C'Pi
Or you!!
Captain Murphy
>> Eastbound and down, loaded up and truckin', we're gonna do what they
>> say can't be done. We got a long way to go, and a short time to get
>> there. I'm eastbound, just watch ol' "C'Pi" run.
>>> free...@hotmail.com, you magnificent bastard. I read your post:
>>>> Man do I feel stupid. I only read that article and didn't bother to
>>>> look at the whole site. O_O Nevermind then... I still can't wait for
>>>> the movie!
>>> It would be better for you if you just said you were trolling.
>>> 'Err...eh, yeah, I knew it was fake.'
>> At least we should respect him for his honesty. I must say, I've read
>> the "Oh, err, umm...yeah...I was, uhh, trolling you the *whole time*,
>> and you didn't even know it...ha ha, uhh, jokes on you" responses all
>> too many times.
Read it? You've USED that response.
Captain Murphy
Or me! Bwaa-haa-haaaaaaaa!
Wavy G
can't be done. We got a long way to go, and a short time to get there.
Please provide proof.
Captain Murphy
>>>> At least we should respect him for his honesty. I must say, I've read
>>>> the "Oh, err, umm...yeah...I was, uhh, trolling you the *whole time*,
>>>> and you didn't even know it...ha ha, uhh, jokes on you" responses all
>>>> too many times.
>>Read it? You've USED that response.
>Please provide proof.
Please kiss my ass.
Charles Kunz
If I'm trolling, I'm scrolling. :-)
Chuck
C'Pi
If you're scrolling, I'm bowling.