Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Doctor Who Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS Review with Spoilers
5 views
Skip to first unread message
The Doctor
Apr 27, 2013, 9:14:28 PM4/27/13
to
8/10 .
Kind of reminded me on Lost in Space the movie from a few years ago.
Paradox cause time rift and if not fixed TARDIS and it is on board will
blow up.
First the Doctor uses greed and menaces to
get the salvage crew to help.
Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
IT needs to be fixed and the
Doctor needs a button on this.
Greed, what a sin. Living metal to salvage?
The TARDIS does have self defences.
The Eye of Harmony in a TARDIS? Hmm!
All right what about a family feud?
Elements of interest and what about the CLoister Bell?
REal clue. Cloister bell and defences.
So everything resets and off we go.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 amnd 53 on Atheism
B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
Kind of reminded me on Lost in Space the movie from a few years ago.
Paradox cause time rift and if not fixed TARDIS and it is on board will
blow up.
First the Doctor uses greed and menaces to
get the salvage crew to help.
Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
IT needs to be fixed and the
Doctor needs a button on this.
Greed, what a sin. Living metal to salvage?
The TARDIS does have self defences.
The Eye of Harmony in a TARDIS? Hmm!
All right what about a family feud?
Elements of interest and what about the CLoister Bell?
REal clue. Cloister bell and defences.
So everything resets and off we go.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 amnd 53 on Atheism
B.C. do not condemn your province - vote Liberal!
Stephen Wilson
Apr 28, 2013, 6:38:08 AM4/28/13
to
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:klht5k$1rt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> 8/10 .
>
> Kind of reminded me on Lost in Space the movie from a few years ago.
>
>
> Paradox cause time rift and if not fixed TARDIS and it is on board will
> blow up.
>
> First the Doctor uses greed and menaces to
> get the salvage crew to help.
>
> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>
> IT needs to be fixed and the
> Doctor needs a button on this.
>
> Greed, what a sin. Living metal to salvage?
>
> The TARDIS does have self defences.
>
> The Eye of Harmony in a TARDIS? Hmm!
>
>
> All right what about a family feud?
>
> Elements of interest and what about the CLoister Bell?
>
> REal clue. Cloister bell and defences.
> So everything resets and off we go.
The title of this post suggested there would be a review and spoilers. I've
>
> Kind of reminded me on Lost in Space the movie from a few years ago.
>
>
> Paradox cause time rift and if not fixed TARDIS and it is on board will
> blow up.
>
> First the Doctor uses greed and menaces to
> get the salvage crew to help.
>
> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>
> IT needs to be fixed and the
> Doctor needs a button on this.
>
> Greed, what a sin. Living metal to salvage?
>
> The TARDIS does have self defences.
>
> The Eye of Harmony in a TARDIS? Hmm!
>
>
> All right what about a family feud?
>
> Elements of interest and what about the CLoister Bell?
>
> REal clue. Cloister bell and defences.
> So everything resets and off we go.
no idea what the above is. It's got some English words in it - was it
originally written in Chinese and translated by a computer?
The Doctor
Apr 28, 2013, 8:37:54 AM4/28/13
to
In article <q_6ft.92960$0W4....@fx10.fr7>,
Yawn!
Jette Goldie
Apr 28, 2013, 10:33:13 AM4/28/13
to
it just wasn't a very concise review (short, not concise) and the
spoilers were only spoilers if you knew what they were talking about.
--
Jette Goldie
jgold...@btinternet.com
Living in the Future!
Stephen Wilson
Apr 28, 2013, 10:59:46 AM4/28/13
to
news:klj571$tu$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
And there's the problem. I can't tell whether it's because you really so
have the mental abilities of a 5 year old, whether you skipped school or
whether you have some form of dyslexia. But your comment of "yawn" suggests
the reality is you're just too lazy and can't be bothered to form coherent
sentences.
have the mental abilities of a 5 year old, whether you skipped school or
whether you have some form of dyslexia. But your comment of "yawn" suggests
the reality is you're just too lazy and can't be bothered to form coherent
sentences.
solar penguin
Apr 28, 2013, 1:41:26 PM4/28/13
to
The Doctor wrote:
>
> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
trouble counting as high as one...?
John Hall
Apr 28, 2013, 2:11:43 PM4/28/13
to
In article <klht5k$1rt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
>Paradox cause time rift
Nope. The salvage ship using a magnetic grapple to reel in the TARDIS,
when the Doctor had lowered its shields, damaged it, leading to the time
rift. Any paradoxes that ensued were an effect of the time rift rather
than its cause.
[I've removed the least relevant group, rec,arts.tv, from the
crossposting.]
--
John Hall
"Sir, I have found you an argument;
but I am not obliged to find you an understanding."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
>Paradox cause time rift
Nope. The salvage ship using a magnetic grapple to reel in the TARDIS,
when the Doctor had lowered its shields, damaged it, leading to the time
rift. Any paradoxes that ensued were an effect of the time rift rather
than its cause.
[I've removed the least relevant group, rec,arts.tv, from the
crossposting.]
--
John Hall
"Sir, I have found you an argument;
but I am not obliged to find you an understanding."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
The Doctor
Apr 28, 2013, 4:11:28 PM4/28/13
to
The Doctor
Apr 28, 2013, 4:11:58 PM4/28/13
to
In article <GPaft.46189$9j3....@fx11.fr7>,
Steven you failed pre-school so ...
The Doctor
Apr 28, 2013, 4:12:26 PM4/28/13
to
In article <df3cf0d9-614d-4504...@s4g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>,
Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
The Doctor
Apr 28, 2013, 4:13:05 PM4/28/13
to
In article <jnLTnwEf...@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>,
John Hall <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <klht5k$1rt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
>>Paradox cause time rift
>
>Nope. The salvage ship using a magnetic grapple to reel in the TARDIS,
>when the Doctor had lowered its shields, damaged it, leading to the time
>rift. Any paradoxes that ensued were an effect of the time rift rather
>than its cause.
>
Even the Salvage ship would experience paradoxes.
>In article <klht5k$1rt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
>>Paradox cause time rift
>
>Nope. The salvage ship using a magnetic grapple to reel in the TARDIS,
>when the Doctor had lowered its shields, damaged it, leading to the time
>rift. Any paradoxes that ensued were an effect of the time rift rather
>than its cause.
>
Stephen Wilson
Apr 28, 2013, 4:49:51 PM4/28/13
to
news:kljvqe$srt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
just makes you look incredibly childish, and in itself is nonsense. I'm not
even sure what you mean by pre-school - in the UK we have nursery schools
and playgroups prior to infant schooling, and there's nothing about either
that you can fail. Which basically points to my initial suggestion being the
correct one.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yawn!
>>
>>And there's the problem. I can't tell whether it's because you really so
>>have the mental abilities of a 5 year old, whether you skipped school or
>>whether you have some form of dyslexia. But your comment of "yawn"
>>suggests
>>the reality is you're just too lazy and can't be bothered to form coherent
>>sentences.
>>
>>
>
> Steven you failed pre-school so ...
That doesn't explain your inability to type anything that makes sense. That
>>>
>>> Yawn!
>>
>>And there's the problem. I can't tell whether it's because you really so
>>have the mental abilities of a 5 year old, whether you skipped school or
>>whether you have some form of dyslexia. But your comment of "yawn"
>>suggests
>>the reality is you're just too lazy and can't be bothered to form coherent
>>sentences.
>>
>>
>
> Steven you failed pre-school so ...
just makes you look incredibly childish, and in itself is nonsense. I'm not
even sure what you mean by pre-school - in the UK we have nursery schools
and playgroups prior to infant schooling, and there's nothing about either
that you can fail. Which basically points to my initial suggestion being the
correct one.
anim8rFSK
Apr 28, 2013, 7:09:31 PM4/28/13
to
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_189806
9291_n.jpg
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
9291_n.jpg
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
The Doctor
Apr 28, 2013, 8:24:51 PM4/28/13
to
In article <QXfft.79638$DQ3....@fx27.fr7>,
You cannot accept reality FWIW SW.
solar penguin
Apr 29, 2013, 2:34:44 AM4/29/13
to
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:12:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>>
>>Teams? I only counted one team. Where were the others?
>>
>>OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
>>trouble counting as high as one...?
>
> Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
The Doctor
Apr 29, 2013, 9:32:45 AM4/29/13
to
Stephen Wilson
Apr 29, 2013, 12:25:46 PM4/29/13
to
news:klkekj$fr0$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
whatever passes for reality in your strange little world bears very little
similarity to the reality that most of the rest of us live in.
> In article <QXfft.79638$DQ3....@fx27.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kljvqe$srt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yawn!
>>>>
>>>>And there's the problem. I can't tell whether it's because you really so
>>>>have the mental abilities of a 5 year old, whether you skipped school or
>>>>whether you have some form of dyslexia. But your comment of "yawn"
>>>>suggests
>>>>the reality is you're just too lazy and can't be bothered to form
>>>>coherent
>>>>sentences.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Steven you failed pre-school so ...
>>
>>That doesn't explain your inability to type anything that makes sense.
>>That
>>just makes you look incredibly childish, and in itself is nonsense. I'm
>>not
>>even sure what you mean by pre-school - in the UK we have nursery schools
>>and playgroups prior to infant schooling, and there's nothing about either
>>that you can fail. Which basically points to my initial suggestion being
>>the
>>correct one.
>>
>>
>
> You cannot accept reality FWIW SW.
And another childish non sequitur. But in a way you're correct, because
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kljvqe$srt$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yawn!
>>>>
>>>>And there's the problem. I can't tell whether it's because you really so
>>>>have the mental abilities of a 5 year old, whether you skipped school or
>>>>whether you have some form of dyslexia. But your comment of "yawn"
>>>>suggests
>>>>the reality is you're just too lazy and can't be bothered to form
>>>>coherent
>>>>sentences.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Steven you failed pre-school so ...
>>
>>That doesn't explain your inability to type anything that makes sense.
>>That
>>just makes you look incredibly childish, and in itself is nonsense. I'm
>>not
>>even sure what you mean by pre-school - in the UK we have nursery schools
>>and playgroups prior to infant schooling, and there's nothing about either
>>that you can fail. Which basically points to my initial suggestion being
>>the
>>correct one.
>>
>>
>
> You cannot accept reality FWIW SW.
whatever passes for reality in your strange little world bears very little
similarity to the reality that most of the rest of us live in.
The Doctor
Apr 29, 2013, 6:20:18 PM4/29/13
to
In article <gaxft.207857$MR6.1...@fx21.fr7>,
You doubt therefore you are SW.
Stephen Wilson
Apr 29, 2013, 6:39:57 PM4/29/13
to
news:klmrn2$62r$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
No Yads. I have no doubt whatsoever that whatever passes for reality in your
little world bears very little resemblance to the reality the rest of us
live in.
And yet again, your response is a complete non sequitur. You've said it many
times, almost as if you think it's a good insult when it's actually more of
a compliment, even by your own warped standards. You probably don't realise
this, but it was St Augustine who is credited with saying "I doubt,
therefore I am."
little world bears very little resemblance to the reality the rest of us
live in.
And yet again, your response is a complete non sequitur. You've said it many
times, almost as if you think it's a good insult when it's actually more of
a compliment, even by your own warped standards. You probably don't realise
this, but it was St Augustine who is credited with saying "I doubt,
therefore I am."
David Barnett
Apr 29, 2013, 6:44:10 PM4/29/13
to
In article <kljbp6$t68$1...@dont-email.me>, jgoldie247
@btinternet.com says...
I liked it, but IMHO it was the usual frenetic episode.
I can't recall Jon Pertwee's Doctor running about like
mad. In fact all the previous pre-Moffatt Doctors seem
quite comatose compared with Matt Smith's Doctor.
--
David Barnett
@btinternet.com says...
I can't recall Jon Pertwee's Doctor running about like
mad. In fact all the previous pre-Moffatt Doctors seem
quite comatose compared with Matt Smith's Doctor.
--
David Barnett
solar penguin
May 1, 2013, 8:29:49 AM5/1/13
to
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:32:45 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <kll4a4$djs$3...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:12:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>>>>
>>>>Teams? I only counted one team. Where were the others?
>>>>
>>>>OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
>>>>trouble counting as high as one...?
>>>
>>> Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
>>
>>He didn't need the help of _more than one_ salvage team to get out!
>
> Looks as if he got spat out.
The Doctor
May 1, 2013, 8:34:23 AM5/1/13
to
In article <klr1rt$jsg$2...@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:32:45 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <kll4a4$djs$3...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:12:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>>>>>
>>>>>Teams? I only counted one team. Where were the others?
>>>>>
>>>>>OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
>>>>>trouble counting as high as one...?
>>>>
>>>> Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
>>>
>>>He didn't need the help of _more than one_ salvage team to get out!
>>
>> Looks as if he got spat out.
>
>So what does that have to do with how many salvage teams there were!?!
>
The Doctor is a team on his own.
>
>On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:32:45 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <kll4a4$djs$3...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:12:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>>>>>
>>>>>Teams? I only counted one team. Where were the others?
>>>>>
>>>>>OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
>>>>>trouble counting as high as one...?
>>>>
>>>> Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
>>>
>>>He didn't need the help of _more than one_ salvage team to get out!
>>
>> Looks as if he got spat out.
>
>So what does that have to do with how many salvage teams there were!?!
>
David Barnett
May 4, 2013, 2:40:48 AM5/4/13
to
In article <anim8rfsk-CDE77E.16093128042013
@news.easynews.com>, anim...@cox.net says...
>
> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_189806
> 9291_n.jpg
I didn't realize the book was in that language.
--
David Barnett
@news.easynews.com>, anim...@cox.net says...
>
> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_189806
> 9291_n.jpg
I didn't realize the book was in that language.
--
David Barnett
anim8rFSK
May 4, 2013, 9:09:12 AM5/4/13
to
The Doctor
May 4, 2013, 9:24:44 AM5/4/13
to
In article <anim8rfsk-0A443...@news.easynews.com>,
>--
>"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
anim8rFSK <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
>In article <MPG.2bef587a2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> David Barnett <dbar...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>> In article <anim8rfsk-CDE77E.16093128042013
>> @news.easynews.com>, anim...@cox.net says...
>> >
>> > https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_189806
>> > 9291_n.jpg
>>
>> I didn't realize the book was in that language.
>
>Nor I.
>
And now that you do ...
>In article <MPG.2bef587a2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> David Barnett <dbar...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>> In article <anim8rfsk-CDE77E.16093128042013
>> @news.easynews.com>, anim...@cox.net says...
>> >
>> > https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_189806
>> > 9291_n.jpg
>>
>> I didn't realize the book was in that language.
>
>Nor I.
>
>--
>"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
Wouter Valentijn
May 4, 2013, 3:06:42 PM5/4/13
to
anim8rFSK wrote:
> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_1898069291_n.jpg
Cool!
Thank you.
My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become the TARDIS
matrix!
Or would that be too crazy?
--
Wouter Valentijn http://www.j3v.net
Kirk: "My God, Bones... what have I done?"
McCoy: "What you had to do. What you always do: turn death into a fighting
chance to live."
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.
liam=mail
> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_1898069291_n.jpg
Cool!
Thank you.
My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become the TARDIS
matrix!
Or would that be too crazy?
--
Wouter Valentijn http://www.j3v.net
Kirk: "My God, Bones... what have I done?"
McCoy: "What you had to do. What you always do: turn death into a fighting
chance to live."
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.
liam=mail
The Doctor
May 4, 2013, 5:14:34 PM5/4/13
to
In article <51855c45$0$15974$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>anim8rFSK wrote:
>> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_1898069291_n.jpg
>
>Cool!
>Thank you.
>
>My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become the TARDIS
>matrix!
>Or would that be too crazy?
>
Clara is not River.
>anim8rFSK wrote:
>> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_1898069291_n.jpg
>
>Cool!
>Thank you.
>
>My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become the TARDIS
>matrix!
>Or would that be too crazy?
>
anim8rFSK
May 4, 2013, 6:23:05 PM5/4/13
to
In article <51855c45$0$15974$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
"Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> anim8rFSK wrote:
> > https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_189806929
> > 1_n.jpg
>
"Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> anim8rFSK wrote:
> > https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_189806929
> > 1_n.jpg
>
> Cool!
> Thank you.
>
> My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become the TARDIS
> matrix!
> Or would that be too crazy?
LOL, well, that's sort of a combination of mine and Peachywho's
> Thank you.
>
> My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become the TARDIS
> matrix!
> Or would that be too crazy?
theories. :)
Peachy also thinks it's possible she's the Doctor's granddaughter, but
not by the daughter we've met.
The Doctor
May 4, 2013, 6:36:13 PM5/4/13
to
Wouter Valentijn
May 5, 2013, 2:49:50 AM5/5/13
to
anim8rFSK
May 5, 2013, 9:21:24 AM5/5/13
to
In article <51860110$0$15999$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
"Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article <51855c45$0$15974$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
> > "Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> >
> >> anim8rFSK wrote:
> >>> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_1898069
> >>> 29
> >>> 1_n.jpg
> >>
> >> Cool!
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become
> >> the TARDIS matrix!
> >> Or would that be too crazy?
> >
> > LOL, well, that's sort of a combination of mine and Peachywho's
> > theories. :)
> >
> > Peachy also thinks it's possible she's the Doctor's granddaughter, but
> > not by the daughter we've met.
>
> As in 'Susan'?
I think so, but I'm not sure.
> anim8rFSK wrote:
> > In article <51855c45$0$15974$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
> > "Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> >
> >> anim8rFSK wrote:
> >>> https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_1898069
> >>> 29
> >>> 1_n.jpg
> >>
> >> Cool!
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> My theory about Clara: I think she once was River and will become
> >> the TARDIS matrix!
> >> Or would that be too crazy?
> >
> > LOL, well, that's sort of a combination of mine and Peachywho's
> > theories. :)
> >
> > Peachy also thinks it's possible she's the Doctor's granddaughter, but
> > not by the daughter we've met.
>
> As in 'Susan'?
Stephen Wilson
May 5, 2013, 9:31:11 AM5/5/13
to
"anim8rFSK" <anim...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:anim8rfsk-AE520...@news.easynews.com...
way connected with River Song or Susan.
solar penguin
May 5, 2013, 9:44:06 AM5/5/13
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <klr1rt$jsg$2...@dont-email.me>,
> solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:32:45 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <kll4a4$djs$3...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> >> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:12:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>The Doctor wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Teams? I only counted one team. Where were the others?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
> >>>>>trouble counting as high as one...?
> >>>>
> >>>> Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
> >>>
> >>>He didn't need the help of _more than one_ salvage team to get out!
> >>
> >> Looks as if he got spat out.
> >
> >So what does that have to do with how many salvage teams there were!?!
> >
>
> The Doctor is a team on his own.
> --
solar penguin
May 5, 2013, 9:58:03 AM5/5/13
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <anim8rfsk-0A443...@news.easynews.com>,
> anim8rFSK <anim...@cox.net> wrote:
> >In article <MPG.2bef587a2...@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > David Barnett <dbar...@bigpond.net.au> wrote:
> >
> >> In article <anim8rfsk-CDE77E.16093128042013
> >> @news.easynews.com>, anim...@cox.net says...
> >> >
> >> > https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/246680_583368755029365_1898069291_n.jpg
> >>
> >> I didn't realize the book was in that language.
> >
> >Nor I.
> >
>
> And now that you do ...
>
continuity problems. Who wrote the book?
The Time Lords themselves have written a history of the Time War,
since Gallifrey was time-looped and destroyed during the War. But why
would anyone else write it in Gallifreyan?
Did the Doctor write it? But if so, which Gallifreyan readers did he
write it for? And why did he use his real name?
OTOH the title was definitely in English and we didn't see the pages,
so maybe it wasn't in Gallifreyan after all...
(And I wonder if Clara's comment "So that's who..." on seeing his
name, was actually "So that's Who," and WOTAN was right all along!)
anim8rFSK
May 5, 2013, 11:10:53 AM5/5/13
to
In article <Eatht.245767$Pj4....@fx14.fr7>,
Well, I'm from the "will turn out to be the T.A.R.D.I.S." camp myself.
solar penguin
May 5, 2013, 11:41:39 AM5/5/13
to
cloned or duplicated somehow, possibly involving the TARDIS" camp.
After all, we've _seen_ Clara's origin complete with parents and
childhood, but we haven't seen the parents or childhoods of her
doubles.
The Doctor
May 5, 2013, 4:37:33 PM5/5/13
to
In article <Eatht.245767$Pj4....@fx14.fr7>,
Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
The Doctor
May 5, 2013, 4:37:55 PM5/5/13
to
In article <ba9d88a7-1ee5-442e...@m7g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <klr1rt$jsg$2...@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:32:45 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <kll4a4$djs$3...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> >> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:12:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Teams? I only counted one team. Where were the others?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
>> >>>>>trouble counting as high as one...?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
>> >>>
>> >>>He didn't need the help of _more than one_ salvage team to get out!
>> >>
>> >> Looks as if he got spat out.
>> >
>> >So what does that have to do with how many salvage teams there were!?!
>> >
>>
>> The Doctor is a team on his own.
>> --
>
>If that's what you meant, why didn't you say so in the first place?
Tell me when he is not.
>
>
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <klr1rt$jsg$2...@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:32:45 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article <kll4a4$djs$3...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> >> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:12:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Guess what, the Salvage Ship's Teams did cause a breach.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Teams? I only counted one team. Where were the others?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>OTOH since you seem to think there are two of me, maybe you just have
>> >>>>>trouble counting as high as one...?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Well how did the Doctor get out of the TARDIS?
>> >>>
>> >>>He didn't need the help of _more than one_ salvage team to get out!
>> >>
>> >> Looks as if he got spat out.
>> >
>> >So what does that have to do with how many salvage teams there were!?!
>> >
>>
>> The Doctor is a team on his own.
>> --
>
>If that's what you meant, why didn't you say so in the first place?
The Doctor
May 5, 2013, 4:38:28 PM5/5/13
to
In article <69ff7d62-8a04-43e6...@a6g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
Or does the TARDIS translate for the reader?
Jim G.
May 6, 2013, 3:52:59 PM5/6/13
to
anim8rFSK sent the following on Sun, 05 May 2013 08:10:53 -0700:
So you're telling me that I have an inappropriate infatuation with a
phone booth? (There's a "reach out and touch someone" joke in there
somewhere, but I'm not quite seeing it.)
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
phone booth? (There's a "reach out and touch someone" joke in there
somewhere, but I'm not quite seeing it.)
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
solar penguin
May 9, 2013, 5:07:01 AM5/9/13
to
remember) the TARDIS doesn't usually translate Gallifreyan text. e.g.
It didn't translate the Doctor's name on his cot in "A Good Man..."
The Doctor
May 9, 2013, 7:49:15 AM5/9/13
to
In article <391de4df-fd86-495d...@gb2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Was it inside or outside the TARDIS?
Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
Wouter Valentijn
May 11, 2013, 2:24:35 PM5/11/13
to
One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional metaphor 'a
captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns out to be literal?
River Song actually married The Doctor...
The Doctor
May 11, 2013, 5:35:50 PM5/11/13
to
In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Good episode though.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Wouter Valentijn
May 11, 2013, 5:59:34 PM5/11/13
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
<snip>
> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>
>
> Good episode though.
One of the best of the modern era.
The Doctor
May 11, 2013, 6:01:03 PM5/11/13
to
"Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> writes:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
><snip>
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>
>>
>> Good episode though.
>Yes, very much so.
>One of the best of the modern era.
I will be watching.
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
><snip>
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>
>>
>> Good episode though.
>Yes, very much so.
>One of the best of the modern era.
>--
>Wouter Valentijn http://www.j3v.net
>Kirk: "My God, Bones... what have I done?"
>McCoy: "What you had to do. What you always do: turn death into a fighting
>chance to live."
>Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.
>liam=mail
Stephen Wilson
May 11, 2013, 6:06:26 PM5/11/13
to
"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
news:kmmf2v$ni1$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> "Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> writes:
>
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>
>><snip>
>
>>>>
>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good episode though.
>
>>Yes, very much so.
>>One of the best of the modern era.
>
> I will be watching.
Canada must be some time behind. We saw this episode in the UK almost
>
>>The Doctor wrote:
>>> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>
>><snip>
>
>>>>
>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Good episode though.
>
>>Yes, very much so.
>>One of the best of the modern era.
>
> I will be watching.
exactly 2 years ago.
The Doctor
May 11, 2013, 6:37:42 PM5/11/13
to
In article <Ghzjt.45958$PV5....@fx22.fr7>,
The Cyberman one!!
Wouter Valentijn
May 12, 2013, 2:17:10 AM5/12/13
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <Ghzjt.45958$PV5....@fx22.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
<snip>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good episode though.
>>>
>>>> Yes, very much so.
>>>> One of the best of the modern era.
>>>
>>> I will be watching.
>>
>> Canada must be some time behind. We saw this episode in the UK almost
>> exactly 2 years ago.
>>
>>
>
> The Cyberman one!!
???
> In article <Ghzjt.45958$PV5....@fx22.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
<snip>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good episode though.
>>>
>>>> Yes, very much so.
>>>> One of the best of the modern era.
>>>
>>> I will be watching.
>>
>> Canada must be some time behind. We saw this episode in the UK almost
>> exactly 2 years ago.
>>
>>
>
> The Cyberman one!!
Uh...
We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
The Doctor's Wife
But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 7:32:01 AM5/12/13
to
In article <518f35c2$0$15907$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <Ghzjt.45958$PV5....@fx22.fr7>,
>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>
><snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good episode though.
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, very much so.
>>>>> One of the best of the modern era.
>>>>
>>>> I will be watching.
>>>
>>> Canada must be some time behind. We saw this episode in the UK almost
>>> exactly 2 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The Cyberman one!!
>
>???
>
>Uh...
>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>
>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>
>The Doctor's Wife
>
>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>
>
Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <Ghzjt.45958$PV5....@fx22.fr7>,
>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>
><snip>
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good episode though.
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, very much so.
>>>>> One of the best of the modern era.
>>>>
>>>> I will be watching.
>>>
>>> Canada must be some time behind. We saw this episode in the UK almost
>>> exactly 2 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The Cyberman one!!
>
>???
>
>Uh...
>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>
>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>
>The Doctor's Wife
>
>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>
>
solar penguin
May 12, 2013, 8:07:38 AM5/12/13
to
Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 8:08:32 AM5/12/13
to
In article <1f8eb4df-81ed-435e...@bz1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Exclusive or mate.
>>
>> Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
>> --
>
>Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
Well it is an average.
>>
>> Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
>> --
>
>Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
solar penguin
May 12, 2013, 8:23:58 AM5/12/13
to
indication that the translation works differently depending on whether
or not you just happen to be inside the TARDIS at the time.
> >>
> >> Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
> >> --
> >
> >Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
>
> Well it is an average.
> --
over and over again.
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 8:25:58 AM5/12/13
to
solar penguin
May 12, 2013, 8:30:06 AM5/12/13
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <8ef50c02-c639-4c3e...@k4g2000vba.googlegroups.com>,
> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >The Doctor wrote:
> >
> >> In article <1f8eb4df-81ed-435e...@bz1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> >> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >The Doctor wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> In article <391de4df-fd86-495d...@gb2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> >> >> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The Doctor wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> In article <69ff7d62-8a04-43e6...@a6g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>,
> >> >> >> solar penguin <solar....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >OTOH the title was definitely in English and we didn't see the pages,
> >> >> >> >so maybe it wasn't in Gallifreyan after all...
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Or does the TARDIS translate for the reader?
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >
> >> >> >But (and this is what started this whole subthread in the first place,
> >> >> >remember) the TARDIS doesn't usually translate Gallifreyan text. e.g.
> >> >> >It didn't translate the Doctor's name on his cot in "A Good Man..."
> >> >>
> >> >> Was it inside or outside the TARDIS?
> >> >
> >> >Yes, it was.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Exclusive or mate.
> >>
> >
> >In this case, does it make any difference? We've never seen any
> >indication that the translation works differently depending on whether
> >or not you just happen to be inside the TARDIS at the time.
> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
> >> >> --
> >> >
> >> >Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
> >>
> >> Well it is an average.
> >> --
> >
> >So one person could've created 482 different accounts to rate it 7.9
> >over and over again.
>
>
> Nope.
> --
"Nope," what? Nope, it doesn't make any difference? Or: Nope, one
> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >
> >> >> >But (and this is what started this whole subthread in the first place,
> >> >> >remember) the TARDIS doesn't usually translate Gallifreyan text. e.g.
> >> >> >It didn't translate the Doctor's name on his cot in "A Good Man..."
> >> >>
> >> >> Was it inside or outside the TARDIS?
> >> >
> >> >Yes, it was.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Exclusive or mate.
> >>
> >
> >In this case, does it make any difference? We've never seen any
> >indication that the translation works differently depending on whether
> >or not you just happen to be inside the TARDIS at the time.
> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
> >> >> --
> >> >
> >> >Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
> >>
> >> Well it is an average.
> >> --
> >
> >So one person could've created 482 different accounts to rate it 7.9
> >over and over again.
>
>
> Nope.
> --
person couldn't create multiple imdb accounts?
Stephen Wilson
May 12, 2013, 9:51:20 AM5/12/13
to
news:kmmh7m$pkj$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <Ghzjt.45958$PV5....@fx22.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmmf2v$ni1$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> "Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> writes:
>>>
>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>>>>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good episode though.
>>>
>>>>Yes, very much so.
>>>>One of the best of the modern era.
>>>
>>> I will be watching.
>>
>>Canada must be some time behind. We saw this episode in the UK almost
>>exactly 2 years ago.
>>
>>
>
> The Cyberman one!!
No, it wasn't the Cyberman one.
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmmf2v$ni1$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> "Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> writes:
>>>
>>>>The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <518e96df$0$15998$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>>>>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>>
>>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>>>>>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>>>>>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>>>>>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Good episode though.
>>>
>>>>Yes, very much so.
>>>>One of the best of the modern era.
>>>
>>> I will be watching.
>>
>>Canada must be some time behind. We saw this episode in the UK almost
>>exactly 2 years ago.
>>
>>
>
> The Cyberman one!!
Stephen Wilson
May 12, 2013, 10:12:48 AM5/12/13
to
news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>
>>Uh...
>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>
>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>
>>The Doctor's Wife
>>
>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>
>>
>
> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>Uh...
>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>
>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>
>>The Doctor's Wife
>>
>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>
>>
>
> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
Stephen Wilson
May 12, 2013, 10:21:56 AM5/12/13
to
news:kmo0o0$11n$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
Median, mean or mode?
Stephen Wilson
May 12, 2013, 10:37:06 AM5/12/13
to
news:kmo1om$20h$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
From imdb.com, talking about Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS:
"The episode is ruined by the last ten minutes that are simply dreadful . In
Curse Of The Black Spot the audience effectively got a remake of The Empty
Child/The Doctor Dances and here we get a medley mega-mix of Russell T
Davies . We get angst ridden family nonsense with the salvager's who reveal
they're not androids at all and we get a dues ex machina ending involving a
reset button just like in Last Of The Timelords a story that is known in
some fan circles as the biggest cheat the show has come up with . The only
segment of the last ten minutes that didn't rip off RTD was more timey-wimey
paradox nonsense and yet another character piece involving the enigma of
Clara that seems shoehorned in by Moffat and has quickly outlived its
welcome
In summary this is a relatively enjoyable episode let down by ill thought
out writing and producing . The ending is a massive cheat and not for one
second does one believe writer Steve Thompson is giving a massive post
modernist nod to RTD . Moffat should have insisted on a much better ending
with a rewrite that does away with time paradox and as it stands this
episode doesn't merit a rewatch and why should it since in reality it didn't
happen "
From imdb.com, talking about Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS:
"Dr Who has got a lot to offer but not as a fast food meal with no substance
and not as a science fiction show without the basic science included. If
these flaws were a one offs in a good season I'd forgive and forget but as
the whole season has been flawed I think the buck stops with Stephen Moffat.
Come back Russell T. we never had to forgive you anything."
From imdb.com (via flick filosopher), talking about Journey to the Centre of
the TARDIS:
"I'm not sure this episode works on any scale imaginable. There's tons of
little fiddly plot stuff that simply makes no sense. How did the Doctor end
up outside the TARDIS when it got pulled aboard the salvagers' ship? Why the
hell would the head salvage guy tell his dumb brother to "get back to the
console, strip it apart" when as far as he knows, that console is the only
way for the Doctor to stop the self-destruct countdown he's convinced the
brothers he's started? Why are the burnt zombies menacing everybody, even
killing that one Van Baalen brother? Instead of being, like, dead?"
From imdb.com (via a mighty fine blog), talking about Journey to the Centre
of the TARDIS:
"The dark side of time travel lies in the temptation it presents to writers
who might be looking for an easy way to resolve a plot by basically wiping
the slate clean. Killed off a character you liked? Just travel back in time
and save them. Revealed some potentially story-altering secrets? Just change
the past so no one remembers them. Trapped the cast in a deadly situation
that they can't get out of? Just hit the reset button."
From imdb.com (via the unaffiliated critic), talking about Journey to the
Centre of the TARDIS:
"Somewhere within the wreckage of "Journey to the Center of the TARDIS"
there was a great episode of Doctor Who to be found, but writer Steve
Thompson didn't quite find it. Like the Doctor (Matt Smith) himself,
Thompson kept journeying further and further into the legendary, infinite
recesses of the famous craft, searching for the salvage of a lifetime: there
were many pleasures and wonders to be discovered along the way, but,
ultimately, what they both found was just a big old mess in desperate need
of a do-over."
>>> >>
>>> >> Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
>>> >> --
>>> >
>>> >Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
>>>
>>> Well it is an average.
>>> --
>>
>>So one person could've created 482 different accounts to rate it 7.9
>>over and over again.
>
>
> Nope.
OK then, let's see what people at imdb.com really thought about the episode.
>>> >> Also Journey was rated 7.9/10 by 482 users on imdb.com
>>> >> --
>>> >
>>> >Also how many users didn't rate it 7.9/10?
>>>
>>> Well it is an average.
>>> --
>>
>>So one person could've created 482 different accounts to rate it 7.9
>>over and over again.
>
>
> Nope.
From imdb.com, talking about Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS:
"The episode is ruined by the last ten minutes that are simply dreadful . In
Curse Of The Black Spot the audience effectively got a remake of The Empty
Child/The Doctor Dances and here we get a medley mega-mix of Russell T
Davies . We get angst ridden family nonsense with the salvager's who reveal
they're not androids at all and we get a dues ex machina ending involving a
reset button just like in Last Of The Timelords a story that is known in
some fan circles as the biggest cheat the show has come up with . The only
segment of the last ten minutes that didn't rip off RTD was more timey-wimey
paradox nonsense and yet another character piece involving the enigma of
Clara that seems shoehorned in by Moffat and has quickly outlived its
welcome
In summary this is a relatively enjoyable episode let down by ill thought
out writing and producing . The ending is a massive cheat and not for one
second does one believe writer Steve Thompson is giving a massive post
modernist nod to RTD . Moffat should have insisted on a much better ending
with a rewrite that does away with time paradox and as it stands this
episode doesn't merit a rewatch and why should it since in reality it didn't
happen "
From imdb.com, talking about Journey to the Centre of the TARDIS:
"Dr Who has got a lot to offer but not as a fast food meal with no substance
and not as a science fiction show without the basic science included. If
these flaws were a one offs in a good season I'd forgive and forget but as
the whole season has been flawed I think the buck stops with Stephen Moffat.
Come back Russell T. we never had to forgive you anything."
From imdb.com (via flick filosopher), talking about Journey to the Centre of
the TARDIS:
"I'm not sure this episode works on any scale imaginable. There's tons of
little fiddly plot stuff that simply makes no sense. How did the Doctor end
up outside the TARDIS when it got pulled aboard the salvagers' ship? Why the
hell would the head salvage guy tell his dumb brother to "get back to the
console, strip it apart" when as far as he knows, that console is the only
way for the Doctor to stop the self-destruct countdown he's convinced the
brothers he's started? Why are the burnt zombies menacing everybody, even
killing that one Van Baalen brother? Instead of being, like, dead?"
From imdb.com (via a mighty fine blog), talking about Journey to the Centre
of the TARDIS:
"The dark side of time travel lies in the temptation it presents to writers
who might be looking for an easy way to resolve a plot by basically wiping
the slate clean. Killed off a character you liked? Just travel back in time
and save them. Revealed some potentially story-altering secrets? Just change
the past so no one remembers them. Trapped the cast in a deadly situation
that they can't get out of? Just hit the reset button."
From imdb.com (via the unaffiliated critic), talking about Journey to the
Centre of the TARDIS:
"Somewhere within the wreckage of "Journey to the Center of the TARDIS"
there was a great episode of Doctor Who to be found, but writer Steve
Thompson didn't quite find it. Like the Doctor (Matt Smith) himself,
Thompson kept journeying further and further into the legendary, infinite
recesses of the famous craft, searching for the salvage of a lifetime: there
were many pleasures and wonders to be discovered along the way, but,
ultimately, what they both found was just a big old mess in desperate need
of a do-over."
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 5:25:43 PM5/12/13
to
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 5:26:26 PM5/12/13
to
In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>,
That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 5:27:19 PM5/12/13
to
In article <cANjt.281763$T71....@fx01.fr7>,
Mean you meannie.
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 5:27:52 PM5/12/13
to
In article <qONjt.29306$pv1....@fx04.fr7>,
Now to get these people to post here on USEnet.
Stephen Wilson
May 12, 2013, 5:35:19 PM5/12/13
to
news:kmp1e2$2c0$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>
>>>>Uh...
>>>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>>>
>>>>The Doctor's Wife
>>>>
>>>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>
>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>
>>
>
> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
Is that a question or your proof?
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>
>>>>Uh...
>>>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>>>
>>>>The Doctor's Wife
>>>>
>>>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>
>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>
>>
>
> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
The Doctor
May 12, 2013, 5:49:58 PM5/12/13
to
In article <wWTjt.97671$ew7....@fx16.fr7>,
Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:kmp1e2$2c0$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>,
>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>
>>>>>Uh...
>>>>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>>>>
>>>>>The Doctor's Wife
>>>>>
>>>>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>
>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>
>Is that a question or your proof?
>
>
Question about your question.
>
>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>news:kmp1e2$2c0$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>,
>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>
>>>>>Uh...
>>>>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>>>>
>>>>>The Doctor's Wife
>>>>>
>>>>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>
>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>
>Is that a question or your proof?
>
>
Stephen Wilson
May 12, 2013, 6:02:41 PM5/12/13
to
news:kmp2q5$3l1$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
> In article <wWTjt.97671$ew7....@fx16.fr7>,
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmp1e2$2c0$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>,
>>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Uh...
>>>>>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Doctor's Wife
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>>
>>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>>
>>Is that a question or your proof?
>>
>>
>
> Question about your question.
About 5 o'clock
> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmp1e2$2c0$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>,
>>> Stephen Wilson <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Uh...
>>>>>>We were talking about the ep from May 14, 2011:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1721226/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Doctor's Wife
>>>>>>
>>>>>>But I think you meant 'Nightmare in Silver' now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>>
>>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>>
>>Is that a question or your proof?
>>
>>
>
> Question about your question.
solar penguin
May 13, 2013, 10:37:38 AM5/13/13
to
On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:26:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>, Stephen Wilson
> <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>
> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>, Stephen Wilson
> <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>
>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>
>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>
>>
>>
> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
No, Yads. Russell T Davies isn't the Emperor.
>>
>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>
>>
>>
> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
Jim G.
May 13, 2013, 12:22:42 PM5/13/13
to
Wouter Valentijn sent the following on 5/11/2013 1:24 PM:
That would get interesting in a hurry. Whatever the case, I hope that
the writers keep in mind that the longer they tease something, the
bigger the reveal had better be in terms of payoff for the audience's
patience, and all that.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
the writers keep in mind that the longer they tease something, the
bigger the reveal had better be in terms of payoff for the audience's
patience, and all that.
--
Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
The Doctor
May 13, 2013, 5:18:15 PM5/13/13
to
The Doctor
May 13, 2013, 5:18:46 PM5/13/13
to
Bill Steele
May 14, 2013, 3:16:48 PM5/14/13
to
episode, and when she became the Companion they had to figure out an
explanation.
If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet. But
then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and deliberate
deception. How did River Song move around in time? We never saw her with
a TARDIS.
Or, since Doctor Who comes on just an hour before Orphan Black...
The Doctor
May 14, 2013, 3:53:04 PM5/14/13
to
In article <ws21-A5DB57.1...@70-3-168-216.pools.spcsdns.net>,
Thankfully North American scheduling is not the same as European
Scheduling.
Scheduling.
solar penguin
May 15, 2013, 10:54:58 AM5/15/13
to
On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:18:15 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <kmqtri$n8u$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:26:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>, Stephen Wilson
>>> <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>
>>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>>
>>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>>
>>No, Yads. Russell T Davies isn't the Emperor.
>>
>>
> WARWICK Davies!!
If that's what you meant, why didn't you say so in the first place?
> In article <kmqtri$n8u$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:26:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>, Stephen Wilson
>>> <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>
>>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>>
>>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>>
>>No, Yads. Russell T Davies isn't the Emperor.
>>
>>
> WARWICK Davies!!
Remember, always say what you mean.
Jim G.
May 15, 2013, 3:01:59 PM5/15/13
to
Bill Steele sent the following on 5/14/2013 2:16 PM:
Yep.
> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet. But
> then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and deliberate
> deception. How did River Song move around in time? We never saw her with
> a TARDIS.
>
> Or, since Doctor Who comes on just an hour before Orphan Black...
Lots of Claras. Lots and lots of Claras. I like it. :)
> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet. But
> then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and deliberate
> deception. How did River Song move around in time? We never saw her with
> a TARDIS.
>
> Or, since Doctor Who comes on just an hour before Orphan Black...
The Doctor
May 15, 2013, 4:00:43 PM5/15/13
to
In article <kn07k1$mu4$1...@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:18:15 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <kmqtri$n8u$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:26:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>, Stephen Wilson
>>>> <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>>>
>>>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>>>
>>>No, Yads. Russell T Davies isn't the Emperor.
>>>
>>>
>> WARWICK Davies!!
>
>If that's what you meant, why didn't you say so in the first place?
>Remember, always say what you mean.
I doubt Russell can act.
>On Mon, 13 May 2013 21:18:15 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> In article <kmqtri$n8u$2...@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
>> <solar....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 12 May 2013 21:26:26 +0000, The Doctor wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <ErNjt.18351$ne1....@fx07.fr7>, Stephen Wilson
>>>> <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>"The Doctor" <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>news:kmnujh$fh6$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Still prove Gaiman rocks!
>>>>>
>>>>>If you think it, then why don't you prove it?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That Gaiman rocks, With Davies as the Emperor?
>>>
>>>No, Yads. Russell T Davies isn't the Emperor.
>>>
>>>
>> WARWICK Davies!!
>
>If that's what you meant, why didn't you say so in the first place?
>Remember, always say what you mean.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
I am a New World Order Enemy! I Endorse freedoms!
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
Wouter Valentijn
May 18, 2013, 2:13:00 AM5/18/13
to
Bill Steele wrote:
> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
<snip>
> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet. But
> then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and
> deliberate deception. How did River Song move around in time? We
> never saw her with a TARDIS.
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vortex_manipulator
But if my theory about River/Clara is correct, that is not the device in
play I think.
--
Wouter Valentijn http://www.j3v.net
Kirk: "My God, Bones... what have I done?"
McCoy: "What you had to do. What you always do: turn death into a fighting
chance to live."
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.
liam=mail
Wouter Valentijn
May 18, 2013, 2:29:54 AM5/18/13
to
Jim G. wrote:
> Wouter Valentijn sent the following on 5/11/2013 1:24 PM:
>> Jim G. wrote:
>>> anim8rFSK sent the following on Sun, 05 May 2013 08:10:53 -0700:
>>>> In article <Eatht.245767$Pj4....@fx14.fr7>,
>>>> "Stephen Wilson" <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
<snip>
> Wouter Valentijn sent the following on 5/11/2013 1:24 PM:
>> Jim G. wrote:
>>> anim8rFSK sent the following on Sun, 05 May 2013 08:10:53 -0700:
>>>> In article <Eatht.245767$Pj4....@fx14.fr7>,
>>>> "Stephen Wilson" <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking of the Neil Gaiman episode of last season.
>> One could take the title 'The Doctor's Wife' as the traditional
>> metaphor 'a captain is married to his ship', but what if it turns
>> out to be literal? River Song actually married The Doctor...
>
> That would get interesting in a hurry. Whatever the case, I hope that
> the writers keep in mind that the longer they tease something, the
> bigger the reveal had better be in terms of payoff for the audience's
> patience, and all that.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtaIpkjF6Ss
I think they WILL deliver today. At least some answers.
One other thing I thought about:
Oswald means: Gods Power
But it can also read as:
Wald: meaning: power, influence, violence, and also as 'walt', 'forest' in
German. And what was the only water in the forest? :-). Its 'Woud' in Dutch
BTW, which also connects to my own name, a Dutch variant of 'Walter'. :-D
Os(s), in Norse, means 'rivermouth'.
Just thinking out loud.
The Doctor
May 18, 2013, 9:23:22 AM5/18/13
to
In article <51971bef$0$15930$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>--
>Wouter Valentijn http://www.j3v.net
>
>Kirk: "My God, Bones... what have I done?"
>McCoy: "What you had to do. What you always do: turn death into a fighting
>chance to live."
>
>Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.
>
>liam=mail
>
>
>
Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>Bill Steele wrote:
>> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
><snip>
>
>> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet. But
>> then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and
>> deliberate deception. How did River Song move around in time? We
>> never saw her with a TARDIS.
>
>A Time Vortex Manipulator.
>
>http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vortex_manipulator
>
>But if my theory about River/Clara is correct, that is not the device in
>play I think.
>
Let's watch.
>Bill Steele wrote:
>> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
>> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
><snip>
>
>> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet. But
>> then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and
>> deliberate deception. How did River Song move around in time? We
>> never saw her with a TARDIS.
>
>A Time Vortex Manipulator.
>
>http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vortex_manipulator
>
>But if my theory about River/Clara is correct, that is not the device in
>play I think.
>
>--
>Wouter Valentijn http://www.j3v.net
>
>Kirk: "My God, Bones... what have I done?"
>McCoy: "What you had to do. What you always do: turn death into a fighting
>chance to live."
>
>Star Trek III: The Search for Spock.
>
>liam=mail
>
>
>
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
The false churches will conform themselves to this world's demands, seeing as they do not fear and thus do not obey God. - anon
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
The Doctor
May 18, 2013, 9:23:59 AM5/18/13
to
Wouter Valentijn
May 18, 2013, 9:59:45 AM5/18/13
to
The Doctor wrote:
> In article <51971bef$0$15930$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>> Bill Steele wrote:
>>> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet.
>>> But then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and
>>> deliberate deception. How did River Song move around in time? We
>>> never saw her with a TARDIS.
>>
>> A Time Vortex Manipulator.
>>
>> http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vortex_manipulator
>>
>> But if my theory about River/Clara is correct, that is not the
>> device in play I think.
>>
>
> Let's watch.
Indeed! :-)
> In article <51971bef$0$15930$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>> Bill Steele wrote:
>>> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet.
>>> But then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and
>>> deliberate deception. How did River Song move around in time? We
>>> never saw her with a TARDIS.
>>
>> A Time Vortex Manipulator.
>>
>> http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vortex_manipulator
>>
>> But if my theory about River/Clara is correct, that is not the
>> device in play I think.
>>
>
> Let's watch.
The Doctor
May 18, 2013, 10:05:19 AM5/18/13
to
In article <51978963$0$15884$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <51971bef$0$15930$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>> Bill Steele wrote:
>>>> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet.
>>>> But then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and
>>>> deliberate deception. How did River Song move around in time? We
>>>> never saw her with a TARDIS.
>>>
>>> A Time Vortex Manipulator.
>>>
>>> http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vortex_manipulator
>>>
>>> But if my theory about River/Clara is correct, that is not the
>>> device in play I think.
>>>
>>
>> Let's watch.
>
>Indeed! :-)
>
>
I await!
>The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <51971bef$0$15930$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
>> Wouter Valentijn <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
>>> Bill Steele wrote:
>>>> In article <kmrg1o$dbl$1...@dont-email.me>,
>>>> "Jim G." <jimg...@geemail.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> If she's jumping around in time she apparently hasn't done it yet.
>>>> But then we'll have to choose between convenient memory loss and
>>>> deliberate deception. How did River Song move around in time? We
>>>> never saw her with a TARDIS.
>>>
>>> A Time Vortex Manipulator.
>>>
>>> http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Vortex_manipulator
>>>
>>> But if my theory about River/Clara is correct, that is not the
>>> device in play I think.
>>>
>>
>> Let's watch.
>
>Indeed! :-)
>
>
Jim G.
May 18, 2013, 2:41:11 PM5/18/13
to
Wouter Valentijn sent the following on 5/18/2013 1:29 AM:
Interesting, and you're reminding me of how people would dissect and
analyze character names on LOST back in the day. In any case, we'll know
soon ... maybe ...
analyze character names on LOST back in the day. In any case, we'll know
soon ... maybe ...
The Doctor
May 18, 2013, 4:36:09 PM5/18/13
to
In article <kn8hp2$lcm$1...@dont-email.me>,
As of now, the UK should have seen the Name of the Doctor.
>
>--
>Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
>"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
>
>--
>Jim G. | A fan of the good and the bad, but not the mediocre
>"Can you and your stupid hair let us in?" -- Carlton Lassiter, PSYCH
John Hall
May 18, 2013, 5:13:17 PM5/18/13
to
In article <kn8onp$mai$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
[I've removed the least relevant group from the crossposting. My
newsreader objects - quite rightly IMO - if one tries to crosspost to
five or more groups.]
--
John Hall
"Sir, I have found you an argument;
but I am not obliged to find you an understanding."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
>As of now, the UK should have seen the Name of the Doctor.
Indeed it has. I thought it was excellent. :)
>As of now, the UK should have seen the Name of the Doctor.
[I've removed the least relevant group from the crossposting. My
newsreader objects - quite rightly IMO - if one tries to crosspost to
five or more groups.]
--
John Hall
"Sir, I have found you an argument;
but I am not obliged to find you an understanding."
Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
The Doctor
May 18, 2013, 7:12:28 PM5/18/13
to
In article <z9HVF1Jt...@jhall.demon.co.uk.invalid>,
>--
>John Hall
> "Sir, I have found you an argument;
> but I am not obliged to find you an understanding."
> Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
John Hall <john_...@jhall.co.uk> wrote:
>In article <kn8onp$mai$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
>>As of now, the UK should have seen the Name of the Doctor.
>
>Indeed it has. I thought it was excellent. :)
>
>[I've removed the least relevant group from the crossposting. My
>newsreader objects - quite rightly IMO - if one tries to crosspost to
>five or more groups.]
Will be watching.
>In article <kn8onp$mai$1...@gallifrey.nk.ca>,
> The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> writes:
>>As of now, the UK should have seen the Name of the Doctor.
>
>Indeed it has. I thought it was excellent. :)
>
>[I've removed the least relevant group from the crossposting. My
>newsreader objects - quite rightly IMO - if one tries to crosspost to
>five or more groups.]
>--
>John Hall
> "Sir, I have found you an argument;
> but I am not obliged to find you an understanding."
> Dr Samuel Johnson (1709-1784)
Wouter Valentijn
May 19, 2013, 1:41:13 AM5/19/13
to
I think I have to go back to my drawingboard. :-D
Jim G.
May 20, 2013, 1:09:02 PM5/20/13
to
Wouter Valentijn sent the following on 5/19/2013 12:41 AM:
That's okay. A good theory and its discussion can be perfectly
entertaining on their own.
entertaining on their own.
solar penguin
May 20, 2013, 3:25:50 PM5/20/13
to
solar penguin wrote:
> anim8rFSK wrote:
>
> > In article <Eatht.245767$Pj4....@fx14.fr7>,
> > "Stephen Wilson" <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I'll be very surprised (and disappointed) if Clara turns out to be in any
> > > way connected with River Song or Susan.
> >
> > Well, I'm from the "will turn out to be the T.A.R.D.I.S." camp myself.
> >
> > --
> > > way connected with River Song or Susan.
> >
> > Well, I'm from the "will turn out to be the T.A.R.D.I.S." camp myself.
> >
>
> I'm from the "will turn out to be an ordinary human who later gets
> cloned or duplicated somehow, possibly involving the TARDIS" camp.
>
> After all, we've _seen_ Clara's origin complete with parents and
> childhood, but we haven't seen the parents or childhoods of her
> doubles.
Yaayy!!! I was right! Well, sort of. Close enough.
Wouter Valentijn
May 24, 2013, 12:32:07 PM5/24/13
to
anim8rFSK
May 24, 2013, 1:35:32 PM5/24/13
to
In article <519f960b$0$15902$e4fe...@news2.news.xs4all.nl>,
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
"Wouter Valentijn" <li...@valentijn.nu> wrote:
> solar penguin wrote:
> > solar penguin wrote:
> >
> >> anim8rFSK wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <Eatht.245767$Pj4....@fx14.fr7>,
> >>> "Stephen Wilson" <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll be very surprised (and disappointed) if Clara turns out to be
> >>>> in any way connected with River Song or Susan.
> >>>
> >>> Well, I'm from the "will turn out to be the T.A.R.D.I.S." camp
> >>> myself.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>
> >> I'm from the "will turn out to be an ordinary human who later gets
> >> cloned or duplicated somehow, possibly involving the TARDIS" camp.
> >>
> >> After all, we've _seen_ Clara's origin complete with parents and
> >> childhood, but we haven't seen the parents or childhoods of her
> >> doubles.
> >
> > Yaayy!!! I was right! Well, sort of. Close enough.
>
> Indeed. Close enough. :-)
She could still turn out to be the T.A.R.D.I.S too!
> solar penguin wrote:
> > solar penguin wrote:
> >
> >> anim8rFSK wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <Eatht.245767$Pj4....@fx14.fr7>,
> >>> "Stephen Wilson" <stephen.w...@nospam.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll be very surprised (and disappointed) if Clara turns out to be
> >>>> in any way connected with River Song or Susan.
> >>>
> >>> Well, I'm from the "will turn out to be the T.A.R.D.I.S." camp
> >>> myself.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>
> >> I'm from the "will turn out to be an ordinary human who later gets
> >> cloned or duplicated somehow, possibly involving the TARDIS" camp.
> >>
> >> After all, we've _seen_ Clara's origin complete with parents and
> >> childhood, but we haven't seen the parents or childhoods of her
> >> doubles.
> >
> > Yaayy!!! I was right! Well, sort of. Close enough.
>
> Indeed. Close enough. :-)
--
"Every time a Kardashian gets a TV show, an angel dies."
Wouter Valentijn
May 24, 2013, 2:15:10 PM5/24/13
to
Hmmm... She's nice looking. But I still miss Amy! :-)
0 new messages