At a tangent to his, related to the original quote--which was a nice
example of how people can engage in the same sort of behavior,
stereotyping and prejudice, that they disapprove of in others, as long
as it fits their prejudices-- ...
Looking at the election map, I was struck by how sharp the division
looks--exaggerated by the fact that the map is showing state totals by
who had a majority, not county in a way reflecting how large the
majority was. The coasts, except for the SE, are blue, the center is
red. Which reminded me of the occasional references here to "flyover
country" as the way in which the coastal elites dismiss the rest of the
country.
Which suggests a couple of sf possibilities, as well as some real world
concerns about an internally divided polity.
One sf possibility is an alternate history in which the U.S. broke up,
either due to the civil war ending differently or at some later point,
producing four or five or more different countries. What would they be
like? Would the current blue states be more or less Scandinavian welfare
states, which I've seen it argued is what Obama really wants, or
something else? The center libertarian, as parts suggests, theocracies,
as a lot of the other side imagines, or merely U.S. exceptionalism in a
somewhat higher degree?
The other possibility starts from now, but explores the possibilities of
a future where the center and the coasts become increasingly estranged.
--
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/
http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/
_Salamander_:
http://tinyurl.com/6957y7e
_How to Milk an Almond,..._
http://tinyurl.com/63xg8gx