Shrinkage!
David Loewe, Jr.
scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
--
"Same dances in the same old shoes
You get too careful with the steps you choose
You don't care about winning but you don't want to lose
After the thrill is gone."
Don Henley & Glenn Frey
Cryptoengineer
> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
Congrats!
{does Happy Dance}
pt
Andre Lieven
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
That's a Good Thing. A call for cheers for the skiffy class tech that
gets
these jobs done...
Andre
Karl Johanson
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
hooaw!
David Friedman
"David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
Good. Hope it keeps going that direction.
--
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/ http://daviddfriedman.blogspot.com/
Author of
_Future Imperfect: Technology and Freedom in an Uncertain World_,
Cambridge University Press.
Alan Winston - SSRL Central Computing
>The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
>scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
>under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
That sounds like good news. Congrats!
-- Alan
dougberry
the mysterious "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> spoke thusly
in rec.arts.sf.fandom:
>The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
>scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
>under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
I never thought I'd say this, but "Hurrah for shrinkage!"
--
Douglas E. Berry dberryOB...@gmail.com
http://gridlore.livejournal.com
http://www.facebook.com/douglas.berry
Do the OBVIOUS thing to email.
To announce that there must be no criticism of
the president... is morally treasonable to the
American public. - Theodore Roosevelt
Nels Satterlund
> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
Great!
Nels
--
Nels E Satterlund I don't speak for the company
Ne...@Starstream.net <-- Use this address please,
My Lurkers motto: I read much better than I type.
rksh...@rosettacondot.com
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
Congratulations...I hope the good news continues.
Robert
--
Robert K. Shull Email: rkshull at rosettacon dot com
Kip Williams
> In article <hhh755pr9h2mobct8...@4ax.com>,
> "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
>> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
>> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
>
> Good. Hope it keeps going that direction.
And don't answer any e-mail ads you get for making parts of your body
bigger. What if they work?
Kip W
Kay Shapero
dlo...@mindspring.com says...
> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
>
--
Kay Shapero
address munged, email kay at following domain
http://www.kayshapero.net
William December Starr
"David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> said:
> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of
> the CT scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have
> shrunk again under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new
> tumors were seen.
Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
_anything_ to complain about.
-- wds
j...@cix.compulink.co.uk
dlo...@mindspring.com (David Loewe, Jr.) wrote:
> ... the tumors have shrunk again under the dose of Sutent I am
> currently on and no new tumors were seen.
Good show!
--
John Dallman, j...@cix.co.uk, HTML mail is treated as probable spam.
Alan Woodford
<dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
>scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
>under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
Good news!
Hope there's more like it.
Alan Woodford
The Greying Lensman!
Kevrob
Double+good!
Having spent many years in retail, shrinkage was always a Bad Thing.
Nice to hear it can be a Good Thing!
Kevin
Keith F. Lynch
> "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> said:
>> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of
>> the CT scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have
>> shrunk again under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no
>> new tumors were seen.
> Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
> _anything_ to complain about.
He'll always have me to complain about.
--
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
Nels Satterlund
> William December Starr <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
>> "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> said:
>>> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of
>>> the CT scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have
>>> shrunk again under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no
>>> new tumors were seen.
>
>> Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
>> _anything_ to complain about.
>
> He'll always have me to complain about.
You'll make a nice couple.
Nels
Sorry couldn't resist
Keith F. Lynch
> Keith F. Lynch wrote:
>> William December Starr <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
>>> Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
>>> _anything_ to complain about.
>> He'll always have me to complain about.
> You'll make a nice couple.
Note that his obsession with me is not reciprocated. In fact, I've
decided not to reply to any of his messages until I'm caught up on
replies to everyone else here. At the moment I have 42 messages
marked as needing replies, of which 35 are from him.
Daniel R. Reitman
<dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
>scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
>under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
May the trend continue.
Dan, ad nauseam
T Guy
> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of the CT
> scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have shrunk again
> under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no new tumors were seen.
(T Guy):
Congratulations!
T Guy
David V. Loewe, Jr
Thanks to all those expressing kind thoughts and good wishes.
--
"Always remember that it is impossible to speak in such a way that
you cannot be misunderstood: there will always be some who
misunderstand you."
Sir Karl Popper
David Loewe, Jr.
wrote:
>Nels Satterlund <Ne...@starstream.net> wrote:
>> Keith F. Lynch wrote:
>>> William December Starr <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>> Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
>>>> _anything_ to complain about.
>
>>> He'll always have me to complain about.
>
>> You'll make a nice couple.
>
>Note that his obsession with me is not reciprocated. In fact, I've
>decided not to reply to any of his messages until I'm caught up on
>replies to everyone else here. At the moment I have 42 messages
>marked as needing replies, of which 35 are from him.
Yet another amusing example of Keith's non-self awareness.
I post. Mainly, I post replies. Most new threads I post are either
about my medical status [1] or are posts that could have been followups
in previous threads - it is just that the thread I'd be responding to
would be very old or it would just be too hard to again find the proper
spot in a several hundred to thousand plus post thread to insert it
properly. I don't killfile anyone for content. If you post something I
have a comment on, I post a reply.
Keith likes to point out that he is the most prolific poster on this NG.
Moreover, he likes to point out how I am the second most prolific poster
on this NG. And Keith has more the double the number of posts of the
third place poster (Professor Friedman). Since I rarely post replies to
myself (although I have done so), it stands to reason that a lot of my
replies would be to the most prolific poster on the NG. Yet, this fact
seemingly doesn't occur to Keith.
The truth couldn't possibly be that he posts more than anyone else and
he posts more outrageous nonsense than anyone else.
[1] Keith likes to characterize fandom as a caring community. When his
mother was in the hospital, I was often the only poster in this NG who
inquired as to her health. Every other poster to the thread has managed
to be humorous or congratulatory in all their replies to my good news.
Only Keith has taken this opportunity to attack me.
How unfannish.
--
"You are an obsession, I cannot sleep
I am a possession unopened at your feet
There is no balance, no equality
Be still I will not accept defeat"
- Holly Knight & Michael des Barres
dougberry
mysterious "Keith F. Lynch" <k...@KeithLynch.net> spoke thusly in
rec.arts.sf.fandom:
>William December Starr <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
>> "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> said:
>>> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of
>>> the CT scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have
>>> shrunk again under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no
>>> new tumors were seen.
>
>> Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
>> _anything_ to complain about.
>
>He'll always have me to complain about.
This Is Not About You. STFU.
--
Douglas E. Berry dberryOB...@gmail.com
http://gridlore.livejournal.com
http://www.facebook.com/douglas.berry
Do the OBVIOUS thing to email.
"The Horsemen are drawing nearer
On leather steeds they ride
They've come to take your life
On through the dead of night
With the Four Horsemen ride
Or choose your fate and die"
Keith F. Lynch
> "Keith F. Lynch" <k...@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
>>> "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> said:
>>>> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of
>>>> the CT scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have
>>>> shrunk again under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no
>>>> new tumors were seen.
>>> Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
>>> _anything_ to complain about.
>> He'll always have me to complain about.
> This Is Not About You. STFU.
How come William is allowed to make a joke, and I'm not?
Kip Williams
> <Doug Berry> wrote:
>> "Keith F. Lynch" <k...@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
>>> William December Starr <wds...@panix.com> wrote:
>>>> "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> said:
>>>>> The oncologist's office just called me to give me the results of
>>>>> the CT scan I had yesterday. They report that the tumors have
>>>>> shrunk again under the dose of Sutent I am currently on and no
>>>>> new tumors were seen.
>
>>>> Well geez, if this keeps up in a while you're not going to have
>>>> _anything_ to complain about.
>
>>> He'll always have me to complain about.
>
>> This Is Not About You. STFU.
>
> How come William is allowed to make a joke, and I'm not?
You are. Doug's also allowed to be a jerk. No moderation, though
concerned citizens could call him on it. And if enough people decided
they weren't going to take any more, he'd magically vanish, like
cigarette ads.
Kip W
David V. Loewe, Jr
wrote:
Consider the differing nature of the "jokes" and Keith's recent history
with me. Like Keith's "joke" about Doug landing on his head - not
appropriate and likely to be taken badly.
--
"My idea of gun control is a steady aim."
- Jack Kemp
Seth
David Loewe, Jr. <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Every other poster to the thread has managed
>to be humorous or congratulatory in all their replies to my good news.
>Only Keith has taken this opportunity to attack me.
"He'll always have me to complain about." is an attack? I'd consider
it humorous, myself.
BTW, congratulations on your good news.
Seth
David V. Loewe, Jr
>David Loewe, Jr. <dlo...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
>>Every other poster to the thread has managed
>>to be humorous or congratulatory in all their replies to my good news.
>>Only Keith has taken this opportunity to attack me.
>
>"He'll always have me to complain about." is an attack? I'd consider
>it humorous, myself.
Note that I did not comment until he had added "Note that his obsession
with me is not reciprocated." That, IMO, makes it clear that, however
joking his initial response was, what his true feelings are. When you
combine the two, I *do* consider it to be an attack.
>BTW, congratulations on your good news.
Thank you, Seth...
--
"The problem with people who have no vices is that generally you can be
pretty sure they're going to have some pretty annoying virtues."
- Elizabeth Taylor