Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Convicted Felons To Vote?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

David V. Loewe, Jr

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 11:45:41 AM1/6/10
to
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/413851_vote05.html

"In a move that could see Washington inmates voting from prison, a
federal appeals court has thrown out the state's restrictions on felon
voting.

Under state law, residents convicted of a felony currently lose the
right to vote until they are released from custody and off of Department
of Corrections supervision. Tuesday's split ruling by a 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals panel puts those restrictions in doubt, as two of three
judges reviewing the voting rights lawsuit found that the state
restrictions unfairly penalize minorities."
--
"Beware of altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root
of all evil."
-Lazarus Long

Paul Ciszek

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 1:44:30 PM1/6/10
to

In article <ndf9k5d03b5biqkue...@4ax.com>,

David V. Loewe, Jr <dave...@charter.net> wrote:
>http://www.seattlepi.com/local/413851_vote05.html
>
>"In a move that could see Washington inmates voting from prison, a
>federal appeals court has thrown out the state's restrictions on felon
>voting.
>
>Under state law, residents convicted of a felony currently lose the
>right to vote until they are released from custody and off of Department
>of Corrections supervision. Tuesday's split ruling by a 9th U.S. Circuit
>Court of Appeals panel puts those restrictions in doubt, as two of three
>judges reviewing the voting rights lawsuit found that the state
>restrictions unfairly penalize minorities."

So what happens when a large prison in a rural county results in the
convicted felons having a voting majority?

--
Please reply to: | "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is
pciszek at panix dot com | indistinguishable from malice."
Autoreply is disabled |

cryptoguy

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 1:53:53 PM1/6/10
to
On Jan 6, 1:44 pm, nos...@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
> In article <ndf9k5d03b5biqkuet21afbdpi0cr4j...@4ax.com>,

> David V. Loewe, Jr <davelo...@charter.net> wrote:
>
> >http://www.seattlepi.com/local/413851_vote05.html
>
> >"In a move that could see Washington inmates voting from prison, a
> >federal appeals court has thrown out the state's restrictions on felon
> >voting.
>
> >Under state law, residents convicted of a felony currently lose the
> >right to vote until they are released from custody and off of Department
> >of Corrections supervision. Tuesday's split ruling by a 9th U.S. Circuit
> >Court of Appeals panel puts those restrictions in doubt, as two of three
> >judges reviewing the voting rights lawsuit found that the state
> >restrictions unfairly penalize minorities."
>
> So what happens when a large prison in a rural county results in the
> convicted felons having a voting majority?

The more interesting question is why we have so many prisoners. The US
has the highest incarceration rate in the world, 5x that of Britain,
20% higher than Russia. and twice that of Puerto Rico.

pt

Kip Williams

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 5:20:22 PM1/6/10
to
Paul Ciszek wrote:
> In article<ndf9k5d03b5biqkue...@4ax.com>,
> David V. Loewe, Jr<dave...@charter.net> wrote:
>> http://www.seattlepi.com/local/413851_vote05.html
>>
>> "In a move that could see Washington inmates voting from prison, a
>> federal appeals court has thrown out the state's restrictions on felon
>> voting.
>>
>> Under state law, residents convicted of a felony currently lose the
>> right to vote until they are released from custody and off of Department
>> of Corrections supervision. Tuesday's split ruling by a 9th U.S. Circuit
>> Court of Appeals panel puts those restrictions in doubt, as two of three
>> judges reviewing the voting rights lawsuit found that the state
>> restrictions unfairly penalize minorities."
>
> So what happens when a large prison in a rural county results in the
> convicted felons having a voting majority?

Files for everybody!


Kip W

Keith F. Lynch

unread,
Jan 6, 2010, 8:45:19 PM1/6/10
to
cryptoguy <treif...@gmail.com> wrote:

> nos...@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) wrote:
>> David V. Loewe, Jr <dave...@charter.net> wrote:
>>> http://www.seattlepi.com/local/413851_vote05.html

Interesting. Too bad the 9th Circuit has no jurisdiction here
in Virginia.

>> So what happens when a large prison in a rural county results in
>> the convicted felons having a voting majority?

Probably prisoners would be counted as living where they were when
arrested. Too bad, because I think it would serve a county right
for having more prisoners than free people if the prisoners were to
politically take over the county.

> The more interesting question is why we have so many prisoners.
> The US has the highest incarceration rate in the world, 5x that of
> Britain, 20% higher than Russia. and twice that of Puerto Rico.

Maybe because of the high false conviction rate. At least it would be
nice to think it isn't equally high everywhere.
--
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

0 new messages