Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Book Publicist Judd Miller

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Abby Peace

unread,
May 13, 2013, 2:47:54 AM5/13/13
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Hello.

My name is Judd Miller and I am one the top net-workers in the world. I have utilized my skills for Paypal, Amazon, Salesforce, St. Martin Press, Harlequin, Simon & Schuster, and many other small press publishers by advertising their books / eBooks to the masses. I am also one of the five owners of http://www.webdvloper.com. I specialize in website development and promotions, and I would love to be the promoter of your books / publishing press. Order my promotional service for one hundred dollars FLAT. To learn more about the benefits comes with hiring me go to -> https://www.ribbon.co/c20a47

Tell me about your books and I will be more than happy to provide you samples so you can understand how my book promotions work.

Want to contact me via your cellphone? Text Juddmiller to 244326 and I will text you back within 24 hours.

Thank you. I look forward to hearing back from you.



Regards,

Judd Miller / juddm...@rocketmail.com

Dorothy J Heydt

unread,
May 13, 2013, 2:08:50 PM5/13/13
to
In article <5fdfc27d-c74d-45f7...@googlegroups.com>,
Abby Peace <abbyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello.
>
>My name is Judd Miller and I am ....

a spammer who has spammed every newsgroup I read.

Die spammer.

--
Dorothy J. Heydt
Vallejo, California
djheydt at gmail dot com
Should you wish to email me, you'd better use the gmail edress.
Kithrup's all spammy and hotmail's been hacked.

Keith F. Lynch

unread,
May 13, 2013, 8:05:03 PM5/13/13
to
Dorothy J Heydt <djh...@kithrup.com> wrote:
> Abby Peace <abbyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello.

>> My name is Judd Miller and I am ....

> a spammer who has spammed every newsgroup I read.

Was it the fact that the spammer couldn't keep its name or sex
straight for two lines that clued you in? Did it "find" a website
that it turns out it owned all along?

> Die spammer.

I wonder what spammer hell is like. I have a few ideas, if God wants
to hear about them. (Yes, I'm very interested in serving God -- but
only as an advisor.)
--
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

Paul Dormer

unread,
May 14, 2013, 6:32:00 AM5/14/13
to
In article <MMr12...@kithrup.com>, djh...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt)
wrote:

>
> Die spammer.

Isn't that a German film?

Keith F. Lynch

unread,
May 14, 2013, 10:06:53 PM5/14/13
to
Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
> djh...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
>> Die spammer.

> Isn't that a German film?

Only if the spammer was female.

It's true that if the "die" was imperative and English, there should
have been a comma.

David Goldfarb

unread,
May 15, 2013, 1:11:54 AM5/15/13
to
In article <kmuqjt$7v0$3...@reader1.panix.com>,
Keith F. Lynch <k...@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
>Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
>> djh...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
>>> Die spammer.
>
>> Isn't that a German film?
>
>Only if the spammer was female.

But then wouldn't it have been "die spammerin"?

--
David Goldfarb | Nunc, Pince, tibi nocendus sum.
goldf...@gmail.com |
gold...@ocf.berkeley.edu | -- Aniinsani

Paul Dormer

unread,
May 15, 2013, 7:05:00 AM5/15/13
to
In article <MMtqF...@kithrup.com>, gold...@ocf.berkeley.edu (David
Goldfarb) wrote:

>
> In article <kmuqjt$7v0$3...@reader1.panix.com>,
> Keith F. Lynch <k...@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> >Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
> >> djh...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
> >>> Die spammer.
> >
> >> Isn't that a German film?
> >
> >Only if the spammer was female.
>
> But then wouldn't it have been "die spammerin"?

Alas, yes. Should have checked my German grammar first. And, because
Germans tend to capitalise all nouns, it would be "Die Spammerin".

But it reminded me that some years ago the BBC showed a series called Die
Kinder. It was actually about an English woman trying to get her
children back from their German father (I think, I never saw it), but a
TV critic the next day said he'd thought from the title that it was a
softer remake of one of the Die Hard films.

Kevrob

unread,
May 15, 2013, 1:44:43 PM5/15/13
to
On May 15, 7:05 am, p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer) wrote:
> In article <MMtqFu....@kithrup.com>, goldf...@ocf.berkeley.edu (David
>
> Goldfarb) wrote:
>
> > In article <kmuqjt$7v...@reader1.panix.com>,
> > Keith F. Lynch <k...@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> > >Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
> > >>> Die spammer.
>
> > >> Isn't that a German film?
>
> > >Only if the spammer was female.
>
> > But then wouldn't it have been "die spammerin"?
>
> Alas, yes.  Should have checked my German grammar first.  And, because
> Germans tend to capitalise all nouns, it would be "Die Spammerin".
>
> But it reminded me that some years ago the BBC showed a series called Die
> Kinder.  It was actually about an English woman trying to get her
> children back from their German father (I think, I never saw it), but a
> TV critic the next day said he'd thought from the title that it was a
> softer remake of one of the Die Hard films.

Re: Spammer's Hell:

Ol' Scratch could enslave the spammer to a "Nigerian Prince," or make
him do the manual labor for the GET RICH NOW schemes..."I want you to
address and seal these 7 billion envelopes." No water is provided for
moistening the flaps, and the glue on the flaps rates 20b on the
Scoville scale.

Then there's the constant Rickrolling, by Mr Astley himself, (or
demonic equivalent.)

Kevin R

Keith F. Lynch

unread,
May 15, 2013, 9:13:46 PM5/15/13
to
Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
> But it reminded me that some years ago the BBC showed a series
> called Die Kinder. It was actually about an English woman trying to
> get her children back from their German father (I think, I never saw
> it), but a TV critic the next day said he'd thought from the title
> that it was a softer remake of one of the Die Hard films.

Was he surprised that Das Boot wasn't a movie about footware? :-)

Philip Chee

unread,
May 16, 2013, 12:52:06 AM5/16/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 10:44:43 -0700 (PDT), Kevrob wrote:
> On May 15, 7:05 am, p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer) wrote:
>> In article <MMtqFu....@kithrup.com>, goldf...@ocf.berkeley.edu (David
>>
>> Goldfarb) wrote:
>>
>> > In article <kmuqjt$7v...@reader1.panix.com>,
>> > Keith F. Lynch <k...@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
>> > >Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
>> > >> djhe...@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) wrote:
>> > >>> Die spammer.
>>
>> > >> Isn't that a German film?
>>
>> > >Only if the spammer was female.
>>
>> > But then wouldn't it have been "die spammerin"?
>>
>> Alas, yes. Should have checked my German grammar first. And, because
>> Germans tend to capitalise all nouns, it would be "Die Spammerin".

A native German speaker tells me that "Die Spammer" is the correct plural.

Phil

--
Philip Chee <phi...@aleytys.pc.my>, <phili...@gmail.com>
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.

Paul Dormer

unread,
May 16, 2013, 6:52:00 AM5/16/13
to
In article <kn1bsa$3tp$2...@reader1.panix.com>, k...@KeithLynch.net (Keith F.
Lynch) wrote:

>
> Was he surprised that Das Boot wasn't a movie about footware? :-)

You mean it wasn't!

Keith F. Lynch

unread,
May 17, 2013, 10:35:24 PM5/17/13
to
Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
> k...@KeithLynch.net (Keith F. Lynch) wrote:
>> Was he surprised that Das Boot wasn't a movie about footware? :-)

> You mean it wasn't!

In a way it was. It was about the Nazis stomping all over allied
shipping, kicking it to the bottom of the sea.

Kevrob

unread,
May 18, 2013, 10:28:05 AM5/18/13
to
On May 17, 10:35 pm, "Keith F. Lynch" <k...@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> Paul Dormer <p...@pauldormer.cix.co.uk> wrote:
> > k...@KeithLynch.net (Keith F. Lynch) wrote:
> >> Was he surprised that Das Boot wasn't a movie about footware? :-)
> > You mean it wasn't!
>
> In a way it was.  It was about the Nazis stomping all over allied
> shipping, kicking it to the bottom of the sea.
> --
>

It wasn't a story where a Bierstiefel was the McGuffin?

Kevin

0 new messages