Hopefully this is true. The world needs more laughter. However it is
impossible to establish adroitness with Dale or any of the other 3
stooges (Barrett, Brandon.) These individuals are literal minded,
pretty much without imagination, unable to see contradiction and
governed by slogans. Failure to grasp the obvious is "normal" to them.
Many of us are trying to help them with this problem and we hope you
will continue.
If nothing else we might wrest the word "surrealism" from them and
imbibe it with some of it's original vision.
> >
> > which page are you on? it was a, you know, joke? obviously, i'm more
> > adroit at deception than i thought i was. potatoo igglethronx yourself,
> > sir!
>
>
> Hopefully this is true. The world needs more laughter. However it is
> impossible to establish adroitness with Dale or any of the other 3
> stooges (Barrett, Brandon.) These individuals are literal minded,
> pretty much without imagination, unable to see contradiction and
> governed by slogans. Failure to grasp the obvious is "normal" to them.
> Many of us are trying to help them with this problem and we hope you
> will continue.
how terribly, incredibly, monstrously, insanely sad for them.
i will watch out for them in the future and try not to take them as
seriously as they take themselves.
maybe they just need some new slogans?
>>
>> which page are you on? it was a, you know, joke? obviously, i'm more
>> adroit at deception than i thought i was. potatoo igglethronx yourself,
>> sir!
>
>
> Hopefully this is true. The world needs more laughter. However it is
>impossible to establish adroitness with Dale or any of the other 3
>stooges (Barrett, Brandon.) These individuals are literal minded,
>pretty much without imagination, unable to see contradiction and
>governed by slogans. Failure to grasp the obvious is "normal" to them.
>Many of us are trying to help them with this problem and we hope you
>will continue.
>
> If nothing else we might wrest the word "surrealism" from them and
>imbibe it with some of it's original vision.
Let's imbibe *something,* for crying out loud.
>Andrea Chen <fallin...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > which page are you on? it was a, you know, joke? obviously, i'm more
>> > adroit at deception than i thought i was. potatoo igglethronx
yourself,
>> > sir!
>>
>>
>> Hopefully this is true. The world needs more laughter. However it is
>> impossible to establish adroitness with Dale or any of the other 3
>> stooges (Barrett, Brandon.) These individuals are literal minded,
>> pretty much without imagination, unable to see contradiction and
>> governed by slogans. Failure to grasp the obvious is "normal" to them.
>> Many of us are trying to help them with this problem and we hope you
>> will continue.
>
>how terribly, incredibly, monstrously, insanely sad for them.
>i will watch out for them in the future and try not to take them as
>seriously as they take themselves.
>maybe they just need some new slogans?
>
Or maybe a testosterone patch? They seem a little limp.
gilbert vanburen wilkes iv
http://eserver.org/home/wilkes
<a href="http://www.2600.com/mindex.html">Free Kevin</a>
Revolutions are always verbose.
Leon Trotsky
>In article <3725C8...@earthlink.net>, Andrea Chen
><fallin...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>> which page are you on? it was a, you know, joke? obviously, i'm more
>>> adroit at deception than i thought i was. potatoo igglethronx yourself,
>>> sir!
>>
>>
>> Hopefully this is true. The world needs more laughter. However
it is
>>impossible to establish adroitness with Dale or any of the other 3
>>stooges (Barrett, Brandon.) These individuals are literal minded,
>>pretty much without imagination, unable to see contradiction and
>>governed by slogans. Failure to grasp the obvious is "normal" to them.
>>Many of us are trying to help them with this problem and we hope you
>>will continue.
>>
>> If nothing else we might wrest the word "surrealism" from them and
>>imbibe it with some of it's original vision.
>
>Let's imbibe *something,* for crying out loud.
>
Imbibe indeed. God forbid we imbue anything.
No, you are not capable of taking a joke. There is no place where you
respond with good humor, you really hate the people who tease you which
is what makes it so much fun. As for producing a joke, there are many
kinds of jokes, you are capable of producing spiteful remarks which are
sometimes funny, so technically you are right, but you have no
appreciation for the spirit of play or of absurdity or ...
If you did, you would know that the people without a sense of humor are
always the one's who most strongly think they have a sense of humor. I
on the other hand will happily deny that I have a sense of humor and you
poor fool will believe me which is what makes you so much fun, you can
be convinced of anything.
Can we imbibe crustaceans? That sounds like fun.
--
************
*
* Nick Wise <Lo...@FunGUs.GrOVe>
* http://personal.sdf.bellsouth.net/~headless
* Life sure is weird, but what else have I to know?
*
************
To this immediate point: if I were to need a testosterone donation of
any sort, I certainly wouldn't come to your empty patch. You are easily
among the slackest of the infecting group. A veritable bug with no
bite...
DMH
>
>"g.v.w. iv" wrote:
>>
>>
>> Or maybe a testosterone patch? They seem a little limp.
>>
> To the main "point": any idiot who can read (I, in my generosity,
>include
>you among this group) will note that I am more than capable of taking
>and
>producing a joke.
Huh? When have you ever produced a joke, you humorless toad?
>
> To this immediate point: if I were to need a testosterone donation of
>any sort, I certainly wouldn't come to your empty patch. You are easily
>among the slackest of the infecting group. A veritable bug with no
>bite...
Point out the funny part, would you?
>
>DMH
> No, you are not capable of taking a joke.
I've been taking you (you pill) for quite a time now.
> There is no place where you respond with good humor
Oh yeah, Andrea, you're a laugh foundry you are! You think everyone
has the same sort of mechanical recall you do, but I quite clearly
recall your bilious misconstructions from my very first post. Now you
can claim all you want that it's all been a joke, but if it is, I say
you
need to sharpen your act. And (at any rate) you're wrong.
> you really hate the people who tease you which is what makes it
>so much fun. As for producing a joke, there are many
> kinds of jokes, you are capable of producing spiteful remarks which are
> sometimes funny, so technically you are right, but you have no
> appreciation for the spirit of play or of absurdity or ...
...the shit you drip from your raptor hole thinking it's the honey of
intellect. You
may be right there. And I hope you stay right there... You've already
admitted that your "humor" is based on your imagined discomfort of
others; so you are not very convincing in your paean to the comedic.
you're just a lout with a falcon, Chen.
>
> If you did, you would know that the people without a sense
of humor are always the one's who most strongly think they have
> a sense of humor.
Those who can't, teach and other baseless banalities. Not true for one
thing;
a generalization with no weight. At any rate, you're the one who
brought
this notion of humor up in the first place. And if you had an ounce of
wit
(rather than that pus you call your mind) , you'd realize that it is
always
the people without a sense of humor who bring up humor to cover their
lack of ability. Since you claim to have no sense of humor (as some
lame
in-joke to your departed human shade), yet find my responses funny, may
I also be self-contradictory (in homage) and say that I have no sense
of humor, and find you hilarious. Neither of our statements make
much sense, but at least I know it.
> on the other hand will happily deny that I have a sense of humor and you
> poor fool will believe me which is what makes you so much fun, you can
> be convinced of anything.
Except of your humanity, Andrea. You're not funny, you're sick. And that
is funny, you little raptor hangar you...
DMH