On Jun 2, 8:02 am, Hieronymous 707 <
hieronymous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jun 1, 8:11 pm, George Dance <
georgedanc...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 1, 3:55 am, Hieronymous 707 <
hieronymous...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 31, 9:40 pm, George Dance <
georgedanc...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 27, 10:16 pm, Hieronymous 707 <
hieronymous...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I'll be here in the group, but you and George do your
> > > > > own thing, and good luck to you both. I won't criticize or comment or
> > > > > correct or offend or even respond to either of you.
>
> > > > On May 30, 7:10 am, Hieronymous 707 <
hieronymous...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I honestly thought you were smarter than that so I figured you had to
> > > > > be lying. Please accept my deepest and most sincere apology. I
> > > > > couldn't have been more wrong.
>
> > > Yes, I wrote both of those statements. Do you have a question; would
> > > you rather call me a liar;
>
> > Nah, no sense belaboring the obvious.
>
> > > or are you smarter than that?
>
> > I don't have to ask the same of you, do I?
>
> So you do have a question. I thought you might.
Huh? You're trying to spin this get caught lying, yet again, and just
shrug it off like that. Maybe I do have to belabor the obvious with
you. So let's do so. Three days ago, after I began responding in kind
to your constant attacks, you asked me to stop, and promised to stop
yourself. You managed to restrain yourself for just 3 days, and now
here you are starting again.
To answer your question: No, I don't think you were "lying" -- I think
that 3 days ago, you really believed you would, and could, behave
yourself; but, after three days, that no longer matters. You said what
you needed to, then, to get what you wanted; and now you'll say
whatever you need to to get what you want: if that means contradicting
yourself, then you'll contradict yourself. That doesn't make you a
"liar," but it does make you as untrustworthy as any liar.
> For me, it's about
> people, trust, and friendship. I tend to trust people, even when they
> lie.
Well, that's true. You not only "trust" certain proven liars, but fawn
all over them if you think it helps you pursue your goals; like Gary's
Trolls and the stAUKers whose tactics you've been emulating.
> It's not the "smartest" practice by any means.
Hey, it worked for them; they had an iron control of AUK, RAP, and a
number of groups for a few years. While you've never been able to
control AAPC, you have driven quite a few people off, even some that
Gary's Trolls were never able to eliminate.
On the other hand, your "friends" don't seem very reliable. For all
your fawning, ~PJ~ and ~ggary~~ still will have nothing to do with
you; and while the stAUKers have been friendlier (at least while you
were pursuing mutual victims), I haven't noticed any of them helping
you out. So maybe it is time for you to start questioning your own
strategy and tactics.
> I tend to
> friendship, but I know I'm not the most likable guy, so sometimes I
> like people who don't like me in return. That's you and Will.
Huh? When did I say I didn't like you? That's the kind of statement
that, if it were made of you, you'd call a "lie" -- not that it is, of
course.
> I'm just
> tired of fighting with you guys and having my motives and personal
> integrity questioned.
Do you even understand what "integrity" is? Hint: it comes from the
same root as "integration". When you say things like "I'm tired of
fighting," yet continue to provoke fights, then your thoughts and
actions are not integrated. If you really are tired of fighting, then
do what you said you'd do: Stop it. I'm willing to consider this your
second strike (though that's only because I didn't keep count before
last week), and go back to leaving you alone as long as you leave me
alone. If the group is not big enough that two people can co-exist
without interacting, that's a problem with it; and that's what has to
be addressed.
> I'm not saying you don't have a right to. I'm
> saying you should've arrived at some answers by now.
Oh, I've reached plenty of conclusions about you -- you just prefer to
relabel those "lies".