child1.gif [0/6] {female,child}
Philip Nikolayev
i...@pyramid.unr.edu (Ian (Ivo) Veach) writes:
Thought I'd cross-post this routine pearl of wisdom out of Lugworm's
mouth for the delectation of a more general audience.
> ma...@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marek Lugowski) writes:
>>1. Hateful speech, whatever the motivation, is sadder than a
>>picture of a 11yearold without her clothes on.
Put it into your .sig, you puke-laden apostle of bourgeois permissive
niceness and revolting relativism. Did you call yourself a surrealist?
Philip Nikolayev
nik...@husc.harvard.edu
Marek Lugowski
>Thought I'd cross-post this routine pearl of wisdom out of Lugworm's
>mouth for the delectation of a more general audience.
>
>> ma...@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marek Lugowski) writes:
>
>>>1. Hateful speech, whatever the motivation, is sadder than a
>>>picture of a 11yearold without her clothes on.
>
>Put it into your .sig, you puke-laden apostle of bourgeois permissive
>niceness and revolting relativism. Did you call yourself a surrealist?
>
>Philip Nikolayev
>nik...@husc.harvard.edu
-----
Shove off, juvenile. Are you trying to say in your usual nice way that any
depiction of a nude child is deplorable? Hahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha.
Crossposting to larger than appropriate forums has a way of pissing off
users and system administrators, even those super-laid back ones at
husc.harvard.edu.
But nice try at attempted character assasination, Mr. Harvard Code of Honor
student. 2 marks.
-- Marek
Damion Page
First off, In all my time observing the net, I've never heard anyone ask for your opinion. Moreso, I've never seen anyone take it well
Second, let's be realistic here. People are in this topic (as well as A.B.P.E, A.S.P., etc.) to pull erotica off the net. Erotica's primary purpose is to arouse. I'm sure that you did not view any artistic photo's in Cincinnati then go home and pull your teeny-weeny-pee-nee. Those were not erotica, or at least their intent was more clear. Let's deal with reality here, shall we, Sir Marek?
When (if) you grow up, any you have children all your own, please make a point of taking all the nude pictures of them you want. I'll be happy to see your scrawny digitized ass behind bars.
Have a nice day.
-Page
Marek Lugowski
to those groups I don't read, and it seemed a teensy bit antisocial to follow
up to rec.sport.college.basketball. Besides, rap is where Mr. Page likes
to assail me so I might as well cook his goose there in a familiar setting.]
Damion Page <st93...@pip.cc.brandeis.edu>:
> Second, let's be realistic here. People are in this topic (as well
>as A.B.P.E, A.S.P., etc.) to pull erotica off the net. Erotica's primary
>purpose is to arouse. I'm sure that you did not view any artistic photo's
>in Cincinnati then go home and pull your teeny-weeny-pee-nee. Those were
>not erotica, or at least their intent was more clear. Let's deal with
>reality here, shall we, Sir Marek?
Thank you for knighting me; I prefer that to queening. :) Not sure about
the intent but the technique was superior, as was the artistic merit, not
to forget, grain. But we digress, imbecile. My point was squarely that
one must not claim that any depiction of a nude child is necessarily
deplorable, and that hateful speech (as in wishing a bus at full speed upon
a correspondent in full view of thousands of readers) is a sadder thing
than a picture of a nude 11yearold. I suppose asking you to read what I
wrote before spewing is too much, so I ask that you read it now, after
you've spewed. Or is that, spewen? Someone from alt.english.usage please
help correct.
> When (if) you grow up, any you have children all your own, please
>make a point of taking all the nude pictures of them you want. I'll be
>happy to see your scrawny digitized ass behind bars.
There you have it. Radical Reactionary Male seeks contraband nude pictures of
inncoent emaciated male prisoners for gratification and pursuit of happiness.
Where is FBI and Brandais sys admin when you need them?
> Have a nice day.
I cannot bring myself to say the same and reamin truthful. Hope you
suffer from a disagreeable dinner (but not too much -- moderation in all
things, including ill wishing.).
> -Page
-- Marek
Philip Nikolayev
ma...@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marek Lugowski) writes:
> Philip Nikolayev <nik...@husc7.harvard.edu>:
>>Thought I'd cross-post this routine pearl of wisdom out of Lugworm's
>>mouth for the delectation of a more general audience.
>>> ma...@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Marek Lugowski) writes:
>>
>>>>1. Hateful speech, whatever the motivation, is sadder than a
>>>>picture of a 11yearold without her clothes on.
>>
>>Put it into your .sig, you puke-laden apostle of bourgeois permissive
>>niceness and revolting relativism. Did you call yourself a surrealist?
>>
>>Philip Nikolayev
>>nik...@husc.harvard.edu
> -----
> Shove off, juvenile. Are you trying to say in your usual nice way
> that any depiction of a nude child is deplorable?
> Hahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha.
No, my senescent squid, all I'm saying is that given your own
notorious and passionate love of discombobulated hatespeak, your
*still greater* liking for depictions of nude children plausibly
smacks of a cherished secret obsession. This is perfectly consistent
with your plush putrid poetics of interminable satyric reverie.
Although you'll never figure it out, my intension was quite plainly of
a stylistic nature. Your inability to see the idiocy of your
effulgent gem reveals enough about your worth as a poet. If it helps,
think of this routine fuckup on your part as an unwitting indecent
exposure, rather in tune with the compulsive itchiness that pervades
the unexamined life of a logophobic yenta devoid of rhyme and reason.
> Crossposting to larger than appropriate forums has a way of pissing
> off users and system administrators, even those super-laid back ones
> at husc.harvard.edu.
A self-professed surrealist who appeals to authority deserves to be
torn limb from limb and devoured with gusto by Maldoror. Children will
laugh at the pathetic sight.
Every mellow bourgeois poet is a little policeman at heart.
> But nice try at attempted character assasination, Mr. Harvard Code
> of Honor student. 2 marks.
You have no character, Oh Spluttering Plunger; there's nix to
assassinate. Don't pout your succulent suction cup so quaintly. Get
back to work.
> -- Marek
Philip Nikolayev
nik...@husc.harvard.edu
Ariel
[Philip and Marek, blab deleted]
I can't believe you two are still going at it. I haven't logged on here
in all this time, but here you are, still hurling insults...
Why don't you two just meet face to face, sodomize each other and have
done with it.
Then, take the excess time this frees up... and go read a good book, or
meditate... or think about the pitfalls of being a slave to ego...
Or. You could just get together and sling the mud more
literally. Sell tickets. I think we would be more entertained. Nothing
quite like near-naked men, panting and covered in mud. Screaming
semi-intelligent insults while looking like complete asses.
ahem.
Ariel
<snark>
Philip Nikolayev
ari...@west.darkside.com (Ariel) writes:
> [Philip and Marek, blab deleted]
> I can't believe you two are still going at it. I haven't logged on
> here in all this time, but here you are, still hurling insults...
> Why don't you two just meet face to face, sodomize each other and
> have done with it.
Great, that's the spirit! There's nothing I like better than
self-deconstructing good manners. Lady, what are you doing in
alt.surrealism? Pray slither back to your enchanted salon.
> Then, take the excess time this frees up... and go read a good book,
> or meditate... or think about the pitfalls of being a slave to
> ego...
I'd rather serve my ego than the stupid code of morals posited by
someone who shows no evidence of having seen a good book in her life.
> Or. You could just get together and sling the mud more
> literally. Sell tickets. I think we would be more entertained.
One who doesn't realise that it's great and somewhat useful fun to
throw well-justified abuse at the lugubrious Lug O'Wawa, is certainly
missing the whole point of the concept of enlightened entertainment.
Pray go on telling your beads, Ma'am.
> Nothing quite like near-naked men, panting and covered in mud.
> Screaming semi-intelligent insults while looking like complete
> asses.
I wholeheartedly grant you that my lighthearted insults are only
semi-intelligent, but I'm willing to bet my distant pension that you
are hopelessly confusing the halves in question.
> ahem.
Harrumph.
Philip Nikolayev
nik...@husc.harvard.edu
tellefsen,karen a
My goodness, I guess I have been deluded. All those
renaissance putti and that silly Mannikin Pis are not
just charming kitsch, they are abhorrent examples of kiddy porn.
That pamphlet in the pediatrician's office describing diaper rash
is just more exploitation of innocent little babies.
That cute snapshot of three-year-old Susie skinny dipping at the
lake is not a memory for her mother's album, it is child
pornography. Degas' little ballerina is not an elegant figure
study, it is the exploitation of a pre-pubescent girl. The picture
of the naked Vietnamese girl fleeing a bombed village is not an
example of poignant photojournalism, it is virulent pornography.
This scanned image of a nude child may be exploitive and/or
pornographic, I have not seen it. However, one should be very
careful when defining pornography.
So what does this have to do with poetry or surrealism or the
subject of the latest r.a.p. altercation? This is even quoted
out of context. I generally expect more careful and intellectually
honest vitriol from Mr. N.
They're much more alike than they'd care to admit;
they love to speak hate in a venomous way,
r.a.p.'s snakes in the grass, old Philip and Marek,
and flinging manure is just how these boys play.
-----------------------------------------
The news poster gives a bad address;
send e-mail to k...@cc.bellcore.com
Karen Tellefsen
Donald Teed
>In article <0RuPcc...@west.darkside.com>,
>ari...@west.darkside.com (Ariel) writes:
>> Then, take the excess time this frees up... and go read a good book,
>> or meditate... or think about the pitfalls of being a slave to
>> ego...
>I'd rather serve my ego than the stupid code of morals posited by
>someone who shows no evidence of having seen a good book in her life.
+ A Lancaster machine is not enough force to kill the mind of those
who stay where they are by the use of analogies and subjective definitions
played only in part for the desire of sucess.
>I wholeheartedly grant you that my lighthearted insults are only
>semi-intelligent, but I'm willing to bet my distant pension that you
>are hopelessly confusing the halves in question.
>> ahem.
>Harrumph.
>Philip Nikolayev
>nik...@husc.harvard.edu
+ University: A series of houses with emancipatory chambers, which produces
quizes, and creates a confusion by the use of irenic, bipolar, and
compulsory languages, which is solved by knowledge, in the aim of
virtuous progress.
Konstatin Kalikanzaros
Post by "Little Niko the vitriolic" and "Marek the overdefensive surrealist"
deleted (well after printing anyway)
This stuff is great. I print it out and throw it in my compost pit.
Speeds up the decomposition of vegetable matter 3 fold. Keep it up guys
I'll have a good bit of fertilizer built up before spring. I wonder if
this could be considered toxic waste?? Have to call the EPA to find
out.
Conrad
PS
don't make me post a disclaimer just because you happen to be Humor
Impaired.
K K
--- Law must retain useful ways to break with traditional forms because ---
--- nothing is more certain than that the forms of Law remain when all ---
--- justice is gone. ---
--- Gowachin Aphorism (Frank Herbert: _The Dosadi Experiment_) ---
Philip Nikolayev
con...@kryton.UUCP (Konstatin Kalikanzaros) writes:
> Post by "Little Niko the vitriolic" and "Marek the overdefensive surrealist"
> deleted (well after printing anyway)
>
> This stuff is great. I print it out and throw it in my compost
> pit. Speeds up the decomposition of vegetable matter 3 fold. Keep
> it up guys I'll have a good bit of fertilizer built up before
> spring. I wonder if this could be considered toxic waste?? Have to
> call the EPA to find out.
> Conrad
Conrad, conrad, burping bright, KaliKancerous old sprite! Still out
there, huh? And still at @kretin.UUCP! Tell you what, it's a good and
commendable thing that you are trying to devise a method for becoming
a bit cleverer; but your recipe seems quite dangerous. The postings of
your betters may indeed prove toxic for you. I suggest you consume
your compost net - organic stuff is good for you and your creative
process. Gawd bless your digestive tract, and your brave brown brain
therein.
Philip Nikolayev
nik...@husc.harvard.edu