Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Review: The Patriot (2000)
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Rose 'Bams' Cooper  
View profile  
 More options Jul 5 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films
From: "Rose 'Bams' Cooper" <b...@3blackchicks.com>
Date: 2000/07/05
Subject: Review: The Patriot (2000)
'3BlackChicks Review...'

THE PATRIOT (2000)
Rated R; running time 165 minutes
Genre: Action
IMDB site: http://us.imdb.com/Details?0187393
Official site: http://www.spe.sony.com/movies/thepatriot/
Written by: Robert Rodat
Directed by: Roland Emmerich
Cast: Mel Gibson, Heath Ledger, Joely Richardson, Jason Isaacs,
Chris Cooper, Tcheky Karyo, Trevor Morgan, Lisa Brenner, Bryan Chafin,
Skye McCole Bartusiak, Tom Wilkinson, Rene Auberjonois, Logan Lerman,
Adam Baldwin, Beatrice Bush, Mika Boorem, Mary Jo Deschanel,
Shan Omar Huey, Gil Johnson, Jay Arlen Jones, Jamieson Price, Hank
Stone, Kristian Truelsen, Mark Twogood, Joey D. Vieira, Grahame Wood,
Peter Woodward

Review Copyright Rose Cooper, 2000
Review URL: http://www.3blackchicks.com/bamspatriot.html

I've been to plenty of long movies before.  THE GREEN MILE clocked in at
3 hours plus (though it didn't seem that long to me).  And on the other
end of that spectrum, STUART LITTLE (chronologically short at just 94
minutes) seemed *much* longer.  I've been to plenty of long movies
before.  THE PATRIOT wasn't just long.  It was *torture*; sheer
manipulative torture.

The Story (WARNING: **spoilers contained below**):
1776.  A time of upheaval and revolution in these (not quite) United
States Of America.

Widower Benjamin Martin (Mel Gibson) is a man who has known war, and no
longer wants any parts of it; he just wants to farm, make bad rocking
chairs, and be left alone to raise his seven young children.  His eldest
son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger), doesn't understand Ben's pacifistic mood,
and wants to join the Colonials to fight against the Evil British Empire
and old tax baron King George.   After the Evil British Colonel William
Tavington (Jason Isaacs) wreaks havoc on Ben's family and land, Ben
leaves his youngest children with their aunt Charlotte (Joely
Richardson), so he and Gabriel can join forces with Regular Army Colonel
Harry Burwell (Chris Cooper) and French Army officer Jean Villeneuve
(Tcheky Karyo) to create a militia to go up against Tavington and
slightly-less Evil General Cornwallis (Tom Wilkinson).

[And lots more stuff that takes up two hours and forty-five minutes of
movie time.]

The Upshot:
I sat myself down and thought long and hard about what made me the
maddest about THE PATRIOT, to the point where its greenlight for its
epic sweep and beautifully-filmed tale, turned into a yellowlight for
its manipulative nature.  Here's what I told a dear friend about it,
with regard to the other "based on a true[r than *this* one, dadgummit]
story" out this week, THE PERFECT STORM:

    What I liked most about [THE PERFECT STORM] (and conversely,
    hated most about THE PATRIOT), is the way the actors seemed to
    capture the real, messily imperfect folks they played; from
    everything I've read about the production [of "Perfect"], the
    actors and director and such were extremely cognizant of the
    background story, and wanted very much to do those people honor
    (rather than playing the "Look at me, I'm an artiste and a
    battle-recreator!" game that Gibson and the folks attached to
    "Patriot" seemed to).  It shows.

"Manipulative" is the word I keep coming back to when I think about THE
PATRIOT.  It's not enough, it seems, that this movie is being released
around the fourth of July; Independence Day roun' dese hea' parts.  No;
"we must forcefully remind The Uhmerkin Public", the filmmakers seemed
to say, "that Gibson...uh, blue-eyed Benjamin Martin, was a True
American Hero, by having him Wave The Flag Meaningfully at every
opportunity!  And hey, while you're at it, have a few of his friends and
family members die Slow Heroic Deaths with the camera trained on their
faces for a godawful long time, whydoncha?  And ooh yeah, that image of
Mel baby Running Boldly Into Battle with just that battered flag,
*that'll* hit 'em where it hurts, eh?"

Bah.  Just tell me the story, dammit; let *me* decide when and where to
cheer for them, eh?  I don't need no friggin' equivalent to a laugh
track, spattered into so many manipulative scenes.  Bad moviemakers.
Bad, Bad moviemakers.

In all fairness, though, THE PATRIOT latches on to its single-mindedness
and never lets go; at least it's not wishy-washy in its dogged
determination to make the viewer Love Benjamin and his family for being
Epic Heroes.  Even when it speaks of Ben's Unspeakable Past, you learn
early on that Ben was just doing what he had to do For God And Country.
Can't blame a fella for that, even when it leaves him bloody, can ya?
Not the way these moviemakers were selling the story, you can't.

(And don't get me wrong: not having had to ever do much heavy fighting
outside of the time Judy hit me in the stomach with a two-by-four when I
was 13, I'm *not* saying that War Ain't Really Hell; I'm sure it is that
and much more.  What I *am* saying, however, is that the audience
doesn't need to be battered upside the head with the Wifflebat to get
that point.  I understood it after the first hour of my battering; I
didn't need to have it go on for the whole almost-three hours, sheesh!)

I know I'll be in the minority of the reviewing population--I heard
Raving Reviews about "Patriot" blaring on the radio just before I went
to see it (which, in and of itself, gave me a Bad Feeling)--but this
telling of THE PATRIOT didn't move me at all.  Actually, it did: it
moved me from being sympathetic to the cause of a young--and, let's be
honest: White--nation getting its legs under itself, to being cynical
and critical about that *other* part of itself that THE PATRIOT tried to
whitewash over: the folks that were somehow forgotten in "We The People".

The "Black Factor" [ObDisclaimer: We Are Not A Monolith]:
We The People.  Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident.  All Men Are
Created Equal.  That is, "we, the White, male landowners, see it that
way--about us".  All others need not apply.

It was this undeniable truth about the establishment of "a more perfect
union"--that its people were only "created equal" if and only if they
were White, male landowners--that grated me most about THE PATRIOT and
its whitewashing-over of its colorful tale.  If the folks behind this
movie had not addressed it (slavery: the big It) at all, then, fine.  I
wouldn't have had an issue with their looking-over of that big It.  But
they addressed It.  Badly.  Shame on 'em, I say.

A little truth goes a long way; but "Patriot" couldn't seem to face up
to the realities of its own time, *this* late into the moviemaking game
(well past the time when the filmmakers could've claimed ignorance about
such things).  And that--much more than the fact that I never caught the
name of the Black slave character, only knowing him from his
introduction as "my nigra"--is what finally brought "Patriot"'s house of
cards tumbling down for me.  In all its flag-waving, it seemed to forget
that even back then, these States weren't as United as the Founding
Fathers claimed they were.

History, it seems, *does* tend to repeat itself.

Bammer's Bottom Line:
Call me cynical, call me anti-American, whatever; but I hate feeling
manipulated, and that's exactly how I felt watching THE PATRIOT.  I went
into this movie with an open mind, hoping to learn something more about
what made the early revolutionaries in these, yes, great United States,
tick.  I came out of it with a contempt for what I had just been put
through.  And that's *never* A Good Thing.

THE PATRIOT (rating: yellowlight):
If only they had stopped waving the flag long enough to see the hearts
and souls that went into weaving that symbol of independence...

Rose "Bams" Cooper                            /~\
Webchick and Editor,                         /','\
3BlackChicks Review                         /','`'\
Movie Reviews With Flava!                  /',',','/`,
Copyright Rose Cooper, 2000                `~-._'c    /
EMAIL: b...@3blackchicks.com                    `\   (
http://www.3blackchicks.com/                     /====\


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jon Popick  
View profile  
 More options Jul 5 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films
From: Jon Popick <jpop...@sick-boy.com>
Date: 2000/07/05
Subject: Review: The Patriot (2000)
PLANET SICK-BOY: http://www.sick-boy.com
"We Put the SIN in Cinema"

If you liked Braveheart, you probably liked Gladiator. They both had
Australian stars playing extremely manly, likeable heroes who lead
rag-tag bunches of untrained men against seemingly insurmountable
forces.  Each has a really bad guy doing really rotten stuff to really
innocent people.  And each of the male leads are reluctant warriors,
dragged into large-scale confrontation only after somebody messes with
their family in some horrible way.

The Patriot is more of the same - even more so than Gladiator - and
could have saved a fortune in marketing costs by just calling itself
Braveheart II:  The Phantom Menace.  In this installment, Mel Gibson
battles the English on American soil during the Revolutionary War, as
opposed to Braveheart's 13th century Scotland backdrop.  Gibson
(Payback) plays Benjamin Martin, a man who could be a direct descendant
of William Wallace  (he does everything but wear the kilt and the blue
face paint).

The film starts off in 1776 South Carolina.  Martin, a former war
captain, has turned decidedly anti-war ever since his beloved wife went
tits up. The reason for his pacifism?  He’s afraid of leaving his seven
children without a father.  Martin even goes to the Continental Congress
in Charleston to vote against the war, but his side loses and, to make
matters worse, his oldest son Gabriel (Heath Ledger, 10 Things I Hate
About You) signs up to fight the Redcoats.

Before long, the battles are literally being fought in Martin’s
backyard. Gabriel is captured by the ridiculously ruthless Col. William
Tavington  (Jason Isaacs, The End of the Affair) and ordered to hang for
betraying King George.  Some other stuff happens that I won’t give away
here, but before you know it, Martin is wielding his tomahawk and
covered in English blood.  He even teaches two of his younger sons how
to attack a procession of English officers.  The scene, which has
already sparked a lot of debate over the whole kids/guns issue, is a
revelation as both boys are so scared that they end up looking through
the sights of their guns with tears in their eyes.  Kudos to
screenwriter Robert Rodat (Saving Private Ryan) for this splendid scene.

Like Braveheart’s Wallace, Martin has a smart mouth, a cocky attitude
and fights like he's immune to death.  He uses eyebrow-raising tricks
and unconventional combat techniques, and apparently is the guy that
came up with the idea of hiding behind rocks and trees while engaged in
gunfire with the enemy (as opposed to marching in a straight line in a
wide-open field, which was all the rage back then).  And he can mix it
up like nobody’s business, brandishing a long list of weapons from guns
to flagpoles.

But there are problems with Martin’s character, too.  He’s way too
squeaky-clean and noble.  Even his slaves aren’t slaves (they just love
working his fields).  Interestingly enough, Martin’s character is
supposedly based on one Francis “The Swamp Fox” Marion, a Revolutionary
War hero and noted racist that bragged about hunting American Indians
for sport.  Allegedly, The Patriot was intended to be a biopic about
Marion’s life, but once Sony Pictures heard about the Swamp Fox’s
real-life exploits, they changed the name of the character and, as they
say, the rest is history.  Here, some brief mentions are made to some
atrocity that Martin may have committed against the French and the
Cherokee at a place called Fort Wilderness.  But Gibson is Gibson - as
long as he’s bashing people’s skulls in, the world is a happy place.

The Patriot simply looks amazing from the first frame to the last.  It’s
one of those films whose scenes seem to be set during sunrise or
sundown, thanks to cinematographer Caleb Deschanel’s (Anna & The King)
warm photography.  There are several scenes set in a foggy graveyard
marsh, where Martin and his band of merry men meet to discuss battle
plans.  It looks like something out of Sleepy Hollow.  Perennial
Oscar-nominee John Williams (Angela’s Ashes) score manages to press most
of the right buttons.

The Patriot was produced and directed by the team that brought us
Godzilla and ID4 (Roland Emmerich and Dean Devlin), but this film is
leaps and bounds better than those two travesties.  And this film is the
second in two weeks to feature either Gibson (he lends his voice to
Rocky the Rooster in the animated Chicken Run) or the underused Chris
Cooper (Me, Myself & Irene), who plays Col. Harry Burwell in this
picture.

2:45 - R for strong war violence


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Shannon Patrick Sullivan  
View profile  
 More options Jul 12 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films
From: Shannon Patrick Sullivan <shan...@morgan.ucs.mun.ca>
Date: 2000/07/12
Subject: Review: The Patriot (2000)
THE PATRIOT (2000) / ** 1/2

Directed by Roland Emmerich. Screenplay by Robert Rodat. Starring Mel
Gibson, Heath Ledger, Jason Isaacs. Running time: 164 minutes. Rated AA
for blood letting and violent scenes by the MFCB. Reviewed on July 4th,
2000.

By SHANNON PATRICK SULLIVAN

I find it amusing that one of the previews before "The Patriot" was for
"The Hollow Man". That title so accurately sums up this picture: hollow.
It's been a long time since a movie tried so hard to involve me
emotionally, and fail so miserably. Don't get me wrong -- "The Patriot"
looks great, and is broadly entertaining. But much of its almost
three-hour running time is wasted on flimsy characters and tedious
retreads masquerading as emotional high points. For once, I wish the
filmmakers had just been trying to make a summer action pic.

Comparisons with star Mel Gibson's last historical epic, 1995's
"Braveheart", are perhaps inevitable. Both movies feature Gibson as the
leader of a band of insurgents against oppressive British rule. There he
was trying to free Scotland, here it is the American colonies during the
Revolutionary War. The death of Gibson's wife and ultra-realistic battle
scenes figure prominently in both pictures. But "Braveheart" stirred a
raw, genuine response from me. "The Patriot" clearly strives for the same
sort of impact, but never achieves it. Is it just that I've become more
cynical in the five years between the two films? Perhaps. But I think
it's more than that.

"Braveheart", you see, featured real characters. Gibson's William Wallace
was a compelling hero, and his fate left me both shattered and uplifted.
Benjamin Martin in "The Patriot" is just Gibson on autopilot. He's not
poorly-acted, but he's all window dressing with nothing underneath. I
believed in William Wallace; I can't say the same for Benjamin Martin.
The same criticism can be levied at Heath Ledger, who plays Ben's eldest
son Christian. Ledger spends the whole movie mumbling listlessly, like he
didn't realise rehearsal was over.

For a movie about family to work, we must be convinced of the bonds
between them, no matter how strained, but "The Patriot" never forges
those bonds. Indeed, so tepid is the interaction amongst the castmembers
that it feels almost as if they each filmed their scenes individually, so
that they could be composited electronically in post-production. Most
unfortunate is the lack of chemistry between the two stars -- Gibson and
Ledger feel more like passing acquaintances than father and son.

There is a good story underlying "The Patriot", if only it were in
service to a better film. Benjamin is a veteran of the French-Indian War,
but now preaches dialogue instead of combat. Against his father's wishes,
Christian runs off to join the continental army. When the War of
Independence comes as close as the Martins' South Carolina fields, Ben
elects to care for the wounded on both sides, which happens to include
Christian. But the brutal British Colonel Tavington (Jason Isaacs) has
the Martin homestead burned anyway, and Christian is arrested for
carrying colonial dispatches. When another of the Martin sons intervenes,
Tavington shoots him dead.

This spurs Benjamin into action. Accompanied by two more sons, he
ambushes and slaughters the British contingent bringing Christian back to
their camp. That night, one son tells him he's glad he killed British
soldiers. Here was a perfect opportunity to examine the effects of war on
the young. But no, the movie passes it by, instead confining itself to
safe territory well-trod by other movies. Judging from "The Patriot",
pretty much the only negative ramifications of war are that men have to
leave home for long spells, and sometimes they never come back. Well, duh.

Things go downhill from there. There are obligatory romances, one each
for Christian and Benjamin. Christian's at least benefits from involving
a somewhat charismatic paramour, Anne (Lisa Brenner). Benjamin, however,
is shoehorned into an unconvincing attraction to his dead wife's sister
(Joely Richardson). There is no spark between them, and the whole thing
happens only because the movie demands it. Cliche after cliche is paraded
across the screen: The bad guy who's not quite dead yet. The token black
soldier. When a recalcitrant Benjamin is assigned to recruit civilians
for a militia, the locals demur, until Anne gives a stirring speech. A
pause and then... you guessed it, one by one all the naysayers stand in
support of Ben.

The villains of "The Patriot" fare no better than the heroes. Isaacs'
Tavington has no motivation, and no characterisation beyond "he's mean".
Tavington was a real person, and his wicked depiction here has drawn the
wrath of the city of Liverpool, which considers him a hero. Liverpudlians
needn't worry: I doubt anyone could believe this portrayal is accurate,
because no real person is so utterly devoid of personality. Tavington's
superior is General Cornwallis (Tom Wilkinson), who is at least useful
for comic relief -- although much of the humor here is so banal, it's
barely worth a groan. When Benjamin's militia blows up a British supply
ship during a party at Cornwallis' estate, one dim-witted aristocrat
ecstatically exclaims, "Fireworks!"

It is when "The Patriot" concentrates on the war that it finally kicks
into high gear. Director Roland Emmerich does the movie no favours by
filming many of the battle scenes with a tedious, mechanical style (close
up of American soldier, wide shot, close up of British soldier, wide
shot, repeat), but the realism and intensity of the combat overcomes
this, especially in the exciting final clash. Every now and then,
Robert Rodat's script shows a spark of creativity, or at least reuses old
ideas in entertaining ways -- look at what becomes of Cornwallis' dogs,
for example. And the beautiful period detail is a major attraction, with
the whole movie looking as though it was lifted from a Leutze painting.

But "The Patriot" is ultimately a disappointment -- although, given that
Emmerich and producer Dean Devlin masterminded "Independence Day" and
the 1998 "Godzilla", two films with the most grotesque
budget-to-intelligence ratios in recent history, maybe that's actually
not such a bad thing. This is "Braveheart" lite: great fighting sequences
trapped in a shallow narrative.

And why, if the movie spans five years, do the Martin children never age
a day?

Copyright © 2000 Shannon Patrick Sullivan.
Archived at The Popcorn Gallery,
  http://www.physics.mun.ca/~sps/movies/ThePatriot.html

  _______________________________________________________________________
 / Shannon Patrick Sullivan  | "We are all in the gutter, but some of us \
|       shan...@mun.ca       |  are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde |
 \___________________________|__________________________________________/
  | Popcorn Gallery Movie Reviews    www.physics.mun.ca/~sps/movies.html |
  | Doctor Who: A Brief History of Time (Travel)            /drwho.html  |


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Homer Yen  
View profile  
 More options Jul 13 2000, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.reviews
Followup-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films
From: Homer Yen <homer_...@yahoo.com>
Date: 2000/07/13
Subject: Review: The Patriot (2000)
"The Patriot" -- Life, Liberty and Happiness
by Homer Yen
(c) 2000

"The Patriot," a powerful and impressive looking
period piece set during the American Revolution, tells
the story of a family being torn apart by war and a
father torn between duty to his family and duty to his
country.  Full of stirring moments, it is a sweeping
saga that showcases beautifully filmed and brilliantly
choreographed battles, a patriotic soundtrack that
combines the reverie of fife and drums with majestic
orchestrations, and utterly unbridled flag-waving
jingoism.  I can barely contain my enthusiasm and am
saluting as I write this.

In 1776, the American colonists have come to a
critical juncture.  Fed up with British rule,
revolutionaries charge that "if principles dictate
independence, then war is the only way."  However,
countless lives will be lost, though the sacrifice in
the name of freedom is worthwhile.  Benjamin Martin
(Mel Gibson) hopes that instead of voting for war,
America might adopt a more diplomatic course of
action.  Benjamin was once a brilliant military
tactician and warrior, but is now the loving parent of
seven.  He doesn't wish to leave them fatherless.  "I
am a parent," he says.  "I don't have the luxury of
principles."

Although Benjamin remains adamant about his pacifist
stance, his eldest son, Gabriel (Heath Ledger) is
compelled by the crusade.  Against his father's
wishes, he enlists, grateful to serve the cause of
liberty.  But he is horrified to see the
disorganization of the American army.  The Red Coats
are an impressive force who marches into battle with
an imposing cadence.  Going muzzle-to-muzzle against
them in an open field is madness.  The American front
lines continually collapse, leading to swift defeats.
General Cornwallis of the British Army states, "those
rustics are so inept that it takes the honor out of
victory."

Eventually, the battle winds up right on Benjamin's
front lawn.  His political stance is shattered when he
encounters the ruthless Colonel Tavington (Jason
Isaacs).  Gabriel is captured; their plantation home
is burned to the ground.  Tavington doesn't abide by
the rules of war and displays a brutality that is
horrifying.  He shoots innocent children, mercilessly
kills prisoners-of-war, and even locks dozens of
people inside a church and then instructs his men to
burn it down.  This is the kind of villain that
elicits boos from the audience.  It's impossible not
to hate him, and the audience will not find
satisfaction unless he dies by the hand of Benjamin.

We increasingly cheer for our
pacifist-turned-revolutionary hero, as he becomes
something of a colonial Robin Hood.  Recruiting men
throughout the countryside, he employs guerrilla
tactics and mounts a series of successful skirmishes.
In addition to his superb military skills, he is also
adept at humiliating the enemy.  We find much levity
in watching him make a mockery of General Cornwallis.
Yet like the American army, who is outmanned and
outmatched, so too is Benjamin.  As the battle wears
on, personal losses begin to mount.  

However, the colonists' and Benjamin's fighting spirit
never dies.  Even in the darkest of moments, there is
time for a miraculous turnaround.  This leads to a
final, glorious engagement between the
Colonial/British forces and between Benjamin Martin
and Colonel Tavington.  An American victory may turn
the tide of war.  And for our hero, payback may be
close at hand.  This sequence, with flying
cannonballs, thousands of soldiers fighting, and its
swings in momentum are nothing less than riveting.

"The Patriot" packs as much raw power and energy as
any fireworks display and is certainly one of the best
films of the year.  Gibson gives a compelling
Oscar-worthy performance full of passion, courage and
strength.  As far as summer movies go, this film is as
good as it gets, featuring bold emotions, an epic
storyline, incredibly visualized battle sequences and
a monumental dramatic arc.  To miss this film would be
an act of treason.

Grade: A
S: 1    out of 3
L: 0    out of 3
V: 3    out of 3

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »