Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: New Canon 5D

0 views
Skip to first unread message

�R�..-����*��*b�rt��

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 1:43:14 PM11/21/09
to
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:57:54 -0800, Douglas Tourtelot
<dtour...@comcast.net> schreef:

>With enhanced audio capture!
>
>
>D.
Interesting., pics on usenet ..

I thought that was not possible ?

R ( it apparently is )

Jon Ailetcher

unread,
Nov 21, 2009, 6:24:25 PM11/21/09
to
On Nov 21, 10:43 am, ¤R¼..-¦°€•*¤¦*b€rt°• <~¤..-¦-•¦-y¤€-•~¤¤¦*@le•

€s.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:57:54 -0800, Douglas Tourtelot
> <dtourte...@comcast.net> schreef:

>
> >With enhanced audio capture!
>
> >D.
>
>   Interesting., pics on usenet ..
>
> I thought that was not possible ?
>
> R ( it apparently is )

We just did some tests with the new Canon 7D on my show. There is an
audio track on the camera so we attached a clockit box to it and I ran
my sound at 23.976. A bit of an offset but they just slid the audio
into place by a few frames and it sank fine. The sad part is that
there is now an external audio box that has xlr inputs. That can be
worrisome if those BIG Time producers out of film school think they
can buy a $2000 SLR and can capture good sound with it. Should we
start panicking now or later?

Derek

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 1:28:13 AM11/22/09
to
later

Philip Perkins

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 10:14:52 PM11/22/09
to
On Nov 21, 10:28 pm, Derek <derek.dhan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> later

It still sounds pretty wretched, and the ext boxes make the sound
somewhat strange. Shooters don't like being tethered
with the ext boxes either. For one--man-bands, whatever, but they
aren't even close to the audio quality of even an HDV camera
yet.

Philip Perkins

Douglas Tourtelot

unread,
Nov 22, 2009, 10:51:39 PM11/22/09
to
They aren't up to the audio quality of my 25 year-old Sony Walkman.

D.


On 11/22/09 7:14 PM, in article
0c37cd21-9aee-4339...@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com, "Philip

0 new messages