"Scott Farr" <sc...@farroutpro.com> wrote in message
news:1137216150.8...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
"engaudio" <grant...@clear.net.nz> wrote in message
news:1137232210.4...@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I've had the NTG-2 for a month or so. I also like it quite allot. It's very
solidly built, has some weight to it, has a good sturdy body, the AA
battery compartment isn't too tight so you can get the battery in and out
comfortably...all in all nicely crafted. Sonically, it also reminds me of
the CS1, especially when you use the low cut on the NTG-2. Ty Ford had a
nice audio file comparison of the NTG and a Sennheiser 416 posted awhile
back. If I recall, I think the NTG needed to be cranked up slightly
level-wise to equate to the 416.
I just used the NTG-2 today on an acoustic guitar and it was bright and
"sparkly"...sounded good; smooth not harsh and edgy. I used the NTG on a
male voiceover and it was deep, rich and 416ish.
For just over $300 Canadian, I'm going to get great use of the Rode in all
kinds of situations.
I just received Trew Audio's e-flyer regarding the Rode series...I gather
there's a Rycote that will fit the Rodes?
In my opinion you can't go wrong with the NTG's...I agree that you may be
pleasantly surprised
Best regards,
Dave
"Martin Harrington" <len...@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:Kp4yf.215902$V7.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Hi,
>
> I've had the NTG-2 for a month or so. I also like it quite allot. It's very
> solidly built, has some weight to it, has a good sturdy body, the AA
> battery compartment isn't too tight so you can get the battery in and out
> comfortably...all in all nicely crafted. Sonically, it also reminds me of
> the CS1, especially when you use the low cut on the NTG-2. Ty Ford had a
> nice audio file comparison of the NTG and a Sennheiser 416 posted awhile
> back. If I recall, I think the NTG needed to be cranked up slightly
> level-wise to equate to the 416.
>
> I just used the NTG-2 today on an acoustic guitar and it was bright and
> "sparkly"...sounded good; smooth not harsh and edgy. I used the NTG on a
> male voiceover and it was deep, rich and 416ish.
> For just over $300 Canadian, I'm going to get great use of the Rode in all
> kinds of situations.
> I just received Trew Audio's e-flyer regarding the Rode series...I gather
> there's a Rycote that will fit the Rodes?
> In my opinion you can't go wrong with the NTG's...I agree that you may be
> pleasantly surprised
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dave
Rode took a close listen to the CS3 as they were developing the NTG-1 and
NTG-2 (both pretty much the same but for the battery compartment.)
I do have samples in the online archive on my site.
Regards,
Ty Ford
-- Ty Ford's equipment reviews, audio samples, rates and other audiocentric
stuff are at www.tyford.com
I'm going to rural Africa for 2 months and need a solid, reliable, good
quality sound solution. I'm a bit of a newbie to this, and will most
likely be by myself taking care of video (panasonic DVX 100b) and sound
by myself all at once, with the microphones most likely plugged
directly into the XLR inputs on the camera. Setting price aside, are
there any advantages to purchasing the Rode over the Sennheiser 416?
Thanks for any insight.