Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anyone tried using Older Lectros as Camera Hops?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

chrisb...@bellsouth.net

unread,
May 11, 2008, 7:57:12 PM5/11/08
to
Anyone had experience (good or bad) using pre 205 series UHF lectros
as bag to camera links?
I realize there will be no IFB, so camera op will need to monitor the
signal.
I have used a 210 as a mono mix jump, and found quality fine for eng
use..
Oh.. my application is ENG and corporate
I am trying to find a way my clients will be willing to afford that is
better than a pair of Sennheiser g2's (I find the signal quality to be
too low grade with those).
I know.. the right way is with a Zaxcom ENG link.. can't swing it yet,
nor can I get enough rent from current clients to justify it.

But... I still want a better than Senn Evo quality way to get an
unmixed 2 channels to the camera by wireless. As I have a boom and a
board feed to send as separate elements.

Thanks for advice, guys

Charles Tomaras

unread,
May 11, 2008, 9:55:57 PM5/11/08
to

<chrisb...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:86020cd1-aaaa-4bea...@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

I've used 185's, 190's, 195's 195D's and currently have been using 205's for
years as links. They are all just fine for ENG/Doc use. Never a complaint
and the shows I saw on TV all sounded fine.


jazzology

unread,
May 11, 2008, 10:14:17 PM5/11/08
to
On May 11, 8:55 pm, "Charles Tomaras" <toma...@tomaras.com> wrote:
> <chrisbala...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message

Heck Yeah ! if it's around antiques, medical whatever needs a hop, my
190's work at least enough for em to cut a minute 30 out of the 7
hours we shoot.... I'm always recording to a maudio when wireless...
cause usually, no one is listening... until the edit or uplink.

Philip Perkins

unread,
May 11, 2008, 10:24:52 PM5/11/08
to
I still use some 205s for this, and they work fine. Remember that a
camera link is usually not as challenging a situation for a wireless
as having the TX on an actor etc.
The RX are up in the air w/ the antennas clear, your TXs are pretty
clear of your bag as are the antennas for those, and you are often
only a few feet from the camera. The main issues are the size and
power consumption of the RX, shortening the camera battery life
significantly compared to later Lectro RX. I still use a VHF 185 for
TC link w/ some cameras, and that works fine almost all the time as
well.

Philip Perkins

jazzology

unread,
May 11, 2008, 10:29:45 PM5/11/08
to

SHHHH... top secret, quiet VHF freqs... ;)

David White

unread,
May 12, 2008, 10:58:06 PM5/12/08
to

"jazzology" <jazzol...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d1b9152a-6d92-47da...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...


Just one thing to remember if you are looking at the UCR200. It gets very
warm and draws about 500mA. From a servicing point of view, If I had to
choose from the older UHF, the 190 rocked.


0 new messages