Received: by 10.204.131.75 with SMTP id w11mr884932bks.0.1334020696378;
        Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:18:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: h15ni105855bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: globular <takecarebew...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.past-films
Subject: Re: Back To the Future
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:18:03 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <jm01od$8hl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <QCXfr.28270$GV1.28007@newsfe12.iad>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 01:18:15 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="MfoZhRNqslx0lgCf/MDZCg";
	logging-data="8757"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+jB+NdRU/QH22uAegB373Wj4Q3wXcr7qI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
In-Reply-To: <QCXfr.28270$GV1.28007@newsfe12.iad>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yZYM++PXWWhj/GefN6Qy3myOqp0=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 7/04/2012 11:50 PM, really real wrote:
> I tried watching Back To the Future the other night as it was on our
> movie channel. What an interestingly dated movie, from a time, the 80s,
> when terrorism jokes were still funny.
>
> What wasn't funny were the scenes of the kid's father getting bullied
> and being a nerd. This was unwatchable. I didn't make it very far
> through this movie. Should I?

If it was made today the Doc would be wondering why in the future people 
keep referring to anything they like as if it is a mountain when they 
say 'awesome'.

It's 3 years to the year Back To The Future Part 2 was based in, 2015.