Worst SCIFI Movie of 1977

Daryl

unread,

May 8, 2012, 10:49:37 AM5/8/12

to

1977, the same year that Starwars was released. No, this isn't
Starwars. It's the worst SCIFI move of 1977 though. Not that it
was bad but it's 1977.
http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/john-richardson-yanti-somer-and-west-buchanan/war-of-the-planets-1977-video_e1b291269.html

Duggy

unread,

May 8, 2012, 6:45:05 PM5/8/12

to

On May 9, 12:49 am, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
> 1977, the same year that Starwars was released. No, this isn't
> Starwars. It's the worst SCIFI move of 1977 though. Not that it

> was bad but it's 1977.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/john-richardson-yanti-somer-and-west-b...

http://www.imdb.com/search/title?genres=sci_fi&sort=moviemeter,asc&title_type=feature&year=1977

imdb says "The Crater Lake Monster" & "Cinderella 2000" are worse.

YMMV.

===
= DUG.
===

Daryl

unread,

May 9, 2012, 8:31:13 AM5/9/12

to

On 5/8/2012 4:45 PM, Duggy wrote:
> On May 9, 12:49 am, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
>> 1977, the same year that Starwars was released. No, this isn't
>> Starwars. It's the worst SCIFI move of 1977 though. Not that it
>> was bad but it's 1977.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/john-richardson-yanti-somer-and-west-b...
>
> http://www.imdb.com/search/title?genres=sci_fi&sort=moviemeter,asc&title_type=feature&year=1977
>
> imdb says "The Crater Lake Monster"&

I would classify this one as Horror, not SCIFI. They did think
enough of it to renew the copyright.

>"Cinderella 2000" are worse.

Yes, that one would be considered SCIFI. Still under Copyright

Now, the one brought up was such a stinker, they didn't renew the
copyright.

--
http://tvmoviesforfree.com
for free movies and Nostalgic TV. Tons of Military shows and
programs.

Duggy

unread,

May 9, 2012, 9:04:09 PM5/9/12

to

On May 9, 10:31 pm, Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
> On 5/8/2012 4:45 PM, Duggy wrote:
>
> > On May 9, 12:49 am, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
> >> 1977, the same year that Starwars was released. No, this isn't
> >> Starwars. It's the worst SCIFI move of 1977 though. Not that it
> >> was bad but it's 1977.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/john-richardson-yanti-somer-and-west-b...
>

> >http://www.imdb.com/search/title?genres=sci_fi&sort=moviemeter,asc&ti...

>
> > imdb says "The Crater Lake Monster"&

> I would classify this one as Horror, not SCIFI.

There's a lot of crossover. Alien is both.

> They did think
> enough of it to renew the copyright.

Good for them.

> >"Cinderella 2000" are worse.
> Yes, that one would be considered SCIFI.

Seems so.

> Still under Copyright

That's... nice?

> Now, the one brought up was such a stinker, they didn't renew the
> copyright.

Who is "they"?

===
= DUG.
===

weary flake

unread,

May 10, 2012, 12:53:33 PM5/10/12

to

Daryl <dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:

> On 5/8/2012 4:45 PM, Duggy wrote:
> > On May 9, 12:49 am, Daryl<dh...@nospami70west3.com> wrote:
> >> 1977, the same year that Starwars was released. No, this isn't
> >> Starwars. It's the worst SCIFI move of 1977 though. Not that it
> >> was bad but it's
> >> 1977.http://tvmoviesforfree.com/mel/john-richardson-yanti-somer-and-west-b.
> >> ..
> >
> > http://www.imdb.com/search/title?genres=sci_fi&sort=moviemeter,asc&title_typ
> > e=feature&year=1977
> >
> > imdb says "The Crater Lake Monster"&
>
> I would classify this one as Horror, not SCIFI. They did think
> enough of it to renew the copyright.
>
>
> >"Cinderella 2000" are worse.
>
> Yes, that one would be considered SCIFI. Still under Copyright

It's Sci-fi because the talking penis is a robot.

Another 1970's talking penis movie is Groovetube, but it is
not sci-fi because the talking penis is a penis.

Message has been deleted