Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: 'WHY DOESN'T SRK RAISE FUNDS FOR 26/11 MARTYRS?'

0 views
Skip to first unread message

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Dec 29, 2010, 7:06:30 PM12/29/10
to
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > > Forwarded message from A. C.
> > >
> > > Tuesday, December 28, 2010
> > >
> > > 'Why doesn't SRK raise funds for 26/11 martyrs?'
> > >
> > > Tehelka December 11, 2010
> > >
> > > Intro: Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut tells Kunal Majumder that Shah Rukh
> > > Khan should not dance to Pakistan's tune
> > >
> > > What is your problem with Shah Rukh Khan now?
> > >
> > > Shah Rukh lives in Mumbai and is an Indian citizen. Everybody knows
> > > the kind of relationship India has with Pakistan. All terror
> > > activities that are taking place in our country originate from
> > > Pakistan. When people in Mumbai were taking part in memorial services
> > > for those who lost their lives in the 26/11 terror attacks, this
> > > gentleman planned to dance at a show organised by a Pakistani channel
> > > in London on 28 November. This is an insult to the martyrs and the
> > > country. When his own country is mourning the loss of so many lives
> > > due to terrorist attacks from Pakistan, he was planning to dance for
> > > a Pakistani channel. He should be ashamed. The Congress government
> > > gave a lot of protection to the theatres where Shah Rukh's films were
> > > being screened and to his house, so he thinks he has become a very
> > > important person.
> > >
> > > Would you have protested if Shah Rukh's last name was Sharma or
> > > Singh?
> > >
> > > No, there are no issues with his surname. We would have still
> > > protested if it was someone else. It has nothing to do with caste or
> > > religion. If you recall, we had protested when Mahesh Bhatt did
> > > something similar. His surname is not Khan.
> > >
> > > Shah Rukh was just planning to help raise funds for the flood
> > > victims. Is everything associated with Pakistan evil?
> > >
> > > This is not about flood victims. We have flood victims in Assam,
> > > Odisha and Bihar. Why hasn't he organised musical shows to raise
> > > funds for them? Why hasn't he raised money for the 26/11 Mumbai
> > > martyrs? So many places in our country are flooded all the time, why
> > > doesn't he help us? We understand that on issues like floods, there
> > > should be no politics. But after Pakistan was flooded, the Indian
> > > government had offered help but was rebuffed. The reason was because
> > > India is considered the enemy. Pakistan doesn't want to take help
> > > from our government but wants help from Shah Rukh. And he wants to
> > > help. This is a serious matter.
> > >
> > > We can understand that you might have problems with Pakistan because
> > > of 26/11. But why does the Shiv Sena want to get the burqa banned?
> > > Isn't the demand against the spirit of the Indian Constitution?
> > >
> > > The issue of banning the burqa doesn't have a religious angle. For
> > > the past couple of years, women dressed in burqas have kidnapped many
> > > children from government hospitals in Mumbai. Most of them might not
> > > even be Muslims but they use the burqa to commit this heinous crime.
> > > All over the world, questions are being raised about the utility of
> > > the burqa. It is not linked to religion. Muslim women don't want to
> > > wear the burqa. Progressive Muslims don't want the burqa.
> > >
> > > Popular reality television show Bigg Boss 4 continues to have
> > > Pakistani participants. Has the Shiv Sena come to an agreement with
> > > the producers of the show?
> > >
> > > No, we don't have an agreement with them. There were two participants
> > > from Pakistan. Begum Nawazish Ali has already left. Veena Malik would
> > > also leave soon.
> > >
> > > When will the Shiv Sena, as the principal opposition party in
> > > Maharashtra, raise serious issues such as land scams?
> > >
> > > Terrorism from Pakistan is not the Shiv Sena's personal issue. It is
> > > a national issue. Our party is committed to raise issues that affect
> > > the common man. The Assembly session has just begun. We will
> > > certainly raise our concerns about the Lavasa and Adarsh land scams.
> > >
> > > End of forwarded message from A. C.
> >
> > Forwarded message from S. J.
> >
> > Wednesday, December 29, 2010
> >
> > Nice interview. I am curious - when Rahul Gandhi and chamcha diggy
> > made ugly remarks about the RSS, why didn't the BJP remind Rahul that
> > he was partying hard at the Satish Sharma son wedding right after
> > Mumbai attack?
> >
> > Is it an accident that BJP NEVER makes a really pertinent attack on
> > Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi?
> >
> > End of forwarded message from S. J.
>
> Forwarded message from H. B.
>
> Wednesday, December 29, 2010
>
> It is deliberate accident. [(:-)))
>
> They are happy going after a soft Manmohan.
>
> End of forwarded message from H. B.

Forwarded message from N. P.

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Did RSS send any strong message to SRK when he opened his big mouth
saying "Pakistanis are nice people, they are nice neighbors, ... bla
bla bla" at the time of his stupid movie release?

The spokes person of RSS said that we don't comment on that because
he is just an actor, and he is just promoting his movie.

End of forwarded message from N. P.

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Dec 29, 2010, 7:09:54 PM12/29/10
to

Forwarded message from K. M.

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Well, Bala Sb Thackrey did object. He is the man with guts.

End of forwarded message from K. M.

0 new messages