BHARAT, CHINA WILL HURT OBAMA IN COPENHAGEN
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
By Sen. James Inhofe
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
As U.N. delegates mingled at the global-warming summit in Copenhagen,
Denmark, the Obama Administration's Environmental Protection Agency
issued a new regulatory finding to address climate change --
delighting the international green elites. EPA's finding under the
Clean Air Act will lead to a back-door energy tax and will extend the
agency's regulatory reach into nearly every corner of the American
economy, destroying jobs, crippling international competitiveness,
and raising the price of gasoline and electricity.
As delegates in Copenhagen cheered, those responsible for creating
jobs here at home jeered. "The EPA is moving forward with an agenda
that will put additional burdens on manufacturers, cost jobs and
drive up the price of energy," said the National Association of
Manufacturers. "This finding comes when unemployment is hovering at
10% and many manufacturers are struggling to stay in business. It is
doubtful that this endangerment finding will achieve its stated goal,
but it is certain to come at a huge cost to the economy."
According to Tom Donahue, president of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce,
EPA's action could lead to "a top-down command-and-control regime
that will choke off growth by adding new mandates to nearly every
single construction and major renovation project."
Climategate Undermines EPA
EPA's finding came even as its very scientific foundation appears to
have crumbled. In the scandal now known as Climategate, e-mails
released from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit
(CRU), located in the U.K., revealed that the world's top climate
scientists -- several of whom served on the U.N.'s Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) -- may have, among other things,
manipulated the data the IPCC uses to make its climate-science
assessments. It is those same assessments that support EPA's
"endangerment finding." EPA rejected calls from me and many others to
delay the finding until investigations by my staff, other committees,
the CRU, and Penn State University, the employer of a central figure
in the scandal, were completed.
It is no surprise that EPA's announcement coincided with the start of
Copenhagen. After all, President Obama had little to discuss at the
conference, since he has failed to deliver on a central plank of his
platform: enacting into law a massive cap-and-tax bill to address
global warming. In June, the House passed the 1,400 page Waxman-
Markey bill by only seven votes, 219 to 212.
The politics of global warming are no better, and probably worse, in
the Senate. The Kerry-Boxer bill, which is in many respects more
destructive than Waxman-Markey, is dead. After Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-
Calif.), chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public
Works, proceeded to mark up Kerry-Boxer in clear defiance of
committee rules, the bill was roundly criticized by Democrats as much
as Republicans. Several Democrats voiced opposition not just to
Kerry-Boxer, but to the very concept of cap-and-trade. Sen. Jim Webb
(D.-Va.) is justifiably concerned about cap-and-trade, given that
newly elected Virginia GOP Gov. Bob McDonnell successfully campaigned
against Waxman-Markey. "In its present form, I could not vote for
[Kerry-Boxer]," Webb said on November 16. "I have some real questions
about the real complexities of cap-and-trade."
With nothing happening at home, President Obama desperately needed an
agenda item in Copenhagen that would find favor with transnational
green elites, whose energy-rationing schemes will put millions of
Americans out of work. EPA's action last week perfectly fit the bill.
And yet even with the EPA's moving forward, President Obama will
undoubtedly fail in reaching a grand climate accord. The reason is
simple: China, the world's leading emitter of CO2, and India, the
world's third largest emitter, have refused to accept binding
emissions cuts that will harm their economies.
Yet carbon pledges from China and India will be sold as concrete
evidence that a climate deal is imminent. But don't be fooled.
Whatever "agreements" are made will merely reinforce business-as-
usual for both countries. This is not a surprise. This summer,
India's Environment Minister, Jairam Ramesh, said, "India will not
accept any emission-reduction target -- period. This is a non-
negotiable stand." China has said very much the same thing.
Given the obduracy of China and India, don't expect much from
Copenhagen. Clearly, President Obama, with his EPA finding in tow,
desperately needs to demonstrate meaningful progress at the
international level. Without it, Congress will never pass cap-and-tax
unless China and India assume the same burdens as the U.S. But what's
also clear is that China and India want nothing to do with job-
killing carbon mandates. They are putting the fate of their citizens
and their countries first. I urge President Obama to do the same.
Mr. Inhofe, a Republican, is ranking member of the Senate Environment
and Public Works Committee.
More at:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=34847
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.