VICTIMS OF ISLAMIC BIGOTRY
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
By Anuradha Dutt
Op-Ed
The Pioneer
Thursday, February 25, 2010
The beheading of Sikhs in Pakistan and the assault on a temple at
Sonargaon in Bangladesh point towards the plight of non-Muslims in
Muslim majority countries. The situation is clearly intolerable and
India must exercise its moral authority to come to the aid of
innocent victims
Even as political parties that nurture minority (read Muslim) vote-
banks prepare to grant further privileges to the community under the
guise of alleviating social and economic backwardness, and lakhs of
illegal Bangladeshi Muslim immigrants procure property and voting
rights, one just needs to look across India's western and eastern
flanks to ascertain how Sikh and Hindu minorities in Muslim majority
nations are being persecuted. In the latest of a series of communal
assaults on them, two Sikhs were beheaded by the Pakistani Taliban
for their reported failure to convert to Islam. A grief-stricken
Taranjit Singh, cousin of Jaspal Singh, one of the decapitated men,
praised Jaspal for choosing martyrdom over the ignominy of forced
conversion. The other reason cited for the decapitation is the
deadline having passed for payment of ransom of Rs 3 crore to the
abductors. Two other Sikhs are still in the Taliban's captivity.
In Bangladesh, on February 6, a gang of men, 30-35 in number,
vandalised the Sonargaon temple, an ancient Hindu pilgrimage in
Narayanganj district, and damaged six idols. The supposedly secular
Indian intelligentsia and media, which suffered an apoplectic fit as
a result of the Babri Masjid demolition, largely ignored the assault.
Neither did Right-wing groups, posing as custodians of Hindu
interests, bother to raise the issue. Yet, to dreg up the past, the
Muslim backlash to the Babri Masjid demolition on December 6, 1992
was marked by the ancient Dhakeshwari shaktipeeth in Dhaka being
vandalised and Hindus being butchered; and over a hundred shrines,
including those of Jains and Sikhs, being damaged in Pakistan, and a
Jain temple being razed. In Britain, a temple was razed by a vengeful
mob, and gurudwaras and Hindu shrines attacked. Muslim expatriates
from the subcontinent attacked the Indian Embassy at Teheran, and
rose in protest in Arab countries though Arabs themselves observed
restraint.
The assault on the Sonargaon shrine as well as the beheading simply
draws attention to the plight of non-Muslims in regions, where
Islamic bigotry has reared up in a ferocious avatar. Under the
previous Bangladesh Government, reports of snatching of land, owned
by Hindus, were common; and majority of rape cases were registered by
Hindu women. Such persecution forced many Hindus to flee their homes
and seek refuge here. In Afghanistan and Pakistan, where the
Taliban's writ runs, besides Sikhs and Hindus, minority Christians
too are on the run from marauders, criminals and fanatics, posing as
the true flag-bearers of Islam. They are being forced to pay jizya,
protection money or survival tax, in order to ensure their safety, to
extortionists. In Iraq, too, according to reports, Christian families
are being coerced by gun-toting men to pay jizya or leave.
The poll tax levied on non-Muslims in Muslim countries in exchange
for state protection draws sanction from the Quran (Al-Tawbah 9:29).
The imposition of jizya and the accompanying violence in lawless
areas is a throwback to the past, when crusading Islamic conquerors
subjugated 'infidel natives' either on the point of the sword via
forced conversions or spared their lives in exchange for the payment
of protection money:
"Summon the people to god; those who respond to your call, accept it
from them, but those who refuse must pay the poll tax out of
humiliation and lowliness. If they refuse this, it is the sword
without leniency. Fear god with regard to what you have been
entrusted." (Al Tabari, Volume XII)
Umar ibn al-Khattab during the conquest of al-Basrah (636 CE)
The conquest of Sindh by Muhammed Bin Qasim in the early 8th century
AD led to imposition of jizya on Hindu and Buddhist natives. In
return, they were free to follow their own religions. This set the
precedent for some of the Islamic rulers who followed him into India.
The empire-builders among them, the Mughals, alternated between
Islamic severity and kingly graciousness in their treatment of non-
Muslims. However, the Sikhs, as a militant sect, came into conflict
with them. Emperors Jahangir and Aurangzeb clashed with two of the
Sikh gurus Arjan Dev and Tegh Bahadur, respectively, and had them put
to death. The four sons and mother of Guru Govind Singh, the last in
the line, were also martyred for resisting imposition of Islam, as
were thousands of others. The differentiation between Muslims and
infidels often owed to political compulsions.
But such intolerance is an anachronism in today's rapidly shrinking
world. There are ulterior motives behind religious bigotry. Hugh
Fitzgerald, of JihadWatch, states on his internet site DhimmiWatch:
"Elsewhere, as in Pakistan and Bangladesh, the Hindus and Christians
live in a state of permanent physical danger, and that danger also is
one of losing their property to Muslim looters and marauders who
cannot be sued or brought to justice on the say-so of a non-Muslim...
There is no security for the property of non-Muslims in Muslim lands,
and there are various ways in which the 'protection money' that is
the jizya is paid...".
Religious bigotry is thus also a convenient pretext for extortion and
grabbing minorities' property, and making them abandon their homes.
http://dailypioneer.com/238429/Victims-of-Islamic-bigotry.html
More at:
http://www.dailypioneer.com
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.